Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Kosher Salt]

Motion to Seal by Melinda. She complaints that mean Kiwis are Cyberstalking her because the Court of Appeals includes her envelopes in her filings

This should be denied, but then it should've been denied at the former court's level too, and courts aren't dickheads enough to do that to a retard just because she's retarded. They'll see no harm in granting it, so it'll probably be granted.

Hey retard, the envelopes aren't posted here with the intent to "harass, intimidate [sic] and cause distress" to you (USE OXFORD COMMAS IN LEGAL FILINGS, SMELLY). They're being posted here because 1) they're literally attached to the PDFs that we need to have to document your garbage legal cases, and 2) pointed out by the likes of myself with the intent to mock, deride, demean, and debase you. NOT to harass, intimidate, or cause distress, unless said distress is felt because you suck. Sucks to suck!

Neat. Last week she was sending stuff certified mail from Christiansburg, VA, and this week it's regular first-class mail with pretty little stamps from Knoxville, TN. Running low on postage funds, I take it.

That's a bit over 200 miles. Do we have any idea what her business might be there?

As a general rule most courts will on request keep personal addresses private if the litigant is not using their lawyers office as the location of Service. That's really all Mel is asking for in this one. Just to black out the home address. Not to seal the whole case file. It's not unhinged, it will be granted.

It's not her personal address, nor is it the address she's using as the location of service (that's a PO box). She'd absolutely be justified in asking the court to put a seal on her personal address. This is just a postmark containing the zip code; not even her zip code, just the zip code from which it's mailed. I don't see any reason why it should be granted other than that the court feels like being nice to the retard. Her general location isn't considered private; in fact in some instances it needs to be public (to establish whether the court has jurisdiction), and the postmark doesn't even indicate her exact general location, since she could easily drive a little ways to find a USPS drop box, or even use an anonymous re-mailer service.

That being said, I'm enough of an asshole to say that it should be denied, but the court likely won't be.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

That's a bit over 200 miles. Do we have any idea what her business might be there?

Either she found some new messianic cult that isn't pissed at her and lets her stay with them or it's some kind of opcec.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Im getting confused, there is simultaneously stuff going on both in the lower court, even though that case supposedly ended, and the appellate court at the same time? Can someone please give a brief summary of all the things currently pending and how they affect each other? Sorry if im the only one retarded enough not to get that on my own.

District court: Fights over appellate bond and punishing Mel with Fees
Appellate court: Fight over dismissing Mel's lawsuit.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Im getting confused, there is simultaneously stuff going on both in the lower court, even though that case supposedly ended, and the appellate court at the same time? Can someone please give a brief summary of all the things currently pending and how they affect each other? Sorry if im the only one retarded enough not to get that on my own.

Yes... it's kind of a mess. The lower court made its order dismissing the case, but it hasn't ruled on fees yet. She's trying to make an appeal of the lower court's order dismissing the case, but Null still has time to file his motion for fees in that court. At the same time, Null has also filed two motions in the appeals court to dismiss the appeal, moved to have the briefing schedule suspended (which was denied), and moved for an extension of time in the briefing schedule (which was granted).

Plus, you've got the lower court certifying that the appeal isn't being taken in good faith, and the pesky question of what that means for Melinda's in forma pauperis status, and the appeal bond which the lower court has ordered but hasn't set an amount for. I'm not even sure how all of those will affect her already-ongoing appeal.

In hindsight it might have been more efficient to bring to the appeals court's attention the fact that the lower court hadn't made its final decision in all matters before it, and the appeals case shouldn't proceed until all matters had been resolved by the lower court. The case is not yet ripe for appeal, and the appeal really should've been put on ice until it was ripe.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

In hindsight it might have been more efficient to bring to the appeals court's attention the fact that the lower court hadn't made its final decision in all matters before it, and the appeals case shouldn't proceed until all matters had been resolved by the lower court. The case is not yet ripe for appeal, and the appeal really should've been put on ice until it was ripe.

This was already pointed out:

I think it was mentioned by Hardin more than once, but this is the one I remember best because it was said pretty recently.

 

[talk talk talk]

For those following ECF more closely than I, has judgment been entered in the District Court case?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

For those following ECF more closely than I, has judgment been entered in the District Court case?

 

[obsdj]

I see there's a new "Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Document" today, looking forward to seeing that...

 

[Kosher Salt]

This was already pointed out:
View attachment 2607947
I think it was mentioned by Hardin more than once, but this is the one I remember best because it was said pretty recently.

It should've been featured prominently in the motion to dismiss, as well as in the motion to suspend briefing schedule (docs 5 & 6).

I see there's a new "Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Document" today, looking forward to seeing that...

"MINUTE ORDER denying 85 Motion for Extension of Time to File Document. Defense counsel may move to supplement motion and evidence later, if necessary. Therefore, no further extension required. Entered by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 10/8/21. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order to be mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(PMS)"

 

[RodgerDodger]

This should be denied, but then it should've been denied at the former court's level too, and courts aren't dickheads enough to do that to a retard just because she's retarded. They'll see no harm in granting it, so it'll probably be granted.

Hey retard, the envelopes aren't posted here with the intent to "harass, intimidate [sic] and cause distress" to you (USE OXFORD COMMAS IN LEGAL FILINGS, SMELLY). They're being posted here because 1) they're literally attached to the PDFs that we need to have to document your garbage legal cases, and 2) pointed out by the likes of myself with the intent to mock, deride, demean, and debase you. NOT to harass, intimidate, or cause distress, unless said distress is felt because you suck. Sucks to suck!

That's a bit over 200 miles. Do we have any idea what her business might be there?

It's not her personal address, nor is it the address she's using as the location of service (that's a PO box). She'd absolutely be justified in asking the court to put a seal on her personal address. This is just a postmark containing the zip code; not even her zip code, just the zip code from which it's mailed. I don't see any reason why it should be granted other than that the court feels like being nice to the retard. Her general location isn't considered private; in fact in some instances it needs to be public (to establish whether the court has jurisdiction), and the postmark doesn't even indicate her exact general location, since she could easily drive a little ways to find a USPS drop box, or even use an anonymous re-mailer service.

That being said, I'm enough of an asshole to say that it should be denied, but the court likely won't be.

They can and will seal adresses. But postmarks? Thats an official datestamp. I can't see them being happy about that as it is part of preserving the timeline.

 

[Kosher Salt]

They can and will seal adresses. But postmarks? Thats an official datestamp. I can't see them being happy about that as it is part of preserving the timeline.

Good point. That actually might be grounds to oppose the motion, if Null cared enough to spend money doing it.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

"MINUTE ORDER denying 85 Motion for Extension of Time to File Document. Defense counsel may move to supplement motion and evidence later, if necessary. Therefore, no further extension required. Entered by Magistrate Judge Pamela Meade Sargent on 10/8/21. This Notice of Electronic Filing is the Official ORDER for this entry. No document is attached. (Order to be mailed to Pro Se Party via US Mail)(PMS)"

 

[obsdj]

Can we infer from this that the court is tired of screwing around and just wants to get things over with already?

 

[Kosher Salt]

View attachment 2608195

Yeah, I had to pull it from PACER... CourtListener updated its own docket as soon as I did.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Yeah, I had to pull it from PACER... CourtListener updated its own docket as soon as I did.

Figured, but posted the image just in case

 

[Empyrea]

USE OXFORD COMMAS IN LEGAL FILINGS, SMELLY

The dropping of the Oxford Comma is always a sore point for me. Thank you for that.

Also it does feel like a "let's just get this show on the road" ruling, but it is hard to say. We can't know the judge's mind, after all.

I'd be tired of this case if I were her, though.

 

[RodgerDodger]

Can we infer from this that the court is tired of screwing around and just wants to get things over with already?

Pretty much. She just wants to see Hardin's bill. She'salready adjudicated Mel is bringing these suits in bad faith. She's probably already mentally settled on the rough size of sanctions, costs and the appeal bond, if any, and just needs the paperwork in order to wave bye bye to the crazy bitch.

 

[Toasty]

Melinda is literally the only person on the planet not completely sick of this case. She wants it to stretch on infinitely.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Melinda is literally the only person on the planet not completely sick of this case. She wants it to stretch on infinitely.

Once the case is over, she has to go back living her life. Of course she wants to drag this out

 

[Kosher Salt]

Melinda is literally the only person on the planet not completely sick of this case. She wants it to stretch on infinitely.

I must demand you retract this FALSE and DEFAMATORY accusation! She does not want it to stretch on infinitely, she only wants it to stretch on until she's given exactly what she's demanded.