Nick is absolutely coping right now on his dwindling viewership. It has been mentioned here before that his chat just isn’t moving like it should be if his viewership was at its previous levels and we all know he reads this thread and it gets to him. Additionally, he has been asked several times via superchat about when the contiguous viewer count functionality will be added to his site, americafirst.live. His response is to always blow the asker off, telling them they are working on so many other cooler and more important features. Mind you, it would only take five minutes for him to ask his developer to implement it. That right there should be a dead giveaway that it isn’t there because he doesn’t want it to be there.
Well, the “America First Updates” account ostensibly ran by Nick, but most likely Assistant Groyper (aka America First Jew), just put up a little piece of propaganda to clap back at his haters. Unfortunately, the 14yr old intern they were quoting has no ability to interpret the data, and neither do they. Because if they did, it would be immediately clear that this was an entirely illogical conclusion and only used to support a false narrative.
https://t.me/AFUpdates/1117
https://www.similarweb.com/website/americafirst.live/#overview
Per the Telegram message: “1.96 million in 6 months is 326k a month, that's ~10.8k a day which means Nick gets about 10k viewers a night on average. This is actually MORE than the ~8k per night average he was getting on dlive.tv, meaning Nick is effectively censorship-proof as he's still managed to steadily grow on his own site.”
Everything in that statement is wrong. Perhaps the person who made the graphic did this on purpose, but they cut the dates off the bottom of Nick’s graph. This wasn’t done on all of them though, so I’ll just chalk it up to retardation, not malice. If they had kept the dates on though, they might have more easily realized that that 1.96M number is not a total number of “viewers” (more on this later) for the past six month period. It is the number for the past month alone; meaning 1.96M in the month of September.
What they did is take this 1.96M and divide it by 180 days, roughly six months, to get their 10.8k, and then interpreted the number of page views as the numbers of concurrent viewers, stating “~10.8k a day which means Nick gets about 10k viewers a night on average.” So if we follow this logic, and correctly apply the 1.96M number and divide it by 30 days, we are now at 65k views per day, which would mean something like 60k “viewers a night on average.” 10.8/10 is 93%, so that’s the number I applied to 65 to get to 60.
Mind you, this 93% number is pulled out of their ass and not supported anywhere, but I guess this is supposed to mean that 93% of their viewership is captured when Nick is live and replays played during the week and weekends constitutes the remaining 7% of viewers. And not only that, but every time someone comes and goes from the website for any reason (changing devices, closing tabs, etc.), they are counting it as a unique member of his audience. For that matter, while typing this up, I’ve been counted a half dozen times just for checking on things. And this issue plays into the next data point, average visit duration.
Average visit duration is calculated at 9 minutes, 22 seconds. Including his 90 minutes of introduction music/preshow the average length of his shows is roughly four hours. Limiting it to just the portion Nick is actually on, you are looking at closer to 2.5 hours. How is the average time being calculated at only 9:22? Am I supposed to believe that on average, the viewer doesn’t even watch for 10 minutes before they turn it off? And what about an average page per visit of 3.5? Aside from anyone watching replays, there is no point to be clicking around on the site, visiting other pages. Americafirst.live is a direct link to the stream. A bounce rate of 36.89% also seems incredibly low for essentially a single page website. Bounce rate is calculated as the percentage of visits where a person visits just the one page without viewing any other page. It doesn’t make sense to me why 63% of the visitors have a reason to click on anything else. I don’t know anything about coding or SEO, so maybe someone else might be able to weigh in more on this.
In conclusion, I have no clue how similarweb.com is pulling these numbers, how accurate they are, or what on Nick’s website is actually triggering these data events to be recorded, but what I do know is that it’s entirely bullshit if you are following the logic of the Groyper who made the post and even more bullshit for Nick or Assistant Groyper to broadcast the message as some sort of validating statement that what Nick says is true regarding viewership being as strong as ever. It is purely a reflection of the cult like mental illness of the movement and ability for their loyal followers to bend reason and logic to fit a narrative about their dear leader. Either way, they are all dumb faggots and if I’m going to call someone a dumb faggot who is making shit up, it’s only right that I back it up. If this is the best they have, they are totally fucked.