Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

I must demand you retract this FALSE and DEFAMATORY accusation! She does not want it to stretch on infinitely, she only wants it to stretch on until she's given exactly what she's demanded.
What makes this so much worse for her and has driven her to unhinged levels is she thought she had won due to Null defaulting because he was never properly served. For the first time ever she was finally getting exactly what she demanded. But then Hardin came along with his racist misogynistic freemasons to steal from her!

At this point Mel is probably farther out there mentally than even the Sovereign Citizen morons.
 
What makes this so much worse for her and has driven her to unhinged levels is she thought she had won due to Null defaulting because he was never properly served. For the first time ever she was finally getting exactly what she demanded. But then Hardin came along with his racist misogynistic freemasons to steal from her!

At this point Mel is probably farther out there mentally than even the Sovereign Citizen morons.
You say that like she wasn't one in spirit if not name even before this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
yarmdf_0000.png


Melinda is talking to herself and praising herself. :)

The writing style of YaHUaH Reigns matches Melinda's shitful writing style. She has reused expressions that she has used on the forum. I am confident that it is Melinda and not Marshall.

My speculation:

Attorney Hardin isn't aiming to only demonstrate that Melinda exhibits a pattern of vexatious litigation. I believe that he is aiming to expose Melinda's modus operandi of extortion. The vexatious litigation is in service of the goal of extortion. Melinda's numerous other cases will show this. This is why an extension of time was requested. Attorney Hardin intends to examine all her cases to demonstrate her motive and broader pattern of behavior.

The emails that she sent to the John and Jane Does--the KFers she is trying to sue--requesting money to drop the litigation have become relevant. If they haven't been provided to Null they should be. The complete SMTP headers of the emails should be included as they can serve to authenticate the emails if that becomes necessary. The emails will serve to provide corroborative evidence of her extortionate behavior.

I think Melinda is utterly fucked and deservedly so.
 
View attachment 2609869

Melinda is talking to herself and praising herself. :)

The writing style of YaHUaH Reigns matches Melinda's shitful writing style. She has reused expressions that she has used on the forum. I am confident that it is Melinda and not Marshall.

My speculation:

Attorney Hardin isn't aiming to only demonstrate that Melinda exhibits a pattern of vexatious litigation. I believe that he is aiming to expose Melinda's modus operandi of extortion. The vexatious litigation is in service of the goal of extortion. Melinda's numerous other cases will show this. This is why an extension of time was requested. Attorney Hardin intends to examine all her cases to demonstrate her motive and broader pattern of behavior.

The emails that she sent to the John and Jane Does--the KFers she is trying to sue--requesting money to drop the litigation have become relevant. If they haven't been provided to Null they should be. The complete SMTP headers of the emails should be included as they can serve to authenticate the emails if that becomes necessary. The emails will serve to provide corroborative evidence of her extortionate behavior.

I think Melinda is utterly fucked and deservedly so.
Reigns account is Marshalls.
 
Melinda is talking to herself and praising herself. :)
We found the YaHUah Reigns channel, the address is: https://www.youtube.com/user/castersen13 and there are videos featuring Marshall there so it's pretty much confirmed that he's still simping for her and she's accepting the simping.

I believe that he is aiming to expose Melinda's modus operandi of extortion
With her success rate I'd say at this point it shows she's not mentally well, not that she's some kind of master scammer. Her only noticeable success was Andrew and he probably just wanted an excuse to give her some cash.
 
View attachment 2609869

Melinda is talking to herself and praising herself. :)

The writing style of YaHUaH Reigns matches Melinda's shitful writing style. She has reused expressions that she has used on the forum. I am confident that it is Melinda and not Marshall.

My speculation:

Attorney Hardin isn't aiming to only demonstrate that Melinda exhibits a pattern of vexatious litigation. I believe that he is aiming to expose Melinda's modus operandi of extortion. The vexatious litigation is in service of the goal of extortion. Melinda's numerous other cases will show this. This is why an extension of time was requested. Attorney Hardin intends to examine all her cases to demonstrate her motive and broader pattern of behavior.

The emails that she sent to the John and Jane Does--the KFers she is trying to sue--requesting money to drop the litigation have become relevant. If they haven't been provided to Null they should be. The complete SMTP headers of the emails should be included as they can serve to authenticate the emails if that becomes necessary. The emails will serve to provide corroborative evidence of her extortionate behavior.

I think Melinda is utterly fucked and deservedly so.
No. Do not provide any avenue that would risk unmasking john and jane doe kiwi users. Hardin dorsn't need it.
 
Demand letters are a part of the normal legal process, and depending on the wording and content might be completely benign. I haven't seen any of the ones directed at kiwis, so forgive ignorance but unless she directly threatened them or demanded completely unrealistic amounts of money, the judge won't even look at them twice.

Asking for money in exchange for being dropped from a suit is normal. Hardin doesn't need those.
 
I haven't seen any of the ones directed at kiwis, so forgive ignorance but unless she directly threatened them or demanded completely unrealistic amounts of money, the judge won't even look at them twice.
Kiwis are mentioned in the original filing: OP of Andrew's thread (she believes it's someone she knows personally), two posters who were joking about CPS call (so they both must be conspiring against her with Null to make the call) and one poster who's super-mean to her (plus she likely has hots for this poster).
She demanded money (don't think she specified the amount) and identifying information about other people in the lawsuit that would allow her to serve them.
 
She demanded specific, large amounts of money, information on users, and admitted that she lied about at least one of the does named in the suit, but screen shots have already been posted, and I'm sure Hardin has everything he needs.
 
You guys are right. I stand corrected. I thought it was Melinda using Marshall's YT account. On re-reading the comments, a different pattern of spelling and grammatical errors emerges.

jckzfg_0001.png

fhifwq_0002.png


He consistently incorrectly uses your instead of you're and writes could of instead of could've. (He doesn't understand contracted words.) Melinda doesn't always get these wrong, and there are no random capitalizations. All of the errors that his phone can't autocorrect remain.

Marshall, this is for you:

woimhd_0004.png


Incidentally, if I am not mistaken, the video that these comments came from has been deleted. When you go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPSnvvhQo4o you get this:

cndgui_0003.png


It doesn't appear in the Rekieta Law YT channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/RekietaLaw/videos

mgvskn_0000.png


Did our beloved pair of retards get the video pulled?

Jew pretending to be a greasy, unwashed Mexican.
Grade: A+ (RIP Eli)
eli_tuco.jpg


Greasy, unwashed Mexican pretending to be a Jew.
Grade: F
oykrew_0000.png
 
Asking for money in exchange for being dropped from a suit is normal. Hardin doesn't need those.
There are very precise ways such demands have to be worded not to be extortionate. Even lawyers fuck this up. Witness Michael Avenatti and the time he is doing for "asking for money in exchange for being dropped from a suit."
 
Back