Pedophiles of Sluthate AND Lookism (MRZ, Brian Peppers and many more!)

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date

Which user is a bigger faggot?

  • @drz

  • Marijan Siklic

Results are only viewable after voting.
MRZ laments in the thread cat linked to about his situation and wonders why "virgin JBs" aren't traveling across the world to have sex with him. Elsewhere, he claims that having sex with "JBs" is his "birthright," and he apparently wants to overthrow the US Gov't because they're "in the way" of said "birthright."
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: Vex Overmind, DirkBloodStormKing and Sanae Kochiya
ToroidalBoat said:
MRZ laments in the thread cat linked to about his situation and wonders why "virgin JBs" aren't traveling across the world to have sex with him. Elsewhere, he claims that having sex with "JBs" is his "birthright," and he apparently wants to overthrow the US Gov't because they're "in the way" of said "birthright."
Click to expand...
I mean he's totes a l33t hax0r. What is more appealing to teenage girls than that? They must have not heard about his ability to create different user names.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sanae Kochiya, Uncanny Valley and ToroidalBoat
Untitled.png
 
  • Winner
Reactions: DirkBloodStormKing and Sanae Kochiya
Ignoring the fact that most shootings are at places that hold some huge sentimental value to the psychopath in question and, thus, a "male strip club" would probably be one of the least likely places to be hit unless the guy was systematically dumped and embarrassed in front of his entire graduating class in said club and all of his peers went to said club on a daily basis in one of the most unlikely coincidences since finding the winning lottery ticket stuck on the heel of the shoe of your long lost dad, does anyone wanna point out to @OmegaKV that most humans are not, in fact, terrible individuals and would not consider the place that one of their loved ones died important next to the fact that, you know, these people fucking died.

A charmer, placing the circumstances of someone's death above that person's death. He must get all the ladies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rin
Sanae Kochiya said:
Ignoring the fact that most shootings are at places that hold some huge sentimental value to the psychopath in question and, thus, a "male strip club" would probably be one of the least likely places to be hit
Click to expand...

I think @OmegaKV just thinks about male strip clubs a lot. Perhaps nostalgic recollections of all the time he's spent there.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: DirkBloodStormKing, autisticdragonkin, Cthulu and 1 other person
"anti-jb is anti-male" (by MRZ)

http://sluthate.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1003166

Ready to see some crazy shit?
anti-jb is anti-male Shitty Advice.png

anti-jb is anti-male
by mrz » Thu Oct 15, 2015 11:35 am

Feds still pwning people from playpen as soon as two weeks ago

http://www.cleveland.com/akron/index.ssf...in-la.html

what really surprises me about the playpen bust is how almost everyone they pwnt so far was into JB porn instead of CP. It absolutely disgusts me that the police are in the business of rounding up completely normal (as is scientific fact, completely disregard their lies that it is not because they have no support outside of their cult) males, for the crime of looking at teenage girls in sexual situations. It's nothing short of abhorrent and disgusting, and they should not only be absolutely ashamed of their war on natural male sexuality, but should honestly be put to death for crimes against humanity.

It is scientific fact that it is natural for males to be attracted to JBs, despite the vile lies of the corrupt prison industrial complex, the non-prison industry academic community has consensus on this fact. It is also patently obvious that looking at pictures does not cause harm to the people depicted in them, and only a truthfully religiously delusional person could claim otherwise. The people who make these claims have absolutely zero scientific evidence supporting them, they have no studies backing their claims, they have nothing but canned propaganda slogans that they repeat ad nauseam, as if their repetition somehow makes their mystical claims reality.

A completely normal, harmless, male sexual behavior, is being demonized by corrupt slave catchers, to justify ruining the lives of completely normal people, for the profits of the prison industrial complex, and the benefit of a delusional feminist desire to deny evolution. It makes me absolutely sick to my stomach, and I hope the monsters responsible for this have their dicks cut off and shoved up their assholes before having their brains blown out of their heads.

Anti-JB is anti-male, plain and simple, there is nothing short of a full out onslaught against harmless, normal, male sexual behavior, it is at this point practically a holocaust situation, it is a modern day salem witch trial, and anyone who supports it is a shameful, vile, horrible, monster.

We must put an end to this evil crusade of religious fanatics, and if you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem. We cannot allow the delusional mentally ill beliefs of these puritan feminist crusaders to victimize more males. We cannot tolerate a society where natural harmless male sexuality is repressed with the threat of enslavement, it is absolutely a disgusting situation when almost half of the population of a society is criminalized and demonized in such a way.

There is absolutely no excuse for this to continue, and the people responsible for this must die to bring justice to the countless lives they have ruined. It's time to stop your delusions (and lies) and get into reality and get into the 21st century, and if you refuse to do so you must be killed, because there is no place for you in this world.

Everybody likes JBs, it is disgusting that it is "taboo", and even more disgusting that federal police are rounding some of the people who do up for enslavement in prison, they should just arrest all males since virtually all males who are not liars are attracted to JBs and would look at JB porn if it were legal or they thought they could certainly get away with it. It's absolutely disgusting fucking bullshit what they are doing, they are singling out some subset of males that they can manage to pwn and parading them around as horrible pedophiles even though they are completely normal and just like virtually everyone else, and they have the situation such that anyone who disagrees with what they are doing must be a horrible pedophile by default, so nobody can argue against them, it's seriously reminiscent of Nazi Germany / Stasi East Germany / Salem Witch Trials, but its own special brand of disgusting.

Even though tons of males don't give the slightest fuck if people look at JB porn or fuck JBs, we can't do anything about it, because if anyone actually says that they are automatically demonized, it's fucking absolutely disgusting, like makes me legitimately want to puke IRL thinking about it just because of how horrible it is. It needs to be ended immediately, by whatever means necessary, murder and terrorism are acceptable if they will bring it to an end, whatever needs to be done to stop this practically genocide tier situation from continuing is morally justified and imperative.

We have no obligation to humor the delusions of religious fanatics. They can either come into reality, or they can fuck off, if they refuse to do either they should die, the lives of normal, completely harmless, males, are infinitely more important, than the delusional beliefs of Puritan-Feminist crusaders, who want to live with their heads in the clouds, trapped in a make believe reality of moral panic and prison industry mysticism.

There is no time to wait for democracy to stop this, we cannot sit by and allow this to continue, it needs immediate action to bring an immediate end to it, it doesn't matter how many people support it (mostly due to being lied to and brainwashed), the will of the majority is irrelevant to morality, and what they are doing is absolutely immoral, and severely damaging to those who are victimized by it.

The logic the Supreme Court used in criminalizing the viewing of Child Pornography is invalid today and should render their decision void.

The government has a very compelling interest in preventing the sexual exploitation of children.[2][3]


All research into child pornography has come to the conclusion that legalizing the viewing of child pornography reduces the sexual exploitation of children, if we are to apply this reasoning to our modern understanding of child pornography viewing it would be in favor of legalization.

http://phys.org/news/2010-11-legalizing ... d-sex.html

Could making child pornography legal lead to lower rates of child sex abuse? It could well do, according to a new study by Milton Diamond, from the University of Hawaii, and colleagues.

Results from the Czech Republic showed, as seen everywhere else studied (Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sweden, USA), that rape and other sex crimes have not increased following the legalization and wide availability of pornography. And most significantly, the incidence of child sex abuse has fallen considerably since 1989, when child pornography became readily accessible – a phenomenon also seen in Denmark and Japan. Their findings are published online today in Springer's journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.


Distribution of visual depictions of children engaged in sexual activity is intrinsically related to the sexual abuse of children. The images serve as a permanent reminder of the abuse


This logic must then be applied to any pictures of abuse, there is precedent for banning images of any victimizing crime if we are to apply this reasoning broadly, videos of bank robberies must be criminalized, videos of murders must be criminalized, any video of anyone being victimized must be criminalized, otherwise this logic is irrelevant in obviously not being the reason why child pornography must be illegal to view (if it were the reason, all of those other sorts of videos must be illegal to view as well).

Additionally, a huge amount of underage porn is not at all abusive. There is nothing abusive about pictures of paid teenage models exposing their breasts with their parents permission and their full consent (over half a million CP images). There is nothing abusive about 17 year old girls consensually sexting pictures of their tits!

Advertising and selling child pornography provides an economic motive for producing child pornography.[2]

Is completely irrelevant to the viewing of child pornography, which is virtually always done without any economic motivation today (the Supreme court ruling came before the prevalence of the internet, reality has radically shifted today).

http://libertus.net/censor/resources/st ... ering.html

Journalist: The people who put these images up on a site, are they getting paid, [...inaudible...], where's the economic benefit?

AFP Andrew Colvin: We're not talking about a crime that's driven by a financial motive, there's other motivations here. So, while there may be some sites that attract a financial return, that's not the motivation here. So the answer to your question is no really, that's not what's motivating people, people aren't necessarily making a lot of money.


In summary, the US$20 billion figure has been invented by some unknown person/organisation and since then been commonly attributed to the FBI or Unicef, both of which said in April 2006 that the 'statistic' did not originate with them.

The writer considers the fixation among advocacy groups and the media with attaching a dollar number to the problem is curious given commercial/monetary 'estimates' (or even factual statistics if it were possible to obtain same) are of minimal relevance to understanding or determining the extent of the problem. This is because a significant amount, possibly most, of the trade in child sexual abuse images takes place at no cost via Usenet newsgroups, IRC (Internet Relay Chat), Instant Messaging, P2P technologies, email, etc. The images themselves, not money, are the trading currency. Extensive information about the nature of the non-commercial trade is available in the book: Beyond tolerance : child pornography on the Internet by Philip Jenkins. New York University Press, 2001. ISBN: 0814742629.


particularly noteworthy:

The images themselves, not money, are the trading currency.

Guess what happens when you take currency out of circulation? It's called deflation (economics 101), and it increases the value of the currency. Increasing the value of a decentralized currency incentivizes the production of more of it!

Visual depictions of children engaged in sexual activity have negligible artistic value.

Is completely subjective, and in fact many images considered Child Pornography by the US have been deemed as artistic nudes by the governments of foreign countries, including Germany.

Thus, holding that child pornography is outside the protection of the First Amendment is consistent with the Court's prior decisions limiting the banning of materials deemed "obscene" as the Court had previously defined it. For this reason, child pornography need not be legally obscene before being outlawed.


Absolutely none of the reasoning the supreme court used when they made child pornography illegal to view in 1982 is applicable to the world in 2015. Things have radically changed since then.

Today the primary reasons for CP being illegal to view are "Pictures are magical" and "Supply and demand", neither of which has a single shred of evidence in support of it, the first of which is blatantly a religious tier delusion, and the second of which is contradicted by the fact that as consumption of child pornography has increased rates of child sexual abuse have decreased.

What may have started off with the goal of protecting children has legitimately morphed into a crusade of delusional religious fanatics rounding up completely normal males for enslavement by the prison industry, there is absolutely no valid reason for the criminalization of child pornography viewing, let alone locking up completely normal (scientific consensus, only the prison industry disputes this) males for looking at sexualized pictures of teenagers.

The arguments for criminalizing the viewing of CP are nothing short of Goebbelian Propaganda at this point.

"The rank and file are more primitive than we imagine. Propaganda must therefore always be essentially simple and repetitious. In the long run only he will achieve basic results in influencing public opinion who is able to reduce problems to the simplest terms and who has the courage to keep forever repeating them in this simplified form despite the objections of intellectuals."
--Joseph Goebbels (from P&A)


Wow doesn't that sound like "Every time you look at CP it's like the person is molested all over again" and "supply and demand!" and the other five second sound bytes that they repeat over and over verbatim to justify what they are doing?

If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself. - Hitler


Wow, doesn't that sound just like the notion that "Normal males don't have sexual interest in developed adolescents"?

The shit they are doing is straight from the Nazi playbook!

If you support what they are doing, you are no different from a German citizen who supported the Nazis, and just as the Nazis were taken out of power and had their leaders executed for crimes against humanity, we must take the current US Nazis out of power and execute the ones responsible for this holocaust.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back