Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
So The FiLiA Women’s Rights Conference took place yesterday and lots of salt was spilled. Lets start off with our standard Suck the Lady Dique TRA's

suck the girl dick.png

Next up Suck on the Pink Strap

strap.jpg

It looks like the Women had a great time being there, although I would of changed the sign to TERFS of the world unite, because lets be honest we're all TERFS now.

wotwu1.jpg
wotwu2.jpg
WRA1.jpg
 
Meet Sydney Pritchard, aka Sydney Salt
From the profile info I assumed this was going to be another man trying hard to look like a 'big titty goth girlfriend'.
sydneyprofile.png

x

Instead, I found a pinned tweet with pictures of a bald black guy looking like a bald black guy
sydneybaldguy.png

x

Actually, he does wear skirts and dresses. And he also tells people to suck his dick, like a real lady.
sydneyskirt.png

x

When he's DJ-ing he often wears fetish gear.
sdj2.jpg
sdj1.jpg

x / x

Like so many troons, this one also makes crappy electronic/industrial music to share on soundcloud and bandcamp.
One of his musical aliases:
sydneybc.png


But wait! There's more!

He got himself a trans-commie-muslim flag
sydneyflag1.png
sydneyflag2.png

x / x


It seems he sometimes also wears a hijab.
This is what I found on this instagram (I don't have an account, so it won't let me see the full context)
sydneyhijab.png

Note the communism tattoo

sydneyhijab2.png

I wonder what he's burning here

Further boxes to check:
-autistic
-sucks girldick
sydneycum.png


The name on his Venmo is still Tarik, btw https://archive.ph/knmQF
 
Hmm, my sheer academic expertise and worldly wisdom identifies this as attempts to intimidate, but that cannot be possible, they are the mostest oppressedest people in the known world with no way of fighting back...!!!

EDIT: BTW I heard there's going to be some neopronoun bullshit day next week. How many special days for trans and genderspeshuls have been in this year? I wonder how many "days of" something important but low-profile they are overwriting without knowing.
 
Last edited:
So The FiLiA Women’s Rights Conference took place yesterday and lots of salt was spilled. Lets start off with our standard Suck the Lady Dique TRA's


Next up Suck on the Pink Strap

Trans rights are human rights. Women's rights? Those bitches just need some good old fashioned assault to put them in their place.

Non-binary is when you have just enough critical thinking to notice you don't seem to fit the gender stereotypes of either men or women, but not enough brain power to realise noone does.

That, and the narcissism.
Non-binary is a handy escape if you're dealing with someone who decided you're an egg and they're going to crack you. It may satisfy them enough to lay off it, or give you time to find a better way out of their harassment if they persist.
 
Non-binary is when you have just enough critical thinking to notice you don't seem to fit the gender stereotypes of either men or women, but not enough brain power to realise noone does.

No, it's when you realise you're tremendously ordinary, uninteresting and straight but feel you need to do something to belong to the day's hip in-group, so you too can make shop employees, waiters and assorted authorities walk on eggshells around you. So you too can get unmitigated support from a thousand Twitter fans, politicians, the press, and human rights movements.
 
I’ll bet they “identify” as disabled, too

Does anyone know what this is broadly called? I want to read some academic work on it but cant work out what area of academia it would be (psychology? sociology? anthropology? veterinary medicine?) And im not sure what search terms to use that dont result in either bastardised academia or raging identity politics articles where left and right fight to gotcha the otherside.

I just want to make it make sense. Why have we allowed suffering to become something that can be opted in and out of? Has anyone considered that by not gatekeeping we are allowing suffering to be redefined by those suffering the least to the detriment of genuine sufferers that we claim to care about.

I basically want red pill academia. Any ideas?

Edit: in my journey i came across this about Collective Narcissism which relates to the subject of this thread.

Choice quote for you;

Collective narcissism is associated with prejudice. For example, men who feel that their manhood is precarious endorse prejudice toward women.

Exhibit A: Troons very existance.
Exhibit B: The pro troon bearded soy boys (he/him) on twitter who weigh in to explain to women that their understanding of womenhood wrong.

One more section worth quoting in full, although this paper is worth a full read because it describes trooonery perfectly.

Collective narcissism predicts experiencing intergroup situations in a manner akin to affective group-based relative deprivation: feeling angered that the in-group does not receive desired outcomes received by relevant out-groups.

The troon in group and its anger at women, their out group.

However, the expectation that the in-group should receive better outcomes than the relevant out-groups is specific to collective narcissism. Collective narcissists are interested in privilege, not justice or equality.

This explains why troon doctrine is so inconsistent and contradictory.

Thus, collective narcissism is likely to motivate violent and nonnormative rather than normative collective action in reaction to perceived group-based deprivation.

We should expect escalating violence in due course. How will society justify troons killing women? I expect they will say that being a tranny is irreverent.

Collective narcissism increases in response to perceived intergroup threat:

Symbolic (i.e., to the in-group’s values, esteem, or belief system),

Realistic (i.e., to material or physical security)

And especially distinctiveness threat (i.e., threat of being indistinguishable from other people).

Ding ding ding dong.

However, collective narcissists also exaggerate the perception of intergroup threat and believe that their in-group alone faces the hostility of other people. In their view, the in-group never receives the outcomes it is entitled to. Thus, collective narcissism pertains to a “sore” in-group veneration permanently tinted by implicit doubts and the perception that the in-group is wronged by other people. Collective narcissists believe that the only appropriate and rewarding reactions to threats from other people are aggression and hostility.

Seriously, this predicts that these men are likely to become violent.
 
Last edited:
I just want to make it make sense. Why have we allowed suffering to become something that can be opted in and out of?
Because these people in question are very very loud and annoying and everyone else just doesn't want to have to deal with their shit so they just placate them. It's much easier just to say "okay fine you're disabled and trans, whatever"
 
Does anyone know what this is broadly called? I want to read some academic work on it but cant work out what area of academia it would be (psychology? sociology? anthropology? veterinary medicine?) And im not sure what search terms to use that dont result in either bastardised academia or raging identity politics articles where left and right fight to gotcha the otherside.

I just want to make it make sense. Why have we allowed suffering to become something that can be opted in and out of? Has anyone considered that by not gatekeeping we are allowing suffering to be redefined by those suffering the least to the detriment of genuine sufferers that we claim to care about.

I basically want red pill academia. Any ideas?

Edit: in my journey i came across this about Collective Narcissism which relates to the subject of this thread.
Yeah there might be some more generalized stuff in psychology, but nobody seems to have the balls to really attack the pathology of online identity politics in academic work. Twitter mobs can just kill an academic's career if they want to, because the institutions either cave (for whatever reason) or are already captured ideologically. Higher education has really become a service industry. Same thing goes for journalists and authors, unless they want to go all-in on substack.
 
162892658498480166.png


Coming from the big pharma consoomer
Is it possible to delete someone else's twitter account?
I’ll bet they “identify” as disabled, too

View attachment 2633209
I am quite certain that DNA is, in fact, a definite thing, sir.


They’re already extending jail time for female prisoners accused of “misgendering” the male rapists they’re forced to be imprisoned with.
That has to constitute cruel and unusual punishment, right?
 
That has to constitute cruel and unusual punishment, right?
What, you mean innocent rapists getting misgendered by the evil cissies? Yeah, totally cruel and unusual. After all, you have nothing to fear, if you‘re not a transphobic bigot. So just do everything they say and there will be no problem!

(Tweet is talking about the filia conference, but this obvs applies to rapists in prison as well, bc if you misgender one troid when they‘re nasty it means you are secretly a heretic and don‘t believe in the gender gospel)
79491E91-D05C-45C1-BFE9-8921BA265777.jpeg

164D2A34-D8F2-4278-9FCF-F0008122FD6B.jpeg



D69B7C95-7095-498A-93F8-A08BDD6903AB.jpeg
Petition to rename the roided clits and armroll sausages testosteroni.

A houseplant group on facebook:
91F1768F-D9CD-4056-BAF9-0F61B685171E.jpeg
BDA48E3B-AD77-4533-A4A8-5C8682EFA74B.jpeg

F46A5811-2587-4A99-B9E2-DD1F5194270C.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know what this is broadly called? I want to read some academic work on it but cant work out what area of academia it would be (psychology? sociology? anthropology? veterinary medicine?) And im not sure what search terms to use that dont result in either bastardised academia or raging identity politics articles where left and right fight to gotcha the otherside.

I just want to make it make sense. Why have we allowed suffering to become something that can be opted in and out of? Has anyone considered that by not gatekeeping we are allowing suffering to be redefined by those suffering the least to the detriment of genuine sufferers that we claim to care about.

I basically want red pill academia. Any ideas?
This, this, or maybe this might probably come close to giving you an answer. If not you can always search on google scholar "consumerism+ identity formation+ historicize" to find something that speaks to you. But essentially, it's because of american consumerism and individualism being globalized. It's all just social commodity fetishism which reduces subjective human life as just another experience you can buy, collect, and claim as your own just because you paid money for it
 
From Skokie to... this. Jesus Christ.
Skokie was entirely in line with their current behavior. The ACLU knew for a fact that the Skokie nazi thing was fake, they knew that leader was a (pedophile serial rapist) jew pulling an op. It is possible to likely that they helped organize it. At the very least they collaborated with them to launder the illegitimacy to further their political ends, which seem to have been terrorizing local jewish communities to stir up anti-goy hate, and to villify whites.

The dedication to free speech was only ever tactical. Now that they have control of all of the institutions, it is no longer necessary. "We have won. Now you shut up."
 
Back