Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Hey Tammy did you tear your gooch after having 6 kids?
Ask her about her episiodomy
proxy-image
 
So you're saying you understand appreciate and personally utilize the free speech nature of this site? Putting the lie to the entirety of your lawsuit?

This is why if you had an actual lawyer he or she would have told you to stop doing this. Stop talking to the people you keep attempting to sue.

Exibit C
She can't. We're the only friends we have. This is the closest thing to genuine human connection in her life. Her children are little zombie mongrels that just slog through her braindead curriculum, and Marshall occasionally stumbles into the trailer, high off home cooked meth, punches her in the face and say says ,'baby, it's time to fuck'. Four minutes later he goes to his video games in just his underwear, and she goes to the kitchen, covered in bruises and with a fresh black eye, smiling and thinking to herself, 'I have the best sex life of anyone in the history of ever.'

Then it hits her. None of that makes her feel anything. Nothing. There's just a void in her chest cavity. So she pulls out her third hand smartphone and cruises on over to kiwkifarms.net and scrolls through the abuse and the advice, laughing and smirking at how she is just so much smarter than these plebs, and she's going to prove it. So she spends more time crafting posts on here than she does mothering her children, who, if you pressed her, would say as long as they obey her word, they are self governing. She tells people they're wrong. And when they're right, they're goyim, so they cannot possibly be anything but wrong. She tells them she's the most desirable woman in the world, and only attracts grade A men. She tells them she has porn star grade sex all the time. She tells them she is a great mother and has a degree that proves it, somehow. This empowers her. It's like doing a line of coke for her. She's smiting heathens and she's a fucking legend in her mind.

And we are the best friends she has.

Edit:

Are we posting our doggo pics?
10517375_10154359963530525_3113448006318780664_o.jpg
 
She can't. We're the only friends we have. This is the closest thing to genuine human connection in her life. Her children are little zombie mongrels that just slog through her braindead curriculum, and Marshall occasionally stumbles into the trailer, high off home cooked meth, punches her in the face and say says ,'baby, it's time to fuck'. Four minutes later he goes to his video games in just his underwear, and she goes to the kitchen, covered in bruises and with a fresh black eye, smiling and thinking to herself, 'I have the best sex life of anyone in the history of ever.'

Then it hits her. None of that makes her feel anything. Nothing. There's just a void in her chest cavity. So she pulls out her third hand smartphone and cruises on over to kiwkifarms.net and scrolls through the abuse and the advice, laughing and smirking at how she is just so much smarter than these plebs, and she's going to prove it. So she spends more time crafting posts on here than she does mothering her children, who, if you pressed her, would say as long as they obey her word, they are self governing. She tells people they're wrong. And when they're right, they're goyim, so they cannot possibly be anything but wrong. She tells them she's the most desirable woman in the world, and only attracts grade A men. She tells them she has porn star grade sex all the time. She tells them she is a great mother and has a degree that proves it, somehow. This empowers her. It's like doing a line of coke for her. She's smiting heathens and she's a fucking legend in her mind.

And we are the best friends she has.
Explains why she keeps engaging with us and suing Null.
Antagonistic human interactions are the only ones she knows.
Also,
We don't (nor would ever) physically harm her.
That already makes KF a better boyfriend than Marshall.
 
She can't. We're the only friends we have. This is the closest thing to genuine human connection in her life. Her children are little zombie mongrels that just slog through her braindead curriculum, and Marshall occasionally stumbles into the trailer, high off home cooked meth, punches her in the face and say says ,'baby, it's time to fuck'. Four minutes later he goes to his video games in just his underwear, and she goes to the kitchen, covered in bruises and with a fresh black eye, smiling and thinking to herself, 'I have the best sex life of anyone in the history of ever.'

Then it hits her. None of that makes her feel anything. Nothing. There's just a void in her chest cavity. So she pulls out her third hand smartphone and cruises on over to kiwkifarms.net and scrolls through the abuse and the advice, laughing and smirking at how she is just so much smarter than these plebs, and she's going to prove it. So she spends more time crafting posts on here than she does mothering her children, who, if you pressed her, would say as long as they obey her word, they are self governing. She tells people they're wrong. And when they're right, they're goyim, so they cannot possibly be anything but wrong. She tells them she's the most desirable woman in the world, and only attracts grade A men. She tells them she has porn star grade sex all the time. She tells them she is a great mother and has a degree that proves it, somehow. This empowers her. It's like doing a line of coke for her. She's smiting heathens and she's a fucking legend in her mind.

And we are the best friends she has.

Edit:

Are we posting our doggo pics?
That's a cute pupper
 
@TamarYaelBatYah stated
Nice try. But in Virginia no one has the legal right to be on another's property if:

(1) the owner of the property posts visible no trespassing signs on the property. Virginia has NO TRESPASSING laws.
(2) They are asked to leave orally
(3) They are told in writing not to come on someone's property
(4) They are served a cease and desist letter to not contact the person
(5) they are not a law enforcement officer carrying out their duties

It's a Class 1 Misdemeanor to trespass on a person's property, crossing their signs posted that say "do not trespass", or if they have been told orally or in writing to stay off a person's property and they are not law enforcement officers carrying out their duties.

Read it and weep....

VA CODE § 18.2-119. Trespass after having been forbidden to do so; penalties.​

If any person without authority of law goes upon or remains upon the lands, buildings or premises of another, or any portion or area thereof, after having been forbidden to do so, either orally or in writing, by the owner, lessee, custodian, or the agent of any such person, or other person lawfully in charge thereof, or after having been forbidden to do so by a sign or signs posted by or at the direction of such persons or the agent of any such person or by the holder of any easement or other right-of-way authorized by the instrument creating such interest to post such signs on such lands, structures, premises or portion or area thereof at a place or places where it or they may be reasonably seen, or if any person, whether he is the owner, tenant or otherwise entitled to the use of such land, building or premises, goes upon, or remains upon such land, building or premises after having been prohibited from doing so by a court of competent jurisdiction by an order issued pursuant to §§ 16.1-253, 16.1-253.1, 16.1-253.4, 16.1-278.2 through 16.1-278.6, 16.1-278.8, 16.1-278.14, 16.1-278.15, 16.1-279.1, 19.2-152.8, 19.2-152.9 or § 19.2-152.10 or an ex parte order issued pursuant to § 20-103, and after having been served with such order, he shall be guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. This section shall not be construed to affect in any way the provisions of §§ 18.2-132 through 18.2-136.

Code 1950, § 18.1-173; 1960, c. 358; 1975, cc. 14, 15; 1982, c. 169; 1987, cc. 625, 705; 1991, c. 534; 1998, cc. 569, 684; 2011, c. 195.
Link: https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title18.2/chapter5/section18.2-119/

And let's take a look at Self Defense as it applies in Virginia more closely: I copied this from a criminal defense lawyer who is licensed in the state of Virginia:
https://www.tmwilsonlaw.com/criminal-law/self-defense#3.2
3.2. Defense of dwelling

As a general rule, Virginia law does not allow deadly force to prevent an entry into a home or dwelling. Non deadly force on the other hand may be used to prevent an unlawful entry into a dwelling.25

However, Virginia case law does support a version of the "castle doctrine" which allows deadly force to prevent an entry into a dwelling where a person reasonably believes the intruder will commit great bodily injury or death against him.26, 27

It is important to note that the castle doctrine in Virginia, arguably, only applies prior to when the intruder has entered the home, but where the intruder is already in the home only the normal rules of self defense would apply with respect to the use of deadly force.28

So, if a homeowner wakes up in the night and finds the intruder already inside his house, it may be argued that he may use deadly force, but only if the usual rules regarding the use of deadly force apply.

3.3. Defense of other property

Virginia law does not allow deadly force to defend property, aside from a dwelling.

The defense of property defense in Virginia allows a person to retain possession of property he is in rightful possession of.

He may only use the amount of force necessary to prevent the dispossession of his property, and no more.
When it comes whether someone was in the wrong for using excessive force to prevent a trespass, the courts are going to look at "parity" (the concept of being equal). In other words, you are allowed to defend yourself with approximately same degree of force that you were attacked with. Yes you have the right to defend property but not with deadly force.

As for setting bear traps or shotguns on your property. This was an actual case that went before a state supreme court:

Katko v. Briney - 183 N.W.2d 657 (Iowa 1971)

RULE:​

A possessor of land has no privilege to use force intended or likely to cause death or serious harm against another whom the possessor sees about to enter his premises or meddle with his chattel, unless the intrusion threatens death or serious bodily harm to the occupiers or users of the premises. A possessor of land cannot do indirectly and by a mechanical device that which, were he present, he could not do in person. Therefore, he cannot gain a privilege to install, for the purpose of protecting his land from intrusions harmless to the lives and limbs of the occupiers or users of it, a mechanical device whose only purpose is to inflict death or serious harm upon such as may intrude, by giving notice of his intention to inflict, by mechanical means and indirectly, harm which he could not, even after request, inflict directly were he present.

FACTS:​

A husband and wife trespassed into an abandoned and uninhibited house, where they found several old bottles and fruit jars which they took and added to their collection of antiques. They decided to go back a second time. Little did they know that the owners of the house had been aware that of a series of trespassing and housebreaking events over the years with loss of some household items so they boarded up the house and made a 20-gauge spring shotgun trap in one of the bedrooms. Upon entering that room, the husband was shot in the leg and lost his leg, resulting in permanent deformity. He was also in the hospital for 40 days. The trespassers filed for damages resulting in the injury, which was awarded by the trial court. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the Iowa.


ISSUE:​

Can an owner protect personal property in an unoccupied boarded-up farmhouse against trespassers and thieves by a spring gun capable of inflicting death or serious injury?

ANSWER:​

No.

CONCLUSION:​

The Court held that the law has always placed a higher value upon human safety than upon mere rights in property. It is the accepted rule that there is no privilege to use any force calculated to cause death or serious bodily injury to repel the threat to land or chattels, unless there is also such a threat to the defendant's personal safety as to justify self-defense. The possessor may of course take some steps to repel a trespass but only that amount which is reasonably necessary to effect the repulse. Thus, spring guns and other man-killing devices are not justifiable against a mere trespasser, or even a petty thief. They are privileged only against those upon whom the landowner, if he were present in person, would be free to inflict injury of the same kind. Moreover, if the trespass threatens harm to property only--even a theft of property--the possessor is not privileged to use deadly force. He may not arrange his premises so that such force is inflicted by mechanical means. If he does, he will be liable even to a thief who is injured by such device.


https://www.lexisnexis.com/community/casebrief/p/casebrief-katko-v-briney
 
Explains why she keeps engaging with us and suing Null.
Antagonistic human interactions are the only ones she knows.
Also,
We don't (nor would ever) physically harm her.
That already makes KF a better boyfriend than Marshall.
Well, after all she admits filing lawsuits is her quality time:
1634512862180.png
 
It's more to do with wanting to protect your home. There are other cases in Canada and even in England which are very similar. Though they are often because someone decided to rig their home with basically tripwire guns. I do like the booby trap safe which was set to release CS gas but due to it's age it was more akin to nitroglycerin. You can still buy them at auction still with the gas.
They still sell them: https://pepperalarm.com/
I'm not sure what the legality would be in Virginia though.
This concept is wrong. Victims of Cyberstalking, Cyberbullying, and Cyberharassment do not need to retreat and hide in the shadows.

This approach you promote of a victim hiding in the shadows is a narcissistic abuse tactic called "isolation". That's like telling someone "don't go hiking so you won't get murdered on a trail or else it's your fault for hiking". It's a form of victim blaming.

Participating in the internet and society are common leisure activities. Everyone has a right to participate in society and leisure activities without the threat of Stalking or Harassment. The principle is even recognized in the law somewhat as the torts of "loss of society", "loss of consortium" and "loss of enjoyment of life".

Isolating a person is a form of abuse.

Read the Judge's opinion of August 30, 2021. It's 0-3.

Did you read the dismissals or you're just asking me because you're another herd mentality Sheeple watching Rekeita's misinformation campaign?

My first case was dismissed because some of my facts were written to vague. My second case was dismissed because I didn't add a paragraph why Joshua Moon wasn't immune under Section CDA 230.

My 3rd case was dismissed because the Judge was asleep behind the wheel

The Creator has nothing to do with secular judges

You just can't stop gaslighting. Ridiculous.

You're desperate to stop people from knowing their rights. Typical Masonic lawyer.

Virginia law requires labels next to the traps to prevent humans from being injured. But VA law also says don't trespass on other's land, so its considered your fault if you end up in a properly labeled animal trap while trespassing.

My bear traps are the least of your worries though. I have 2 pit bulls who don't take kindly to Stalkers.
Having two pit bulls to tear someone up who trespasses onto your property might be viewed in the same way as having a spring gun or booby trap. Me personally, I would consult a lawyer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The whole Biblical vs. Modern Hebrew thing is just a dodge. Modern Hebrew is a simplified version of Biblical with extra vocabulary to accommodate modern life. It's not like Attic Greek vs. Modern Greek; There isn't thousands of years of progression there. If someone is truly fluent in Biblical Hebrew, they're going to be able to figure out a lot of modern Hebrew. But it's easier for her to pretend to be fluent in Biblical Hebrew, because Christians have all of these interlinear translations, and no one actually speaks in Biblical Hebrew.

It would be like saying you're fluent in King James English but you can't make heads or tails of The Great Gatsby. They're not that different.
 
Hey Tammy did you tear your gooch after having 6 kids?
No. I had all my children at home (homebirths) so I didn't need. unnecessary medical intervention.

Hospitals make the stupid mistake of laying women down in beds. That's sheer stupidity.

I squatted during each birth. I also learned a technique from my first midwife when I entered the "ring of fire" phase. It's like secret knowledge she passed on to me. I used what she taught me for all 6. For those of you who don't know, the "ring of fire" is when the baby's head is crowning. So I used that secret during all 6 and never once had a tear.

All 6 of my homebirths were trouble free. YHWH Elohim blessed me for my righteousness, according to his Torah. The Torah promises minimal pain in childbirth for obedience to The Torah. Praise YHWH, whose promises endure forever.

Ask her about her episiodomy
proxy-image
Never had one. It's an unnecessary medical intervention because hospitals don't understand the art of childbirth.


When was the last time Marshall took all the responsibility for a day and let you rest?
There's no such thing as a day to yourself when you're breastfeeding. Ecological breastfeeding requires the baby with the mother all the time. Also, I don't believe in mother-child separation before the age of 5. I don't leave any of my children under the age of 5 with anyone, other than Marshall because he's a parent figure. And usually that's only an hour to go to the dollar store.

I take breaks in the evening after they go to sleep or in the early morning when I get up before they do.

I wouldn't even know what to do with myself if I had a whole day alone. I wouldn't be able to relax. My mind would go stir crazy thinking about what my children need, what I need to cook. I cook 3 meals a day and serve snacks and drinks all day for 8 people....every day. I'm cooking all the time. It has to get done. There's really no break from your children's hunger and restaurant food doesn't cut it. Plus it's expensive. In order to stay in my $1200/month budget, I have to cook at home. Marshall does the cars, I do the food. He does dinner occasionally though. He stays back from it usually though because I was trained in culinary practices working for a restaurant for 3 years so I'm really picky about food handling and how it all should be done so he thinks I'm over the top about it all and just lets me do my thing.

I just don't even know what else would I do other than take a bike ride? I want to do more kayaking but when you're breastfeeding and pregnant all the time, you can't just get in a kayak and leave down the river.


It's not, it's perfectly legal to keep guard dogs or personal protection dogs in Virginia.

I'm going to agree there



Having two pit bulls to tear someone up who trespasses onto your property might be viewed in the same way as having a spring gun or booby trap. Me personally, I would consult a lawyer
I came back on here after I heard Joshua Moon air illegal threats on YouTube to harass me with some thug creeps he'd hire off the blackmarket and send to my door -- that I will not hesitate to call the cops for anyone not an actual and real law enforcement officer who is Trespassing on my land and/or use deadly force if necessary. I made my point and now I'd like to step away again.

"I'm still mad as hell, and I don't have time
To go 'round and 'round and 'round
" 🎶


 
I came back on here after I heard Joshua Moon air illegal threats on YouTube to harass me with some thug creeps he'd hire off the blackmarket and send to my door -- that I will not hesitate to call the cops for anyone not an actual and real law enforcement officer who is Trespassing on my land and/or use deadly force if necessary. I made my point and now I'd like to step away again.
I don't think he said anything about thugs hired off the black market, I think he was talking about legitimate collection agency.
Doing any business with unlicensed thugs would be both stupid and unethical.

"I'm still mad as hell, and I don't have time

To go 'round and 'round and 'round
" 🎶
That's your go-to mad quote? Most people go with this:

Nice visuals in terms of playing with light, shadow and color but very forgettable music.
 
There's no such thing as a day to yourself when you're breastfeeding. Ecological breastfeeding requires the baby with the mother all the time. Also, I don't believe in mother-child separation before the age of 5. I don't leave any of my children under the age of 5 with anyone, other than Marshall because he's a parent figure.
So your kids are going to end up unhealthily attached to you and unable to fare in the real world, got it.
I just don't even know what else would I do other than take a bike ride? I want to do more kayaking but when you're breastfeeding and pregnant all the time, you can't just get in a kayak and leave down the river.
That's really sad. And not healthy. I feel bad for you that you've ended up pigeonholed to the point where you can't do the outdoorsy stuff you love in solitude with God and nature.
 
So your kids are going to end up unhealthily attached to you and unable to fare in the real world, got it.

That's really sad. And not healthy. I feel bad for you that you've ended up pigeonholed to the point where you can't do the outdoorsy stuff you love in solitude with God and nature.
She can't fare in the real world either. Without welfare her and her fetal alcohol brood would have rightly starved by now.

The only thing she knows how to do is get "pigeonholed". It's her only skill in life...Being a fuckhole for Marshall tier men.
 
Back