Mike Peinovich / Mike Enoch & The Right Stuff (therightstuff.biz) - Lazy Podcasting Clique, Pepe the Frog Fetishists, Doxed by /pol/, Fed Honeypot for Gullible Neo-Nazi Conspiracy Theorists.

[Boingo]

He didn't have the balls to be honest and tell Destiny that Classical Music is better than rap because it was made by Whites and that rap is culture poison. So instead he kinda tried to dance around the issue.

I'm not even talking about the content of his arguments. Just his entire way of talking and communicating seems... idk... slow?
I'm not a regular TRS listener so I was wondering if it's a thing people take notice of.

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

I'm not even talking about the content of his arguments. Just his entire way of talking and communicating seems... idk... slow?
I'm not a regular TRS listener so I was wondering if it's a thing people take notice of.

Striker is many things but slow is not one of them. In fact, it’s pretty much the opposite; if we eventually found out he was on coke or speed, I would not be surprised. If you mean mentally, he tends to rattle off various things that check out.

The issue with him is that he really seems to believe Americans actually want National Bolshevism. NJP is never going to get traction primarily because Duginism-Strasserism is fundamentally incompatible with American culture and has been so historically to boot. It’s something only a small segment of the population wants. The only successful politician who came close was Huey Long but he was a populist who was very effective at using the bully pulpit to get the job done. Very fundamental differences between Long and what NJP proposes.

 

[Rekkington]

Striker is many things but slow is not one of them. In fact, it’s pretty much the opposite; if we eventually found out he was on coke or speed, I would not be surprised. If you mean mentally, he tends to rattle off various things that check out.

The issue with him is that he really seems to believe Americans actually want National Bolshevism. NJP is never going to get traction primarily because Duginism-Strasserism is fundamentally incompatible with American culture and has been so historically to boot. It’s something only a small segment of the population wants. The only successful politician who came close was Huey Long but he was a populist who was very effective at using the bully pulpit to get the job done. Very fundamental differences between Long and what NJP proposes.

Striker needs to feel comfortable in his own skin. Every time he takes the stage at NJP he looks like he wants to collapse into insects and fly away. I'm about to put him up on my shoulders like a cool dad and march him up there.

 

[wholetthegodsout]

I honestly want trump to come back and win a non consecutive second term just to hear the blackpilling on TDS

 

[brentkanaris]

He didn't have the balls to be honest and tell Destiny that Classical Music is better than rap because it was made by Whites and that rap is culture poison. So instead he kinda tried to dance around the issue.

You don’t have to know music theory to know classical music is better than subversive Jew Nigger rap.

Dumb takes on music imo.

 

[NEETzsche]

Yeah finkelthink sounds like they basically made up a term to describe a concept of a “managed dialectic” except putting the TRS Jew centric spin on it.

Another thing is the “kosher sandwich”. Which is really pretty much the idea of the Overton window just repackaged with Jews controlling the window.


Mess? Mike Enoch said it was a wild success and propaganda victory

In practice, "finkelthink" means "any political ideas that contradict our own."

 

[NSJAP]

 

[NSJAP]

-"our failure was that we were too successful, and not ready for the success"
-"we where not ready for what was coming"

 

[Yuri_]

So I saw 4chan's summary of a new woke series that's come out recently. The podcast named within the show sounds like it might have been based on TDS

heh

 

[Gnillik Yot]

So I saw 4chan's summary of a new woke series that's come out recently. The podcast named within the show sounds like it might have been based on TDS

heh

View attachment 2607445

Okay, you're probably going to want to rate this post autistic or mad at the internet, but I can't fucking stand when people make up lies about a movie or show in order to advance culture war bullshit. The movie in question is woke, but it's not even one tenth as anti-white as this anon makes it out to be. Some of the points mentioned in this 4chan post are true, but he got most of them wrong. I'll address each point:

1. Yes, the cast is diverse.

2. Yes, this one is right too.

3. Yeah, one of them is non-binary. Right again.

4. There are two speeches about the evil of the white man, but one of them is said ironically by the villain. Then there are a few sarcastic quips. So this point is wrong.

5. No, it is never said in the movie that being white is not a valid identity. This point is also wrong.

6. Killer exclusively murders whites? No! This is a lie, and shows me that this 4chan user probably didn't see the movie. The murderer (who is white) repeatedly tries to murder the black girl protagonist. He also targets a Hispanic man. And he tries to murder several non-white students in the climax.

7. Yes, the first person murdered is murdered for being homophobic. And later on, the killer murders the main gay boy. So, wtf is the point this 4chan user is trying to make? The killer murders both the homophobe and the gay the homophobe was bullying. This is a stupid point.

8. Yes, the second victim is a white girl who starred in a podcast very similar to TRS. But the movie doesn't condone this. The killer is the BAD GUY. Duh.

9. Point 9 is another lie and more proof that this anon scum hasn't seen the movie. The collector of Nazi memorabilia is NOT THE THIRD VICTIM, HE IS THE KILLER!

10. No, the characters are not portrayed as flawless. Most of the main characters are portrayed as heavily flawed. The main character accidentally killed another girl in a drunken accident and hates herself. Another lie from this anon.

11. No, the killer is NOT the only white dude in the main cast. The gay guy, who he killed, is a main character and also white. Another lie.

12. Yes, the killer did say he did it because he was proud to be white. This is a change from the book, where his motivation was more complicated. But the villain's speech undermines his actions. He killed multiple whites, including a Nazi girl. He said he was punishing them for their sins. So this part of the movie contradicts itself.

13. Yep, the main character mocks the villain for being a "fragile white." But again, this supposedly pro-white villain spent half the movie killing white kids. And eventually, the main character emphasizes with the victims.

This movie is being described (outside of 4chan) as an anti-cancel culture story. A few liberals have written bad reviews of it. Since the villain murders people who have cancelable secrets - like the homophobe and the girl with the TRS inspired podcast.
If 4Chan wants to see a recent horror film that glorifies the murder of white people, it should watch the recent Candyman. Not this movie, which while still very woke, tried to critique cancel culture and shows how it's main characters were WRONG for not right away emphasizing with the white victims of the (also white) killer. Because they were targeted next.

 

[BaidinBriste]

Okay, you're probably going to want to rate this post autistic or mad at the internet, but I can't fucking stand when people make up lies about a movie or show in order to advance culture war bullshit. The movie in question is woke, but it's not even one tenth as anti-white as this anon makes it out to be. Some of the points mentioned in this 4chan post are true, but he got most of them wrong. I'll address each point:

1. Yes, the cast is diverse.

2. Yes, this one is right too.

3. Yeah, one of them is non-binary. Right again.

4. There are two speeches about the evil of the white man, but one of them is said ironically by the villain. Then there are a few sarcastic quips. So this point is wrong.

5. No, it is never said in the movie that being white is not a valid identity. This point is also wrong.

6. Killer exclusively murders whites? No! This is a lie, and shows me that this 4chan user probably didn't see the movie. The murderer (who is white) repeatedly tries to murder the black girl protagonist. He also targets a Hispanic man. And he tries to murder several non-white students in the climax.

7. Yes, the first person murdered is murdered for being homophobic. And later on, the killer murders the main gay boy. So, wtf is the point this 4chan user is trying to make? The killer murders both the homophobe and the gay the homophobe was bullying. This is a stupid point.

8. Yes, the second victim is a white girl who starred in a podcast very similar to TRS. But the movie doesn't condone this. The killer is the BAD GUY. Duh.

9. Point 9 is another lie and more proof that this anon scum hasn't seen the movie. The collector of Nazi memorabilia is NOT THE THIRD VICTIM, HE IS THE KILLER!

10. No, the characters are not portrayed as flawless. Most of the main characters are portrayed as heavily flawed. The main character accidentally killed another girl in a drunken accident and hates herself. Another lie from this anon.

11. No, the killer is NOT the only white dude in the main cast. The gay guy, who he killed, is a main character and also white. Another lie.

12. Yes, the killer did say he did it because he was proud to be white. This is a change from the book, where his motivation was more complicated. But the villain's speech undermines his actions. He killed multiple whites, including a Nazi girl. He said he was punishing them for their sins. So this part of the movie contradicts itself.

13. Yep, the main character mocks the villain for being a "fragile white." But again, this supposedly pro-white villain spent half the movie killing white kids. And eventually, the main character emphasizes with the victims.

This movie is being described (outside of 4chan) as an anti-cancel culture story. A few liberals have written bad reviews of it. Since the villain murders people who have cancelable secrets - like the homophobe and the girl with the TRS inspired podcast.
If 4Chan wants to see a recent horror film that glorifies the murder of white people, it should watch the recent Candyman. Not this movie, which while still very woke, tried to critique cancel culture and shows how it's main characters were WRONG for not right away emphasizing with the white victims of the (also white) killer. Because they were targeted next.

lol calm down.

 

[Gnillik Yot]

lol calm down.

Worry not, son. The rant is over.

 

[GordonRameses]

Okay, you're probably going to want to rate this post autistic or mad at the internet, but I can't fucking stand when people make up lies about a movie or show in order to advance culture war bullshit. The movie in question is woke, but it's not even one tenth as anti-white as this anon makes it out to be. Some of the points mentioned in this 4chan post are true, but he got most of them wrong. I'll address each point:

1. Yes, the cast is diverse.

2. Yes, this one is right too.

3. Yeah, one of them is non-binary. Right again.

4. There are two speeches about the evil of the white man, but one of them is said ironically by the villain. Then there are a few sarcastic quips. So this point is wrong.

5. No, it is never said in the movie that being white is not a valid identity. This point is also wrong.

6. Killer exclusively murders whites? No! This is a lie, and shows me that this 4chan user probably didn't see the movie. The murderer (who is white) repeatedly tries to murder the black girl protagonist. He also targets a Hispanic man. And he tries to murder several non-white students in the climax.

7. Yes, the first person murdered is murdered for being homophobic. And later on, the killer murders the main gay boy. So, wtf is the point this 4chan user is trying to make? The killer murders both the homophobe and the gay the homophobe was bullying. This is a stupid point.

8. Yes, the second victim is a white girl who starred in a podcast very similar to TRS. But the movie doesn't condone this. The killer is the BAD GUY. Duh.

9. Point 9 is another lie and more proof that this anon scum hasn't seen the movie. The collector of Nazi memorabilia is NOT THE THIRD VICTIM, HE IS THE KILLER!

10. No, the characters are not portrayed as flawless. Most of the main characters are portrayed as heavily flawed. The main character accidentally killed another girl in a drunken accident and hates herself. Another lie from this anon.

11. No, the killer is NOT the only white dude in the main cast. The gay guy, who he killed, is a main character and also white. Another lie.

12. Yes, the killer did say he did it because he was proud to be white. This is a change from the book, where his motivation was more complicated. But the villain's speech undermines his actions. He killed multiple whites, including a Nazi girl. He said he was punishing them for their sins. So this part of the movie contradicts itself.

13. Yep, the main character mocks the villain for being a "fragile white." But again, this supposedly pro-white villain spent half the movie killing white kids. And eventually, the main character emphasizes with the victims.

This movie is being described (outside of 4chan) as an anti-cancel culture story. A few liberals have written bad reviews of it. Since the villain murders people who have cancelable secrets - like the homophobe and the girl with the TRS inspired podcast.
If 4Chan wants to see a recent horror film that glorifies the murder of white people, it should watch the recent Candyman. Not this movie, which while still very woke, tried to critique cancel culture and shows how it's main characters were WRONG for not right away emphasizing with the white victims of the (also white) killer. Because they were targeted next.

the fact the only other white male character is a gay says it all. It's a growing trend of making the heroes "diverse" aka not white and keeping white male roles at a minimum or having some qualifier like gay, trans, villain. etc.

 

[NSJAP]

Media2Rise NJP short documentary released

Media2rise - National Justice Party

Follow the Media2Rise crew as we go behind the scenes with the American based National Justice Party and interview its board members as well as speak with those in attendance. To continue making thes...

odysee.com

 

[123456789]

Media2Rise NJP short documentary released

Media2rise - National Justice Party

Follow the Media2Rise crew as we go behind the scenes with the American based National Justice Party and interview its board members as well as speak with those in attendance. To continue making thes...

odysee.com

13:55

Mike: It's gonna be a long and uphill battle because the republican party is so entrenched, but we want to discredit them in the eyes of more and more people and have more and more people see us as the thing they can trust, and eventually we will be standing in elections.

interesting

 

[tantric_depressive]

Okay, you're probably going to want to rate this post autistic or mad at the internet, but I can't fucking stand when people make up lies about a movie or show in order to advance culture war bullshit. The movie in question is woke, but it's not even one tenth as anti-white as this anon makes it out to be. Some of the points mentioned in this 4chan post are true, but he got most of them wrong. I'll address each point:

1. Yes, the cast is diverse.

2. Yes, this one is right too.

3. Yeah, one of them is non-binary. Right again.

4. There are two speeches about the evil of the white man, but one of them is said ironically by the villain. Then there are a few sarcastic quips. So this point is wrong.

5. No, it is never said in the movie that being white is not a valid identity. This point is also wrong.

6. Killer exclusively murders whites? No! This is a lie, and shows me that this 4chan user probably didn't see the movie. The murderer (who is white) repeatedly tries to murder the black girl protagonist. He also targets a Hispanic man. And he tries to murder several non-white students in the climax.

7. Yes, the first person murdered is murdered for being homophobic. And later on, the killer murders the main gay boy. So, wtf is the point this 4chan user is trying to make? The killer murders both the homophobe and the gay the homophobe was bullying. This is a stupid point.

8. Yes, the second victim is a white girl who starred in a podcast very similar to TRS. But the movie doesn't condone this. The killer is the BAD GUY. Duh.

9. Point 9 is another lie and more proof that this anon scum hasn't seen the movie. The collector of Nazi memorabilia is NOT THE THIRD VICTIM, HE IS THE KILLER!

10. No, the characters are not portrayed as flawless. Most of the main characters are portrayed as heavily flawed. The main character accidentally killed another girl in a drunken accident and hates herself. Another lie from this anon.

11. No, the killer is NOT the only white dude in the main cast. The gay guy, who he killed, is a main character and also white. Another lie.

12. Yes, the killer did say he did it because he was proud to be white. This is a change from the book, where his motivation was more complicated. But the villain's speech undermines his actions. He killed multiple whites, including a Nazi girl. He said he was punishing them for their sins. So this part of the movie contradicts itself.

13. Yep, the main character mocks the villain for being a "fragile white." But again, this supposedly pro-white villain spent half the movie killing white kids. And eventually, the main character emphasizes with the victims.

This movie is being described (outside of 4chan) as an anti-cancel culture story. A few liberals have written bad reviews of it. Since the villain murders people who have cancelable secrets - like the homophobe and the girl with the TRS inspired podcast.
If 4Chan wants to see a recent horror film that glorifies the murder of white people, it should watch the recent Candyman. Not this movie, which while still very woke, tried to critique cancel culture and shows how it's main characters were WRONG for not right away emphasizing with the white victims of the (also white) killer. Because they were targeted next.

I might agree with you if it wasn't for the very key : a. "the killer did say he did it because he was proud to be white." and b. "the main character mocks the villain for being a "fragile white." "
I'd say that any good the movie says it's trying to do against 'cancel culture ' is more than cancelled out when being proud to be white is equated to serial murder, and "white fragility" is considered an actual valid thing, instead of the massive cope of hypocritical projection it is in reality.
One easy test to let oneself know if a movie is pozzed libshit gayopoganda is to reverse the races and ask if it could still be made today. Would a white hero of a movie be allowed to kill a black villain and quip about the villain's blackness ? " DIE, BOOK-ALLERGIC NEGRA!"

 

[Gnillik Yot]

I might agree with you if it wasn't for the very key : a. "the killer did say he did it because he was proud to be white." and b. "the main character mocks the villain for being a "fragile white." "
I'd say that any good the movie says it's trying to do against 'cancel culture ' is more than cancelled out when being proud to be white is equated to serial murder, and "white fragility" is considered an actual valid thing, instead of the massive cope of hypocritical projection it is in reality.
One easy test to let oneself know if a movie is pozzed libshit gayopoganda is to reverse the races and ask if it could still be made today. Would a white hero of a movie be allowed to kill a black villain and quip about the villain's blackness ? " DIE, BOOK-ALLERGIC NEGRA!"

Yeah, I agree with you that it's woke

I might agree with you if it wasn't for the very key : a. "the killer did say he did it because he was proud to be white." and b. "the main character mocks the villain for being a "fragile white." "
I'd say that any good the movie says it's trying to do against 'cancel culture ' is more than cancelled out when being proud to be white is equated to serial murder, and "white fragility" is considered an actual valid thing, instead of the massive cope of hypocritical projection it is in reality.
One easy test to let oneself know if a movie is pozzed libshit gayopoganda is to reverse the races and ask if it could still be made today. Would a white hero of a movie be allowed to kill a black villain and quip about the villain's blackness ? " DIE, BOOK-ALLERGIC NEGRA!"

Yeah good point. I won't deny that this film is ultra-woke. It has flavors of anti-white racism like you mentioned. Still, not as bad as movies like Candyman (where the killing of white teens is justified) or Get Out. The redeeming feature of this film is it's stance against cancel culture.
But yeah, it still has annoying anti-white lines.

 

[66andtwothirds]

NJP article already out shitting on the dead britbong mp.

archive https://web.archive.org/web/2021101...omali-was-strong-supporter-black-lives-matter

 

[berenstain]

I haven't really followed this thing too closely but I was under the impression that they a) married in a state with open records, b) nobody ever found a record of their divorce, c) Mike Enoch said the divorce records were under seal and that d) even if the records were under seal there'd be at least a record of their existence.

Also, let's not forget that his wife did appear on their podcast more than once when TRS was still a bunch of racist postlibertarians shooting the shit before becoming GAS THE KIKES RACE WAR NAO gnatzee types.

Keep coping , he let his Jew wife on the show, and there’s still no divorce record .

What you fags don’t understand is that the only people who listen to TRS are actively looking for that kind of content, they don’t spread any message.

I know some people, including my past self, have disputed Mike's divorce from his wife Amy "Ames" Friedman. It just seemed too convenient of an excuse, because in NYC divorce records are sealed from the public and are not freely searchable. She was allegedly a "based and red-pilled" contributor to TRS herself, "only half-Jewish," and there could have been a variety of factors unknown to us preventing a divorce. If Mike, who is known to constantly shift his story, lied about his wife for years, why wouldn’t he lie about his divorce? Every time someone would bring it up, Mike would get red in the face and say he was legally barred from discussing details.

However, it was known that Amy went to live in Michigan with her mother after the dox. I don’t know anything about divorce law, especially divorces that cross state lines, but I searched through Oakland county's court records and lo and behold:

Case Number
2017-856941-DO



I'm not exactly sure what this is, and I'm not willing to spend anything for these documents to find out, but "RECORD OF DIVORCE/ANNULMENT SENT TO STATE" is enough for me. This is personally the first time I have seen evidence that the divorce occurred.

Now for an excerpt from Andrew Marantz's aptly named Antisocial.

“[Mike Enoch's mother] always liked Mike Enoch’s wife—“ex-wife, I guess I should say”—and had recently sent her a birthday card. The ex-wife, in her response, wrote, “I wish I could push a reset button on my life.”
“The last time Mike E. was here, I told him about that note,” his mother said. “He was sitting at the dining-room table, right over there, and when I told him those words he just burst into tears.”

And so ends a decades long romance, all to gain internet-Nazi clout.

 

[Sargon's wife's son]

I know some people, including my past self, have disputed Mike's divorce from his wife Amy "Ames" Friedman. It just seemed too convenient of an excuse, because in NYC divorce records are sealed from the public and are not freely searchable. She was allegedly a "based and red-pilled" contributor to TRS herself, "only half-Jewish," and there could have been a variety of factors unknown to us preventing a divorce. If Mike, who is known to constantly shift his story, lied about his wife for years, why wouldn’t he lie about his divorce? Every time someone would bring it up, Mike would get red in the face and say he was legally barred from discussing details.

However, it was known that Amy went to live in Michigan with her mother after the dox. I don’t know anything about divorce law, especially divorces that cross state lines, but I searched through Oakland county's court records and lo and behold:

Case Number
2017-856941-DO

View attachment 2635972

I'm not exactly sure what this is, and I'm not willing to spend anything for these documents to find out, but "RECORD OF DIVORCE/ANNULMENT SENT TO STATE" is enough for me. This is personally the first time I have seen evidence that the divorce occurred.

Now for an excerpt from Andrew Marantz's aptly named Antisocial.


And so ends a decades long romance, all to gain internet-Nazi clout.

And these are the people who want to traditionalist to side with them people undermine the sanctity of marriage because a bunch of the retarded fans can't deal with the fact that the leader has a Jewish wife
Is random people on the internet can pressure you into divorcing your wife who you been married to for 10 years
Yeah I'm not going to follow you into anything