US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Billy Beer, Splinters RCVD, GenderCop and 22 others
Click to expand...
An Avenging Bird said:
It's clear as day to me that the majority of what this Administration and subordinate leftists in government have been doing is desperately trying to provoke a hostile reaction so they have an excuse to call in the UN troops and seize guns pre-dawn.
Regardless, it is going to happen one way or another and thus I have sworn to survive long enough to see all these creatures exterminated by either the actual Communist power structure or the 0.001% chance the "patriots are in control."
Click to expand...

The UN couldn't handle a bunch of black people with machetes.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Isaac Clarke, Francis York Morgan, Luck Skeleton and 12 others
...Activists storm out of meeting with Biden...
Archived: https://archive.vn/JrY4l By: SSF2T Old User

"Before leaving the meeting, the activist accused Biden of "playing politics with human lives." "



Ahhh, relaxation.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Isaac Clarke, the fall of man, Francis York Morgan and 24 others
Kuritan Deplorable said:
Private Security don't even pretend to be motivated by duty, obligation, or serving a greater good, they're in it for the cash, and you can't spend it when you're dead. They'll turn tail faster than the gestapo soyboys in
Click to expand...
I think with the way selective prosecution is going there's every chance that the system will devolve into poor or insufficient policing for the normal population while the rich and politically connected will have the ability to draw on private security that can, with the cooperation of friendly DAs etc, operate with an impunity that the left currently only think police have in their worst fever dreams.
We saw it with private contractors in the forever war operating without having to worry about the UCMJ



Also Someone needs to post the virgin UN in USA meme for all the doomers talking about un intervention in the us. That's substantially less likely than a hot civil war and that's unlikely af.


Most of the pajeets and assorted other mudbloods would desert to go work picking fruit anyway
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Isaac Clarke, Luck Skeleton, LurkNoMore and 6 others
CaesarCzech said:
At this rate somebody is going to write "Gehenna the Steven Bannon-like figure and Political Mastermind of Infamous Harasment forum known as Kiwifarms" seriously when people point at this forum being trash because of pissed as hell Burn it all raged out fools like me well i appreciate being to use you as counterpoint in itself.
Click to expand...
And I would politely request them to never say that again. I feel weird enough as is with the occasional tepid praise on here, something like that would just... uhg.

Absolutego said:
I mean the man was fighting blood cancer, even with reduced symptoms due to the vax he was likely to die.
I really don't see the point in using Powell's death to advocate for or against the effectiveness of the vax, he was immunocompromised and very elderly.
Click to expand...
Because it takes a sledgehammer to their deification of the vaccine. If this were merely an argument of "Pro vs Anti Covid Vaccine" I'd say his death provides nothing. But instead, it's framed from the left as "The Most Holy Perfect Vaccine Which Can Never Fail vs. The Horrid Evil Plague Rats Who Want everyone to Die".

Oxous said:
Even if she is wanting to resign, she's apparently making Build Back Better passing a requirement for that to happen. Which... probably isn't ever going to happen.
Click to expand...
Source? I haven't heard anything about her making her retirement contingent on Biden's agenda.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Isaac Clarke, the fall of man, Justa Grata Honoria and 6 others
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Isaac Clarke, madethistocomment, Luck Skeleton and 10 others
The Last Stand said:
TL: DR, don't fuck with American Whites.
Click to expand...
Give some of the other Americans some credit. I'm sure the Roof Koreans would make a good showing of themselves in such a situation.

Panama said:
The bounties on their gear alone would knock out a few thousand. How many niggas would dome a blue helmet to get their hands on a FAMAS?
Click to expand...
memed-io-output.jpeg

Someone would be happy to see these being imported in large numbers, at least.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: 6thRanger, Isaac Clarke, the fall of man and 19 others
Corn Flakes said:
Give some of the other Americans some credit. I'm sure the Roof Koreans would make a good showing of themselves in such a situation.
Click to expand...
Honestly, I think even the hoodiest of hood rats would make a good showing of it. In a theoretical situation where the U.N. helps, what troops would be sent? The Blue Helmets? An untested, inexperienced military unit with a divided command structure that gets the dregs of modern military equipment?

Well, those guys are going to find the average gang banger in Chicago has a higher body count than them and more experience in a gunfight.

Alright, those guys would be dead in a week if heavy fighting ever occurred. So who else do we got? Basically, the Military Police of various nations. No, not the full on military. No western country would want the horrid press that comes with sending in actual ground troops to invade the U.S., and countries like China would just laugh and do nothing because it serves their interests best. So see above for descriptions of those forces.

This is why it would never happen. It'd be a meat grinder, with no pay off.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Isaac Clarke, the fall of man, Francis York Morgan and 19 others
Oxous said:
Literally anudda 1/6!
View attachment 2637005
View attachment 2637006
Click to expand...
I'm convinced taking up a fourth of the screen with the flailings of what I can only assume is language is actually intended to distract, annoy, and disrupt thinking about what was said. Its harder to focus on mannerisms and intonation of the speaker, and afterward its harder to recall details. Its like trying to read a wiki with flashing ads. I doubt anyone was actually clamoring for sign language imposed on government channels. We already transcribe all this shit, and the rest of us shouldn't have to deal with the gesticulations of retarded handtalk, supposedly to benefit the bitter no-hearo superminority.
 
  • Feels
  • Informative
Reactions: thyme's up, naaaaiiiiillllll!!!, greengrilledcheese and 3 others
Gehenna said:
Honestly, I think even the hoodiest of hood rats would make a good showing of it. In a theoretical situation where the U.N. helps, what troops would be sent? The Blue Helmets? An untested, inexperienced military unit with a divided command structure that gets the dregs of modern military equipment?

Well, those guys are going to find the average gang banger in Chicago has a higher body count than them and more experience in a gunfight.

Alright, those guys would be dead in a week if heavy fighting ever occurred. So who else do we got? Basically, the Military Police of various nations. No, not the full on military. No western country would want the horrid press that comes with sending in actual ground troops to invade the U.S., and countries like China would just laugh and do nothing because it serves their interests best. So see above for descriptions of those forces.

This is why it would never happen. It'd be a meat grinder, with no pay off.
Click to expand...
By the way, utilizing political theory it's not hard to figure out how such a scenario would go from a tactical standpoint... much to the chagrin of anyone actually trying to do it.

Absolutely most basic, simplified form. Whatever you put into a project should at least return something of equal worth. So however much force and political capital any supporting countries put in, they'd expect to get back. So, why is this incredibly basic concept so important -here-? Well, put simply, there really isn't much to gain from aiding the U.S. in some sort of Civil War scenario, which is the only scenario to get U.N troops on American soil. Long-term favors only go so far, specifically because they are long-term. Anything that would be paid back past a decade is basically worthless and sees decreasing worth until then. And a civil war scenario sees the U.S. requiring at least a decade to merely obtain proper functionality, let alone the ability to pay debts.

So, political theory says that aiding the U.S. has literally no returns. At all. Any support would need to be done out of either obligation or due to cashing in favor by the U.S. So, knowing this what kind of support would be expected?

Simply put, all those fancy U.N. troops and military police will get to set up, sit down, and play pure defense. And only defense. They'd be used soley for securing static targets. Meaning any offensive maneuvers, moving of supplies, and anything actually proactive would need to be the U.S. alone.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Isaac Clarke, the fall of man, Justa Grata Honoria and 4 others
Gehenna said:
Source? I haven't heard anything about her making her retirement contingent on Biden's agenda.
Click to expand...
I was quoting the article that I replied to.
During a segment on “Sunday Morning Features,” Bartiromo said that sources had told her that Pelosi is stepping down after Democrats pass Joe Biden’s Build Back Better agenda.

“First, this morning is exclusive, sources tell Sunday Morning Futures there is speculation swirling in Washington that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi may step down after getting the massive spending package through,” she said.

“So all those Democrat members who had their arms twisted to vote on the multitrillion-dollar package and put their own reelection in jeopardy may be fuming to learn that the speaker could be planning a cut and run,” she added.
Click to expand...
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Gehenna said:
That... says the exact opposite of what you said, and I really need to take this with some salt. It's saying that once it passed she'd basically resign right there, not that she is holding out for it.
Click to expand...
Huh? I don't think she's stepping down, personally - would like to hear at the very least more media figures saying "sources told me..." before getting my hopes up - but I interpreted Bartiromo's source's claims as meaning both of those things. "I'll resign after BBB passes" is just a different saying of "Hey, if you pass BBB through Congress, I'll go". Unless I missed something or phrased myself wrong, idk.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back