Artcow Shaddai Prejean / Shädman / Shadman / Shädbase / Shad / TheShadling - Pedophile Web Artist. Edgelord. Alleged Heroin Addict. Drew Porn of His Mother. Charged with Assault with a Deadly Weapon. Legally a "Menace to Society" in Switzerland. TAKE IT EZ BABE!!!

Cory likes shemales, not children. Has he drawn loli at some point? Probably since he came from the same edgy community but hes a dickgirl man through and through.

Considering how many of the NG guys have distanced themselves from Shad (Cory fighting with him, Chris cutting him off, Johnny Utah I know tweeted at one point that drawing loli is disgusting), they prolly realized he would never change from drawing loli garbage. Think they all also want to be more professional as well and you can't really look too professional associating with the dude that draws lewd children all the time.
u6RxnvWRsW.png
What Jeff said in response to Shad going off the rails recently

Also, to all the people asking about how Shadman has stayed in the United States so long/questions about whether or not he has a visa- Shad's father is American. It is basically guaranteed that he has dual citizenship.
 
Shad is that edgy 2000's teenager who wears trenchcoats to school and has copies of the Matrix, Linkin Park, low quality porn and gruesome death videos downloaded from Rotten.com burned onto CDs next to his computer, who somehow forgot that he wasn't living in 2006, but 2016.
 
View attachment 2638055
What Jeff said in response to Shad going off the rails recently

Also, to all the people asking about how Shadman has stayed in the United States so long/questions about whether or not he has a visa- Shad's father is American. It is basically guaranteed that he has dual citizenship.
Holy fucking shit, lmao. Looking at that, I don't think Jeff was ever civil with Shad. I don't even remember if they shared a Sleepycabin episode at some point.
 
I agree that what you draw is more important than what you claim. I don't know if it would be as hard as you think, I think it's pretty obvious when a character is a loli. These things really aren't hidden in anyway.

As for stated art of high schoolers getting raped, like in hentai, I think when they are outright admitting its underage porn I don't see why we shouldn't ban it.
My issue is that we shouldn't conflate the suffering of actual children getting their lives ruined by actual pedophiles to people whacking off to loli.

I know actual child abuse victims who are fucking furious that morons on Twitter want to bring fictional characters who can't feel pain to the same level as the amount of suffering they went through.

How would you feel if someone intentionally ruins your life for their own pleasure only to find out that a few years later a bunch of people who never suffered the way you did are saying what you went through is as bad as a non-living entity getting porn drawn of them?
 
Holy fucking shit, lmao. Looking at that, I don't think Jeff was ever civil with Shad. I don't even remember if they shared a Sleepycabin episode at some point.
They did and Shad was overly autistic in it. Talking about survival of the fittest and what not.
Edit: Just a clip from one the eps that had both of them in it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dF8ZSMnJd3E
2:36 shad makes a kid fucking joke lmao.
 
My issue is that we shouldn't conflate the suffering of actual children getting their lives ruined by actual pedophiles to people whacking off to loli.

I know actual child abuse victims who are fucking furious that morons on Twitter want to bring fictional characters who can't feel pain to the same level as the amount of suffering they went through.

How would you feel if someone intentionally ruins your life for their own pleasure only to find out that a few years later a bunch of people who never suffered the way you did are saying what you went through is as bad as a non-living entity getting porn drawn of them?
The issue is that the longer you talk about the differences in ethics of finding children sexy and raping children the more you look like a pedophile with an agenda. How about we just put them all up against the wall?
 
The issue is that the longer you talk about the differences in ethics of finding children sexy and raping children the more you look like a pedophile with an agenda. How about we just put them all up against the wall?
Because we don't operate on that standard? There's a massive difference between a child suffering in real life and someone drawing a picture I might personally find morally objectionable.

The one hurting actual people is scum and deserves the assraping in prison. The person drawing the art is a creep and I wouldn't go near them, but I wouldn't condone them to death.
 
My issue is that we shouldn't conflate the suffering of actual children getting their lives ruined by actual pedophiles to people whacking off to loli.
To believe this, you’d have to think 100% of lolicons will NEVER act on their desires and that’s just exceptionally wrong, so you also believe no one in the furry community fucks dogs 🐕
 
Wasn't this stupid fuck a draft dodger too- and that's the whole reason he had to leave Switzerland (a country that usually cares so much for their citizens each Swiss family is given their own little fallout shelter in the alps free of charge)?

He'll fit right in in LA.
No. According to him(shad) he finished his conscription. In sleepycabin episode S1 E27 "sharks" shad says it like this...
1. Shad uploads his "art" to his site.
2. Shad links to his site, when he applies to his art university.
3. He gets invited by the head of the university to a "random building in Zurich", where two men, one a criminal Psychologist, another from the justice department, who block him from Uni, make him sign a paper saying he is a "Menace to Society", and order him to report himself to his local police.
4. He gets home, Turns himself into the police, is interrogated by the police, who make him delete his site, fine him 2,800 swiss francs, and let him go.
5. He goes to fulfill his mandatory conscription, finishes it, and leaves.
There is no hard and fast way to my knowledge to verify if his story is accurate, (swiss government records don't appear to be open to the public) but judging by his details of his service he is telling the truth here.

Was looking around for info and found this...
SVyIvTU.jpg

Someone on Reddit commented on this:
"This is a Sig SG 550 that was issued to Shaddai Prejean, AKA: Shädman. As a male Swiss citizen, he took part in compulsory military service and kept this assigned rifle, which he most definitely made his own."
Another pointed out :
"Fuck he's Swiss? I'm kind of ashamed.

But you guys need to calm it. These rifles cost a 100 bucks to keep after service and are neutered to semi-automatic. It's not like he's doing this to an expensive historic relic.
Also it's not like sharpie is permanent. A quick rundown with some rubbing alcohol and it's gone
"
source:

TLDR; He left switzerland because he is effectively(if not officially) a criminal offender there, and being a dual citizen, simply left for america, he did not "draft dodge".
4chan Jannies were deleting all threads on him for the last few weeks while he’s spiraling out on amphetamines, so I’m glad I checked on here. So Oney now has 3 deranged schizophrenics that emerged from his sphere of influence, Stamper, Shad, and TVMaxwell. What the fuck...
None of those "emerged" from oney's "sphere of Influence".
Stamper was stamper well before he met Oney, Shad was Shad well before he met Oney.
Oney is a popular creator with connections to other Newgrounders, the chances he'll meet a crazy person is way higher, once you factor that those traits are autism magnets.
Is there any particular thing that caused his downward spiral?

I wanna say he just got into drugs like an idiot and it was all downhill from here but I get the feeling there was more than just that going on
He's got the autism. It led him down the path of making Lisa Simpson porn. There is no escaping that fate.
 
My issue is that we shouldn't conflate the suffering of actual children getting their lives ruined by actual pedophiles to people whacking off to loli.

I know actual child abuse victims who are fucking furious that morons on Twitter want to bring fictional characters who can't feel pain to the same level as the amount of suffering they went through.

How would you feel if someone intentionally ruins your life for their own pleasure only to find out that a few years later a bunch of people who never suffered the way you did are saying what you went through is as bad as a non-living entity getting porn drawn of them?
No one's saying that what Shad is doing is equivalent to the physical act. They're just saying that we shouldn't normalize the sexualization of minors at all and enable degenerates' fantasies about committing the actual act. Shad has drawn porn of several IRL underaged kids, he's a fucking degenerate pedophile who is a danger to children. People who fap to those drawings are degenerate pedophiles who are a danger to children.

I really don't get it when you people make this argument. Both things are fucking bad, people criticizing one doesn't mean the other is okay or less bad.
 
My issue is that we shouldn't conflate the suffering of actual children getting their lives ruined by actual pedophiles to people whacking off to loli.

I know actual child abuse victims who are fucking furious that morons on Twitter want to bring fictional characters who can't feel pain to the same level as the amount of suffering they went through.

How would you feel if someone intentionally ruins your life for their own pleasure only to find out that a few years later a bunch of people who never suffered the way you did are saying what you went through is as bad as a non-living entity getting porn drawn of them?
And I know actual child abuse victims who are fucking furious that morons on Twitter defend people drawing fetish art of underage characters because they were groomed by greasy degenerates online who sent them loli porn to normalize persuing them sexually. This is a very "I have a friend that is X so therefore it's okay" arguement and not one that holds much merit since most of it is extremely subjective.

Also, Shad actually drew porn art depicting children who exist IRL, such as Keemstar's daughter, so the arguement that it's "just characters" falls very flat in this scenario.
 
To believe this, you’d have to think 100% of lolicons will NEVER act on their desires and that’s just exceptionally wrong, so you also believe no one in the furry community fucks dogs 🐕
If you're going to put words in my mouth make them fun ones like "nigger". I never said someone into lolicon can't be a pedophile or touch real kids. But to assume they all do because one does is wrong.

Same thing with the furry issue. Zoosadists like Kero the Wolf are fucked up and deserve hell for what they do. Other furries who just jerk off to anthro cartoons aren't?
 
Ok so, forgive me for not wanting to look through 255 pages (i'll probably do it during the week), but it seemed like people liked Shadman before? Even in the beginning of this thread you had people going to bat for him:
His comics do seem like satire deliberately made to bait stupid people like the op.
Yeah, he belongs in devart horrors at the most, not his own thread. unless he has some serious sperging and drama going on with him
Coincidentally I listened to some podcast recently where he was a guest, and the guy actually seemed pretty down to earth. This one. Just drawing fucked up shit does not necessarily a lolcow make.

Before it was like "Haha, OP! Get triggered and baited!", but now people greatly dislike him. When did the shift happen?
 
Because we don't operate on that standard? There's a massive difference between a child suffering in real life and someone drawing a picture I might personally find morally objectionable.

The one hurting actual people is scum and deserves the assraping in prison. The person drawing the art is a creep and I wouldn't go near them, but I wouldn't condone them to death.
The amount of "G-guys! It's not the real thing or the real act! P-people who get off to it are just creeps, but I wouldn't want them to die!" sidestepping you're doing is really fucking suspect. I've read the same shit from lolifags on Twitter every time shadman's name comes up or some other degenerate "artist" gets banned from a platform.

That, and you have an anime avatar. Putting two and two together leads me to understand that you're a weeb trying to do damage control for lolifaggotry in the same way a furfag does damage control for zoophilia art.
 
Ok so, forgive me for not wanting to look through 255 pages (i'll probably do it during the week), but it seemed like people liked Shadman before? Even in the beginning of this thread you had people going to bat for him:




Before it was like "Haha, OP! Get triggered and baited!", but now people greatly dislike him. When did the shift happen?
Before the shit with Keem's kid I liked some of the non-porn he made. It was dumb edgy stuff and I myself was dumb and edgy. Plus I liked the people he surrounded himself with at the time. (Sleepycabin) After the Keem incident I didn't my enjoyment for him dropped off a cliff.
 
If you're going to put words in my mouth make them fun ones like "nigger". I never said someone into lolicon can't be a pedophile or touch real kids. But to assume they all do because one does is wrong.

Same thing with the furry issue. Zoosadists like Kero the Wolf are fucked up and deserve hell for what they do. Other furries who just jerk off to anthro cartoons aren't?
I suppose that argument is similar to because one guy who played games shoot up a school all gamers are mass murderers and violent video games are murder simulators.

Guess the issue is, games proved that there exsistance reduced violent crime thus it was prove that games had the opposite effect to what everyone was afraid off.

However lolicon, the jury is out on that. I haven't seen any evidence proving it reduces or increases pedophilla. Some on here have pointed out that it uses to normilize pedophilic thoughts.

But the same was said of grand theft auto increasing violence and normalizing it. So to be honest I am no expect and therefore will wait until we get a good solid answer.
 
The amount of "G-guys! It's not the real thing or the real act! P-people who get off to it are just creeps, but I wouldn't want them to die!" sidestepping you're doing is really fucking suspect. I've read the same shit from lolifags on Twitter every time shadman's name comes up or some other degenerate "artist" gets banned from a platform.

That, and you have an anime avatar. Putting two and two together leads me to understand that you're a weeb trying to do damage control for lolifaggotry in the same way a furfag does damage control for zoophilia art.
Or maybe I'm not a fucking psychopath who wishes death on people who do things I personally don't like. The hard line is "don't touch kids". Why is that so fucking hard to understand?

I'm able to seperate real life from fantasy and the weird way you're going at this makes me suspicious you might be hiding shit in your closet. I think thou doth protest too much.
 
Before the shit with Keem's kid I liked some of the non-porn he made. It was dumb edgy stuff and I myself was dumb and edgy. Plus I liked the people he surrounded himself with at the time. (Sleepycabin) After the Keem incident I didn't my enjoyment for him dropped off a cliff.
Also that Dafne Keen shit was really bad.
 
Back