Culture REEEE! Handmaid Tale’s author Margaret Atwood asks why we can’t say ‘woman’ anymore and the Left lose their damn minds - Someone's about to be eaten by the monster they helped to feed.

Article
___

HOOboy … how long before the Left try to cancel their HERO who wrote their favorite book EVER, Handmaid’s Tale? Someone should probably tell her saying woman is a big no-no now or something because a few hundred people in the country want to erase women since their mere existence is oppressing to them.

Or something.

Hey man, we don’t buy this crap.

And neither does Margaret Atwood:

1634691080469.png
(link to the article)

Guess how this went over?

We know you know people lost their minds but you know, we needed a tie into these ridiculous tweets.

1634690853780.png

Ok, MAN. Tell a woman she can’t say woman.

That reads.

1634690871941.png

Or we can just keep saying women instead of trying to erase them from society.

Who are these people?

1634690903303.png

Boosting women is profoundly disappointing.

Alrighty then.

1634690924318.png


Oh no!

Whatever will she do with only 2.1 million followers left?!

1634690960940.png



Huh?
1634690982914.png

Ok?


1634690992576.png

Anti-trans dog whistle.

This. Is. Ri-damn-diculous.


1634691004819.png

Truly recoiled?

REALLY?


1634691028034.png

1634691043701.png


How pathetic that this is their reaction. They use her book for YEARS to #Resist Trump … maybe instead of trying to cancel her they should listen to her?

Oh, we know they won’t but still.

***
 
Atwood is basically the Ayn Rand of feminism, one of those authors who seems really good to a certain set of readers that explicitly shares her politics while being hysterically incoherent to anyone else.

Troons REEEing is icing on top of a talking cake that someone should have told to shut the fuck up a long time ago. Naturally, in our clown world, only people even more mentally ill than avid Atwood readers are allowed to go there at all.
 
It's funny to see Laura Kate Dale among the angry mob against Feminist Supreme Margaret Atwood because I find him to be one of the trannies who more obviously got into it for fetishistic reasons. Keep in mind that he already gleefully touts himself as a butt fetishist, his Twitter avatar being a cartoon of himself surrounded by asses.
1634696690212.png
 
TERFs are right about the Left’s eventual plan to have state/corporate enforced androgyny. You will take hormones or you’re a bigot.
Feminism wasn't really that far behind. They didn't want people to take hormones, but they wanted society to forget that women are in fact limited by certain biological factors, except of course, when these factors were negative (ETA: ) and convenient for their narrative(/). Say, "please remember women can get pregnant during rape unlike men, but let's not mention that testosterone makes men faster and stronger."

They indeed got what they fucking deserve.
 
Last edited:
I got that one too. And A Raisin in the Sun, which I really didn't mind that much.
To A Raisin in the Sun's credit, it was what allowed me to utter the word "faggot" out loud in class with no repercussions (there's a part where the dad is lambasting some other character for his school uniform).
 
It's funny to see Laura Kate Dale among the angry mob against Feminist Supreme Margaret Atwood because I find him to be one of the trannies who more obviously got into it for fetishistic reasons. Keep in mind that he already gleefully touts himself as a butt fetishist, his Twitter avatar being a cartoon of himself surrounded by asses.
View attachment 2641531
Im familiar with LKD's antics, but I had never noticed that the "cutsy" cartoon avatar was surrounded by butts up until you mentioned it :cryblood: .
aZLDPKSF72_avatar-fb61IdETg.jpg

For those unfamiliar, this is what this stunning and brave autistic womxn actually looks like.
 
Im familiar with LKD's antics, but I had never noticed that the "cutsy" cartoon avatar was surrounded by butts up until you mentioned it :cryblood: .
aZLDPKSF72_avatar-fb61IdETg.jpg

For those unfamiliar, this is what this stunning and brave autistic womxn actually looks like.
Damn, he looks worse than I remember, and still rocking that five-o-clock shadow.
 
I thought "The Handmaid's Tale" was more of a TERF-dominant fiction piece anyway.

Where the fuck did all these pick-me's and trannies come from? Since when did they like this sort of stuff?
Atwood wrote Handmaiden Tales for two reasons:

1. She's a treehugger who wanted to do a story about an infertility crisis caused by pollutions

2. She wanted to do a story that was inspired by the Iranian Revolution which saw womens rights in Iran wiped out and women turned into second class citizens under a theocracy.

She ended up replacing all references to Islam and Muslims to Christianity and Fundie Christians due to her A not wanting to become a pariah amongst her left leaning friends in the literary world and B. because bashing Fundies would give the book a bigger reach with readers.

That said, while it's long been promoted that the book was also anti-second wave anti-porn feminist, it's something that has long been over-exagerated. At best,. the book implies that the anti-porn, TERFs were treated as the version of a "broke clock is alway right once per day" thing by folks like Aunt Lydia. That they had right ideas but let all of their other feminist views distract them from the few "good" things they were about.
 
Atwood wrote Handmaiden Tales for two reasons:

1. She's a treehugger who wanted to do a story about an infertility crisis caused by pollutions

2. She wanted to do a story that was inspired by the Iranian Revolution which saw womens rights in Iran wiped out and women turned into second class citizens under a theocracy.

She ended up replacing all references to Islam and Muslims to Christianity and Fundie Christians due to her A not wanting to become a pariah amongst her left leaning friends in the literary world and B. because bashing Fundies would give the book a bigger reach with readers.

That said, while it's long been promoted that the book was also anti-second wave anti-porn feminist, it's something that has long been over-exagerated. At best,. the book implies that the anti-porn, TERFs were treated as the version of a "broke clock is alway right once per day" thing by folks like Aunt Lydia. That they had right ideas but let all of their other feminist views distract them from the few "good" things they were about.
I don't know...judging what little I've seen from the Hulu version, there seems to be undertones of a weird, "porn for women" theme going on, almost as if a woman had a BDSM/humiliation fetish going on but not as transparently as 50 Shades of Gray or whatever. Even it was only the TV network, is it that crazy a theory?
 
It's just so annoying how they'll gaslight you and tell you things like, "Well akshully, you can say 'woman', but being inclusive means saying 'pregant person'".

So no, you can't actually say "woman/women", according to them. It's simply problematic and exclusionary to not use their "inclusive" language, and they'll ree and cancel you if don't use it.
 
I don't know...judging what little I've seen from the Hulu version, there seems to be undertones of a weird, "porn for women" theme going on, almost as if a woman had a BDSM/humiliation fetish going on but not as transparently as 50 Shades of Gray or whatever. Even it was only the TV network, is it that crazy a theory?
Once again proving that porn for men is far superior at that goal.
 
Back