Aussie Feds have announced the booster roll out to nursing home residents starting beginning next month. The booster will be 'made available' to everyone else in March 2022.
www.sbs.com.au
I must have been hallucinating when I read that the Israelis are already planning the 4th jab
www.axios.com
Oh that's right I wasn't.
You see it's all about building blocks of immunity. It's just the same as the other vaccines. Science, safe and effective, anyway it's not a booster it's a third dose. We totally told you guys that a third dose would be needed. Sure it's going to be mandatory but promise this will be the last one. Lmao.
What you need to know about COVID-19 booster shots after the new Omicron variant
Will the vaccines stop Omicron? The jury is still out. But experts have indicated the current vaccines and booster shots may still offer protection against the new variant.
"A third dose is likely, at this stage, to be the last dose we have to do."
"We know a lot about vaccines from other viruses. With hepatitis, for example, two or three doses is likely to give lifelong immunity. And that is what we hope for these."
I must have been hallucinating when I read that the Israelis are already planning the 4th jab

Israel preparing for potential second round of coronavirus booster shots
Additional doses as booster shots have been strongly opposed by the World Health Organization.

Israel is moving to ensure that it will have enough coronavirus vaccines for a potential second round of booster shots, which would be a fourth dose, Israel's Health Ministry director general Nachman Ash said Sunday, according to Bloomberg.
Oh that's right I wasn't.
You see it's all about building blocks of immunity. It's just the same as the other vaccines. Science, safe and effective, anyway it's not a booster it's a third dose. We totally told you guys that a third dose would be needed. Sure it's going to be mandatory but promise this will be the last one. Lmao.
It was a 3 month trial. They dosed the subject group with 100 times the antibody titre that comes from natural infection. It's almost like they knew their vaccines were complete shit and the antibody levels would start collapsing a few weeks after the jab and so they limited the time and dosed at a high level so it would pass.@Vic Viper T301
I had to look up exactly what Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) and Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) are. They're standard measurements used for assessing all medical treatments in randomized controlled trials. This textbook explains it well and simply: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK63647/ (https://archive.md/pyDSk)
Their example is for a hypothetical randomized trial for a new treatment: 20% of their control group (C) got infected, whereas 12% of the group who got the treatment (T) got infected.
This makes the ARR 8%. That's 20%-12%, the difference of infections between control (C) and treated (T) group.
The RRR is 40%: the formula to get to that is 1-(T/C), so in this example 1-(12%/20%) = 1-(0.6) = 0.4 = 40%
So basically, RRR = 1-(T/C) and ARR = C-T
Rearrange that and you have C = ARR/RRR, and T = ARR/RRR - ARR
For the Covid vaccines we have the ARR and the RRR.
For example in Pfizer: RRR = 0.95, ARR = 0.0084. So you have C = 0.0084/0.95 = 0.01053, and T = 0.01053-0.0084 = 0.0021
So let's say the Pfizer study used 100'000 people in each group (control and treatment). That means that 1053 people in the non-vaccinated group got Covid, whereas 210 people got sick (breakthrough?) despite having the vaccination. So about a fifth. I wouldn't say it "really really doesn't work" but it still seems a bit suboptimal. I don't know how it compares to other traditional vaccines.
Maybe I'm completely off with my maths, correct me if I'm wrong.
The conclusion is that you need both the ARR and the RRR to get a better picture of how the trial worked, if you don't know the percentages that were infected in the two groups.
Why Reuters couldn't just post the simple calculation I just did but instead posted this inconclusive word salad as a "debunk" instead is beyond me: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-thelancet-riskreduction-idUSL2N2NK1XA (https://archive.md/5EOw5)