Horrorcow Tommy Tooter / Thomas Wasserberg - Dog-Abusing, Trash-Eating Pedo, Neo-Nazi, Fake Tranny, "1st-Wave Incel", Hounded YouTuber to Suicide

the only question worthy of response here is what is your purpose in propagating the lie that i'm a sexual predator based on nothing but that isolated, inconsequential event that occurred before some of your mothers were even born?
You are a sexual predator though. That isn't a lie, it's a very provable fact.



So with his brother and sister being normal people, how did Tom here become such a fuck up? They actually look their age too while Tom here looks like he's the living dead.
 
Last edited:
You are a sexual predator though. That isn't a lie, it's a very provable fact.
1620695023041-png.2159575
-

No lie, founder of the cult "Children of God" David Berg said the exact same thing when he ordered his members to rape male and female children.
 
1620695023041-png.2159575
-

No lie, founder of the cult "Children of God" David Berg said the exact same thing when he ordered his members to rape male and female children.
Does Tom here know that if he ever took anyone to court discovery would come to bite him on the ass? (harder than the bedbugs do in his apartment).
 
Does Tom here know that if he ever took anyone to court discovery would come to bite him on the ass? (harder than the bedbugs do in his apartment).
Yeah but mental illness combined with narcissistic tendencies makes that a non issue in Tommies eyes.
 
Does Tom here know that if he ever took anyone to court discovery would come to bite him on the ass? (harder than the bedbugs do in his apartment).
WRONG.

The way the law works is: Tom gets to present evidence against you. You are not allowed to present evidence against him, and he is entitled to everything you own by default.
 
WRONG.

The way the law works is: Tom gets to present evidence against you. You are not allowed to present evidence against him, and he is entitled to everything you own by default.
There's also no such thing as conflicting interests, so Tom's lawyer must also represent you to make sure there's no funny business.
 
Does Tom here know that if he ever took anyone to court discovery would come to bite him on the ass? (harder than the bedbugs do in his apartment).
He'd have to manage to file the paperwork without getting yoked up by security for bringing drugs and weapons into the courthouse. That's no small task for the 6 or 8 neurons he's got left.
 
WRONG.

The way the law works is: Tom gets to present evidence against you. You are not allowed to present evidence against him, and he is entitled to everything you own by default.

There's also no such thing as conflicting interests, so Tom's lawyer must also represent you to make sure there's no funny business.
Man hobo law is rough
 
I see you’re avoiding the questions. Given how eager you are to otherwise “set the record straight,” that’s very significant. So I’ll ask the questions again.
I feel absolutely no need to gratify your psychosexual disorders at this point in the game, droog. Save your arguments for the mean and stupid in your audience. You can't erode my actual reader base because the first few hundred are people i know in the real world.
When someone is too much of a pervert for the Tranch you know They are a serious danger. The Tranch has like 7 untrained dogs that woild be easy pickings for a guy like tom--a guy who is A danger to both kids and dogs.
The Tranch was disinterested in what i was offering from the beginning and completely unwilling to answer any questions. the rest of that is your own disgusting paraphilias talking.
 
I feel absolutely no need to gratify your psychosexual disorders at this point in the game, droog. Save your arguments for the mean and stupid in your audience. You can't erode my actual reader base because the first few hundred are people i know in the real world.

The Tranch was disinterested in what i was offering from the beginning and completely unwilling to answer any questions. the rest of that is your own disgusting paraphilias talking.
They rejected you like everyone else always has because you're a miserable prick. Your family thinks the same. Your mom even came to this board to tell you what a useless faggot you are.
 
I feel absolutely no need to gratify your psychosexual disorders at this point in the game, droog. Save your arguments for the mean and stupid in your audience. You can't erode my actual reader base because the first few hundred are people i know in the real world.
There is no argument. I’m just asking some simple questions for the purposes of clarification. As you say you aren’t a pedo, I don’t see how that could be a problem. Here are the questions that you refuse to answer.
- Did you know Sabrina was underage?
- Were you sexually attracted to her?
- What were your intentions when you got into bed with her?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Uncle Buck
Why would you find it funny for your sister to receive phone calls from people she doesn't know that involve speculation about whether or not you raped her?

What the fuck is wrong with you?
What is right with him? Seriously look at him, he's a fucking mutant.
mutant.jpg
Is this freakshow even human?
The Tranch was disinterested in what i was offering from the beginning and completely unwilling to answer any questions.
You stupid prick. Just so you know, even a sideshow like the Tranch can recognize that you're a pedophile, and since pedophilia is all you have to offer, no, they have no need for the likes of you. Kill yourself, freak.
 
Because Thomas doesn't seem to want to address your questions, @Tragi-Chan; let's consider some of his answers to at least the first two questions he's given in the past [most of Thomas's quoted comments can be found here: https://imgur.com/a/EiW6G]:

"Did you know Sabrina was underage?"

On 6/3/2015 Thomas J. Wassersperg said:
She was fourteen going on fifteen when we met and fifteen going on sixteen when she was giving herself willingly to my old lady when i walked in. as far as i know she had been running away since she was nine or ten...she was born in august of 1967 and this occured sometime a few months before her birthday in 1983.

On 9/19/2014 Thomas J. Wassersperg said:
Sabrina was one of us, not just a groupie, but an artist who happened to still be underage

On 12/12/2012 Thomas J. Wassersperg said:
Sabrina was very mature looking and i didn't know she was only 14 until her 15th birthday.

In short, yes he knew she was underage "a few months before her [sixteenth] birthday in 1983...when she was giving herself willingly to my old lady when i walked in".

"Were you sexually attracted to her?"

On 5/8/2013 Thomas J. Wassersperg said:
Sabrina was a blond, blue-eyed cherub with perfect sized, smooth, firm globes on both her breasts and bottom, with the most incredible sparkling eyes, heart-stopping smile, exuberant laugh and the voice of an angel. it was difficult for many people not to get hard-ons when she was around.

From: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/tommy-tooter-general-discussion.18925/post-3519297
Thomas J. Wassersperg said:
...i only had a few fingers in meghan's snapper, not even the whole hand past the wrist and was all over sabrina, who i'd been lusting after for at least 15 months without ever getting more than long hugs and chaste kisses, which you all know what that will do to a young male at the peak of testicular performance.

In short, yes he was sexually attracted to her.

"What were your intentions when you got into bed with her?"

On 12/12/2012 Thomas J. Wassersperg said:
If I were approached by a 13 year old girl who actually got me aroused, which isn't very easy when they're that young, and she has emancipation papers, I would accept her offer.

On 10/26/2015 Thomas J. Wassersperg said:
Sabrina's first relationship lasted over a year and involved heavy fornication. her second lasted 5 minutes and involved some hugging, kissing and rubbing of erogenous zones.

On 4/10/2015 Thomas J. Wassersperg said:
Hippies do not have the same sexual mores as people like yourselves. for one thing, clothing is optional and we're very affectionate, hugging rather than shaking hands, for instance. what happened back then was not considered that unusual or morally horrifying and it really was a very beautiful moment for us while it lasted, nothing at all like the assholes depict it, which is really my own fault for writing it when I was zooming hard and embellishing it...

Obviously, neither of these quotes directly answers your final question, but based on what he's saying here it seems to me - and I'm only speculating - that he believed there was a possibility of a "relationship" between them [he described that five minutes of "heavy petting" as such] that would have been born out of a "very beautiful moment"; I suspect in his own mind his "fictional" account of the longer event involving oral sex is probably part of that idealized scenario of his where a man comes along and does such a thing for him because he's really the young girl of the fantasy, rather than the adult male of nearly thirty years. This of course leads to that whole "enslaving a man with my pussy" vileness that's also included in the comment from earlier in the thread.

In short, I believe his intention was to create his own fantasy as he wished someone would have done for him.
 
They rejected you like everyone else always has because you're a miserable prick. Your family thinks the same. Your mom even came to this board to tell you what a useless faggot you are.
Do you sincerely believe that's actually my mother? If yes, does your mother know how stupid you are?
Because Thomas doesn't seem to want to address your questions, @Tragi-Chan; let's consider some of his answers to at least the first two questions he's given in the past [most of Thomas's quoted comments can be found here: https://imgur.com/a/EiW6G]:

"Did you know Sabrina was underage?"







In short, yes he knew she was underage "a few months before her [sixteenth] birthday in 1983...when she was giving herself willingly to my old lady when i walked in".

"Were you sexually attracted to her?"



From: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/tommy-tooter-general-discussion.18925/post-3519297


In short, yes he was sexually attracted to her.

"What were your intentions when you got into bed with her?"







Obviously, neither of these quotes directly answers your final question, but based on what he's saying here it seems to me - and I'm only speculating - that he believed there was a possibility of a "relationship" between them [he described that five minutes of "heavy petting" as such] that would have been born out of a "very beautiful moment"; I suspect in his own mind his "fictional" account of the longer event involving oral sex is probably part of that idealized scenario of his where a man comes along and does such a thing for him because he's really the young girl of the fantasy, rather than the adult male of nearly thirty years. This of course leads to that whole "enslaving a man with my pussy" vileness that's also included in the comment from earlier in the thread.

In short, I believe his intention was to create his own fantasy as he wished someone would have done for him.
tl;dr you choose to live my past in your head. to what end? you won't be able to destroy my reputation with anybody but stupid people because I'm too well known in the real world by people who have known me since before your mothers were stupid enough to carry you all to term.
 
Back