RWBY - The Hindenburg on which Rooster Teeth rests its hopes, dreams and future

Blessed_feed said:
*Points out slight animation error*
View attachment 2637165

*Triggers r/RWBY*
View attachment 2637174View attachment 2637175View attachment 2637176View attachment 2637177View attachment 2637178View attachment 2637184View attachment 2637179
*The good one*
View attachment 2637192
Click to expand...
And to think, if they had just used just double checked their work, it all could've been avoided.

How does death battle's second ever 3d battle manage to hide the same problem back in 2013 yet RT makes an amateur mistake?
 
HumanHive said:
Excuse me, are you calling Disney lazy? Could you actually be racist?
Click to expand...
Not ‘lazy‘ per se. At least for that specific moment I used. The background of Gaston’s song was already incredibly animated as is (three fully-animated background characters are also in that gif).
When you on a schedule like B&tB was, a few corners were bound to get shaved where they could. B&tB went through a huge script rewrite and was made into a musical, which led to the movie having to be completed on a compressed timeline in 2 years because they spent half of the usual 4 year Disney Feature Animation production working on a radically different version that got completely scrapped in the rewrite and musicalization. It’s a miracle enough that the movie was as animated as it ended up being in the end.
These sorts of animation errors aren’t even that bad. If you had to have the error be pointed out to you after several watches through, I can’t really say it’s that substantial of a flaw.
Same goes for RWBY/RoosterTeeth. There’s way more to talk about than small mistakes in animation.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Juan's Sombrero, rollercoasterdecapitation, Rondo Richter Belmont and 2 others
LecherousGranolaBar said:
www.youtube.com

The Jerma985 Dollhouse: Behind the Scenes

A look behind the curtain on one of Jerma's stupidest and most expensive streams.Editor:Vinnysuperg123https://www.youtube.com/user/vinnysuperg123Main Channel...
www.youtube.com www.youtube.com

Well, it's official. The storylines for Jermas 3 day dollhouse experiment had better thought out plots than all of RWBY.
Click to expand...
Are any of us truly surprised? The original ideas man was an autist who wasted effort removing keys off his keyboard for "efficiency" and was supposed to be managed by two lesser autists who sucked at their jobs.

On a more serious note, the lack of thought was a major problem with RT as a whole. I'm not surprised that almost everything has more thought put into it than rwby. I doubt I'd be wrong to say sonichu had more thought put in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Juan's Sombrero, Rondo Richter Belmont, Suikafag and 2 others
Might as well post this. https://twitter.com/OfficialRWBY/status/1451224267622858752?s=20

E7C8C925-1D28-4083-9785-91E188A6BC31.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Suikafag and Juan's Sombrero
  • Agree
Reactions: madethistocomment and Juan's Sombrero
Skipjack-o-lantern said:
1) What is an "asexual personality?", Lindsay?
Click to expand...
Baically, Lindsay is saying that Ruby could be asexual since she's shown no interest in getting into a relationship, nor has she been shown to be attracted to any character in the show to date.
Grumpy Pickle Rick said:
Why are these RWBY nerds always so shallow?
Click to expand...
Because the show itself is pretty shallow thanks to the skill level of the people making it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChevroletBlackboard, ThatDumbPhilosopher, Juan's Sombrero and 3 others
Random Internet Person said:
Baically, Lindsay is saying that Ruby could be asexual since she's shown no interest in getting into a relationship, nor has she been shown to be attracted to any character in the show to date.

Because the show itself is pretty shallow thanks to the skill level of the people making it.
Click to expand...
So because a character who's defining trait is their singleminded drive to save the world hasn't made the mistake of trying to get boned, they must be asexual. It's also a just a stupid question too. We don't see the MHA fandom asking questions about the cast's sexualities, but then again MHA's characters have more depth than a puddle.

A better question to ask is what the fuck is Ruby's character supposed to be? She was introduced as an immature, antisocial fanatic of weapons who had a drive to be a huntress. A simple dream for a simple person who wears their heart on their sleeve. But now there is non of that. She's a distrusting schemer who makes motivational speeches. It's like we have 2 completely different characters but they wield the same weapon and powers.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Desu Mountain, Saturnalia-1918, Grumpy Pickle Rick and 4 others
Sup3r said:
So because a character who's defining trait is their singleminded drive to save the world hasn't made the mistake of trying to get boned, they must be asexual. It's also a just a stupid question too. We don't see the MHA fandom asking questions about the cast's sexualities, but then again MHA's characters have more depth than a puddle.

A better question to ask is what the fuck is Ruby's character supposed to be? She was introduced as an immature, antisocial fanatic of weapons who had a drive to be a huntress. A simple dream for a simple person who wears their heart on their sleeve. But now there is non of that. She's a distrusting schemer who makes motivational speeches. It's like we have 2 completely different characters but they wield the same weapon and powers.
Click to expand...
As I always say: Ruby Rose isn’t a character. She’s a mascot.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Grumpy Pickle Rick and madethistocomment
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back