Culture REEEE! Handmaid Tale’s author Margaret Atwood asks why we can’t say ‘woman’ anymore and the Left lose their damn minds - Someone's about to be eaten by the monster they helped to feed.

Article
___

HOOboy … how long before the Left try to cancel their HERO who wrote their favorite book EVER, Handmaid’s Tale? Someone should probably tell her saying woman is a big no-no now or something because a few hundred people in the country want to erase women since their mere existence is oppressing to them.

Or something.

Hey man, we don’t buy this crap.

And neither does Margaret Atwood:

1634691080469.png
(link to the article)

Guess how this went over?

We know you know people lost their minds but you know, we needed a tie into these ridiculous tweets.

1634690853780.png

Ok, MAN. Tell a woman she can’t say woman.

That reads.

1634690871941.png

Or we can just keep saying women instead of trying to erase them from society.

Who are these people?

1634690903303.png

Boosting women is profoundly disappointing.

Alrighty then.

1634690924318.png


Oh no!

Whatever will she do with only 2.1 million followers left?!

1634690960940.png



Huh?
1634690982914.png

Ok?


1634690992576.png

Anti-trans dog whistle.

This. Is. Ri-damn-diculous.


1634691004819.png

Truly recoiled?

REALLY?


1634691028034.png

1634691043701.png


How pathetic that this is their reaction. They use her book for YEARS to #Resist Trump … maybe instead of trying to cancel her they should listen to her?

Oh, we know they won’t but still.

***
 
To A Raisin in the Sun's credit, it was what allowed me to utter the word "faggot" out loud in class with no repercussions (there's a part where the dad is lambasting some other character for his school uniform).
Yup, it's gonna get cancelled soon.

Between black people and the rainbow alphabet clowns it's definitely obvious.
 
This is the new face of Progressivism - erasing women like the Taliban do. This disease has to be contained or else the affected countries will eventually turn into Pakistan and Afghanistan.
If the USA had the balls to be like Afghanistan we'd be tossing these people off of rooftops instead of giving them a platform.
 
I don't know...judging what little I've seen from the Hulu version, there seems to be undertones of a weird, "porn for women" theme going on, almost as if a woman had a BDSM/humiliation fetish going on but not as transparently as 50 Shades of Gray or whatever. Even it was only the TV network, is it that crazy a theory?
To be fair the Kinsley studies show that the most common female sexual fantasy was being forced by a strong male figure into sex. Hence why pure shit like 50 shades made massive bank.

As an fyi the most common male sexual fantasy was a FFM threesome.
 
To be fair the Kinsley studies show that the most common female sexual fantasy was being forced by a strong male figure into sex. Hence why pure shit like 50 shades made massive bank.

As an fyi the most common male sexual fantasy was a FFM threesome.
The Kinsey study was garbage though. He should've been imprisoned.
 
The Kinsey study was garbage though. He should've been imprisoned.
Kinsey's methodology was garbage, but flip open some romance novels from the 60s and 70s. Bored women have been flicking the bean to the idea of being swept off their feet and ravished by Chad Thundercock (McThundercock is this one has a Scottish theme) for quite some time. This is probably one of those "blind squirrel finds nut" situations on Kinsey's part.
 
The 90s version is superior in every aspect. If anything, it sticks to the original story as much as possible. It even ends in a somehow positive note: the protagonist has an uncertain future, but at least she's free and will try to keep herself alive and safe on her own. Considering how's the life for her before, she got a good ending. I think she's also pregnant at the end, so she keeps her baby.

And, I wouldn't call it softcore as much as it's "erotica" (which are basically the same, tbh), but the Hulu version is just humiliation porn despite it's not sexually explicit (I've only seen a few episodes, so I could be wrong about this)

I have no problem with the story having sex in it because they are showing there is a difference between how she is forced to sex with her owner and how she willingly sleeps with the guard. But I can assure you 100% that feminists watching this consider the former more sexually arousing than the other, and not because they enjoy forced sex (although they probably do), but because they enjoy the idea of having all their beliefs about women validated. Better said, they get off by thinking that, indeed, women are raped and have it as bad as Offred does.
The movie is considered softcore porn because the director made it as such.

Fun fact: they had to fire the director from the film because he saw it as nothing more than a skinnimax film and the producers wanted a proper adaptation and he kept refusing their orders to tone down the sex. They fired him midway through production and had to bring MA to the set to have her help them salvage the product as far as her being an onset advisor and basically rewriting scenes on the fly and helping re-edit what they had already filmed (and being limited at that due to them only having Faye Dunaway and Robert Duval available for filming for a certain number of days, with their scenes largely filmed first along with the bulk of the sex scenes; as the direct filmed them first then was going to do the other non-sex plot scenes last due to those being ones the had the least interest in doing).

It's to their credit that they were able to salvage the film but even then it flopped hard at theaters and looked down upon by people as a "poor adaptation".
 
The movie is considered softcore porn because the director made it as such.

Fun fact: they had to fire the director from the film because he saw it as nothing more than a skinnimax film and the producers wanted a proper adaptation and he kept refusing their orders to tone down the sex. They fired him midway through production and had to bring MA to the set to have her help them salvage the product as far as her being an onset advisor and basically rewriting scenes on the fly and helping re-edit what they had already filmed (and being limited at that due to them only having Faye Dunaway and Robert Duval available for filming for a certain number of days, with their scenes largely filmed first along with the bulk of the sex scenes; as the direct filmed them first then was going to do the other non-sex plot scenes last due to those being ones the had the least interest in doing).

It's to their credit that they were able to salvage the film but even then it flopped hard at theaters and looked down upon by people as a "poor adaptation".
I didn't know that, and now I'm a bit glad that I'm not the only one who considers that this story has a lot of potential for an erotic story rather than some feminist activism tale.
 
Kinsey's methodology was garbage, but flip open some romance novels from the 60s and 70s. Bored women have been flicking the bean to the idea of being swept off their feet and ravished by Chad Thundercock (McThundercock is this one has a Scottish theme) for quite some time.
For another thread I took a look at what lady smut was like these days.
why_nascar.jpg

The Nascar smut makes me curious...
 
For another thread I took a look at what lady smut was like these days.
View attachment 2647448
The Nascar smut makes me curious...
Funny thing is, I read some of the lady-smut one time just to see if it was interesting.

Lady-smut has better plots, characterization, action scenes, and descriptions than 90% of the books everyone talks about how progressive and thought provoking they were.

Johanna Lindsey had a really cool serious that involved politics, spies, all kinds of shit in the Regency Era that was better than the fucking 'modern literature' I had to read in college.
 
Funny thing is, I read some of the lady-smut one time just to see if it was interesting.

Lady-smut has better plots, characterization, action scenes, and descriptions than 90% of the books everyone talks about how progressive and thought provoking they were.

Johanna Lindsey had a really cool serious that involved politics, spies, all kinds of shit in the Regency Era that was better than the fucking 'modern literature' I had to read in college.
To be fair that’s not a high bar.
 
So I guess they'll cancel her while still going on and on about her work like JK Rowling?

Transwomen aren't women. People don't get pregnant. Women do. Uterus havers are women. So are menstruators and front hole havers. That's just the way it is. No amount of stomping your feet and demanding full access to the cookie jar before dinner is going to change that.
 
The left will always turn on you, why? Because their circle of whats ok will begin to tighten more and more. A few years before, women were their allies, but now its becoming more and more clear that trans have them replaced...

You helped brew this culture, Margaret, you fucking suffer it now.
 
That would be funny if leftists liberal people started to say it’s better for a man to date A transgender and call it “problematic” if a man dates a biological woman. And then men start getting cancelled if they are dating a biological woman instead of transgender woman. And then all women born women are now considered terfs by default, unless they become trans men. And then you show up to work and tons of homosexual men are having anal sex out in the open and the boss says you have to watch. The boss forces you to watch homosexual men having anal sex at work. This is the road this leads down.
 
Back