Law Pablo Escobar’s cocaine hippos legally recognised as people by US court - Probably on something stronger.


After Pablo Escobar’s death in 1993, illegally imported animals at his ranch in Colombia were shipped off to other zoos. All except for four hippos that authorities deemed too difficult to round up.

They were allowed to stay on the land but soon escaped to an area around the Magdelena River. Since then their numbers have increased to around 100.

As part of a battle to save these so-called “cocaine hippos” from being culled, the animals have become the first non-human creatures to be legally considered people by US courts.

Authorities in Colombia have been discussing killing the hippos since 2009 under the premise that they are an invasive species. They reportedly compete with local wildlife for food and pollute local waterways with their faeces.

But some scientists say that the feral mammals may actually be helping the ecosystem by replacing species lost to human activity. A study last year found that their diet and size was similar to extinct giant llamas and their semi-aquatic habit was comparable to that of another extinct mammal.

So how did the hippos get legally recognised as people?​

Colombian attorney Luis Domingo Gómez Maldonado filed a lawsuit on behalf of the animals in July this year. It is intended to prevent them from being killed.

In Colombia, non-human animals do have the right to bring lawsuits that protect their interests, but someone in the US cannot be compelled to present documents to support it.

Interested parties in Colombia are however allowed to go to a US federal court to obtain documents or testimony. The Animal Defense League Fund (ADLF), an animal law advocacy group, applied on behalf of the hippos for two wildlife experts from Ohio to share their expertise about non-surgical sterilization.

They granted the application, meaning the District Court legally recognised non-human creatures as people for the first time in US history.

The court’s order authorizing the hippos to exercise their legal right to obtain information in the United States is a critical milestone in the broader animal status fight to recognize that animals have enforceable rights,” says Stephen Wells, ADLF’s executive director.

Animals have the right to be free from cruelty and exploitation, and the failure of US courts to recognize their rights impedes the ability to enforce existing legislative protections.”

It’s a small step in the legal case for Pablo Escobar’s unusual pets but one that could have huge implications for animal rights cases across the US. As ADLF’s managing attorney told AFP on Thursday, it is the first “concrete example” of a US court authorising animals to exercise legal rights in their own name.
----

So can the Hippos be charged for criminal damage and trespass now?
 
Can't you just capture the hippos and sell them to zoos?
 
Outside of the horrifying realization that furries can now qualify for human rights... this particular line pisses me off.
But some scientists say that the feral mammals may actually be helping the ecosystem by replacing species lost to human activity. A study last year found that their diet and size was similar to extinct giant llamas and their semi-aquatic habit was comparable to that of another extinct mammal.
A hippo does not have the same temperament as a llama and besides all of that... that age ended thousands upon thousands of years ago, we're talking BC. A lot of things went extinct during that era and it wasn't from civilized society given how many years back we're talking. It's not like when the industrial revolution killed everything or some redneck was hunting the Carolina Parakeet for its feathers... it simply died to a superior predator and climate change. The study even admits the outcome is unknown, so any statement of positivity is bunk. There is no helping, you're just changing it back to an era that's tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of years ago when animals have already adapted to the change from the extinction of those animals. That's dumb.

These scientists should be beaten with oars and their degrees stripped from them if they're dare suggesting the hippos be allowed to live. Shameful.
 
Let me start out by saying that I don't like hippos. I think they're fat and irritable assholes that think they own the whole fucking world because they weigh 4000 pounds and can crush a watermelon with their mouth.
They are not only assholes to every other living creature that wants a sip of water in the scorching East African sun, they're also gigantic assholes to each other. Hippos are the only creature Steve Irwen wouldn't play with (in hindsight stingrays should have also been on that list). If you're such a miserable fucking asshole that the patron saint of animals won't wrastle with you, you're an evil abomination and should be eradicated from existence.
The only reason I haven't started on my fat fuck slaying crusade is because I'm not very smart and don't understand what the full ramifications of removing them from the food chain would entail. You can rest assured that as soon as I can confirm that the world will be a better place without them, I will be the first on the front line to ridding our beautiful planet of these chunky demons.
 
Fuck hippos and the SocJus activists defending them staying alive. Those fuckers are not native, they are certainly reproducing, and they are grown adults. No way you are capturing those things alive. They already attack fisherman and native wildlife and are a threat to anyone and anything in the general area.
 
Nothing like 100 inbred hippos.

A population of 4 does not good genetic diversity make.
Especially since the of the original 4 hippos 3 were female and 1 is male. That's some insane inbreeding there. If it had been 2 mating pairs it would still be bad, but all of these hippos are decended from a single male.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cereal Killer
Back