Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.9%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,594
"The assertion that Plaintiff has to prove Moon’s users were guided by the FAQs specifically is not Plaintiff’s responsibility" Does this not fall under the requirement to show proof that the Court had not considered/etc previous motions/etc in their entirety? As in, it IS his responsibility? The Court disagreed with him and found him wrong, and Skordas' reply had further pointed out that in Russ' response to the courts disagreement he hadn't provided proof to the FAQ showing any form of infringment & how the Court had been wrong.
Yes, Russ is wrong, and it is upon him to show that the court erred.
Am I reading Russ' reply right in that he's continuing down the "No, you're wrong" route?
Yes
The entire thing reads like Russell is being told why and how and he's going "THATS NOT MY REALITY SO YOU MISUSED IT, DIDNT READ IT RIGHT, AND ARE WRONG" and now I'm wondering if/what Skordas' reply will sound like.
His entire reply is more or less "the court didn't read the caselaw as I did, therefore super wrong", and "the court did not specifically mention FAQ, therefore it totally ignored it".
Is his actual legal argument here, “But I’ll be upset if I don’t win”?
His legal argument is that there is no way the court could read caselaw differently from him, therefore since they didn't agree with him, they are wrong. Literally:
Screenshot 2021-10-22 220339.png
So... did Skordas file late
Seems to me that he did. I could be missing something, though.
 
So... did Skordas file late, or is Rusty miscalculating this:
The motion was filed on September 29th. Since the deadline was 14 days, that would be October 13th, a Wednesday. The defendant's memorandum in opposition to his motion was filed on the 18th, which is the Monday following Wednesday the 13th. Neither the 13th nor any of the other intervening days (much less all of them) were holidays, so yeah, it does appear that it was late.

Realistically though the court should deny Russ's rule 59(e) motion regardless of whether or not it considers Skordas's opposition memorandum. 59(e) motions are very rarely ever successful, so it's almost certainly going to be denied anyway, and if the judge bothers to read the opposition memorandum it could still serve as the logical framework for why the court is going to deny the 59(e) motion, even if the court doesn't officially recognize it.

For those who are optimistic that the judge finally awards Josh some attorney's fees and costs, though, I really don't think the fact that the opposition memorandum was filed late bodes well for that.
 
Is this mong seriously bitching about Skordas filing late after he showed up late to his own case? Didn't also miss a filing date in his last TS suit?

This was my favourite part. I'm not relitigating, big meanies Skordas and Null are!
IMG_20211022_161136.png


Also, found the perfect piece of chocolate for ol' Rusty. #disabledandcute

1634920449183.png
1634920542748.png


^From @Tasty Tatty in Thread 'Superhero stories have a disability problem' https://kiwifarms.net/threads/superhero-stories-have-a-disability-problem.103481/
 
He's also said he's actually diagnosed bipolar, but he refuses to take his meds because they make him "not himself."
“Not himself” is the best thing he could possibly be, he should get on the meds immediately. When people talk about how important it is to be yourself, there’s always an implied caveat of “unless ‘yourself’ is a relentless sex pest and serial vexatious litigant” lmao
 
I don’t remember which document it was from, but Russ did once miss a legal deadline and then said something along the lines of “due to the plaintiff’s own negligence, the deadline was missed, but I honestly thought I had more days than I did to file, so my mistake should be overlooked.” I’m positive he used the word negligence in regards to this.

It was delightful for the double whammy of his constant masturbation over his legal skills and him once again using “it was not malicious, I’m just an idiot” as an excuse in court (he also attempted to show the Grande trial judge his phone alarm to show why he was 30 minutes late to the trial).
 
Hoo boy...

1634938695424.png

"Please be patient, I have plights"

1634938578073.png

Yep. Because it's not like the judge is the one who gets the final say as to whether or not any submissions to the Court are waived.

1634938758736.png

TIL Skordas is billing Null in Euro.

1634938882142.png

I'm not a lawyer, but last time I checked there was a difference between being guided and being mandated. I love how the language changes from "can" to "must" halfway through explaining Local Rule DUCiR 7-1B(3). I also love how Russhole feels that his 2 year paralegal training taken over 5 years is qualification to explain to a judge - who has spent decades working in the legal system - how to interpret court rules.

That said, True and Honest legal types seem to suggest that Russhole may have a perfectly cromulent argument viz. this is a late filing. To be fair, Russhole would know all about that.

1634939178528.png

If only Null could explain...

1634939483545.png

I'm still not a lawyer, but last time I checked the word "copyright" doesn't even appear in the CDA. Maybe Russhole meant DMCA but he just can't spell it?

1634939753782.png

Let Grokster go, Russ. This citation has been blown out of the water, retrieved, put back in the water, blown out of the water again, retrieved again, put back in the water, blown out the water yet again, and now resembles slurry.

Fun game: whenever you see Grokster in this document, take a shot. Not even Nick Rekieta could get past page 6 without passing out.

1634940027110.png

That really narrows things down.

1634940220342.png

It's not the Plaintiff's responsibility to present evidence to the Court in relation to allegations made by said Plaintiff? It's a bold strategy, Russhole. Let's see if it pays off for you.

1634940389864.png

Nope, I'm still not a lawyer... but even I wouldn't put "I know you are but what am I?" in a response.

1634940522177.png

You mean the market that doesn't exist?

1634940623628.png

I can hear the seething from here even though I live in another country.

:story:

The entire thing reads like Russell is being told why and how and he's going "THATS NOT MY REALITY SO YOU MISUSED IT, DIDNT READ IT RIGHT, AND ARE WRONG" and now I'm wondering if/what Skordas' reply will sound like.
Russhole could have saved hours by just submitting "I reject your reality and substitute my own. Resoectfully, Russell Greer". It'd be about as useful and it would save that long-suffering judge some time that could be used to hear cases that actually have some merit to them.
 

Attachments

  • 1634940598523.png
    1634940598523.png
    23.5 KB · Views: 46
  • 1634941484545.png
    1634941484545.png
    763 bytes · Views: 54
Last edited:
I'm still not a lawyer, but last time I checked the word "copyright" doesn't even appear in the CDA. Maybe Russhole meant DMCA but he just can't spell it?
CDA protects website owners from actions done by their users. Russ is trying to make an argument as to why CDA doesn't shield Null.
 
Erika was being really nice by offering to meet him as a friend. I feel bad for her: this was a kind gesture. Creepy men often don’t understand that kind women who agree to meet as friends, and say it’s just as friends, aren’t up for sex.

Has Russ been officially diagnosed yet? I would have hoped his adoptive parents would have taken him to a psychiatrist after the bathroom wall death threats.

Erika technically didn't offer. Like the exceptional Predator catcher groups like to say: "We never message first."

And not only did Russell message first, he almost immediately launched a high pressure campaign to "meet up" reeking with grease, drool, A WOO HOO HOO, and much reosect.
Erika issued a noncommittal reply (as anyone, man or woman might do during polite conversation). Not entirely convinced she ever intended on actually meeting up (we women might say things like this to get greasy gourds to back off and redirect elsewhere). It was Russell coming at her like John Kennelly just tryna get something to eat! Except in this ding's case, it's buying her a shake.

As always with many young ladies, she unwittingly bought a season's pass to Silkwood shower town courtesy of the "nicest guy you'll ever meet."
 
CDA protects website owners from actions done by their users. Russ is trying to make an argument as to why CDA doesn't shield Null.
That's my understanding. My speculation is that Russhole has somehow conflated the protections afforded to content service providers under Section 230 viz. anti-decency and anti-obscenity with copyright infringement.

Ofc Russhole may have accidentally suggested that his copyrighted intellectual property is indecent and/or obscene. It still wouldn't affect Null because Section 230, but it'd be the first time in his entire life that Russhole has shown even the tiniest skerrick of self-awareness (albeit subconsciously).
 
With this filing,Did Russ even drop below his typical quality of legal lunacy?
Well, he got one point correct (on the fact that Skordas' response might have been slightly late), so I guess its actually better than usual.
That's my understanding. My speculation is that Russhole has somehow conflated the productions afforded to content service providers under Section 230 viz. anti-decency and anti-obscenity with copyright infringement.
His whole CDA/230 argument is twofold:

1. CDA protecting Kiwi is totes mean and some people think CDA should go away, therefore no protect Null plz
2. Null, himself, committed contributory copyright infringement.

Only one of these arguments is legally sound one, and both of these were dismissed by the court for lack of evidence and facts.
 
The irony is that Russel has gotten loads of free marketing and sales for his book by being featured here. I imagine several Kiwis bought hard copies of the book which is likely a half dozen more sales than he’d have gotten otherwise.

“Mr. Greer, what damages have you suffered?”
“People are buying and reading my book!”
“…okay.”
 
But it’s a true story! Russ said so, and he wouldn’t make stuff up to appear like an underdog hero in a bad movie. Haven’t you heard about T Swizzle’s dangerous Hispanic gangster fans and their toy guns?

Sure, Russ at that time posted on Facebook every little detail about anyone who even dared to look funny at him, but he absolutely wouldn’t have mentioned this incident happening. Just picture him at the gym, ladies, you know it makes him so much hotter.

:left:

Just the fact that Russ believes it’s okay to share this delusional daydream with the world is cringe enough, but he expects everyone to believe it or you hate the disabled and obviously just need him to explain some more. Fifteen year old girls daydream about being swept off their feet by some pop star. A bloke in his late 20s building his entire life around that fantasy and expecting everyone to play along is kinda mind-blowing. It’s hilarious on first reading, but the more you take in the more you realise how utterly obsessional and insane this man is.

Absolute serial killer vibes. And he wonders why women are creeped out by him (as if the face weren’t a massive clue).
One small quibble with what you wrote here. Russ is no longer in his 20s. He's 30 now. I think part of what gets him is he believed he would be young, handsome, and successful, but now he's no longer a young man and has nothing but a string of failures and a Kiwi Farms thread to his name.
Another howler of a legal filing. Thanks, Russ! I needed the laugh.

When he says "respectfully," I get the feeling that he doesn't mean any respect at all. He's trying a new word, thinking this will be the magic word that gets the bias judge to listen to him and make those dang dirty Kiwis to remove that thread.
 
Back