Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
Getting up and exercising a bit is crucial, because this pumps the lymph. The white blood cells have their own "circulatory system" but it's pumped by movement, rather than the heart. People who are stationary die much more quickly.

Interesting that nobody in gov or media has ever recommended this, at least that I have heard. Not saying it's untrue at all. Just that the silence on what to actually do for yourself if infected has been deafening.

All you hear now is vax vax vax.
 
Interesting that nobody in gov or media has ever recommended this
It's not suggested, for the same reason that they're denying the benefits of natural immunity, vitamin supplementation, a healthy diet, and sunlight + fresh air.

You can't make an obscene profit off of that stuff. Why would they suggest it?
 
Friend who absolutely doesn't need the booster (though, who does?) went and got the booster yesterday. Another friend who isn't speaking to me anymore told me that she'd rather take boosters for the entire rest of her life rather than suffer the small chance of a horrific corona death. She's young, healthy, not a hamplanet, no comorbidities. But she is a self-admitted hypochondriac.

So I decided to check out our government's guidance to boosters - https://archive.md/siWUO

Some choice parts:

Why you are being offered a COVID-19 booster
Like some other vaccines, levels of protection may begin to wane over time. This booster dose will help extend the protection you gained from your first 2 doses and give you longer term protection.

The booster will help to reduce the risk of you needing admission to hospital due to COVID-19 infection this winter.

'Like some other vaccines', yes, perfectly normal for a vaccine's protection to wane after just a few months, every single time you take it. Remember to book your half-yearly MMR boosters alongside your corona boosters, guys!

At least they're honest about what it does now, reduces risk of hospitalisation. No more saving granny guilt trips. Although, do we know hospitalisation stats for countries such as Israel going gung-ho with the boosters?

Timing of booster
The booster is being offered at least 6 months after your last dose. Like your previous doses, the vaccine will be given in your upper arm.

Protection against severe disease from the first 2 doses seems to decline very slowly. So don’t worry if your booster vaccine is given a few weeks after the 6 months time-point. The booster dose should help to extend your protection into the next year.

Decline very slowly? Why do we need a booster after just six months then? That's three jabs in potentially as few as seven months (assuming you get your second dose within a few weeks of the first).

At least they're being honest again. The booster dose should extend into next year, as next year is only just over a couple of months away!

Which vaccine you will be offered
You will be given a booster dose of either Pfizer or Moderna vaccine[footnote 1]. These vaccines have already been given to millions of people in the UK.

You will be offered the right vaccine for you which may be the same or different from the vaccines that you had before.

'The right vaccine for you', they are just making it up as they go.

Serious side effects
Worldwide, there have also been recent, very rare cases of inflammation of the heart called myocarditis or pericarditis reported after Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

These cases have been seen mostly in younger men within several days after vaccination. Most of these people recovered and felt better following rest and simple treatments.

Is that true? Will most people with vaccine-induced myocarditis and pericarditis just be able to sleep it off?

Do you think they'll still recommend the second booster, whenever that is, to individuals who have experienced these side effects?

Those who shouldn’t have a booster
There are very few people who should not have a booster.

If you have had a severe reaction to a previous dose of the vaccine you should discuss this with your doctor.

Very few people. They want everyone to get the damn booster. So far, the guidance is just for 'People aged 50 years and over, health and social care workers and younger people at risk' to get a booster.

But one dose of the vaccine is being extended to those aged 12-17, a demographic who absolutely does not need the vaccine. So it won't surprise me if everyone eventually is recommended to get the booster.

Can you still catch COVID-19 after having the vaccine?
The COVID-19 vaccination will reduce the chance of you suffering from COVID-19. It may take a few days for your body to build up some protection from the booster.

Like all medicines, no vaccine is completely effective – some people may still get COVID-19 despite having a vaccination, but this should be less severe.

I remember back when the vaccines were starting to be rolled out here, before I took any time to question what was going on in the world around me, that I saw an article in the BBC about a study that was conducted, proclaiming how the vaccine seems to be effective and seems to prevent transmission.

I remember thinking to myself, 'Er, great? Isn't that what it's supposed to do?'. It struck me as odd that we'd needed to be told this, as surely isn't that what the actual vaccine trials are for? To determine efficacy (alongside safety)?

And now look where we are. 'No vaccine is completely effective'. True, but a bit disingenuous, no? There's a difference between a vaccine not working for a small amount of people but providing actual immunity in everyone else, and a vaccine whose only accomplishment seems to be reducing symptoms and reducing hospitalisation risk but not preventing you from getting infected & passing it on.

--------

How can you be selfish for not getting the jab? Those that want the vaccine have had ample time to go get it.

Assuming you live in Bongland (by the use of jab), they are already offering boosters.

If they try to state that special X case cannot get vaccinated due to whatever, okay. People with shitty immune systems existed before COVID, are alive now, and will exist in the future. Is society to continue masking forever to ensure the health of these special snowflakes?


You need to talk your family about why they might be irrational and/or accept your right to take risks.

Going by the metrics of this site, I assume you are between 20-40. Below is a COVID fatality rate during Delta. We see that for those in the KF age bracket the risk of death is less than .5%. Now, I am not saying it makes sense to take a 0.5% risk of death but I am saying that society has accepted people take above average risks without an intervention.

Ask them is you rode a motorbike, would they throw you an intervention?

The goal is not to deny your actions but to make them see your logic and acknowledge it.

View attachment 2650574
Yes to Bongland and demographic.

Someone said something earlier on in the thread that resonated completely with me. You can't reason someone into something when they didn't use logic to get there in the first place.

Trust me, I can quote shit I've learned from this thread for days, and occasionally I do get a slight glimmer of understanding and recognition, but the next day for some reason that's all thrown out of the window and I'm back to square one again. Or even worse, because the idea of me being a conspiracy tard is further cemented by my vehemence that this shit ain't right.

Possibly I'm not particularly persuasive, but I have no issues giving advice to my friends and family in other areas which they take on board, so I don't think it's purely down to that if so. I think it's down to a combo of blindly accepting what MSM says, poisoning of the well for contrary viewpoints, and appeals to authority because they are too dumb or scared to take it into their own hands to research. Why listen to the nutjob ranting about how Israel is on their fourth booster and yet their peak after rollout was higher than ever, the nutjob recommending fucking horse paste as a preventative and treatment of all things, when you can just listen to the government telling you to get your booster and then everything will go back to normal?

(To give my persuasion skills some credit, I didn't call it horse paste! But that's poisoning of the well for ya.)
 
Hello, it's been a while. In Belgium, a familydoctor from Antwerp is denying treatment to patients who are not vaccinated. He hung a note outside saying that "If you're not vaccinated, you don't believe in science, therefore, you should not believe in my ability to cure you".
I think more doctors are gonna follow, i'm not sure.
The corona pass was only going to be operated in Brussels but now the Libs and ChristianDems are changing their mind and want a covid pass everywhere, even tho the vaccination levels are over 70 % in Flanders. (Even heard about 80+%)

My pharmacy givin' me the stinkeye because they can see on their PC that im' not jabbed .

Life great:sadwaifu:
 
I wouldn't be surprised if they had put this correction between the obatuaries and the horoscopes instead of the front page.
It was posted at the bottom of the article itself on the online version. This was covered in the Covid/mRNA Vaccine Info thread last week.


The article in question:
 
Interesting that nobody in gov or media has ever recommended this, at least that I have heard. Not saying it's untrue at all. Just that the silence on what to actually do for yourself if infected has been deafening.

All you hear now is vax vax vax.
The also don't recommend losing weight even though fatties are arguably at even higher risk than olds, the majority of old people who die have obesity related illnesses like diabetes and hypertension.

Funnily enough, they are happy to blame weight gain and lack of exercise from the lockdowns on the sudden increase in heart attacks.
 
NPC: Non-vaxxers should be denied access to hospital and healthcare, they chose not to get vaxxed, now they have to deal with it!
Me: So morbidly obese and smokers and druggies chose to endanger their health and should also be denied healthcare?
NPC: NOOO!! Obesity and smoking isn't infectious!!!
Me: gets into rocket...

This goes for traffic accidents too... DUI's, stupid accidents where people were not paying attention.. all of them you should just ignore because they chose this fate.
 
Hello, it's been a while. In Belgium, a familydoctor from Antwerp is denying treatment to patients who are not vaccinated. He hung a note outside saying that "If you're not vaccinated, you don't believe in science, therefore, you should not believe in my ability to cure you".
I think more doctors are gonna follow, i'm not sure.
Somebody should print out the Hippocratic Oath and hang it next to the sign.
 
Was visiting my sister recently. She is adamantly against masking and vaccinating her kids. (One of them is a three year old girl) Unfortunately, she lives in a blue state and if the private schools she sends her kids to decide to enforce mandates, she's gonna pull them out and home school them.

It's honestly sad to me that considering how public schools are being handled nowadays, home schooling seems to be the marginally better option. Thankfully, she's also the type who takes her daughter out to lots of places to socialize her. And her son is pretty well adjusted last I've seen him. He chose to repeat a year of middle school because he didn't adjust well to remote learning.

Pisses me off that little children like my niece are potentially or are actively having their futures negatively effected by the powers that be.
 
NPC: Non-vaxxers should be denied access to hospital and healthcare, they chose not to get vaxxed, now they have to deal with it!
Me: So morbidly obese and smokers and druggies chose to endanger their health and should also be denied healthcare?
NPC: NOOO!! Obesity and smoking isn't infectious!!!
Me: gets into rocket...

This goes for traffic accidents too... DUI's, stupid accidents where people were not paying attention.. all of them you should just ignore because they chose this fate.
Imagine what if the NPC guy is in distress, calling for help and the only guy who could save him is unvaccinated?
 
Was visiting my sister recently. She is adamantly against masking and vaccinating her kids. (One of them is a three year old girl) Unfortunately, she lives in a blue state and if the private schools she sends her kids to decide to enforce mandates, she's gonna pull them out and home school them.

It's honestly sad to me that considering how public schools are being handled nowadays, home schooling seems to be the marginally better option. Thankfully, she's also the type who takes her daughter out to lots of places to socialize her. And her son is pretty well adjusted last I've seen him. He chose to repeat a year of middle school because he didn't adjust well to remote learning.

Pisses me off that little children like my niece are potentially or are actively having their futures negatively effected by the powers that be.
Don't worry, kids who are home schooled tend to be further advanced than their public school counterparts in terms of academic progress as well as socialization. Wasn't always the case but it is now. Your sister homeschooling them will be a very good thing.
 
"If you're not vaccinated, you don't believe in science, therefore, you should not believe in my ability to cure you".
It's honestly sickening how this is not the first instance I've heard of this, but how actually insane it is. This is witch doctor levels of absurdity. Medicine doesn't require "belief", and to deny someone treatment on that basis is malicious at best.
 
How can you be selfish for not getting the jab? Those that want the vaccine have had ample time to go get it.

Assuming you live in Bongland (by the use of jab), they are already offering boosters.

If they try to state that special X case cannot get vaccinated due to whatever, okay. People with shitty immune systems existed before COVID, are alive now, and will exist in the future. Is society to continue masking forever to ensure the health of these special snowflakes?


You need to talk your family about why they might be irrational and/or accept your right to take risks.

Going by the metrics of this site, I assume you are between 20-40. Below is a COVID fatality rate during Delta. We see that for those in the KF age bracket the risk of death is less than .5%. Now, I am not saying it makes sense to take a 0.5% risk of death but I am saying that society has accepted people take above average risks without an intervention.

Ask them is you rode a motorbike, would they throw you an intervention?

The goal is not to deny your actions but to make them see your logic and acknowledge it.

View attachment 2650574
It's not 0.5% it's 0.05%. Which means if you catch Covid you have a 1 in 5000 chance of dying. It gets better, in any given year 10% of the population will catch Covid, which means you have a 90% chance of not catching Covid. So that 1:5000 chance goes to a 1 in 45000 chance. If you're under 30 years old it's a 1 in 100,000 chance and if you're a kid it's a 1 in a 1,000,000 chance. A child is far more likely to die in a car accident than from Covid-19.

If every year they ran PCR tests on millions of people for seasonal flu and marked down every death 28 or 60 days after a positive result a "flu death" how many would die of the flu?


The number of deaths that mention one or more of the conditions indicated is shown for all deaths involving COVID-19 and by age groups. For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death.
95% of all deaths with Covid had an average of 4 co-morbidities listed on their death certificates. People who suffer 4 or more co-morbidities, such as diabetes, heart failure, renal failure, hypertension, are not just ill they are terminally ill. If you are suffering from a stage 4 cancer and you catch a cold and die did the cold kill you or did the cancer?

A relentless fear campaign has led to the majority of the population to come to believe that they are at high risk of death should they catch Covid. This is a lie. Further that the only way to prevent this outcome is to accept a lifetime of experimental vaccination for which there is no long term safety data.

Consider the current media hype that pregnant women are at 'higher risk' from Covid and should consent to vaccination. Note that the actual risk is never mentioned. Is a pregnant woman at more risk compared to other women in her age group? Which is 1:100,000? Or at they at higher risk compared to young children, 1:1,000,000? Further is it explained to them that in any given year they only have a 10% chance of catching Covid in the first place but should they agree to be vaccinated they run a 100% risk of suffering potential side effects? Of course not.

We've descended so far into the pits of hysteria that parents are rushing to inject their children to 'protect' them form an illness that has a literal 0% chance of causing a significant illness let alone death.
 
Not directly related to the coronavirus and sorry if someone else already posted but it might be worth to post it again. That SOB Fraudci is under fire for sick experiments with puppies.

The National Instiute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases, led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, funded cruel experiments on dogs as young as six weeks old in order to test anti-parasitic treatments, according to a letter signed by 24 lawmakers. The experiments, conducted in Tunisia, deliberately infected dozens of beagles with disease-causing parasites to test an experimental drug. The heinous, ethically dubious experiments were funded by Dr. Fauci’s division at the National Institutes of Health, the non-profit group White Coat Waste Project found in its investigation.

“Our investigators show that Fauci’s NIH division shipped part of a $375,800 grant to a lab in Tunisia to drug beagles and lock their heads in mesh cages filled with hungry sand flies so that the insects could eat them alive,” White Coat Waste told Changing America. “They also locked beagles alone in cages in the desert overnight for nine consecutive nights to use them as bait to attract infectious sand flies.”

“White Coat Waste claims that 44 beagle puppies were used in a Tunisia, North Africa, laboratory, and some of the dogs had their vocal cords removed, allegedly so scientists could work without incessant barking,” Changing America learned. “According to the White Coat Waste Project, the Food and Drug Administration does not require drugs to be tested on dogs, so the group is asking why the need for such testing.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back