Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Unpaid Emotional Labourer said:
It is always weirdly adorable watching some enabler who imagines that there is a way to be reasonable and that they’ve proven their loyalty so surely they could just ask a question, or gently suggest that perhaps the latest escalation might be discussed for just a moment before the ALL CAPS DEMAND REPEATED 7 TIMES IS LAUNCHED.

Lol there is not and you cannot. But it’s so entertaining when you try.
Click to expand...
Older women like Atwood probably genuinely had effeminate gay men with their dicks removed in mind when she was defending trains. Now she's dared to question any of it and had the mob go after her, she can probably finally see the reality of the situation. And this is the reality of it - give these vultures an inch and they'll take a nice long mile. She'll learn the hard way that there's no way to compromise with these people, and trying to have a civil discussion about it is entirely fruitless (since any form of mild questioning is framed as lidurally genocide).

I noticed too that on the Twitter thread lots of people were posting pictures of the Suffragettes with sarcastic quips like, "why couldn't they just be nicer? Huh MARGARET*?"This is the world these people are living in, where having the right to vote is equivalent to receiving free, medically unnecessary hormones and cosmetic surgeries because of your special feelings.
*anyone else notice how smug soys and wokescolds take to referring to people they don't like by their first name, especially on Twitter? Like addressing JK Rowling as "Joanne". They think it's an own or something. When I see "look here, Margaret", it just oozes bearded soyboy or dangerhair.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Lunacy
Reactions: LilShotaBoy, Pomme Poire Peche, Soup Sammiches and 39 others
PresidentTerf said:
But honestly some TERFs need to get some self control, they just spammed that sub with post after post about trannies.
Click to expand...
I mean, can you blame them? The TRA shit has been getting so fucking tiring, especially in recent times. No one on reddit has a problem with people making endless posts about Dave Chapelle, it’s only fair. Free speech and all.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: LilShotaBoy, Pomme Poire Peche, Aunt Carol and 20 others
The Magnificence said:
The whole "sex work and workers are good, actually" thing started quite a while ago, and it boggles my mind. Partly because it seemed to start in the Sorority Karen subculture of women who have never not once had to sell it live, partly because they have no fucking idea how that level of society (if it can even be called part of society) works. Marx was not wrong.
Click to expand...
Eh, I‘m not so sure about that. The narrative is hugely successful with idiot women who want to spice up their lives or virtue signal being unique and modern, but I don‘t think that really started out there. Getting my tinfoil hat on I would say there is money in that trade (often even past the tax system) - illegal prostitution flourishes next to the cover of legality. The normal people who champion it do it out of idiocy and selfishness, but I think there are more interests at play in NGOs, lobby groups and „advocacy“. It‘s just like the troon movement: an empty slogan, a feelgood narrative, tremendous social capital. The people who stand against it can scream all they want, but they don‘t get heard (also the connection of the message to existing social rights movements - black troid feminist sex worker unicorns all around).

Add to that that women can be such backstabbing bitches, who would gladly sell out the rest if it means they can make some money by sitting around in talk shows going on about their empowering escort business. So both these movements exploit women‘s tendencies to both enforce group coherency through mutual thought policing and „kindness“ AND selfishly elbow our way to the top, if the opportunity presents itself. The handmaidening is everywhere - this has to be more than a few bad apples. Also happens within feminist/gender critical/TERF circles (the hatred for Dr Julia Long, anyone?) No matter how much we swear on solidarity, it always gets tested in this way and there will usually be a scapegoat to be shunned. Kiwifarms makes me even more cynical about everything, make it staaahp.
behindyourightnow said:
they really hate old women, don’t they? The obsession with age is everywhere, and it took 0.01 milliseconds to bubble up here. I guess it’s because old women aren’t fuckable anymore
Click to expand...
Maybe they believe that political opinions lean more towards conservatism the older you get. Plus old women are dangerous - they might tell young women to just dgaf about men’s opinions. The funniest spats are the occasional generational troid struggles between boomerhons and youngshits. When the older troids suddenly try to assert their wisdom and some kind of debt owed for paving the way. Never works, bc fuck old people.

I guess it doesn‘t really depend on the sex though, but on the opinions of the person. An old man can either be a wise mentor or a disgusting idiot, who should really drop dead by now (how they‘re all wishing for Trump to die is pathetic. it will happen anyway, so why is that sth to gloat about). Old women can be hags or be hailed as some kind of inspirational uber-mom. Just depends on what they utter and if young people happen to agree. Strange that I don‘t see as many rape threats against old women though, guess the sexual violence is reserved for the younger ones
E767C243-089B-4212-A1DE-29B0483DC604.jpeg
Cheers, folx!
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
Reactions: LilShotaBoy, Pomme Poire Peche, Baroque and 21 others
Cr1ms0n_&_C10v3r said:
Older women like Atwood probably genuinely had effeminate gay men with their dicks removed in mind when she was defending trains. Now she's dared to question any of it and had the mob go after her, she can probably finally see the reality of the situation.
Click to expand...

I think there’s probably a moment when many a startled soon-to-be-peaked Gen X or older white feminist thinks to herself, “Why are all these homosexual males who have had their dicks removed threatening to rape me to death? Shouldn’t they lack both interest and ability?”

It takes some longer to understand than others.

Re: why bougie white girls pretend to be and valorise sex workers. Same reason why 20 years ago they pretended to be bisexual. Trendy and they think dudes think it’s hot.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Pretty Sneaky Cis, LilShotaBoy, Pomme Poire Peche and 40 others
behindyourightnow said:
What’s funny is (by their own logic) they are going to be old women some day too. What are they planning on doing then, exactly?
Click to expand...
Oh i’m sure they all think they’ll keep taking hormones and getting facial surgery, and that that will magically keep them young forever. Just like it magically made them women. But most of them will probably 41% or die of hormone-related cancer long before they have the chance to get old.

Cr1ms0n_&_C10v3r said:
anyone else notice how smug soys and wokescolds take to referring to people they don't like by their first name, especially on Twitter?
Click to expand...
Well, seeing how being called their own real first names reduces them to a puddle of tears, they probably figure it will have the same effect.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: LilShotaBoy, Pomme Poire Peche, Piss Bear and 23 others
'Ol Margaret thinking she can argue and placate her way back into the hearts of autogynophiles.
She can't be this dense. It'll never work UNLESS she forever refrains posting her own opinions publicly.

As soon as she stops pretending these crazy people need her support, and won't back down from the reality that TRAs and women have competing issues/interests and calling some men "women" does not help that, she will find support among the GC crowd.
She will never be anything but an old hag that's only useful when she obeys, to this crowd.

ma trying to placate.png


I mean, here is a good compilation of her fan messages from her earlier tweets.
TERFs can be mean by calling AGPs...AGPs, men, creepy men, delusional men, ugly men, etc.But this seems a tad more over the top. Puberty blockers stunt brain growth.
ma compilation.png
Many more on the linked site


And here is a fella doxxing her. Has been reported but still up on the twitters.
EDIT. Twitter finally removed it. But archived below.

archive.ph

Margaret E. Atwood on Twitter: "To be clear, I'm reposting this one: …

archived 24 Oct 2021 07:16:17 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph
archive.ph

Margaret Atwood and the trans activists: a story in screenshots - boo…

archived 24 Oct 2021 07:24:35 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph
archive.ph

The Postmodern Cowboy on Twitter: "1\ Does Atwood still live at 105 A…

archived 24 Oct 2021 07:28:13 UTC
archive.ph archive.ph
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
Reactions: chroma, LilShotaBoy, DemonicMustache and 27 others
The sex work is real work thing isn’t that deep IMO, it’s just another result of this weird cultural shift where no criticism is allowed and any opinion different to the dogma is silenced.
It started with people advocating for the normalization of women’s sexuality, which is ‘valid’ as the kids say. Not too long ago, for a woman to be as sexually open as a man meant social consequences. Many women to this day are ashamed of their sexuality, it’s good to normalize it because that’s literally what it is: normal.
Then because SJWs take everything too far and no one was allowed to say ‘no’ it turned from “it’s okay to be a woman and horny” to “it’s okay to be into depraved kinks” to “it’s okay to publicly display your depraved kinks” etc etc. The arguments for sex work essentially all boil down to “how dare you tell a woman what she’s allowed to do with her body, she’s independent and making money good for her! Yas queen boss ass bitch!”
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: ConSluttant, Pomme Poire Peche, Baroque and 25 others
decaydent said:
Getting my tinfoil hat on I would say there is money in that trade (often even past the tax system) - illegal prostitution flourishes next to the cover of legality. The normal people who champion it do it out of idiocy and selfishness, but I think there are more interests at play in NGOs, lobby groups and „advocacy“. It‘s just like the troon movement: an empty slogan, a feelgood narrative, tremendous social capital.
Click to expand...
You're spot on here. Sex trafficking rates skyrocket in places where prostitution is legal(ized) for this reason: There is a lot of money to be made by pimps and traffickers (who are vast majority men) when prostitution is legal. Sure, pimping is technically illegal in a lot of these places, as is trafficking of course, but it is incredibly difficult to prosecute when the victims are scared, threatened, manipulated young women who are very often foreign and may not even speak the same language as any police who decide to speak to them... and in most of these places, the police won't speak to them, because they not only don't care, but also they simply do not have the time to speak to all of the thousands and thousands of women pressured, manipulated, forced and trafficked into the sex industry.

It's been proven that a huge number of "pro-sex work" advocacy organizations are run/owned by pimps and traffickers, many even with convictions to show how brazen they were about it. The pro-"sex work" movement is led by majority male pimps and traffickers looking to make money off of legalization. Simple as that. And to make that attractive to women, these pimps and traffickers have poured millions of dollars into ad campaigns and social media promotion to convince people - primarily women* - that prostitution is empowering and sexy and makes you loads of money. And to the great shame of every feminist with half a brain, it's worked.

(* Men who are pro-"sex work" by and large don't care if it's empowering for women. You can read countless interviews with sex buyers all over the world on the internet, and they all have one big thing in common: More often than not, they know that they are raping a woman who does not want to be having sex with them and is unable to refuse sex, and they do not care. Men who are pro-"sex work" support it because they want sexual access to women who would not give them the time of day of their own free will.)
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Caldera505, stupid frog, pirate holiday and 75 others
RandallBoggs said:
I mean, can you blame them? The TRA shit has been getting so fucking tiring, especially in recent times. No one on reddit has a problem with people making endless posts about Dave Chapelle, it’s only fair. Free speech and all.
Click to expand...
Nah I can't at all but that's the thing if it was one or two slick posts a week the jannies would be too preoccupied jizzing over r/actuallesbians to notice.
 
5069290E-27FD-4931-B20E-E818C3E5FBF3.png

Tranny learns a fancy new word: biosocial
It does not mean what he thinks it does. It‘s some kind of holistic approach of biological, social, psychological and sociological factors to explain differences in health outcomes and stuff like that (do men live shorter lives bc of biological factors, or more risk-prone behavior, that type of interdisciplinary study). It certainly does NOT means that social norms overwrite biology, or that they‘re on the same level.

It is mostly the exact opposite and arguing that biology has a bigger influence on social norms and traditional behaviors. It also usually distinguishes between the sex categories (bc biological differences). The troid is just too dumb to research or put two and two together. If trannies start using the term for their arguments, they‘ll have simply stolen and twisted it just like anything else. It is not the convincing argument he thinks it is.

Women‘s rights are human rights, no one is arguing against that. AND I WANT THEM NOW! Just like any other male! Fucking genius contradicting himself.
7B6D42CA-44C1-4B63-953D-7C8E09499C5D.jpeg

F6EDC2AD-F7B5-4DD1-A1E1-0335A65AD98B.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
Reactions: Aunt Carol, Richard Cheese, Oh piss off! and 20 others
I know this is good news but it's sad that it's even a thing to begin with

Derailment incoming

'Trans criminals are not women': Home Secretary Priti Patel orders 'woke' police forces to stop recording offences as female crime statistics​

  • Home Office officials are working with police to make records more accurate
  • The ban follows cases where violent and sexual offences by men who call themselves female were recorded as being committed by women
  • The change was revealed in an official response to feminist campaigners
Home Secretary Priti Patel has ordered ‘woke’ police forces to stop recording offences by trans women in female crime statistics.

Home Office officials are working with police forces on a new procedure for officers to record the sex of criminals to ensure crime statistics are ‘more accurate’.

The ban follows cases where violent and sexual offences by men who call themselves female were recorded as being committed by women, prompting concerns that the practice is warping official data.

Earlier this year, The Mail on Sunday highlighted the case of Zoe Watts, who was jailed for a string of offences including building an improvised bomb.

Watts was born male but identifies as a woman.

Lincolnshire Police recorded the crimes as being committed by a woman, meaning they will appear in national female crime figures.

But research suggests that statistics on traditionally male crimes such as rape are being skewed because of current practice.


In law, only a male can commit rape, but analysis by Professor Alice Sullivan of University College London shows that between 2012 and 2018, a total of 436 people prosecuted for rape were recorded as women.

The Home Office confirmed that police forces are to be given new instructions on recording the sex of criminals more accurately.

The change was revealed in an official response to feminist campaigners calling for an overhaul of the rules.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Priti Patel: Stop recording crimes by trans women in female stats

Home Secretary Priti Patel has ordered 'woke' police to stop recording offences by trans women in female crime statistics. The Home Office is working with forces to ensure crime stats are 'more accurate'.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

archive.md

Priti Patel orders 'woke' police to stop recording offences by trans …

archived 23 Oct 2021 21:45:52 UTC
archive.md archive.md
Click to expand...

Check back in a few hours to see it deleted or rape apologists appear

www.reddit.com

r/ukpolitics - Priti Patel orders 'woke' police to stop recording offences by trans women in female crime stats

586 votes and 822 comments so far on Reddit
www.reddit.com www.reddit.com
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: LilShotaBoy, Terf Miku, Beluga and 70 others
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: stupid frog, LilShotaBoy, Pomme Poire Peche and 37 others
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: LilShotaBoy, Medicinal Molduga, Aunt Carol and 21 others
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Pomme Poire Peche, Aunt Carol, Richard Cheese and 19 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back