🐱 Why White People Must Fight White Supremacy

CatParty


I am a middle aged white-skinned male(he/him/his) with a lifelong interest in history and love for the better aspects of the American Dream. These interests have led me to read deeply about the best and worst of US history. Winding through that history there has always been a current of White Supremacy poisoning the American psyche. It is time, long past time, for white people of good conscience to actively fight White Supremacy in the United States.




History always has complexities that fade in the general public consciousness over time. Only by going back to primary sources, reading what people said and did at the time events occurred, or reviewing the art and fiction they created, does the courage or banality of actions appear. People of any time will tell you who they are in their description of events and the stories they create around them. And when people tell you who they are,believe them. When we look at what proponents of White Supremacy have said throughout the history of the country there are several narratives that jump out as especially problematic.



Far too often the focus of US domestic history has largely been on the economics of slavery, understating social effects. Slavery in the Americas, going back to Columbus, has been a rope woven from three cords, economic, racial, and one I’ll discuss more further on. Prior to the US Civil War slavery had a largely economic justification, masking the White Supremacy inherent in the choice of the people used to meet the perceived economic needs. The Civil War became a crucible that burned away the economic justification, leaving behind a toxic residue of concentrated White Supremacy. Racism based slavery before the war became toxic racism once the pretense of economic necessity was removed. Though the principle of White Supremacy was proven unequivocally false by the Civil War, it became the core of post-war Lost Cause lies. Southern White Supremacists quickly converted their grief at the loss of the war into new racist narratives blaming people of color for the loss.Pollard’s The Lost Cause gave the new narrative a name and ideology, which was expanded by others over the years. Key publications based on the Lost Cause narrative are The Clansman and Gone With the Wind, which tell very similar, and entirely fictional, stories.



Following the Civil War, White Supremacists tell us, in their own words, that they believe people of color are inferior. There are many variants on exactly why they claim this, none of which have any basis in science. Evolutionary biology and genetics shown that all humans fall within a narrow range of very similar characteristics, and that superficial differences such as skin color have nothing to do with important aspects such as intelligence or creativity. Rather than acknowledge the fundamental truths that science reveals, White Supremacists deliberately choose to ignore the science, or attempt to distort it to fit their own ideas. While there is a place for reasonable discussion and debate,outright denial of science is dangerous not just to the deniers but to society at large. Science provides a common understanding of the world around us, one that cannot be selectively accepted. Evolutionary biology rests on the same basic science as cell phones,the same principles of mathematics, physics, and chemistry, so to deny evolution while using cell phones is absurd, as absurd as White Supremacy itself. When White Supremacists deny the truth of evolution, that all humans are fundamentally similar regardless of skin color, they also reject basic principles that tie society together.



Aside from an unjustified belief in their own superiority, White Supremacists have believed in a social order that includes violent suppression of people of color. During the first Ku Klux Klan from 1865 to 1871 they would shoot black people openly and leave their bodies in the street. It was this extreme violence that swayed public opinion against the Klan, until authorities disrupted their activities and the organization collapsed in disgrace. We have have seen reemergence of this violent behavior repeatedly since then, in Wilmington, Atlanta, Tulsa, and many other places over the past century and a half, and on January 6 of this year. When outright violence has not been used other methods of suppression have been employed. Over time, as laws have been passed to prevent tactics such as poll taxes and unfair literacy tests, the White Supremacist narrative has avoid directly stating their objectives but has instead used vague terms around security. These superficial disguises do not change their fundamental belief in asocial order ruled by whites, they only mask their toxic racism behind a veneer of public good.



Within the White Supremacist’s social order there is also the mistaken belief that people of color were happier under conditions of slavery. This idea has been spread through fictional depictions of conditions of slavery, the most vile of which was the extremely racist Gone With the Wind. There is considerable documentation that enslaved people despised their conditions, as evidenced among many other things the large number of freed slaves that joined the Union army to help free others. Yet Gone With the Wind includes a scene where Big Sam fondly recalls Tara before the war. Overwhelmingly the post war freed people were quick to build a better future for themselves as best they could under horrific conditions, including the first Klan and later Jim Crow laws designed to keep them from participating in democracy. Showing free people longing for the conditions of slavery when the great majority wanted to build new lives of freedom and prosperity is an idea that only exists in the minds of White Supremacists. Whites of good conscience must understand this lie, and counter it when we come across it.



White women, in the typical view of White Supremacists, are delicate and vulnerable and must be protected. In particular White Supremacists believe women must be protected from Black men. Reality has no place in this view, and many Black men have been brutally attacked and often murdered for the most trivial surmised slights against white women. This view of women is prevalent in the Lost Cause, simultaneously a racist and sexist view of the world.



These four examples, a belief in racial superiority, justification of violence, a skewed version of conditions under slavery, and an unrealistic portrayal of women, area high level look at White Supremacy in the United States. At this point we should look at the high level consequences of this strain of hatred. Consequences for people of color are known, as victims of mass and individual murder, theft of property, destruction of homes,job discrimination, redlining, and other aggressions. Consequences for white people also exist, though. To be clear the consequences for whites have never been as severe as for people of color. For a century and a half some whites have supported White Supremacy to their own detriment, and this is what needs to change. There is no changing hard core White Supremacists for the most part, but there are many moderate whites who follow along, who tacitly support the discriminatory policies out of fear and training. Through education and experience enough white people can be reached to turn the tide of today’s White Supremacist violence.



First off consider those of us called white allies. These are people such as myself who were born into white privilege and through some combination of education on social justice and experience with people of color have recognized the depths of injustice that have existed in the US, and do something about it. We have a responsibility to discuss issues with other white people, raise awareness of the ways that White Supremacy has harmed all of the United States, and taken actions to change our communities. Our privilege has come at a cost to people of color,something we must acknowledge and correct, even if that privilege in our individual case is indirect and not deliberate suppression. We must be supporting justice at city council meetings and school boards, or in hiring and promotion decisions at work, or in our daily interactions.



About 1,300 words ago I mentioned a third cord in the rope of slavery. We in the US have never recognized this third aspect of pre-war slavery and modern racism, allowing it to support the radical extremism that threatens to destroy our democracy. We still live under a post Civil War ideal of maintaining a Union that White Supremacists do not believe in. White Supremacists have never believed in the sanctity of the Union.



From The Lost Cause: “There could be no congeniality between the Puritan exiles who established themselves upon the cold and rugged and cheerless soil of New England, and the Cavaliers who sought the brighter climate of the South, and drank in their baronial halls in Virginia confusion to roundheads and regicides.”



From the movie opening to Gone With the Wind: “There was a land of Cavaliers and Cotton Fields called the OLD SOUTH…”



Some seventy-five years separates those two quotes sharing the same idea. Pollard refers back to the initial English colonies in New England and Virginia, identifying Southern ideals as descending from the Cavaliers. The selected quote contains the core idea, but a good portion of the second chapter of The Lost Cause elaborates on the principles if you want to read more.



Roundheads and Puritans, explicitly disdained by Pollard, were the supporters of the Parliament of England during the English Civil War. Cavaliers were supporters of not just King Charles, but also the principle of the divine right of kings. More than two hundred years after the English Civil War Pollard ties the US Civil War back to the political ideologies of those earlier times. By using the term “regicides” he clearly establishes his view about parliamentary government. That idea is still strong in Gone With the Wind.



That royalist part of White Supremacy is the point that has faded in our current view of history, at great danger to all of us. Over one hundred years after the English Civil War, the American Revolution fought for freedoms based on individual liberties. The Enlightenment refined ideas of liberty during that time after the English monarchy was restored, and ideologically the basis of the United States is that people are able to rule themselves – We The People. For all the flaws and failures since, our founding principles are explicitly humanist, and we do not believe in monarchical rule at all, going so far as to prohibit the President from using “king” or other monarchical titles right in the Constitution. Cavaliers, supporting the idea of absolute monarchy, are enemies of the ideals of the United States. Pollard and all those who follow the Lost Cause narrative today are not merely un-American,they are anti-American, by their own words.



Why has White Supremacy persisted so long in the United States, when it should have died an overdue and natural death in 1865? Not just because of racism, though that is part of the story. Modern White Supremacists come from a tradition that does not even believe in democracy. In this light, the events of January 6, and all the violence that has come before is unsurprising. Current efforts to destroy US democracy and install autocratic governance are another attempt in a long series of attempts to end democratic governance. All the racist redistricting and voter suppression measures we see today descend from the Lost Cause.



There are certainly many people living in the modern South who do believe in democracy and the promises of liberty inherent in the United States. Our concern must be those who do not, and all of us must understand that when we face off against the more determined White Supremacists we are not facing people who believe in the rule of law, but rather in autocratic tyranny. If we are to preserve democracy we have no choice but to face the lies of the Lost Cause, including both the racist lies and the royalist lies,because each set of lies reinforces the whole. History has proven that inclusive democracy, even a young and flawed democracy, is the only political system that allows a modern society to flourish. We cannot drag White Supremacists into the future, but we must not allow them to hold us in the past.



White people, wherever we live, whatever our family history, whatever our current privilege, must fight White Supremacy. Fighting White Supremacy because of the terrors wreaked upon people of color is sufficient reason by itself, but if that is not enough for you individually understand the threats to your own freedom as well. It is time to end White Supremacy for once and for all.



This diary is a high level overview, please let me know in the comments anything you would like to know more about. Reading sources such as Pollard and the journals of the Southern Historical Society is not pleasant, but it is necessary to uproot the evil of White Supremacy.
 
The big issue is thinking a multicultural society can be stable or work. Pure social engineering. Even the longest lasting multicultural societies have tons of conflicts and issues that people are not aware of or ignore. Also, although I agree one should be colorblind when approaching an action (Opening a door for someone) when applying it to people around you, I disagree. You won't catch me dead walking into a black neighborhood at night, or at anytime to be honest. People want you to ignore statistics and details but ignore there were issues with race and more even back then, it's just white majorities were a larger portion of the demographics so it could be ignored. Not so now.
Race alone won’t prevent multiculturalism in a society. The culture of a white Texan is dramatically different from a white New Yorker or a white Californian. Distance, time, economics, class, and even religion will alter one’s culture. Likewise, a black American is quite a bit different from a black Brazilian, not just in terms of genetics, but also language, religion, economic, cultural, and even historical differences.
 
I grew up in a post-racial, colorblind period of history. Everybody denounced the White Power movement and we all thought they were nuts.

Now in the last few years, some of the White Power talking points turned out to be completely true, notably their rhetoric about minorities trying to subjugate and exterminate the white race. These activist groups are quite open about that being their goal.

So I don't know what to believe anymore.
 
You're trying to say southern whites are just as bad as niggers which anyone who doesn't live in a city knows is not true.
To be blunt they see you in the same camp even if they pretend to like blacks.

*Edit* What a lot of conservatives don’t understand is that a lot of what liberals like or dislike are based on their straw man view of southerners: White = bad because Southern Conservatives say white = good; Christianity bad because southerners are Christian; Muslims good because Southern Conservatives say Muslims bad. This bleeds over into moderates end even northern or non-southern republicans. As a yankee I grew up having this beat into my head that the South is the scapegoat for all the evils in the US and in extension the world.
 
Last edited:
Yea, Adolf was genius that attacked a dozen nations over 4 continents. Shame Rohm didn't get to turn out his lights. The world would be a much better place.
Whether you agree with fascism or not Hitler once said that most of societies troubles stemmed from politicians and that they should be held accountable or face violence for it. You don't have to 100% agree with all his sentiments to see he had quite a few points. Not everything Naziman says is bad just because Nazi.
Race alone won’t prevent multiculturalism in a society. The culture of a white Texan is dramatically different from a white New Yorker or a white Californian. Distance, time, economics, class, and even religion will alter one’s culture. Likewise, a black American is quite a bit different from a black Brazilian, not just in terms of genetics, but also language, religion, economic, cultural, and even historical differences.
There will be slight differences in culture, but you won't see full on genocide because of those differences generally. Mix racing which happens sooner or later in vast amounts when 1. The opposite sex figures one group of men are more successful or fitting. 2. Conquest ideology sets in. (We see this currently with most migrant groups stealing resources from the middle class making it harder for them to have children while imposing more taxes on them and stealing further resources so they can have kids.) It's by no means a coincidence. You also get the resentment when one group does better, which leads into hatred, and the racial tension which builds up.

I also never had a white man (from any state) threaten to throw my grandmother down stairs for stepping in front of them, or harass my grandfather when walking in a mall. It's not just a difference it's a racial aimed thing. People ignore this because only whites can mainly be charged for hate crimes though.
 
So I don't know what to believe anymore.
This should be easy. Are you going to believe the people that you now know lied to you and are in the process of arranging your genocide? Or will you believe the people that told uncomfortable truths to you the entire time?

Side with the racial strangers that want you dead, or your own people?
1635176817442.png
 
Whether you agree with fascism or not Hitler once said that most of societies troubles stemmed from politicians and that they should be held accountable or face violence for it. You don't have to 100% agree with all his sentiments to see he had quite a few points. Not everything Naziman says is bad just because Nazi.
Winning is everything. Nothing else matters. The German High Command was against Hitler's military insanity. But most were afraid to stand up to him and when they tried late in the game it was too late.

Most of the "Nazis" were against Hitler's military policy.
 
Winning is everything. Nothing else matters. The German High Command was against Hitler's military insanity. But most were afraid to stand up to him and when they tried late in the game it was too late.

Most of the "Nazis" were against Hitler's military policy.
By that time Hitler was implied to have heavily been drugged. I've seen videos of him walking at that time and he couldn't even keep his hand still without it shaking like he was having some kind of autism fit in his hand alone.

CIA had documents revealing attempts at injecting him with estrogen, and all kind of other whacky shit. It's no surprise by the end he was off his rockers.

Now, had he not been dosed by his doctor, by foreign governments and more I'd argue he would have been a lot more intelligent just like before he went a little off his rocker.
 
I grew up in a post-racial, colorblind period of history. Everybody denounced the White Power movement and we all thought they were nuts.

Now in the last few years, some of the White Power talking points turned out to be completely true, notably their rhetoric about minorities trying to subjugate and exterminate the white race. These activist groups are quite open about that being their goal.

So I don't know what to believe anymore.
Really? Seems pretty obvious what to believe. All that post racial equality stuff was horse shit, and was just the first stepping stone to placate whites before leading them to slaughter.
 
You're saying niggers learned murderous gang culture and abandoning their children from some rednecks?
Well, I'm not saying they learned abandoning their children from rednecks, at least probably not (Celts were big on family ties)-- America in general learned that from the sexual revolution and the welfare state incentivizing single motherhood, but somehow it was black people that ended up eating that shit up the most.

But there's a reason why northern blacks were anxious about southern blacks in times past, despite them both being black.

If niggers were truly influenced by crackers they'd be in a better position now instead of the lowest race in America.
...what positive influence would they have gained from rednecks? And what does this have to do with rednecks still sucking? We've gone from "if not for those damn niggers we would have been like the Jetsons!" to "well, uh, um, rednecks aren't as bad as those damn niggers!"
Yeah redneck daddys usually get a shotgun wedding,
Close to nobody gets a shotgun wedding anymore, which is part of the reason why single motherhood rose meteorically from the 60s onward.
 
Last edited:
Well, I'm not saying they learned abandoning their children from rednecks, at least probably not (Celts were big on family ties)-- America in general learned that from the sexual revolution and the welfare state incentivizing single motherhood, but somehow it was black people that ended up eating that shit up the most.

But there's a reason why northern blacks were anxious about southern blacks in times past, despite them both being black.


...what positive influence would they have gained from rednecks? And what does this have to do with rednecks still sucking? We've gone from "if not for those damn niggers we would have been like the Jetsons!" to "well, uh, um, rednecks aren't as bad as those damn niggers!"

Close to nobody gets a shotgun wedding anymore, which is part of the reason why single motherhood rose meteorically from the 60s onward.
Why is it that whites are to blame for all negative nigger behavior? Perhaps niggers act like this because they learned it from other niggers? Also segregation existed back then especially in the south so I don't see much cultural exchange happening. And if all bad black behavior is to blame on southern whites, why are northern nig nogs just as violent and impulsive??
 
Why is it that whites are to blame for all negative nigger behavior? Perhaps niggers act like this because they learned it from other niggers? Also segregation existed back them especially in the south so I don't see much cultural exchange happening. And if all bad black behavior is to blame on southern whites, why are northern nig nogs just as violent and impulsive??
Are you White today?

Or this?

done1.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: snailslime
They’re both shit though.

They are but here’s the difference,

Yesterday I was reading this, about some superintendent of schools, black lady with PhD, who got BTFO due to performing George Floyd worship too hard:

When Andrea Kane sat down to write a letter to parents in her school district days after George Floyd’s death in 2020, images of the Black man pleading for his life under the knee of a white Minnesota police officer were haunting her.

Dr. Kane, the superintendent, saw him in the faces of Black students in her district and heard him crying out for his mother when she spoke to her own sons. So she started her letter with a warning that it would bear not just “good news,” but “a bit of a reality check.”

No white superintendent of schools with a PhD is out here looking at cops killing some white criminal and seeing their students and their sons. They’re thinking, huh, criminal was taken down. They may feel sympathy if the act itself appeared inhumanely done, but no more than for a person of another race. Why would an educated professional with a PhD and a $150k+ a year job opt in to identifying with criminals just because they’re the same shade? She lives in a rich town on the Maryland shore with only 8% blacks in the population.

You do not HAVE to lose your shit like this. You are able to - invited to in fact - consider yourself and your family *above this*. Because I sure hope you are. I sure hope that PhDs and upper middle class incomes means that you are less likely to have a son who robbed a pregnant woman by shoving a gun into her distended belly and threatening to kill her and her baby than some random black hood family in Minneapolis.

Why do you insist this has something to do with you? Because you’re infected with tribalism and it ain’t even natural honey, it was induced. Sure Africans are more tribal than most races. But they’re not tribal like, all blacks are in my tribe. They’re tribal like gangs. These blacks are in my tribe, these others are not.

Free yourself of the burden of having to identify with rapists robbers murderers and other undesirables. You got your PhD. It was probably from Webster University but still. You had a great job. But because you chose to identify with a dead criminal when no one made you do that, you lost your job.

Stop worshipping the worst people with your skin color. Disregard them like law-abiding whites disregard criminal whites.
 
Back