Chantal Sarault / Chantal Al-Refae / Foodie Beauty - Delusional drug fiend hamplanet mukbanger from Canada trying to be a glamorous online influencer. Pathological liar, huge bitch, narcissist, animal abuser

I am clearly very bored. I don't know if this matters or helps, but hey. Information.
Air Canada TimeTables

Screenshot 2021-10-25 105708.pngScreenshot 2021-10-25 105723.png




\
Screenshot 2021-10-25 105745.pngScreenshot 2021-10-25 105801.png
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: TomboyGF, looney27, Gunslinger and 24 others
TrainWreckSpotter said:
One excuse that Chantal made trying to defend him was that she was with him the whole time. With the rare exception, she goes to Nader 's in the late afternoon/early evening and returns early the next morning. In between, she does hours-long livestreams from the luxury villa without any contact with him, so yeah, the opportunity was there.

From JustSayin's video:

View attachment 2656902
Sounds like she DID go to Canada just for Nader and she WAS expecting a rendezvous. In her own video she implied that she had the hotel booked ahead of time. She was even expecting him to pick her up at the airport?

View attachment 2656918

Yeah Mae, splashing it all over the internet (with receipts) then enlisting reaction channels to help spread it is being REAL careful. You're also just asking to be doxed.

I am beginning to lean toward the theory that she went into it expecting a "romantic weekend" complete with wining and dining. If the incident did actually unfolded the way she described, it's still date rape and still a crime. But how big of a dope can this woman be?

The internet is rife with idiots.

ETA: She actually posted a photo of her airline ticket. Destination Los Angeles. Here are the likely candidates:

View attachment 2656959
Click to expand...

this is probably right the sticker on the windshield of her car said LAX automotive with a LA area code on the phone number
 

Attachments

  • 0E894568-04DB-44F1-B20A-59A3CC1DC6E2.jpeg
    0E894568-04DB-44F1-B20A-59A3CC1DC6E2.jpeg
    70.8 KB · Views: 116
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: A Left Elbow, TomboyGF, looney27 and 51 others
Nader has proven he'll have sex/rape anything that moves, he has sex with a 450 lb Human Roach that picks up cat shit with her bare hand and NEVER washes her hands but he draws the line at a 70 year-old woman, sure we all believe him lol, and he has the nerve to make fun of the way the 70 year-old looks now would be a good time for Chantal to buy Nader a mirror so he can see just how FUGLY he is
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: GrumbleBum2, TomboyGF, looney27 and 64 others
TaterFarmer said:
Another thing that points to something big is left out of the story, is that she claimed to have threatened to contact an attorney before she even left Canada. I've never heard a rape victim threaten to sue. But, if Nader swindled her for his rent money or more by promising something... then I could see contacting an attorney. On the other hand, Nader may have done himself in good if this is a 70yo because they can add elder abuse to his charges. And, yes, elder abuse can be done between strangers. It doesn't require a care-giver scenario. The point is that someone is taking advantage (physically, financially, emotionally) of someone over the age of 60yo.
Click to expand...
I'm going to disagree... Nader is not someone who is a 'trusted" person - they're strangers who met on the internet. I cannot see how any sort of "elder abuse" can apply in this specific scenario. At this point I don't think a legal sperg is necessary and can agree to disagree- I'm on the end that elder abuse is not going to apply to Nader in any regard if any of this is true.

​
​
Who abuses seniors?​
Older adults affected by abuse often know and trust the person mistreating them. Elder abuse can be caused by a family member, a friend, someone who provides assistance with basic needs or services, or health care providers in institutional settings. In many situations of elder abuse, the abuser is dependent on the older adult for money, food or shelter.​

It's also possible that Fern/Mae consulted a lawyer in Canada as she perhaps needed to know what actions to do considering the nuances in the situation and in a different country. Though the first thing she should have done is to To contact the Department of State in the U.S. call 1-888-407-4747 (from the U.S. or Canada) as a US citizen who is a possible victim of a crime. I'm not seeing any indication she did that.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: TomboyGF, looney27, Shianne Wolfe and 24 others
Pizza Sloth said:
I'm going to disagree... Nader is not someone who is a 'trusted" person - they're strangers who met on the internet. I cannot see how any sort of "elder abuse" can apply in this specific scenario. At this point I don't think a legal sperg is necessary and can agree to disagree- I'm on the end that elder abuse is not going to apply to Nader in any regard if any of this is true.

​
​
Who abuses seniors?​
Older adults affected by abuse often know and trust the person mistreating them. Elder abuse can be caused by a family member, a friend, someone who provides assistance with basic needs or services, or health care providers in institutional settings. In many situations of elder abuse, the abuser is dependent on the older adult for money, food or shelter.​

It's also possible that Fern/Mae consulted a lawyer in Canada as she perhaps needed to know what actions to do considering the nuances in the situation and in a different country. Though the first thing she should have done is to To contact the Department of State in the U.S. call 1-888-407-4747 (from the U.S. or Canada) as a US citizen who is a possible victim of a crime. I'm not seeing any indication she did that.
Click to expand...
She went to Canada to meet Nader so all piston are not firing.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: TomboyGF, Baby Beluga, Gunslinger and 25 others
Rotogravure said:
Regarding this location (CA) I think we might be missing something. If only because the address listed on the hotel receipt is from Norwalk, CT. So, either girl has an old address linked to the CC she used or there is a connecting flight from CT to CA that we don't have. And I also checked where Comfort Inn HQ is (Choice Hotels) and thats in Maryland, so that's not that address either.

screenshot_2021-10-25-mae-anderson-receipts-about-her-and-nader-meeting-7-png.2656636



Also additionally questioning why the destination signature for Ottawa (YOW or CYOW) is blanked out, but not Toronto and in the other Toronto (YYZ) is blanked but not LAX.

ETA: Appears to belong to the third party vendor Booking.com - see also middle top hotels.com tag.
Thanks @raritycat & @GargoyleGorl
Click to expand...
1st time poster, long time lurker. In the video Mae or whoever she actually is posted, there's a sticker in the corner of the windshield for LA Automotive. The car is certainly from a dealership in California which adds credibility to her being in LA. The phone number come back to that company too.

Edit:. The zip code on the hotel bill is for 800 Connecticut ave, and priceline.com is located there. Also @IncestualMayoMonkeys beat me to it on the car's sticker.
 

Attachments

  • 20211025_134544.jpg
    20211025_134544.jpg
    201.6 KB · Views: 71
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Late
Reactions: Ebony Way, Baby Beluga, Shianne Wolfe and 28 others
Ramona said:
Big deal, all he has to do is dial *611 from the phone she gave him. Can't he see this?
Click to expand...

That's what I thought too, but (assuming its not a fake email from Chantal to Chantal) maybe the *611 has to come from the account holder phone? I don't know how that kind of crap works...

EDIT TO ADD: This question has been asked on her community tab and she answered that it was account holder only.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TomboyGF, Gunslinger, Fìddlesticks and 17 others
Pizza Sloth said:
Another new Community Post

View attachment 2657478
Click to expand...
Lmao she's surprised?

She's working so hard to virtue signal her way out of this properly. The only thing she cares about is that he may have fucked someone else. It doesn't matter how violent or consensual it may or may not have been. Look at all the stuff she's put up from him personally, right from the get go: slapping, insults, humiliating, sticking his dick in her ass cheeks when she specifically asked him not to (ie, rape.)

She's between a rock and a hard, oozing green place here. I imagine she'll be back with him at least before next payday.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: GrumbleBum2, TomboyGF, looney27 and 46 others
Queen of Moderation said:
Maybe the autism is catching up with me, but does the word "suspension" seem sus? Like termination would be better wording if the number/account was closed. You can suspend your service if you go on vacation. Is she just leaving her options open?
Click to expand...
Suspension is better if she's intending to turn it over to the police.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: looney27, Gunslinger, Fìddlesticks and 15 others
Lechat said:
Very suspish and I HATE IT! (this is why a cast of doubt is always associated with victim).

1. Are you really that dumb? Foodie has been very transparent about his behavior including the borderline SA with the titties bruises, drug abuse, broom, threatening people on stream. Instead of staying away, She whisked herself away to see him. Not sorry, she asked for it.
2. If it happened, why would anyone air this dirty laundry out in public instead of going to the cops? I would like to see a public record/report before I believe this.

Again reiterating the first rule of KF, NEVER ENGAGE WITH THE COWS AND ITS UNIVERSE (thank you so much)
Click to expand...
For some reason I don't get the feeling that this woman is a Chantal watcher. I mean she obviously knows the basics but I think that's because she's seen her on Nader's channel. It'll be interesting to see where this goes.

The following is a comment that was on Chantal's community post. It seems odd that nobody else picked up on this but it also has a ring of truth about it:

You helped to set up BOTH of Nader's YouTube accounts. The one with his cooking and you. And the second one which had videos of his brother's wedding, photos of women and their information and then the rape video. I saw it Chantal and dismissed that video because I thought it was weird that your boyfriend would post a video like that. But you knew Chantal. You knew what he did. That's why that video and the one's of other women are gone from his second channel. That's why you're waffling about breaking up with him. You fucking knew and had it all erased. God damn.
Pizza Sloth said:
Not really. It's possible (and just saying this for plausibility). Mae/Fern reaches out to Justsayin (JS) in a DM or other private chat in which Fern shares she has a video but is not sure what to do and wants to warn other women about her alleged experience. They discuss a plan and Mae/Fern posts the video on her channel, then JS tweeted it out. JS has 4,400 followers on Twitter, many of them in the "hayder nation". Only takes a few minutes for someone to get the notification and sees the tweet while also in the live chat room for FFG....

Social media works fast, and I don't think it's unlikely for someone to say "I have this information, but I don't know what to do with it" to someone who could possibly advise them or help them send out a message.

The same happens to items posted here. It was literally about 2 or 3 minutes before the archive was posted of Chantal's live last night before it was posted on Twitter as well as the updated dox of Nader's residence.
Click to expand...
I agree and Justsayin gets onto everything chantal related very quickly. Its easy enough to do a search on YT for videos uploaded in the last day/hour etc.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Fìddlesticks, thriphhole, Rem Farms and 8 others
lottalove said:
View attachment 2657454
new community tab post
Click to expand...
She says "I suspended the second line on my mobile account... The internet has been disabled a while back since I never paid the bill." If she has two lines on the same account, wouldn't they be combined into a single bill? Would she be able to pay her internet without his?

Sorry if that's a stupid question. I have never had more than one phone line under a single account.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Fae’ri, Gunslinger, Fìddlesticks and 20 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back