The Australian totalitarian megathread - She won't be right mate.

:story:

I was wondering where you were going with this bait but I'm very entertained at this point, so carry on sir.
I'm deadly serious.

We had anti-vax cunts shutting down the vaccine clinics in the CBD for the homeless. If the anti-vaxxed want to die, it's no skin off my nose. It's when they create super-spreader events and piss on the Shrine of Remembrance that we see how sociopathic and selfish these fools actually are.
 
I'm deadly serious.

We had anti-vax cunts shutting down the vaccine clinics in the CBD for the homeless. If the anti-vaxxed want to die, it's no skin off my nose. It's when they create super-spreader events and piss on the Shrine of Remembrance that we see how sociopathic and selfish these fools actually are.

IT WAS CUM, SIR. HOW DARE YOU MISREPRESENT ME
 
Le
I'm deadly serious.

We had anti-vax cunts shutting down the vaccine clinics in the CBD for the homeless. If the anti-vaxxed want to die, it's no skin off my nose. It's when they create super-spreader events and piss on the Shrine of Remembrance that we see how sociopathic and selfish these fools actually are.
Letting the homeless die off is probably a good thing no? Saves me the energy of stepping over them when trying to get to Woolies.
 
Letting the anti-vaxxers die would be the preferable option, sweetie.....

I would think that some people wished the anti-vaxxers would be forced to play either Battle Royale, or Squid Game. The "winner" of the game has to get vaccinated in order to get their freedom, or else they'll get eliminated permanently too, resulting in no winner.
 
I would think that some people wished the anti-vaxxers would be forced to play either Battle Royale, or Squid Game. The "winner" of the game has to get vaccinated in order to get their freedom, or else they'll get eliminated permanently too, resulting in no winner.
There's a certain piquancy about it, isn't there? These violent delights have violent ends. It's the end result of Libertarianism and greed.


Well they're already playing Russian roulette with their own lives by stepping outside unvaxxed and without a mask. It's only a matter of time until they all perish if you believe in The Science™.
Good bait, but I don't think they'll all die, just in the ranges typical of the unvaccinated. If they were alone in their plantations or camps then I wouldn't care if they were unvaccinated. They would just slowly wither away......
 
Last edited:
Whether it gets walked back or not, if we had a sane system then even proposing something like that should cause a politician's bomb collar to go off.

Kinda makes me want to jump states since I can work remotely anyway but I'd probably still have to fly back for a week every few months which seems like a hassle.
Cut this shit out Vic, I'm tired
It won't get walked back. The micro parties in the parliament have already said they'll be supporting it.

It's incredibly vaguely written, on purpose of course. The mechanism is very clear cut, the Premier gets advice there's a pandemic and he tables the health orders. The conditions for declaring a pandemic are whenever he decides there is one. Dan could have a loose motion one morning and declare a gastro pandemic and nobody could stop him. The nature of the health orders are again whatever he feels like. There's provisions in the bill for 'disadvantaged and people from non-English speaking backgrounds' having fines waived or reduced, a sop to important voting pools like the Muslims, but again this is purely discretionary and will be used to target opposition while giving passes to favored groups. Otherwise the fines are outrageous, up to 21K for even minor breaches. But it's the attributes and characteristic clauses that have me worried. When asked Dan and company refused to give a clear definition of what the language meant but instead gave examples and hypotheticals. One of those examples was the non-vaxxed not being allowed to go into shops, so it's clear that at a minimum it's to allow the government to continue with restrictions on the non vaxxed indefinitely. I assume the same will apply to non approved protests, and workplace vaxx requirements. However there's no theoretical limit to what he can order except it needs to be approved by an 'independent panel' that will be hand picked by Dan. All the parliament can do is say yes or no to his motion that a pandemic exists, after that we have one man rule in the state for 3 month blocks which can be endlessly renewed.

We should be clear that Andrews has already stated that the Covid pandemic will be carrying on for the whole of 2022, so this legislation will be enacted before the current state of emergency runs out in December.

The entirety of the yellow press has refused to criticize what is the most far reaching and anti democratic legislation in Australian history, so no surprise there. I've been talking to estate agents today I'm getting the fuck out of here.
 
There's something deeply sexual about violating vaccinated spaces. Knowing my dirty microbes are fondling them unawares, the horror and revulsion they would feel were i discovered
IMG_20211026_155013.jpg

'You think I don't see! You think I don't feel your microbes, like grubbly little fingers. Little, children's fingers on my body!'
 
Last edited:
It won't get walked back. The micro parties in the parliament have already said they'll be supporting it.

It's incredibly vaguely written, on purpose of course. The mechanism is very clear cut, the Premier gets advice there's a pandemic and he tables the health orders. The conditions for declaring a pandemic are whenever he decides there is one. Dan could have a loose motion one morning and declare a gastro pandemic and nobody could stop him. The nature of the health orders are again whatever he feels like. There's provisions in the bill for 'disadvantaged and people from non-English speaking backgrounds' having fines waived or reduced, a sop to important voting pools like the Muslims, but again this is purely discretionary and will be used to target opposition while giving passes to favored groups. Otherwise the fines are outrageous, up to 21K for even minor breaches. But it's the attributes and characteristic clauses that have me worried. When asked Dan and company refused to give a clear definition of what the language meant but instead gave examples and hypotheticals. One of those examples was the non-vaxxed not being allowed to go into shops, so it's clear that at a minimum it's to allow the government to continue with restrictions on the non vaxxed indefinitely. I assume the same will apply to non approved protests, and workplace vaxx requirements. However there's no theoretical limit to what he can order except it needs to be approved by an 'independent panel' that will be hand picked by Dan. All the parliament can do is say yes or no to his motion that a pandemic exists, after that we have one man rule in the state for 3 month blocks which can be endlessly renewed.

We should be clear that Andrews has already stated that the Covid pandemic will be carrying on for the whole of 2022, so this legislation will be enacted before the current state of emergency runs out in December.

The entirety of the yellow press has refused to criticize what is the most far reaching and anti democratic legislation in Australian history, so no surprise there. I've been talking to estate agents
today I'm getting the fuck out of here.
And the absolute worst part. no matter how much attention this gets. no matter how big the protests are. people just dont care, they want to go back to 'normal' and wont rock the boat. Dan will just shove it through a packed parliament, the federal government will just shrug and take another freedom. and at the end of the day, the labour party will win the next election because the majority of people here just want to put their heads down.
 
Everywhere in Australia is getting these mandates eventually. Is there anywhere left in the world to flee to? Anywhere a person could get to without getting jabbed first?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: UnterLord
There's a certain piquancy about it, isn't there? These violent delights have violent ends. It's the end result of Libertarianism and greed.



Good bait, but I don't think they'll all die, just in the ranges typical of the unvaccinated. If they were alone in their plantations or camps then I wouldn't care if they were unvaccinated. They would slowly wither away......
Says the person who posts nothing but bait in this thread. So less than one percent will die? I initially thought that you were just pretending to be retarded, joke's on me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dude Vaccines
Says the person who posts nothing but bait in this thread. So less than one percent will die? I initially thought that you were just pretending to be exceptional, joke's on me.
You're so infected by this cult that you cannot discern between my obvious shitposts about 'the mark of the beast' and my obvious anger at the spiritual and moral vacancy contained within the anti-vaxxer ideological silos.

Vaccination markedly stops the effects of covid. It isn't foolproof but it creates hope in this darkness.....
 
Last edited:
You're so infected by this cult that you cannot discern between my obvious shitposts about 'the mark of the beast' and my obvious anger at the spiritual and moral vacancy within anti-vaxxers ideological silos.

Vaccination markedly stops the effects of vivid. It isn't foolproof but it creates hope in this darkness.....
If you fear death, then perhaps you have never truly lived?
 
And the absolute worst part. no matter how much attention this gets. no matter how big the protests are. people just dont care, they want to go back to 'normal' and wont rock the boat. Dan will just shove it through a packed parliament, the federal government will just shrug and take another freedom. and at the end of the day, the labour party will win the next election because the majority of people here just want to put their heads down.
Yes it's going to sail through and most people won't give a fuck until the next lockdown. Dan has said 2 or 3 times that THIS lockdown will 100% be the last one, until the next one happens. We will be due a big spike in cases and hospital admissions some time after Christmas. They're trying to get ahead of it by rolling out boosters before that but I doubt it will work as without draconian force I very much doubt they'll get 90 plus percent to roll their sleeves up again. Andrews will definitely lockdown if we hit thousands of cases a day in the new year, which doesn't worry me as much compared to what he'll do if there is a panic from a new variant and the media blames the purebloods.

The legislation, and I kid you fucking not, contains provisions to account for people's religious and political beliefs when framing health orders. What does this mean? Potentially that health orders can be issued exclusively to certain groups which will be under different legal restrictions than others. Yes this is happening now with the unvaxxed but the legislation goes a lot further, any attribute or characteristic, your race, religion, sex, political beliefs fucking hobbies can be taken account off in the issuance of targeted health directions. Health orders that single out particular groups for discriminatory policing is not something I'd ever thought I'd see in my lifetime and yes all anti discrimination legislation is suspended during a pandemic as it relates to health orders.

I have no doubt that if shit goes south with the vaccines Dan will start rounding up troublemakers under the guise of health. He's building that giant prison camp for a reason and it has fuck all to do with bush fires or unvaxxed travelers.
 

New AI tech primed to catch rule-breaking Queensland drivers​

https://www.9news.com.au/national/q...breakers/d9968028-a315-43b0-998c-02cae4e08636 (https://archive.ph/gFjW1)
Excerpt:
https___prod.static9.net.jpeg
"Motorists can expect the cameras to be located anywhere, any time," a Transport and Main Roads (TMR) spokesperson told 9News.com.au.

Portable and fixed mobile phone- and seatbelt-detection cameras will be deployed in urban and regional areas across the state.

The cameras take images of each vehicle travelling in the lane of traffic the camera is monitoring, including photographs inside the vehicle, mainly the front seats.

And if you're doing something wrong, AI will catch you, the spokesperson warned.
 
Back