Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

FCrLNG5XEAoi7lo

Okay, that's enough, Canada needs to be subject to some serious corrective action.
He has a remarkably punchable face. He chose the right profession.


Floyd Mayweather shoots down teen fan with painted nails​

“You got painted nails, I don’t take pictures with guys with no painted nails,” Mayweather can be heard saying in TMZ’s video , as his security detail gets the boy to move back.

The security guard then asked the teen to step back, before Mayweather walked away.

The fan is then heard saying: “Floyd’s a homophobe. Floyd doesn’t want to take a picture with me because my nails are painted. Bruh, really?”

Get rekt, faggot.

First comments: W
 
Chappelle: i like trans, but wypipo bad
Chappelle detractors: i like chappelle, but wypipo bad
Such rich discourse.

Is Arizona's Kyrsten Sinema bad for bisexual Americans?

Bisexual women are constantly told we’re untrustworthy, that our attraction to multiple genders means we’re more likely to cheat.
Bi women are constantly told we’re untrustworthy, that our attraction to multiple genders means we’re more likely to cheat. We’re called greedy for finding more than one gender attractive, “confusing” for liking more than one gender and self-absorbed because apparently our brains are unable to think about much beyond our own sexual gratification. Within the LGBTQ community, bisexuals can be viewed as fair-weather members at best — likely to bail the second we stop having fun. Media outlets might not be talking about Sinema’s sex life, but her political reputation as greedy, unreliable and attention-seeking echoes many of the stereotypes my community has been dealing with for years.
Bisexual sufferings are not to be ignored. We demand our place on the oppression stack!
 

Is Arizona's Kyrsten Sinema bad for bisexual Americans?

Bisexual women are constantly told we’re untrustworthy, that our attraction to multiple genders means we’re more likely to cheat.

Bisexual sufferings are not to be ignored. We demand our place on the oppression stack!
She really thinks about this kind of shit a lot:
1635320067783.png

1635320090366.png

1635320106074.png

1635320129728.png
1635320140224.png
1635320153104.png
1635320163915.png

1635320184816.png

1635320194680.png

1635320222160.png

1635320239596.png
 
So Lil Nas X, who is almost exclusively listened to by white girls, who almost all black people hate, and who makes a living by doing what black nationalists call "cooning" hasn't betrayed his race, but Dave Chapelle, whose only crime is telling jokes about anything and everything, has?

I'm not into identity politics, but if you are, then learn to do it properly.
 
So Lil Nas X, who is almost exclusively listened to by white girls, who almost all black people hate, and who makes a living by doing what black nationalists call "cooning" hasn't betrayed his race, but Dave Chapelle, whose only crime is telling jokes about anything and everything, has?

I'm not into identity politics, but if you are, then learn to do it properly.
Sounds like they're doing it exactly properly. They own the identity and if you don't obey your woke (white female) SJW masters, you don't get to be in the identity club anymore.
 
That’s Billy Boy Palmer for you
and majid is no differentView attachment 2661752

Judge is trying to save the prosecution from themselves. Allowing the “victims” to be called victims means Rittenhouse is already convicted, as the trial’s entire purpose is to establish if they were in fact victims, or if Rittenhouse acted in self defense.

Meanwhile, allowing the dead people and the crowd they were with rioters and looters is accurate, and even if it wasn’t, IANAL but prejudicing the jury against the dead people doesn’t provide grounds for Rittenhouse to appeal if convicted. Letting the dead people be called victims? Must be excellent grounds, I think.

But god forbid anyone try to stop these morons from fucking up their own case lol.
 
It's pretty much standard practice not to refer to anyone as "victims" in court even in open and shut cases like I dunno Charles Manson or somebody. There's all kinds of lawyers on Twitter responding to a bunch of these unhinged tweets about removing (by any means necessary) the judge about how it is standard and is even required in some states but nobody cares because it's just outrage cycle crap.

Anyway, journalists need to shut up says academic:
1635329128323.png

1635329083768.png
 
1) These two hulking goons are the ones
Remember it's the hulking obviously male goons who are the real victims here, not the child they're obviously molesting.
Wow, what a horrible judge, how dare he allow a lawyer to refer to rioters and looters as rioters and looters?
 
That's arguably one of the funny things about the defensive claim that NOBODY IS TEACHING CRT, it'd possibly be better if they were teaching CRT than the garbage they actually tend to be. DiAngelo and Kendi are complete frauds (especially DiAngelo), at least CRT has some academic basis and gets peer reviewed (for whatever that's worth) and would generally require that they first teach what it's critical of.

Arguably anything related to Kendi is the worst, since while he and DiAngelo are both epic grifters, Kendi is an outright fascist who calls for the destruction of democracy and the rule of law.
 
That's arguably one of the funny things about the defensive claim that NOBODY IS TEACHING CRT
I always like to ask "Then it wouldn't matter if it was banned, right?" I usually get called a Nazi about 12 seconds later, which is fine, gives me a chance to practice my sloganeering auf Deutsch.
 
Judge is trying to save the prosecution from themselves. Allowing the “victims” to be called victims means Rittenhouse is already convicted, as the trial’s entire purpose is to establish if they were in fact victims, or if Rittenhouse acted in self defense.

Meanwhile, allowing the dead people and the crowd they were with rioters and looters is accurate, and even if it wasn’t, IANAL but prejudicing the jury against the dead people doesn’t provide grounds for Rittenhouse to appeal if convicted. Letting the dead people be called victims? Must be excellent grounds, I think.

But god forbid anyone try to stop these morons from fucking up their own case lol.
It’s also showing people that tge defend woman beaters and pedos
 
Back