Likewise.
It invades the patient's right to privacy if they are filmed and given the heated debate around abortion (especially in the US) it is completely understandable that the clinic wants to prevent its patients from ending up on some schizo's website.
I actually agree, but I will reiterate that abortionists should then have their own public campaign about how abortion is cool and shit. This, though, is bullshit, because you literally cannot sell murder no matter how much commercial polsih you throw at it and this by itself shows that abortion is truly a fucked up, unsellabel business practice besides a radical death worshiping, materialistic culture such and such.
Who is this "you" you're talking about? Abortion is not a nice and flowery operation. Very few medical operations are nice and without any risk. No one but the exceptional dangerhairs and edgelords are trying to paint abortion as something nice. Most of the people who think it should be available as an option do not want abortions to be common. Using the most extreme case of prochoicers to represent the majority is also a losing argument since the most rabid prolife advocates have bombed clinics and killed doctors.
If you have some kind of advanced cancer treatment, organ donor program, whatever fucking expert dentistry expertise, you can all sell those. You can put a picture of a healthy, smiling person to it and put in on a billboard. You can't do that shit with abortion because it is innately pure murder.
As for crazed anti abortionists, again, who the fuck are YOU to blame them for killing, which is fucked up and shouldn't happen, but how the fuck are you then going to defend psycho docs gladly taking paychecks for baby corpses?
When it comes to late-term abortions fetal abnormalities play a big role. These abnormalities are not always observable immediately so it is quite often the prenatal screening at week 20 (the anatomical scan) that reveals anatomical problems. The reason there is that 24-25 week bump is that a lot of parents want genetic testing done to ensure that there is something wrong. And then some just need time to think it over as it is not a decision that is made lightly. Things go wrong all the time and it is not possible to set a hard time limit for when these problems are discovered. These people are not just waiting in order to have the abortion to be as complicated as possible.
I'll be honest, at my anti abortion clan meetings, I slept through all the medical mumbo jumbo that tells a different story, that most of these abnormalities are actually false positives and that you can still take the baby out of the mother without killing it inside, risking the mother's own health while at it. It's a barebone response, but if I have time, I'll glance through this in more detail.
Birthing a severely developmentally challenged child and giving it away is absolutely unrealistic.
That's bullshit. One of the few things I can agree with socialistoids is that a government and western society at large should be able to provide for the disenfranchised and shit. Also, if the child is abnormal, but if he survives into some years, nobody has the right to kill it for convenience sake. It's a hard thing to say, but that is what I believe.
My main point with linking the clinic's website was to simply show you that the patient X wasn't really telling anything about the medical operation that the clinic itself doesn't tell as well. It was not for an argument as there is very little you and I could argue about regarding how these operations should be performed. Everything else the patient X tells can be questioned as there is no guarantee she isn't an activist and thus has a reason to lie to scare other people off.
So then there was no point in wasting your time or mine. Look at this shit, it takes both of us at least 10min. to go through posts this long and then read some useless bullshit on top of that.
She could have easily lied to the receptionist while calling for the appointment. I'm assuming that the nurses cannot kick her out based on a hunch, meaning that it is the doctor's choice to refuse taking her in as a patient. Nothing bizarre about it.
There is plenty of bizzare about it. Like I said, if she's s evidently a plant, just ask her to fuck off, if she talks some plant bullshit, just ignore it. I personally believe she was legit since they did let her be there, but the hospital itself didn't want anybody to know why. Call it an assumption of scumminess from people who get paid to kill babies.
Yes, I think it is important to treat cases individually when it comes to later abortions. There are different circumstances for every case and if a woman does not have a proper access to prenatal care some conditions can be discovered quite late along with other human factors that might lead to a woman considering abortion later in pregnancy.
But would you agree that late term of even post birth abortion solely for the mother's whim is fucked up murder tho?
I thought we were discussing the Crowder video, which primarily focuses on late-term abortion. But sure, move the goalpost.
Crowder did mention the percentages and I ain't against late term abortions, I'm against all abortions unless they really really really threaten the mother's life which I really fucking doubt is 1.2% of them.
Nah, nothing sketchy, you're just conspiratorially inclined.
I am, but does that mean I'm wrong? Let's find out.
I am not saying that the 1.2% means nothing, it just means that later abortion is quite rare. Those 6000 later abortions (your number, not going to go and check it) include fetuses that would not have been viable due to anatomical and/or genetic abnormalities, conditions where the mother's health would be at risk and, yes, also women who did not know they were pregnant until later into the pregnancy or had other issues with getting an abortion earlier.
I mentioned this above, but I heard from someone who heard from someone else, that sometimes those genetic oopsies are false positive and knowing that abortion is basically a private business from psycho motherfuckers, allow my conspiratory inclined brain to boldly claim that maybe they take false positives for business opportunities, either they know its a fp or not.
From a purely biological standpoint you are killing something and that something is definitely human. But the problem of personhood is more in the realm of philosophy and internet bickering.
This is no philosophy and personhood has nothing to do with it. This ain't jacking off into a sock or being on a period. You are literally ending a developing human being, though I just save letters and call it killing babies.
Honestly I fluctuate a bit on my stance on that question as there is no perfect answer
Yes there is, I just gave you one. You fluctuate because you know its murder, but you don't want to admit to it.
but I generally do not regard a fetus as a person.
Yeah, because it's not a person. It's still a human being.
My reasons for supporting abortion rights and wanting to keep it as cheap and accessible as possible is simply because the benefits outweigh the negatives.
No they don't. Crazy hags who are willing to kill one kid, but have another whenever they are convenient ed up being fucked up parents. Take a look at all those famous bitches who are pro abortion because muh career and shit. They look like fucking nutbags and if you want to claim Crowder is bullshit, then allow me to claim that those bitches are bullshit parents.
And again, the Crowder vid was mostly about later abortions.
It was. But why wouldn't you want to talk about early terms? Reckon it be much easier since earlies are even less of a person than lates.