Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)
- Thread starter Borscht
- Start date
CarlosDanger
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2020
According to Jack Posobiec, two of his sources in the intel community are telling him they are some of the "refugees" flown in during the Afghanistan debacle. Apparently they were being bused to somewhere and escaped/got off. That is as far as I got out of it tonight.
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2018
ISIS's Afghan franchise has been flourishing and there's no way at least a few didn't hitch a ride on one of the last planes out of Kabul.
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2019
Im split on that since its a world wide phenomenon (tho I dont discard the possibility they are making it worse on purpose). I honestly think that this year (and the ones ahead) are the consequences for living 2020 on the "We can worry about the economy later" mentality. I attribute this to both sheer comical incompetence brought by nepotism and some intentional sabotage from communist spies from China. Now of course, you are NOT ALLOWED to pin this on the politicians and experts that preached to the choir that you should stay at home and keep receiving free monies from the government, sure no negative consequences will ever come from that...right?
For real, the same people that dont know why everything is so expensive nowadays are the same pricks that told us we can "worry about the economy later"...Well, later has arrived, its here, and there is no escape from it...and the ones that helped motivate this will obviously not be affected and never be blamed.
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2019
Who knew indiscriminately letting in sandnigger goatfuckers with no vetting would have any repercussions at all, no sir, not at all.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
The real kicker is that the USSS is the United States Secret Service, the Presidential bodyguards. They wouldn't be getting directly involved unless there was a credible thread on Biden's life. A certain saying about things and deserving comes to mind at the moment...
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2018
This is total bullshit, because if this were true, they would've pulled this shit during Trump's term.
Seriously, the logic makes no sense. Let's punish the public for voting for Trump by... crashing the economy after Trump leaves office and Biden takes his place? Biden regret is the only lesson this is "teaching" anyone.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
I hope to God this isn't true.Saw this in a Jack Posobiec tweet. The tweet is from Cassandra Fairbanks of the Gateway Pundit. Take with a grain of salt but seems to be in line with what a lot of people have been talking about.
That's all I have to say.
Aussie_Autizzy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
Nothing like throwing some fear down to control the population. Politics 101.
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2017
This clip misses the absolute heat that Glenn Greenwald spit in the interview right after.
and how Eric Swalwell is connected.Every word is a fucking bullseye, especially this line - "They believe they have become such good people, primarily white liberals who engineered this today, that racism is now their little toy, their little weapon that they get to exploit and play with any time they want."
GLENN GREENWALD: It's the classic false flag operation and it was spread all day by the very same people who claim constantly that misinformation, disinformation, and fake news are such grave threats that you need to give them the power to censor the internet to stop it.
MSNBC analysts, Democratic party operatives, people who are associated with DNC super PACS like the Lincoln Project. And it's not just that they spread this disinformation on purpose to manipulate the outcome of an election. Obviously, they did that. But they use the exact tactic, which is making it seem like an event comes from one source when in fact it comes from another, that they have essentially tried to prohibit any of us from investigating or inquiring when it comes to January 6th, and the FBI, even though we know for a fact that the FBI, like them now, uses the tactic constantly.
TUCKER CARLSON: I'm so glad you made that point, because it's true, and you have more than a decade of writing about this, but this once again is an example of a political party turning the conversation to the moral quality of its opponents and ignoring the issues. There is a real debate going on in Virginia over to what extent parents should control the school curriculum. They're not engaging in the debate, they're calling the other guy racist. Is there some point in politics we can get to arguing the issues, or is that done?
GLENN GREENWALD: I think from the perspective of the Democratic Party, they realize that if the debate takes place in terms of what are they actually going to do for voters, who it is who funds them, who controls them, who they serve, if the truth about their agenda is actually revealed, they're going to lose elections.
That is the lesson they learned in 2016. The lesson they took from that is not to "revise our ideology and make sure we are doing things for people so they will vote for us." It was, "let's call everybody as many names as we can and destroy the reputations so they are too afraid to challenge us. We will call them Kremlin agents, white nationalists, racists."
And this is the most important part that happened today, I think. The Democratic Party believes that it "owns" race, that it owns the discourse around race, that it owns the accusations of racism. They believe they have become such good people, primarily white liberals who engineered this today, that racism is now their little toy, their little weapon that they get to exploit and play with any time they want. It is not a serious issue for them. They have no serious convictions about it, it is just something they use for fun to destroy anybody's reputation who opposes them and today provided the most vivid example of how they do that.
MSNBC analysts, Democratic party operatives, people who are associated with DNC super PACS like the Lincoln Project. And it's not just that they spread this disinformation on purpose to manipulate the outcome of an election. Obviously, they did that. But they use the exact tactic, which is making it seem like an event comes from one source when in fact it comes from another, that they have essentially tried to prohibit any of us from investigating or inquiring when it comes to January 6th, and the FBI, even though we know for a fact that the FBI, like them now, uses the tactic constantly.
TUCKER CARLSON: I'm so glad you made that point, because it's true, and you have more than a decade of writing about this, but this once again is an example of a political party turning the conversation to the moral quality of its opponents and ignoring the issues. There is a real debate going on in Virginia over to what extent parents should control the school curriculum. They're not engaging in the debate, they're calling the other guy racist. Is there some point in politics we can get to arguing the issues, or is that done?
GLENN GREENWALD: I think from the perspective of the Democratic Party, they realize that if the debate takes place in terms of what are they actually going to do for voters, who it is who funds them, who controls them, who they serve, if the truth about their agenda is actually revealed, they're going to lose elections.
That is the lesson they learned in 2016. The lesson they took from that is not to "revise our ideology and make sure we are doing things for people so they will vote for us." It was, "let's call everybody as many names as we can and destroy the reputations so they are too afraid to challenge us. We will call them Kremlin agents, white nationalists, racists."
And this is the most important part that happened today, I think. The Democratic Party believes that it "owns" race, that it owns the discourse around race, that it owns the accusations of racism. They believe they have become such good people, primarily white liberals who engineered this today, that racism is now their little toy, their little weapon that they get to exploit and play with any time they want. It is not a serious issue for them. They have no serious convictions about it, it is just something they use for fun to destroy anybody's reputation who opposes them and today provided the most vivid example of how they do that.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2020
Honselty I don't know any of the Lincoln project people until the group existed. I just assumed their dems pretending to be republican. Because I have no idea who Rick Wilson was before any of this.
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2021
I know a dude who works for USPS who is a cultishly defensive of it, and this explains so much for me.
Truly insane because Biden can basically say whatever and an "interpreter" will step in and tell Francis that Biden said hello. Without leaks, we'd never know.
It really does feel like the first stirrings of the great giant waking up. Baris said something like 70% of dads are voting Youngkin. They won't stop until those school boards are at their complete mercy.
The GOP group Project Virginia had an interesting thread about this. Basically said that Dems are such ideologues that they can't help but run the same playbook when confronted, and they can't stop to think that maybe smearing parents for asking questions about rape coverups doesn't have the same effect as pointing the finger at Trump. They can't help it, though, so the GOP has to start going on offense so that they keep running the play that keeps turning people off.
Here's the thread.
Yup, even if the idea originated with the Lincoln Project, they had to have tipped them off to get it retweeted by all of McAuliffe's surrogates at once. And they were treating it as if they were REALLY Youngkin supporters, so either Lincoln Project was completely acting independently and all of McAuliffe's staff is that stupid to think it was real, or the plan was to smear Youngkin supporters and they only came out with the "it was satire" excuse later (a whole day after the images went viral, mind).
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
At this point I'd just go to your local asian grocery store and get a few fried Tilapia and a single Peking duck. Might not be a turkey or a goose but fried tilapia with some sweet chili sauce always reminds me of thanksgiving for some reason, and Peking duck is pretty tasty and cheap at most asian stores around me still. Probably what I'm gonna end up doing this thanksgiving dinner.
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
Its so stupid it must be true. I mean really... when was the last time you saw dems do anything remotely kind and unselfish? There was that one guy who went to afghanistan on my mind, but im talking the big fish.
They have this entitled mentality that is so...evil and controlling. but they have no concept of responsibility, so they dont realize that all this "punishment" is happening under their watch. People voted for Biden to stop all this madness, not exasperate it. They truly are cutting off their nose to spite their face.
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2020
So, did Poso follow up on that one? The false flag bullshit is entertaining for sure, but I really want to know if Biden really tried to sniff the Pope.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2018
Was it not that Biden wanted to propaganda up the visit and the Pope wouldn’t agree to it, or is there ANOTHER level to it?
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2020
Really shows you how much of a complex Biden has. When he tries to get the fucking Pope to simp for him. I don't even remmber Trump doing that.
For what just so he can claim he's a good catholic. I mean the dude admitted he didn't see life begging at conception. Which is aginst catholic teachings.
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
he started shilling his podcast and im not wasting my time listening to him. while I appreciate his info his overall method of speaking i find to be very grating. I feel this way about pretty much everyone on the 'right' so unless they have quick drops of info I ignore them lmfao
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Only thing I've seen of this so far, but it wasn't like I looked into it deep or anything.
Remember they will say this is profane, outrageous, etc. etc. even though they claimed Trump wore diapers for 4 years.
- Joined
- May 25, 2013
Joe misheard when they said "It's time for the Pope"
Oxous
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
The bad thing about being a dementiac head of state is that people will say just about anything about you and it'll sound believable. Contrast this with Posobiec's claims that the cameras were cut because Biden's people wanted to do some movie-tier cinemotography with an official endorsement by the Pope and Francis refused.
- Status