Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)
- Thread starter Borscht
- Start date
- Joined
- May 18, 2014
Biden fucking shit himself in front of the pope. This is so fucking embarrassing.
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2020
I can belive both being true.
I agree. I hope it's true. It would embarrassing if that's why it took so long and not because of what Brookland is saying.
Oxous
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
Panama
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2020
Hopefully both. Biden tard raged so hard after the refusal that he shit himself.
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2013
Who the fuck is Ron again?
Oxous
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2021
Most probably the White House Chief of Staff, Ron Klain.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
This is about the fourth article I've seen in the last week. They are fuming that they can't call this racist. I think they are going to eventually settle on the idea that it foments hate and distrust of the government and must be silenced due to extremist language.
I also noticed that they refer to it as the Afghanistan withdrawal. It comes off as a broke record, but if it was Trump, it would be the "disaster" or "worst military mistake in history" and we'd still be seeing those dead Marines paraded on the news and their names and stories would be plastered on TV nonstop, even now.
---
WASHINGTON (AP) — When Republican Rep. Bill Posey of Florida ended an Oct. 21 House floor speech with a fist pump and the phrase “Let’s go, Brandon!” it may have seemed cryptic and weird to many who were listening. But the phrase was already growing in right-wing circles, and now the seemingly upbeat sentiment -- actually a stand-in for swearing at Joe Biden -- is everywhere.
South Carolina Republican Jeff Duncan wore a “Let’s Go Brandon” face mask at the Capitol last week. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz posed with a “Let’s Go Brandon” sign at the World Series. Sen. Mitch McConnell’s press secretary retweeted a photo of the phrase on a construction sign in Virginia.
The line has become conservative code for something far more vulgar: “F—- Joe Biden.” It’s all the rage among Republicans wanting to prove their conservative credentials, a not-so-secret handshake that signals they’re in sync with the party’s base.
Americans are accustomed to their leaders being publicly jeered, and former President Donald Trump’s often-coarse language seemed to expand the boundaries of what counts as normal political speech.
But how did Republicans settle on the Brandon phrase as a G-rated substitute for its more vulgar three-word cousin?
It started at an Oct. 2 NASCAR race at the Talladega Superspeedway in Alabama. Brandon Brown, a 28-year-old driver, had won his first Xfinity Series and was being interviewed by an NBC Sports reporter. The crowd behind him was chanting something at first difficult to make out. The reporter suggested they were chanting “Let’s go, Brandon” to cheer the driver. But it became increasingly clear they were saying: “F—- Joe Biden.”
NASCAR and NBC have since taken steps to limit “ambient crowd noise” during interviews, but it was too late — the phrase already had taken off.
When the president visited a construction site in suburban Chicago a few weeks ago to promote his vaccinate-or-test mandate, protesters deployed both three-word phrases. This past week, Biden’s motorcade was driving past a “Let’s Go Brandon” banner as the president passed through Plainfield, New Jersey.
And a group chanted “Let’s go, Brandon” outside a Virginia park on Monday when Biden made an appearance on behalf of the Democratic candidate for governor, Terry McAuliffe. Two protesters dropped the euphemism entirely, holding up hand-drawn signs with the profanity.
On Friday morning on a Southwest flight from Houston to Albuquerque, the pilot signed off his greeting over the public address system with the phrase, to audible gasps from some passengers.
Veteran GOP ad maker Jim Innocenzi had no qualms about the coded crudity, calling it “hilarious.”
“Unless you are living in a cave, you know what it means,” he said. “But it’s done with a little bit of a class. And if you object and are taking it too seriously, go away.”
America’s presidents have endured meanness for centuries; Grover Cleveland faced chants of “Ma, Ma Where’s my Pa?” in the 1880s over rumors he’d fathered an illegitimate child. Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were the subject of poems that leaned into racist tropes and allegations of bigamy.
“We have a sense of the dignity of the office of president that has consistently been violated to our horror over the course of American history,” said Cal Jillson, a politics expert and professor in the political science department at Southern Methodist University. “We never fail to be horrified by some new outrage.”
There were plenty of old outrages.
“F—- Trump” graffiti still marks many an overpass in Washington, D.C. George W. Bush had a shoe thrown in his face. Bill Clinton was criticized with such fervor that his most vocal critics were labeled the “Clinton crazies.”
The biggest difference, though, between the sentiments hurled at the Grover Clevelands of yore and modern politicians is the amplification they get on social media.
“Before the expansion of social media a few years ago, there wasn’t an easily accessible public forum to shout your nastiest and darkest public opinions,” said Matthew Delmont, a history professor at Dartmouth College.
Even the racism and vitriol to which former President Barack Obama was subjected was tempered in part because Twitter was relatively new. There was no TikTok. As for Facebook, leaked company documents have recently revealed how the platform increasingly ignored hate speech and misinformation and allowed it to proliferate.
A portion of the U.S. was already angry before the Brandon moment, believing the 2020 presidential election was rigged despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary, which has stood the test of recounts and court cases. But now it’s more than that to die-hard Trump supporters, said Stanley Renshon, a political scientist and psychoanalyst at the City University of New York.
He cited the Afghanistan withdrawal, the southern border situation and rancorous school board debates as situations in which Biden critics feel that “how American institutions are telling the American public what they clearly see and understand to be true, is in fact not true.”
Trump hasn’t missed the moment. His Save America PAC now sells a $45 T-shirt featuring “Let’s go Brandon” above an American flag. One message to supporters reads, “#FJB or LET’S GO BRANDON? Either way, President Trump wants YOU to have our ICONIC new shirt.”
Separately, T-shirts are popping up in storefronts with the slogan and the NASCAR logo.
And as for the real Brandon, things haven’t been so great. He drives for a short-staffed, underfunded team owned by his father. And while that win — his first career victory — was huge for him, the team has long struggled for sponsorship and existing partners have not been marketing the driver since the slogan.
I also noticed that they refer to it as the Afghanistan withdrawal. It comes off as a broke record, but if it was Trump, it would be the "disaster" or "worst military mistake in history" and we'd still be seeing those dead Marines paraded on the news and their names and stories would be plastered on TV nonstop, even now.
---
How ‘Let’s Go Brandon’ became code for insulting Joe Biden
https://apnews.com/article/lets-go-...ns-joe-biden-ab13db212067928455a3dba07756a160 (https://archive.ph/KJiYa)WASHINGTON (AP) — When Republican Rep. Bill Posey of Florida ended an Oct. 21 House floor speech with a fist pump and the phrase “Let’s go, Brandon!” it may have seemed cryptic and weird to many who were listening. But the phrase was already growing in right-wing circles, and now the seemingly upbeat sentiment -- actually a stand-in for swearing at Joe Biden -- is everywhere.
South Carolina Republican Jeff Duncan wore a “Let’s Go Brandon” face mask at the Capitol last week. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz posed with a “Let’s Go Brandon” sign at the World Series. Sen. Mitch McConnell’s press secretary retweeted a photo of the phrase on a construction sign in Virginia.
The line has become conservative code for something far more vulgar: “F—- Joe Biden.” It’s all the rage among Republicans wanting to prove their conservative credentials, a not-so-secret handshake that signals they’re in sync with the party’s base.
Americans are accustomed to their leaders being publicly jeered, and former President Donald Trump’s often-coarse language seemed to expand the boundaries of what counts as normal political speech.
But how did Republicans settle on the Brandon phrase as a G-rated substitute for its more vulgar three-word cousin?
It started at an Oct. 2 NASCAR race at the Talladega Superspeedway in Alabama. Brandon Brown, a 28-year-old driver, had won his first Xfinity Series and was being interviewed by an NBC Sports reporter. The crowd behind him was chanting something at first difficult to make out. The reporter suggested they were chanting “Let’s go, Brandon” to cheer the driver. But it became increasingly clear they were saying: “F—- Joe Biden.”
NASCAR and NBC have since taken steps to limit “ambient crowd noise” during interviews, but it was too late — the phrase already had taken off.
When the president visited a construction site in suburban Chicago a few weeks ago to promote his vaccinate-or-test mandate, protesters deployed both three-word phrases. This past week, Biden’s motorcade was driving past a “Let’s Go Brandon” banner as the president passed through Plainfield, New Jersey.
And a group chanted “Let’s go, Brandon” outside a Virginia park on Monday when Biden made an appearance on behalf of the Democratic candidate for governor, Terry McAuliffe. Two protesters dropped the euphemism entirely, holding up hand-drawn signs with the profanity.
On Friday morning on a Southwest flight from Houston to Albuquerque, the pilot signed off his greeting over the public address system with the phrase, to audible gasps from some passengers.
Veteran GOP ad maker Jim Innocenzi had no qualms about the coded crudity, calling it “hilarious.”
“Unless you are living in a cave, you know what it means,” he said. “But it’s done with a little bit of a class. And if you object and are taking it too seriously, go away.”
America’s presidents have endured meanness for centuries; Grover Cleveland faced chants of “Ma, Ma Where’s my Pa?” in the 1880s over rumors he’d fathered an illegitimate child. Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson were the subject of poems that leaned into racist tropes and allegations of bigamy.
“We have a sense of the dignity of the office of president that has consistently been violated to our horror over the course of American history,” said Cal Jillson, a politics expert and professor in the political science department at Southern Methodist University. “We never fail to be horrified by some new outrage.”
There were plenty of old outrages.
“F—- Trump” graffiti still marks many an overpass in Washington, D.C. George W. Bush had a shoe thrown in his face. Bill Clinton was criticized with such fervor that his most vocal critics were labeled the “Clinton crazies.”
The biggest difference, though, between the sentiments hurled at the Grover Clevelands of yore and modern politicians is the amplification they get on social media.
“Before the expansion of social media a few years ago, there wasn’t an easily accessible public forum to shout your nastiest and darkest public opinions,” said Matthew Delmont, a history professor at Dartmouth College.
Even the racism and vitriol to which former President Barack Obama was subjected was tempered in part because Twitter was relatively new. There was no TikTok. As for Facebook, leaked company documents have recently revealed how the platform increasingly ignored hate speech and misinformation and allowed it to proliferate.
A portion of the U.S. was already angry before the Brandon moment, believing the 2020 presidential election was rigged despite a mountain of evidence to the contrary, which has stood the test of recounts and court cases. But now it’s more than that to die-hard Trump supporters, said Stanley Renshon, a political scientist and psychoanalyst at the City University of New York.
He cited the Afghanistan withdrawal, the southern border situation and rancorous school board debates as situations in which Biden critics feel that “how American institutions are telling the American public what they clearly see and understand to be true, is in fact not true.”
Trump hasn’t missed the moment. His Save America PAC now sells a $45 T-shirt featuring “Let’s go Brandon” above an American flag. One message to supporters reads, “#FJB or LET’S GO BRANDON? Either way, President Trump wants YOU to have our ICONIC new shirt.”
Separately, T-shirts are popping up in storefronts with the slogan and the NASCAR logo.
And as for the real Brandon, things haven’t been so great. He drives for a short-staffed, underfunded team owned by his father. And while that win — his first career victory — was huge for him, the team has long struggled for sponsorship and existing partners have not been marketing the driver since the slogan.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
"Let's Go Brandon" infuriates the left, mainly because they accidentally made it. It, like "Election Fortification", are examples of them being hoisted by their own petard. They attempted to gaslight the nation that "no, the group of NASCAR fans weren't saying "Fuck Joe Biden", they were saying "Lets Go Brandon" you stupid plebs". But nobody believed them, and it started out tongue in cheek then spread.
It's a PG way to say what everyone is thinking, dodges any traditional guidelines, and every time they ban it specifically it only shows how much it stings and makes more people know about it. And they are the one's to create it.
It's a PG way to say what everyone is thinking, dodges any traditional guidelines, and every time they ban it specifically it only shows how much it stings and makes more people know about it. And they are the one's to create it.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
They really are twisting themselves into pretzels over this. They've called in the fact checkers.
edit: The Fox News article they fact check is almost two weeks old at the time they published this article.
---
"Let's Go Brandon" had about 50 million less streams and 40,000 less downloads than the No. 1 song in America.
In October 2021, a number of conservative commentators and websites boasted about the popularity of a song called “Let’s Go Brandon” (a euphemism for “F*ck Joe Biden“), claiming that it had “skyrocketed” to the top of the iTunes charts. Others exaggerated the popularity of this song by falsely claiming that it was the No. 1 song in America, or the number one song on Apple Music.
The song “Let’s Go Brandon” is not the No. 1 song in America, and it’s not the No. 1 song on Apple Music. One “Let’s Go Brandon” song (a few artists have released songs with this title) did reach the top of the iTunes chart for digital song sales.
But what exactly does that mean? How popular is this song? And what’s the current No. 1 song in America?
This confusion appears to be based on the fact that digital music sales are no longer the best indication of a song’s popularity. With the rise of streaming services such as Spotify, and Apple’s own Apple Music service, digital music sales have been on a steady decline for nearly a decade.. According to the Recording Industry Association of America, sales of digital singles fell from about 1.4 billion sales in 2012 to 257 million in 2020. That’s more than an 80% decrease.
While it’s not No. 1 in America, Loza Alexander’s “Let’s Go Brandon” song did make an appearance on the Billboard Hot 100. The song made its debut at number 45 on the Billboard Hot 100 and topped two other Billboard charts for “Rap Digital Song Sales” and “R&B/Hip-Hop Digital Song Sales.” According to Billboard, the song had “1.2 million U.S. streams, and 35,200 downloads sold” during its first week. Comparatively speaking, “Let’s Go Brandon” had about 50 million less streams and 40,000 less downloads than the No. 1 song in America.
iTunes is a media library and digital store where people can purchase songs and albums. Apple Music is a streaming service where people pay a subscription to listen to all of the songs in Apple Music’s catalog. As noted above, a significantly more number of people listen to music via a subscription streaming service than purchasing and downloading individual songs.
The song with the most streams on Apple Music is, again, Adele’s “Easy on Me.” As of this writing, there are no versions of “Let’s Go Brandon” in Apple Music’s top 100 songs.
edit: The Fox News article they fact check is almost two weeks old at the time they published this article.
---
How Popular Are ‘Let’s Go Brandon’ Songs, Really?
https://www.snopes.com/news/2021/10/29/lets-go-brandon/ (https://archive.ph/XViyM)"Let's Go Brandon" had about 50 million less streams and 40,000 less downloads than the No. 1 song in America.
In October 2021, a number of conservative commentators and websites boasted about the popularity of a song called “Let’s Go Brandon” (a euphemism for “F*ck Joe Biden“), claiming that it had “skyrocketed” to the top of the iTunes charts. Others exaggerated the popularity of this song by falsely claiming that it was the No. 1 song in America, or the number one song on Apple Music.
The song “Let’s Go Brandon” is not the No. 1 song in America, and it’s not the No. 1 song on Apple Music. One “Let’s Go Brandon” song (a few artists have released songs with this title) did reach the top of the iTunes chart for digital song sales.
But what exactly does that mean? How popular is this song? And what’s the current No. 1 song in America?
Digital Music Sales Have Been Dropping for Years
On Oct. 16, 2021, Fox News reported that Loza Alexander’s “Let’s Go Brandon” song had reached the top of the iTunes chart. Alexander’s song held this position for awhile, and was eventually replaced by another “Let’s Go Brandon” song by Bryson Gray. While this is certainly an accomplishment any musician should be proud of, some people appeared a bit confused as to what “No. 1 on iTunes” actually meant, and started claiming that “Let’s Go Brandon was the “No. 1 song” in America.This confusion appears to be based on the fact that digital music sales are no longer the best indication of a song’s popularity. With the rise of streaming services such as Spotify, and Apple’s own Apple Music service, digital music sales have been on a steady decline for nearly a decade.. According to the Recording Industry Association of America, sales of digital singles fell from about 1.4 billion sales in 2012 to 257 million in 2020. That’s more than an 80% decrease.
The No. 1 Song in America?
The Billboard 100 keeps track of the most popular music in the country by calculating the number of streams, sales, and radio plays. As of this writing on October 29, 2021, the most popular song in America is Adele’s “Easy on Me.” According to Billboard, Adele’s “Easy on Me” had 65 million radio airplay audience impressions, 53.9 million U.S. streams, and sold 74,000 downloads during its first week of tracking.While it’s not No. 1 in America, Loza Alexander’s “Let’s Go Brandon” song did make an appearance on the Billboard Hot 100. The song made its debut at number 45 on the Billboard Hot 100 and topped two other Billboard charts for “Rap Digital Song Sales” and “R&B/Hip-Hop Digital Song Sales.” According to Billboard, the song had “1.2 million U.S. streams, and 35,200 downloads sold” during its first week. Comparatively speaking, “Let’s Go Brandon” had about 50 million less streams and 40,000 less downloads than the No. 1 song in America.
The No. 1 Song on Apple Music?
Some social media users (and journalists) also appeared to be confused by the fact that Apple Music and iTunes are two different services. If a song is at the top of iTunes, that doesn’t mean that it’s the top of Apple Music.iTunes is a media library and digital store where people can purchase songs and albums. Apple Music is a streaming service where people pay a subscription to listen to all of the songs in Apple Music’s catalog. As noted above, a significantly more number of people listen to music via a subscription streaming service than purchasing and downloading individual songs.
The song with the most streams on Apple Music is, again, Adele’s “Easy on Me.” As of this writing, there are no versions of “Let’s Go Brandon” in Apple Music’s top 100 songs.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2016
Nothing is stopping them from making a Lets Go Brandon cap as racist as a MAGA cap.
The President of the United States. Nominally the most powerful man on the planet. The CoC of the world's most powerful military. Holder of the nuclear football,
The President just shit himself while having an audience with the Pope.
Shit himself. Released a torpedo into his slacks. While chatting to the Pope.
He shit himself, the President.
Let that roll around in your brain for a sec.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
Racism just doesn't sting anymore. It's a threat to democracy. Speaking out against Trump was your patriotic duty, speaking out against Biden is terroristic activity.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2019
uh oh...
stinkyyyyyyyy! poop,hahahahahah!
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
There's something that's been bothering me for a while, and I figure I'd bring it up here since it's threaded into the ongoing nonsense that is this administration being an ever-collapsing 3-ring circus. I was wondering why the fuck this 2030 date was so prominent in all of the usual suspects' plans. Several of you already know what the source of this shit is, so you can forgive me for, like the bulk of humanity, completely ignoring something the UN shat out.
I really lament doing that, because good god, this is the funniest shit I've seen from the UN since the infamous CVAWG report that citationed hard drive locations and quoted Lyndon Larouche. For those who missed that particular gem, this was a report so bad that the UN redacted and publicly apologized for it, so you're already privy to the caliber of humor we're about to engage.
For the uninitiated, in 2015, the UN passed the 2030 Initiative, something every major country in it allegedly signed on for (including the USA under Obama). I'm not going to mince words, I'm just going list off the project's listed goals, and hope you join me in ridiculing them all, one by one.
I don't need to explain in any great detail why this is literally impossible. The sheer scope of the third world alone makes this fucking ridiculous.
Oldie but a goodie:
Moving on.
....Unless they don't agree with your politics, in which case they can fuck right off.
Imagine trying to do this in Dubai.
.....This is from the same agency that made Saudi Arabia the chair of the Human Rights Council until 2020 when they lost the seat.
Just sayin'.
CAPTAIN, DIVERT ALL ENERGY TO WATERING THE DESERT.
All right. Solar requires Rare Earth materials that aren't affordable and the equipment is prone to environental damage, which undercuts reliability. Wind is cheap, but requires continual maintenance that adds up fast and the scalability is utter shit. It also is reliant on the environment and is easily damaged by meteorological events, so it's definitely unreliable. Geothermic and Hydroelectric are effective, but effectively location locked and do not scale.
The one energy type that fills all these requirements and isn't some theoretical nonsense that is ages away from being ready for primetime (such as fusion, microwave, etc) is the one Progressives like to pretend doesn't exist and really should not be allowed in developing countries, especially third-world hellholes.
Took the establishment Democrats and their RINO allies less than seven months to fuck this one up, which says a lot about how tenable it is on the global stage.
.....What the cinnamon toast fuck is "inclusive industralization?"
All right, so they mean global Communism.
You might think I'm joking about that, but Li Wong, the director of UNIDO, the big agency the UN keeps floating for this shit, used to be China's minister of Finance, so you figure this shit out.
This, dear Kiwis, is the big one, the Globalist Sacred Cow, the entire lynchpin of everything the Economic Coomer Gang has been stanning for. The sub-sections of this entry back it up: all about open borders, taking complete control of the economy and distributing other people's money for the greater good (that surely, by coincidence, will mostly benefit people who will proceed to use any nation that adopts it as a pump-and-dump).
It's only now, however, looking at this PDF and pondering the events of the last few years, that I realized how badly this has fucked up for them. Yes, there's a number of countries that have devoted themselves to self-destruction with this shit, but a lot didn't. It's heartening.
Gotta love that the official segments below it covered the need to suck the WTO's cock as part of the plan though.
Those familiar with WTO doctrine essentially know this means exploiting the ever-loving shit out of the third-world.
....So their goal is to bring about equality by victimizing its impoverished elements.
Something about having too much power inevitably makes you fucking retarded, I swear to god.
We've been over "inclusive industrialization," what this means is basically the same shit. In this particular case it's all about using environmentalist rhetoric to ram-rod policies that will hamstring development (see: Green New Deal) that countries like China (surely, by coincidence) will not be subjected to.
Also massive population expansion for cities. Because that worked so well for California.
This fucking list reads like a resume where someone's trying to pad their credentials. If I see a "leverage synergy" in here, I'll know for sure.
What they really mean here, though, is dramatically cutting food waste, pollution, and so on. Bear in mind that Goal 10 involves massively increasing city populations, which will, by definition, necessitate increased power consumption, pollution, and infrastructure upkeep.
One subsection in particular, however, is interesting, emphasis mine, in red:
This shit was supposed to be done by last year.
This seems to imply that something akin to the Green New Deal was supposed to get ramrodded through, but that Trump being is angry orange self put the kabash on it. Good.
This one has an asterisk, and what an asterisk it is:
"WE'RE RELEVANT YOU GUYS, HONEST."
Do this while ignoring the fact that India and China account for over 90% of pollutants in the ocean.
IGNORE ALL GOOGLE RESULTS!
Generic environmentalism entry. Not actually any major nonsense here.
Enjoy the break, it won't last.
We've covered what they mean by inclusive already (open borders), but at the end of the sub-section is one that was so funny it made me fall out of my fucking chair.
.....I have nothing to add. This one speaks for itself.
Basically this entire section and the bulk of the rest of the docco is centered around justifying its own existence.
It is.... Fascinating how this thing is so vapid in how it's put together, how impossible some of the objectives are. The entire thing seems to have been pushed to at worst, push Socialist policy that would pave the way for a Communist one, or at the best, lower the ability of the western world to in any way hinder China (which may be the country isn't named in the PDF once).
And yet, the people pushing it are blisteringly incompetent. I don't know what that goes to show, but it certainly shows something, and I feel I need a drink.
I really lament doing that, because good god, this is the funniest shit I've seen from the UN since the infamous CVAWG report that citationed hard drive locations and quoted Lyndon Larouche. For those who missed that particular gem, this was a report so bad that the UN redacted and publicly apologized for it, so you're already privy to the caliber of humor we're about to engage.
For the uninitiated, in 2015, the UN passed the 2030 Initiative, something every major country in it allegedly signed on for (including the USA under Obama). I'm not going to mince words, I'm just going list off the project's listed goals, and hope you join me in ridiculing them all, one by one.
....I hope you all can appreciate that I didn't just react to every single one of these with a good ol' Tommy Wiseau emoticon, because with a lead-off like this, I fucking could have, and it would have been a credible argument.
I don't need to explain in any great detail why this is literally impossible. The sheer scope of the third world alone makes this fucking ridiculous.
Oldie but a goodie:
Moving on.
....Unless they don't agree with your politics, in which case they can fuck right off.
Imagine trying to do this in Dubai.
.....This is from the same agency that made Saudi Arabia the chair of the Human Rights Council until 2020 when they lost the seat.
Just sayin'.
CAPTAIN, DIVERT ALL ENERGY TO WATERING THE DESERT.
All right. Solar requires Rare Earth materials that aren't affordable and the equipment is prone to environental damage, which undercuts reliability. Wind is cheap, but requires continual maintenance that adds up fast and the scalability is utter shit. It also is reliant on the environment and is easily damaged by meteorological events, so it's definitely unreliable. Geothermic and Hydroelectric are effective, but effectively location locked and do not scale.
The one energy type that fills all these requirements and isn't some theoretical nonsense that is ages away from being ready for primetime (such as fusion, microwave, etc) is the one Progressives like to pretend doesn't exist and really should not be allowed in developing countries, especially third-world hellholes.
Took the establishment Democrats and their RINO allies less than seven months to fuck this one up, which says a lot about how tenable it is on the global stage.
.....What the cinnamon toast fuck is "inclusive industralization?"
One Google Search Later said:
All right, so they mean global Communism.
You might think I'm joking about that, but Li Wong, the director of UNIDO, the big agency the UN keeps floating for this shit, used to be China's minister of Finance, so you figure this shit out.
This, dear Kiwis, is the big one, the Globalist Sacred Cow, the entire lynchpin of everything the Economic Coomer Gang has been stanning for. The sub-sections of this entry back it up: all about open borders, taking complete control of the economy and distributing other people's money for the greater good (that surely, by coincidence, will mostly benefit people who will proceed to use any nation that adopts it as a pump-and-dump).
It's only now, however, looking at this PDF and pondering the events of the last few years, that I realized how badly this has fucked up for them. Yes, there's a number of countries that have devoted themselves to self-destruction with this shit, but a lot didn't. It's heartening.
Gotta love that the official segments below it covered the need to suck the WTO's cock as part of the plan though.
Those familiar with WTO doctrine essentially know this means exploiting the ever-loving shit out of the third-world.
....So their goal is to bring about equality by victimizing its impoverished elements.
Something about having too much power inevitably makes you fucking retarded, I swear to god.
We've been over "inclusive industrialization," what this means is basically the same shit. In this particular case it's all about using environmentalist rhetoric to ram-rod policies that will hamstring development (see: Green New Deal) that countries like China (surely, by coincidence) will not be subjected to.
Also massive population expansion for cities. Because that worked so well for California.
This fucking list reads like a resume where someone's trying to pad their credentials. If I see a "leverage synergy" in here, I'll know for sure.
What they really mean here, though, is dramatically cutting food waste, pollution, and so on. Bear in mind that Goal 10 involves massively increasing city populations, which will, by definition, necessitate increased power consumption, pollution, and infrastructure upkeep.
One subsection in particular, however, is interesting, emphasis mine, in red:
This shit was supposed to be done by last year.
This seems to imply that something akin to the Green New Deal was supposed to get ramrodded through, but that Trump being is angry orange self put the kabash on it. Good.
This one has an asterisk, and what an asterisk it is:
"WE'RE RELEVANT YOU GUYS, HONEST."
Do this while ignoring the fact that India and China account for over 90% of pollutants in the ocean.
IGNORE ALL GOOGLE RESULTS!
Generic environmentalism entry. Not actually any major nonsense here.
Enjoy the break, it won't last.
We've covered what they mean by inclusive already (open borders), but at the end of the sub-section is one that was so funny it made me fall out of my fucking chair.
.....I have nothing to add. This one speaks for itself.
Basically this entire section and the bulk of the rest of the docco is centered around justifying its own existence.
It is.... Fascinating how this thing is so vapid in how it's put together, how impossible some of the objectives are. The entire thing seems to have been pushed to at worst, push Socialist policy that would pave the way for a Communist one, or at the best, lower the ability of the western world to in any way hinder China (which may be the country isn't named in the PDF once).
And yet, the people pushing it are blisteringly incompetent. I don't know what that goes to show, but it certainly shows something, and I feel I need a drink.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
And let's not forget "Fake News." It was mere hours before the weapon intended for use on Breitbart, etc, was snatched away and used to beat the MSM about the head and shoulders.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2019
cardinal sarah wouldve led to a Catholic resurgence.
- Joined
- May 6, 2019
The Left, despite not being able to meme, loves to create around itself the illusion that they are the masters of wit. They are simply more intelligent than you. This tendency is concentrated in Media and Politicians and thus when their clever wit is turned back on them it infuriates them like absolutely nothing else.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2018
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2018
Life has become a 1970s eurotrash comedy starring Peter Sellers as the US President, and directed by Ken Russell.
I wonder if someone has old film of Biden ranting against niggers and coons when he was a non enrolled Klan member back in the seventies? That would make for great copes. No saying dirty niggers need to be strung up by their testicles and covered in tar for even glancing at a white woman didn't mean the same back then. He was actually being anti-racist, nigger is old Delaware slang for I love black people.
Dropping a giant turd into your tidy whities while talking to the Pope is a total Chad move. What's that you say your Holiness? You think abortion is a sin? Hold on........yeah that's what I think about you attempting to infringe on birthing person's bodily autonomy. Drops mic.
Let's go, Brandon! Crap to the extreme!
Greatest President in history confirmed.
- Status