Draventren
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2019
Saw someone say in the Halloween stream thread something that I've seen said in main thread and elsewhere for a while now and figured that'd it be a great subject for me to bloviate like I know what I'm talking about. Phil should rebrand his channel towards food since he'd at least be more engaged with it than video games. Hard disagree. Now let me ramble why.
Phil can't review food. I'm saying this as someone who also can't review food. I know what I like, but that's about it. It's a bigger issue than just him not being able to review food though. He can't review anything. One Philism that gets memed on by alotta peepull here is his "mixed bag" reviews to video games. He will rage, and curse a game and it's devs, claim it sucks and they shouldn't make games anymore, and then at the end say "Well the game's a mixed bag" and leave it at that. I am of two minds of this, but both come down to the same conclusion: Phil either genuinely views the game as a mixed bag with a decent amount of good and a decent amount of bad, or he just outright isn't going to state an opinion out of fear. I think, like most of you, the latter is the more likely. Both come down to the same problem though: Phil can't articulate his opinion. Or at least, not in a coherent way. Reviewing anything, video games, food, films, music, art, fashion, you name it, doesn't mean you have to be an expert in every aspect of the subject. You don't need 20 years of experience in game development to review a game, and it doesn't even necessarily help. The biggest part of reviews is being able to articulate what you like and what you dislike, and why. Phil is incapable of that.
We talk about how mentally and emotionally immature he is, and both play a big part in this. He's not very curious about anything (for a guy who loves food so much it took him a hell of a long time to try anything not made by teenagers and available through drive-thru) and doesn't bother learning anything but the bare minimum. This is really important to reviewing anything since learning about your subject gives you more insight into why you like the things you do, and helps you determine your biases. I can't stand narrative heavy games and I'm aware of this, which gives me a lot of insight into why I review beloved games like The Last of Us so poorly. I dislike games like that since they want to tell stories as if they're movies, but the whole point of a game is to engage with it as an active participant and taking control away from players feels antithetical to the medium. I figured this out that I feel this way by engaging with these games, and reflecting on why those games don't track with me like other games do. It's been said here before, but bares repeating, Phil can't reflect on his thoughts, or feelings. Phil won't put the effort into understanding the technical side of anything, and either can't or won't articulate why he feels certain ways about what he's consuming. That's why we get him repeating the same words to describe things endlessly, like flavorful and robust when he likes food, or bland when he dislikes it. These don't have any meaning since we don't have any frame of reference for what he means.
If he were to rebrand to food, it'd have to be a cooking channel, or rather a learning to cook channel. THAT would be good shit. And hey, maybe he'd even get some fulfillment from learning a useful life skill and find the passion in his life that he hasn't had since...ever?
Phil can't review food. I'm saying this as someone who also can't review food. I know what I like, but that's about it. It's a bigger issue than just him not being able to review food though. He can't review anything. One Philism that gets memed on by alotta peepull here is his "mixed bag" reviews to video games. He will rage, and curse a game and it's devs, claim it sucks and they shouldn't make games anymore, and then at the end say "Well the game's a mixed bag" and leave it at that. I am of two minds of this, but both come down to the same conclusion: Phil either genuinely views the game as a mixed bag with a decent amount of good and a decent amount of bad, or he just outright isn't going to state an opinion out of fear. I think, like most of you, the latter is the more likely. Both come down to the same problem though: Phil can't articulate his opinion. Or at least, not in a coherent way. Reviewing anything, video games, food, films, music, art, fashion, you name it, doesn't mean you have to be an expert in every aspect of the subject. You don't need 20 years of experience in game development to review a game, and it doesn't even necessarily help. The biggest part of reviews is being able to articulate what you like and what you dislike, and why. Phil is incapable of that.
We talk about how mentally and emotionally immature he is, and both play a big part in this. He's not very curious about anything (for a guy who loves food so much it took him a hell of a long time to try anything not made by teenagers and available through drive-thru) and doesn't bother learning anything but the bare minimum. This is really important to reviewing anything since learning about your subject gives you more insight into why you like the things you do, and helps you determine your biases. I can't stand narrative heavy games and I'm aware of this, which gives me a lot of insight into why I review beloved games like The Last of Us so poorly. I dislike games like that since they want to tell stories as if they're movies, but the whole point of a game is to engage with it as an active participant and taking control away from players feels antithetical to the medium. I figured this out that I feel this way by engaging with these games, and reflecting on why those games don't track with me like other games do. It's been said here before, but bares repeating, Phil can't reflect on his thoughts, or feelings. Phil won't put the effort into understanding the technical side of anything, and either can't or won't articulate why he feels certain ways about what he's consuming. That's why we get him repeating the same words to describe things endlessly, like flavorful and robust when he likes food, or bland when he dislikes it. These don't have any meaning since we don't have any frame of reference for what he means.
If he were to rebrand to food, it'd have to be a cooking channel, or rather a learning to cook channel. THAT would be good shit. And hey, maybe he'd even get some fulfillment from learning a useful life skill and find the passion in his life that he hasn't had since...ever?