- Joined
- Feb 12, 2019
Cause a vacation to them is copious amounts of food that may not be available to them in a different setting. Low bar but that’s it.
Chantal Sarault / Chantal Al-Refae / Foodie Beauty - Delusional drug fiend hamplanet mukbanger from Canada trying to be a glamorous online influencer. Pathological liar, huge bitch, narcissist, animal abuser
- Thread starter Strine
- Start date
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
The people screaming pre-nup in her chat are very stupid. What assets do they think Chantal has? Is he going to take half of the kitchen office chair? Gunning for the baker's shelf in the divorce?
You can pretty much assume she doesn't have a penny of savings. There would be no money for Nader to go after. Chantal could wipe her ass with whatever any pre-nup was written on and it would be worth more than she is monetarily and personally.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Given her health she should be thinking about writing down a will, not a fucking pre-nup, but that would be too responsible of her.
Random Internet Person
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2019
Bold of you to think she’ll write either of those .
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
I doubt she spent five thousand…is what I was going to say before I started listing out the costs in my head and got to “100$ meals.”
Ordering meals at 100 a pop and assuming she ate six meals a day like the giant bored whale she is, would be six hundred a day on hotel food just for her. She definitely ordered multiple entrees for herself so that 100 is not surprising. Add in 50 per meal for three meals for Nader, brings the daily food total to 750. For two days, 1500 dollars. Just to eat terrible, overpriced hotel room service food.
This bitch spends money like she shits coins ten times a day instead of former-takeaway.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2018
Come hell or high waters, Chantal is prepared to go down with the ship with Nader.
It doesn't matter that her subscribers and most of her VIBs hate him. In her mind, not only is he a vehicle with which she can extricate herself from her current shithole, but it has also become a matter of retardo principle with her.
This means that no matter what he does, up to and probably including murder, he will get a pass from her. She'll get furious for a day or two, cool off, get frantically lonely, and return to him bearing expensive gifts.
It truly is insane that she has gotten herself into this predicament, but as soon as she first mentioned Tinder, I knew she'd wind up with the utter dregs of a pretty dregsy app. Job well done, Clotso! I wouldn't have expected any less!
The hilarious bind she is in is compounded because she really does not see any other way to escape her miserable situation without him. If she could just live with him, everything in her life will be better, she reasons. And for many people, that is true; marriage often precedes a dramatic improvement in quality of life. But such is not the case here; she is keeping him afloat; they are not pooling any resources. But she is too dumb to think it through that far. She feels like this must happen, because the alternative is she has to fix her nasty, ruined life herself, and she is too indolent and just doesn't have the energy for that. So, it is Nader or bust.
Inevitably, this is all going to go horribly wrong for her (it already is, but the end will be far worse than anything so far), but she is all-in nonetheless.
I do believe that at some point, Nader will agree to let her move in (especially if an upgrade in apartment is included in the deal). I also predict such a union will not survive six months. The ending, no matter how it plays out, will be ruinous for our fat, bald friend. The fate of Peetz and the cats is unclear, but the more distance they can keep between themselves and the monstrous couple, the better off they will be. Peetz needs to grow a fucking brain and start formulating an exit plan; depending on Chantal's largesse is yet another plan doomed to fail.
It doesn't matter that her subscribers and most of her VIBs hate him. In her mind, not only is he a vehicle with which she can extricate herself from her current shithole, but it has also become a matter of retardo principle with her.
This means that no matter what he does, up to and probably including murder, he will get a pass from her. She'll get furious for a day or two, cool off, get frantically lonely, and return to him bearing expensive gifts.
It truly is insane that she has gotten herself into this predicament, but as soon as she first mentioned Tinder, I knew she'd wind up with the utter dregs of a pretty dregsy app. Job well done, Clotso! I wouldn't have expected any less!
The hilarious bind she is in is compounded because she really does not see any other way to escape her miserable situation without him. If she could just live with him, everything in her life will be better, she reasons. And for many people, that is true; marriage often precedes a dramatic improvement in quality of life. But such is not the case here; she is keeping him afloat; they are not pooling any resources. But she is too dumb to think it through that far. She feels like this must happen, because the alternative is she has to fix her nasty, ruined life herself, and she is too indolent and just doesn't have the energy for that. So, it is Nader or bust.
Inevitably, this is all going to go horribly wrong for her (it already is, but the end will be far worse than anything so far), but she is all-in nonetheless.
I do believe that at some point, Nader will agree to let her move in (especially if an upgrade in apartment is included in the deal). I also predict such a union will not survive six months. The ending, no matter how it plays out, will be ruinous for our fat, bald friend. The fate of Peetz and the cats is unclear, but the more distance they can keep between themselves and the monstrous couple, the better off they will be. Peetz needs to grow a fucking brain and start formulating an exit plan; depending on Chantal's largesse is yet another plan doomed to fail.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 11, 2019
Breaking the Fourth Wall and Youtube as Theatre
I could go on at autistic length about the history of The Fourth Wall in Theatre, but as a wise woman once said, "Ain't nobody got time for that." Suffice it to say that Youtube has always been an unusual form of entertainment, one in which the "actors" have always had the ability, if desired, to break the fourth wall, and interact with their audience. One could credibly argue that this is precisely the whole point of Youtube. Now, not only the actor can break the wall, the audience can also break the wall. All the walls have been destroyed, and all the world's a stage, as could be argued when observing things like doxing, swatting and canceling.
I believe that Chantal (and to be fair, many other Youtubers) have made the cardinal mistake of becoming dependent on the dopamine (and income) that positive audience attention provides and they mistakenly think that it is the "Real Me" that the audience wants to see, and not a crafted, reality TV-type "influencer lifestyle". Add to that, Youtubers have the ability to interact with their audience by way of the comments section in the earliest incarnation of Youtube, and now, the turbo-charged interaction provided through live streaming and channel subscriptions. Chantal's laziness and her constant attention and approval seeking nature made it very easy for her to erroneously think that the audience liked the real her and weren't just various people, who for various reasons, watched her videos for entertainment.
In doing nothing but Livestreams for the last 8 months, Chantal not only broke the fourth wall, she took a wrecking ball to it, lit it on fire, and burned it to the ground. Almost nobody finds Chantal charismatic, funny or creative enough to want to be intimately aware of her actual life. I mean, who wants to see Chantal in her nose-picking, farting, oozing, filthy glory? Most of her audience noped out when she started her livestreams. She is left with an audience of creepily overinvolved voyeurs, who believe they are in a friendship with Chantal, and believe that they have the ability, and the right, to tell her how to conduct her theatre and her actual life. Another audience she has cultivated are the Haydurs. That is a rabbit hole that I will resist expounding on...
The other audience is, of course, Farmers. I will leave it to each of you to search your souls for the reasons why you are here...but for myself, I will admit always having a preference for Tragicomedy and Black Comedy...I will not admit to more than that.
P.S. Thanks to all who are archiving and recapping.
I could go on at autistic length about the history of The Fourth Wall in Theatre, but as a wise woman once said, "Ain't nobody got time for that." Suffice it to say that Youtube has always been an unusual form of entertainment, one in which the "actors" have always had the ability, if desired, to break the fourth wall, and interact with their audience. One could credibly argue that this is precisely the whole point of Youtube. Now, not only the actor can break the wall, the audience can also break the wall. All the walls have been destroyed, and all the world's a stage, as could be argued when observing things like doxing, swatting and canceling.
I believe that Chantal (and to be fair, many other Youtubers) have made the cardinal mistake of becoming dependent on the dopamine (and income) that positive audience attention provides and they mistakenly think that it is the "Real Me" that the audience wants to see, and not a crafted, reality TV-type "influencer lifestyle". Add to that, Youtubers have the ability to interact with their audience by way of the comments section in the earliest incarnation of Youtube, and now, the turbo-charged interaction provided through live streaming and channel subscriptions. Chantal's laziness and her constant attention and approval seeking nature made it very easy for her to erroneously think that the audience liked the real her and weren't just various people, who for various reasons, watched her videos for entertainment.
In doing nothing but Livestreams for the last 8 months, Chantal not only broke the fourth wall, she took a wrecking ball to it, lit it on fire, and burned it to the ground. Almost nobody finds Chantal charismatic, funny or creative enough to want to be intimately aware of her actual life. I mean, who wants to see Chantal in her nose-picking, farting, oozing, filthy glory? Most of her audience noped out when she started her livestreams. She is left with an audience of creepily overinvolved voyeurs, who believe they are in a friendship with Chantal, and believe that they have the ability, and the right, to tell her how to conduct her theatre and her actual life. Another audience she has cultivated are the Haydurs. That is a rabbit hole that I will resist expounding on...
The other audience is, of course, Farmers. I will leave it to each of you to search your souls for the reasons why you are here...but for myself, I will admit always having a preference for Tragicomedy and Black Comedy...I will not admit to more than that.
P.S. Thanks to all who are archiving and recapping.
Last edited:
Contrary
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2020
Wouldn't he also lose his welfare if they paired up? Her income would surely preclude him from any payment. Wonder if they've thought of that.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Lol, aMeRiCaNs dOn'T eVeN hAvE a cUiSiNe!
Funny... besides hot dogs, burgers, apple pie, and a LOT of shit on Townsend's channel (including barbecue), lol, I guess Amish, Mennonite, Shakers, Quakers, Creole/Cajuns, Gulla, and a whole lot of others here in America are just BLAND CIS WHYPIPO food with no fLaVoR!
Found the grievance studies major.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2021
Wouldn’t that require her doing her taxes and declaring her income? Not sure if YouTube reports income to government bodies.
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2019
The many ironies in her 'Nader situation' border on delicious. Nobody tells Chantal what to do & her defiance & opposition to any sane suggestions about anything to do with her life are well documented. At the same time as with typical Cluster Bs... Chantal is convinced that constantly barraging her viewers with what SHE wants them to think or believe will in short order, bring them around to her way of thinking. It may not work aimed her way but by God, it will when she does it because that is WHAT SHE WANTS.
Currently, she's convinced herself her viewers don't like him because when she's been furious with him, she's detailed words & behaviors from him that would send any sane woman running; she couldn't make him out to be enough of a scum bag.
Honestly, she didn't have to say anything about Nader - his personality or character, for viewers to form their own opinions. We've heard him speak & noted how he addresses her, especially the contemptuous tone of voice he uses with her. We've seen his behavior towards her & his rudeness & disregard for her at his place & briefly, in Toronto. He's even gone as far as to slap her, with no discernable provocation, in a livestream.
His lack of even the most basic respect towards her goes beyond, (I think), any cultural differences. It's pretty clear he sees her as primarily a Magic Wallet, with all that entails & implies.
I think even her dimmest VIBs see this pretty clearly & that's saying something.
Chantal has a basic Mean Teen Queen Bitch mentality. In her mind having a man, ANY man, is the epitome of success. The more relationship check marks she can tick off & convince her viewers to tick off, the higher HER status to others - at least in her shriveled little mind. Attributes that others view negatively, she gushes don't matter, (while accusing others of X shaming), or she finds some way to try & turn into a positive.
Last night she was pushed to come up with the "good points" she claimed he has, that her viewers don't generally see. As hard as she was pressed, she couldn't come up with anything that came even close to compensating for the many negative things we all see. This is a skinny, skittery, little jitterbug of a manlet barely skating through life & currently latched hard on to her teats. I don't care what jobs he may have had in the past. Currently in a job market screaming for employees in many lines of work, he's content to leisurely graze amongst her ample financial folds & provides what exactly, in return? I've got nothing against SAH adults... if they're producing value for their keep. By any reasonable measure, he does not.
She knows on some level her viewers reject him & on one hand promises zero or minimal Nader presence in her streams & vlogs then turns around & crams him down viewers' throats in the face on ceaseless complaints & reminders that her viewers want nothing to do with him. Worse, she blatantly plugs his channel.
It's amusing to read her comment section - viewer after viewer making the same objections but at the same time, his presence is having zero negative impact on her metrics. Her channel may not be growing but she's not losing subs either. Comment engagement remains high. Her viewers may not be shutting up but they're showing they'll happily put up with his presence.
If she has any ability to read the room, she'll change nothing. As long as she doesn't expect her viewers to actually like him, she can be pretty certain they'll continue to grudgingly accept his presence. If however, she keeps forcing him down viewers' throats expecting, INSISTING they like him... that's not going to fly.
Pushing it further, if she seriously thinks anybody is going to assign her higher status because of his presence in her life, she's terminally delusional. He's not just low hanging fruit, he's fallen to the ground & has been both stepped & shit on by passing critters. A truly confident woman accepts that if no good partner material is available for whatever reason, you're better off alone. Anything else reeks of frenzied, stale desperation.
Currently, she's convinced herself her viewers don't like him because when she's been furious with him, she's detailed words & behaviors from him that would send any sane woman running; she couldn't make him out to be enough of a scum bag.
Honestly, she didn't have to say anything about Nader - his personality or character, for viewers to form their own opinions. We've heard him speak & noted how he addresses her, especially the contemptuous tone of voice he uses with her. We've seen his behavior towards her & his rudeness & disregard for her at his place & briefly, in Toronto. He's even gone as far as to slap her, with no discernable provocation, in a livestream.
His lack of even the most basic respect towards her goes beyond, (I think), any cultural differences. It's pretty clear he sees her as primarily a Magic Wallet, with all that entails & implies.
I think even her dimmest VIBs see this pretty clearly & that's saying something.
Chantal has a basic Mean Teen Queen Bitch mentality. In her mind having a man, ANY man, is the epitome of success. The more relationship check marks she can tick off & convince her viewers to tick off, the higher HER status to others - at least in her shriveled little mind. Attributes that others view negatively, she gushes don't matter, (while accusing others of X shaming), or she finds some way to try & turn into a positive.
Last night she was pushed to come up with the "good points" she claimed he has, that her viewers don't generally see. As hard as she was pressed, she couldn't come up with anything that came even close to compensating for the many negative things we all see. This is a skinny, skittery, little jitterbug of a manlet barely skating through life & currently latched hard on to her teats. I don't care what jobs he may have had in the past. Currently in a job market screaming for employees in many lines of work, he's content to leisurely graze amongst her ample financial folds & provides what exactly, in return? I've got nothing against SAH adults... if they're producing value for their keep. By any reasonable measure, he does not.
She knows on some level her viewers reject him & on one hand promises zero or minimal Nader presence in her streams & vlogs then turns around & crams him down viewers' throats in the face on ceaseless complaints & reminders that her viewers want nothing to do with him. Worse, she blatantly plugs his channel.
It's amusing to read her comment section - viewer after viewer making the same objections but at the same time, his presence is having zero negative impact on her metrics. Her channel may not be growing but she's not losing subs either. Comment engagement remains high. Her viewers may not be shutting up but they're showing they'll happily put up with his presence.
If she has any ability to read the room, she'll change nothing. As long as she doesn't expect her viewers to actually like him, she can be pretty certain they'll continue to grudgingly accept his presence. If however, she keeps forcing him down viewers' throats expecting, INSISTING they like him... that's not going to fly.
Pushing it further, if she seriously thinks anybody is going to assign her higher status because of his presence in her life, she's terminally delusional. He's not just low hanging fruit, he's fallen to the ground & has been both stepped & shit on by passing critters. A truly confident woman accepts that if no good partner material is available for whatever reason, you're better off alone. Anything else reeks of frenzied, stale desperation.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2021
Youtube withholds 40% (for taxes) from income for creators in countries that don't have foreign income tax agreements. Canada does have that agreement with the US so Chantal's youtube income is currently untaxed when it comes to her. Even if Canada doesn't data match, which in this day and age would be pretty unbelievable, her bank would be required to report foriegn income streams the size she claims she receives...the Taxman is going to come after Gunt eventually. Never mind though, Chantal has said in livestreams she does payment plans when she does her taxes and finds out how much she owes. For now she's just putting off the inevitable on Nader's advice....she did actually talk about this a few weeks ago. As for her income affecting any welfare payments he might be receiving...that would require honesty in declaring they are actually living together as a couple and not just in a room mate arrangement. I doubt Nader would allow honesty if it meant losing his welfare payment, but the hate watchers of Reddit would be sure to bombard Canadian authorities with reports and video evidence. The eventual fraud proceedings will be a wonder to watch from afar. Chantal likely believes that she can get Nader's channel earning him too much for any welfare payments and therefore not a barrier to cohabitation.
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2020
One of the many smells emanating from her general direction
- Joined
- May 11, 2019
This sentence wins the Internet for the week. Such an evocative turn of phrase. Grinning from ear to ear.
Bonkersbec
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2021
Someone wants a refund.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
This, exactly. There are two kinds of (straight) gorls out there…the ones who choose to be alone if no good mate currently presents itself, and the ones who think a shitty abusive man is better than no man at all, and that they’re still “winning” if they have the world’s worst boyfriend and you have none.
Chantal is the latter, constantly pushing her “AT LEAST I GOT A MAN!” rubbish in our faces, because in her mind, any man is better than none, since men are primarily used for validation and showcasing how desirable and higher-status you are. Not, you know, because you met someone and have loads in common and their presence in your life is a vast improvement to your situation. She truly is stuck in a 14-year old mentality, back when just having a boyfriend upped your status and made you instantly cooler than the other girls.
Some women see a buffet table covered in food made out of mud and literal feces and they say, “I think I’ll go hungry until supper.” Chantal slams her face down into said buffet and scarfs away, bellowing, “I MAY BE EATING SHIT, BUT AT LEAST I HAVE A MEAL! Hahahaha, have fun being hungry, losers! You’re all so jealous!”
TeaTime42
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2021
The fact she seriously believes he gives a single shit about her "health" is hilarious. His only concern from the get go is her un-earned money, and getting most of it in his pocket. He damn well knows that "no takeout for a month" will net him a huge chunk of change. Both her stupidity and delusion continue to reach new highs daily.
notfoodienotbeauty
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2021
She is really going to lose all the real supporters she had isn't she? Even Travonda left a long time ago and Marissa hasn't been around as much anymore, maybe she is actually taken care of her kid.
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
So was it a life well lived?
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2020
This is an extremely apt analogy and I just wanted to quote it for truth.