Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
they cut the video because a fed testified about the view posobiec got ahold of

1635890665948.png

1635890677132.png
 
The same dumpster set on fire twice.

Prostitution: That may be the perfect metaphor for 2020.

Prostitution: Did you see anyone push dumpster on fire towards gas pumps?
Streamer: *lying even though he recorded watching that happen* no.
So could the defense actually demand the full stream and not the convenient snippets? though I guess Twitch or whereever he streamed has probably deleted the VOD now
 
they cut the video because a fed testified about the view posobiec got ahold of

View attachment 2682219
View attachment 2682220
The only reason for the HD flir to get better picture. so what? pross still has the sd version. what the fuck, who cares.

The only reason why this would matter is that Pross and Defense can argue about which white blip is who and if a dust cloud was riccochet or a gun in the shadows.
 
they cut the video because a fed testified about the view posobiec got ahold of

View attachment 2682219
View attachment 2682220
So, they're withholding exculpatory evidence?

Another day, another round of fuck-fuck games from the feds.
The only reason for the HD flir to get better picture. so what? pross still has the sd version. what the fuck, who cares.

The only reason why this would matter is that Pross and Defense can argue about which white blip is who and if a dust cloud was riccochet or a gun in the shadows.
State wants there to not be clear proof of Kyle's innocence. They're kicking up dust, calling it smoke, and saying there's fire.
 
Last edited:
This prosecutor argument is that the trash wasn't technically push inside the gas station ? That was a worthless pay off.
They tried to cause a massive gas station fire, but failed. This is fine. Mostly peaceful arson.

So could the defense actually demand the full stream and not the convenient snippets? though I guess Twitch or whereever he streamed has probably deleted the VOD now
Streamer claims full stream still available online.
 
"Why did you get your friend to illegally procure you a firearm? Now he's in trouble with you."
When I was aquatinted with Mr. Black, I was fond of the firearm he had and enjoyed the time at his private range.

As such, I wanted a similar firearm to be used under Mr. Blacks direct supervision similar to how a father may retain possession of a firearm that is later gifted to his son.
"Why did you beat up that little girl?" *plays video*
I used the least amount of force necessary to stop the attack against my sister by the aggressor.
"But the pedo jew had it coming"
Mr. Rosenbaum continued to advance on me in an aggressive manner after I had retreated. All I wanted to do is to ensure I could extinguish any fires Mr. Rosenbaum started. I attempted to flee but the gunshot to my front caused me to realize that avenue of escape was no longer safe.

As I turned to beg Mr. Rosenbaum to stop his aggressive advance, the first decedent grabbed my rifle.
Kyle also didn't know the pedo jew possibly went to the mental hospital so they can't paint him as some deranged unhinged pedo who was about to bash in Kyle's brain because Kyle wouldn't know any of those things.
Rosenbaum girlfriend:
You stated he could not stay at your residence, why did you tell him this?

You stated you met Mr. Rosenbaum that night. Is their a reason why you could not meet him earlier?
At the root of all this though, Kyle never should have had that gun. He used illegal means to procure that gun was not legally allowed to use.
Minor in possession of a firearm. Misdomenor.
 

Koerri Washington Testifies For Rittenhouse Prosecution: Jury Won’t Hear About His Criminal Record Because of DA’s Over-Generous Policy of Plea Deals​

Today we heard from BLM sympothiser Koerri Washington. He has expressed publicly that Kyle Rittenhouse did not act in self-defense. In criminal cases, the Jury is entitled to hear about a witness’s criminal history. The authority of what would be told to the jury is up to the judge. In this case, none of Koerri’s arrests and convictions were explained to the Jury. This was done against the defense’s wishes. Although there were very serious charges against Washington, they were all pleaded down by Mike Graveley’s DA’s office. Today Koerri made many comments in support of the prosecution’s case.
Is his criminal past relevant here?
 

Koerri Washington Testifies For Rittenhouse Prosecution: Jury Won’t Hear About His Criminal Record Because of DA’s Over-Generous Policy of Plea Deals​


Is his criminal past relevant here?
it can be. "the reason why Mr. Washington was there was to fuck shit up and record himself doing it. here's all his convictions for property damage. "
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Art Kassul

Koerri Washington Testifies For Rittenhouse Prosecution: Jury Won’t Hear About His Criminal Record Because of DA’s Over-Generous Policy of Plea Deals​


Is his criminal past relevant here?
But Koerri Washington's photo might be worth for a lousy meme. https://imgflip.com/i/5sr0ol No need to guess how the prosecutor who wants Rittenhouse jailed might react if he receive a similar medecine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Art Kassul

Koerri Washington Testifies For Rittenhouse Prosecution: Jury Won’t Hear About His Criminal Record Because of DA’s Over-Generous Policy of Plea Deals​


Is his criminal past relevant here?
I don't know about you, but I find a criminal less trustworthy than a law-abiding citizen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back