US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
It means the GOP can finally stop trying to cuck itself each time by saying they not racist and stick to policy.
GOPers can rest easy with Trump in back wing.

Democrats never learn; they have made Trump, his existence, the fact that he happened, the Congress jog, and literally anything orange a prioritized number one issue (with a fat asterisk stapled to it).

Racism is Numero Dos now. Look how sloppy the Lincoln Project-McAuliffe Staffer stunt was; and the clean Dixie patch on an even cleaner jacket? Get the fuck outta here. Those idiots had to try with racism — something that's suppose to be their greatest trap for the GOPe!

Not much point in getting infront of cameras or out of the White House only to have folks shout “Let’s go, Brandon” or “Coughing Fit, Pants Of Shit” wherever he goes.
There's always "81 million votes, most ever for an elected president!" to scream out to the True Believers. That, and indirectly threatening his opposition like a fool.
 
Ok, I'm prepared for all your Xs, but hear me out.

To me, New Jersey was WAY more important than Virginia. Because there is now a chance, just a CHANCE, a 1% I am not totally black-pilled chance, that New York State goes with a Red govenor in 2022.

Hear me out. New Jersey was supposed to be won by like 15-20 points, and the blue looks like it will BARELY hang on.

New Yorkers voted overwhelmingly against nearly every prop last night. I cannot understate how much Hochul is HATED in Upstate, and I don't think she's going too well even in NYC. Letitia James, the NYS Attorney General that might actually primary Hochul, is just as hated.

There is a CHANCE after seeing New Jersey last night, that enough of Upstate just goes "fuck it; literally anyone else."

Shut up, let me have this.

View attachment 2684605

1635966475580.png
 
No handlers, just unfiltered autism. Really though, did we not learn our lesson from the last few years? Just because an opposition to the Big D wins doesn't mean they're our friend. McConnell, Pence, Lady Lindsey, I'm not taking it as a given that someone using the anger at the Big D is gonna do people right. Lord save you though if you interrupt the party to ask wtf they're planning to do? Oh more funding to public schools? More "choice" in public schools? Oh, well, that'll solve the festering issues. I'd also like to see how they're planning to truly ban CRT as you're gonna need to cut into all of the IDpol in order to do it. So forgive my lack of uninhibited optimism that a ConInc hedgie that's using IDpol themselves (come on...black immigrant LGov) is going to remove CRT in am effective manner.
I think one shouldn't be a doomer about this, as this was a very important rejection of the way the country has been going in the last year or so...but I also agree that this is only the beginning of a new phase of the cultural-political battle, of which the best the Conservatives (even Christopher Rufo) have done so far is to fight to a stalemate.

The war can still be lost if the Republicans don't evolve in a meaningful manner with their clear vision of the future- Conservativism cannot simply be "Progressivism following the speed limit".

1635966464945.png

1635966435703.png

 
Last edited:
That's one thing I find ironic about people like Ben Shapiro who are praising Youngkin for not being Trump. Yet are ignoring the fact that he said that the 2020 election was stolen and agreed with Trump on that.
It's pathetic just how fucking desperate they are to shake off Trump and try to reign in the types who voted for him. They need to accept the fact that the populist wing of their party is the majority of their base now and work from there. I just don't fucking get why these cum-sucking asswipes act like they're allergic to actually doing what their base wants them to do.

And no, I don't want an explanation as to why unless it's from one of the aforementioned cum-sucking asswipes.
That's based as fuck though I'd have spent it at Whataburger.
 
That's one thing I find ironic about people like Ben Shapiro who are praising Youngkin for not being Trump. Yet are ignoring the fact that he said that the 2020 election was stolen and agreed with Trump on that.
No one said grifters and deceivers were consistent in logic, that's how they manipulate people. Ignore the details that don't match and only show optics that agree with the worldview they're presenting. He's also hoping most of his fanbase or watchers are complete idiots, and to be fair quite a few of them probably are. (Consistent viewers not those just scouting him to see what he's saying/etc.)
 
Speaking of which, how long do you all think it'll be until he says the gamer word on live tv? 6 weeks is my guess.
we can always dream...
The best part of him actually doing it wouldn’t be the utterance itself (though that would be iconic and the Christmas gift of the century).

No, the best part would be watching the pARtY oF aNTirAciSM melt down over it and suffer a major identity crisis. They’ve been trying so hard with the pandering/anti-white self-flagellation, that Mushbrain saying it on audio/video would screw all of that up. It would be a massive stain that most people would not be able to write off, given the notoriety of the word. Nowhere to hide. Of course, we would then enjoy the entertainment value of the left trying to spin and rationalize it (much like they’d do for any R, amirite?) because they’d have nothing remaining at that point.

WaPo: The President of The United States Said Nigger. Here’s Why That’s A Good Thing.

Side note, Biden actually saying it would break a loooong streak of US presidents admitting to using it. Wasn’t LBJ the last to really have a reputation for its use (lol @ the first sentence)? I know they tried to stick it to Reagan, but I don’t think it’s documented (though he is heard on a recorded phone call with Nixon saying “those monkeys from those African countries…damn ‘em, they’re still uncomfortable wearing shoes.”).

eta: capitalization/punctuation
 
Last edited:
It's pathetic just how fucking desperate they are to shake off Trump and try to reign in the types who voted for him. They need to accept the fact that the populist wing of their party is the majority of their base now and work from there. I just don't fucking get why these cum-sucking asswipes act like they're allergic to actually doing what their base wants them to do.

And no, I don't want an explanation as to why unless it's from one of the aforementioned cum-sucking asswipes.

That's based as fuck though I'd have spent it at Whataburger.

No one said grifters and deceivers were consistent in logic, that's how they manipulate people. Ignore the details that don't match and only show optics that agree with the worldview they're presenting. He's also hoping most of his fanbase or watchers are complete idiots, and to be fair quite a few of them probably are. (Consistent viewers not those just scouting him to see what he's saying/etc.)
I agree. I don't think it's working Trump is still popular among the Republican base and even guys like Shapiro you go on his youtube comments. Your see alot of his fans being ignored when every he brings the old "there was no election fraud" speech.
 
On the one hand, imagine how much damage the Republicans could have done if they only tried?

On the other hand, holy shit the Republicans did a lot of damage without even trying.
Murphy's blowout in '17 was part in parcel outgoing Christie/Bridgegate + new President Trump + general NJ electorate. Philip Murphy was never that popular.

Murphy will eek out this election, but Ciattarelli totally had that race. Beautiful grassroots campaign. I expect a comeback in '25.
 
The best part of him actually doing it wouldn’t be the utterance itself (though that would be iconic and the Christmas gift of the century).

No, the best part would be watching the pARtY oF aNTirAciSM melt down over it and suffer a major identity crisis. They’ve been trying so hard with the pandering/anti-white self-flagellation, that Mushbrain saying it on audio/video would screw all of that up. It would be a massive stain that most people would not be able to write off, given the notoriety of the word. Nowhere to hide. Of course, we would then enjoy the entertainment value of the left trying to spin and rationalize it (much like they’d do for any R, amirite?) because they’d have nothing remaining at that point.

“The President of The United States Said Nigger. Here’s why that’s a good thing.”

Side note, Biden actually saying it would break a loooong streak of US presidents admitting to using it. Wasn’t LBJ the last to really have a reputation for its use (lol @ the first sentence)? I know they tried to stick it to Reagan, but I don’t think it’s documented (though he is heard on a recorded phone call with Nixon saying “those monkeys from those African countries…damn ‘em, they’re still uncomfortable wearing shoes.”
A white woman in a gorilla mask assaulted a black republican candidate and they didn't give a shit. I don't think there is anything that could make them have an ounce of introspection or force an identity crisis. Worst case is Biden resigns, Kamala ascend to be the first BLACK WOMAN president, and everyone claps and congratulates themselves for how good an ally they are.
 
Murphy's blowout in '17 was part in parcel outgoing Christie/Bridgegate + new President Trump + general NJ electorate. Philip Murphy was never that popular.

Murphy will eek out this election, but Ciattarelli totally had that race. Beautiful grassroots campaign. I expect a comeback in '25.
Eek out or not, the damage is very much done. The problem with "Well, when you consider all the factors this isn't that surprising" explanations to things happening, is that normies rarely consider or even know of all the factors. To the average dem normie, they just nearly got blown out from left field when they thought they were invincible off the high of 2020 (Again, normies aren't usually aware of the cracks between now and then). Normies aren't likely to do much with that feeling other than salt up twitter, but its good watchings none the less.
 
Murphy's blowout in '17 was part in parcel outgoing Christie/Bridgegate + new President Trump + general NJ electorate. Philip Murphy was never that popular.

Murphy will eek out this election, but Ciattarelli totally had that race. Beautiful grassroots campaign. I expect a comeback in '25.
Ciattarelli almost unseated an incumbant governor in a D+16 state with literally no backing from his party and no name recognition. If he had a fifth of what Youngkin got in VA, it wouldv'e flipped.

He can still be a local force and try again in 2025, but now he is going to have to make a name for himself in standing up against the eventual vaccine mandates about to rock New Jersey.
 
If anyone's having problems with critical thinking it's certainly not me, between the two of us.
Sure thing.

It's at this point that I have to ask for you to back up your assertions with some form of evidence. The guy quite literally to my knowledge just got elected as a governor for the first time today. People are going off of his party affiliation, his platform, and his self-purported values as far as judgement of what he's capable of as well as what he might attempt to accomplish as governor, and that's where the optimism is coming from.
Alright, ill repeat myself for the 500th time because I have a problem with reading and critical thinking, that's why I have to keep repeating myself. We are looking at a Conservative Inc candidate who is the Ex-CEO of a major wall street asset management firm that's promised to increase funding to public schools. As far as anything I've seen about the only positive wrt education he's stated is to be against CRT. However in order to adequately remove and not simply force it to exist under a different name he would need to be willing to attack IDPol itself. I do not see this as likely between the Leutenant Gov hitting the IDPol bingo markers a little too well and the analysis presented here and elsewhere that his success has greatly been aided by his neutrality and Middle of the roadness. These are things that do not make me optimistic. Maybe I'm missing information on what he plans to do specifically with the schools as I somewhat checked out after finding out his background, however to act like anything except optimism over this candidate is unwarranted is just wrong.

I made the point that perfect is the enemy of good because you're acting as if though %100 of the problem not being solved with a single election is the same as no progress being made whatsoever which is frankly fucking childish and myopic. Yes, I will say that this outcome was good because the alternative was pretty damn bad by all metrics. Other people have listed all the reasons as to why so I won't bother reiterating them here.
As I've repeated many times, if you're not addressing the actual problems then what percentage of good are you getting? If you're not going after the teachers unions, but feeding them more money. If you're going to "ban CRT" but not deal with with ideology it's based off of its just going to continue under a different name. I'm at a loss to see what's being improved here that isn't just surface level. You all can get mad and yell at me all you want, but all I've gotten back is "yea these surface changes are still changes though!" You'd think that since there is so much to celebrate over there would be more than that but apparently not. Sorry I'm actually concerned with the whether the problem is being addressed or the appearance of it.

I've reached the limit of phone posting as I can't get that last paragraph in but it starts off entirely mischaracterizing what I've been saying. I've said to go ahead and laugh at the progs and the left shitting themselves, but also I haven't the slightest measure of positive emotion from this. I've been pointing out that simply having the Dems lose is not the same automatically as the right winning, therefore nothing has changed and we're doomed. I've repeatedly explained the reasons to have caution with this candidate but at the same time haven't said anything. I've addressed the posts I can, take it or leave it. I didn't ignore the actual points presented. Sorry you missed those. Im not going to take seriously the autistic retards that can only repeat "doom and black pills!" Those do not count as actual responses.


This is about the limit of phone-posting in downtime at work. So go ahead and celebrate for the Republican party. They're our friends and allies. Based Lindsey Graham! Throne of Skulls McConnell! ACB yaaaaaas lol

Jesus, you'd think cautioning overexuberance for a hedgie Republican would be less controversial.
 
I think one shouldn't be a doomer about this, as this was a very important rejection of the way the country has been going in the last year or so...but I also agree that this is only the beginning of a new phase of the cultural-political battle, of which the best the Conservatives (even Christopher Rufo) have done so far is to fight to a stalemate.

The war can still be lost if the Republicans don't evolve in a meaningful manner with their clear vision of the future- Conservativism cannot simply be "Progressivism following the speed limit".

View attachment 2685311
View attachment 2685307
I guess this dude sums it up better than I ever could, conservative and liberal is meaningless post 2016.

Trump is more liberal than all the niggers in the Democratic Party. And look at how far he has taken the GOP back into vogue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back