Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[Ancient Pioneer]

It sounds like people ITT want Richards to fail. Just who are you rooting for, anyway?

I want Rittenhouse to succeed, his case has a wider impact on ALL self defense cases because his is about as close as a textbook example you can get. He is trying to flee, he gets cornered and only responds when he is being attacked or someone has attempted to seize his rifle. Richards has been handed a slam dunk case and he is botching it by letting the prosecution go wild. Remember, the jury is NOT as informed as this crowd here, they haven't seen most or any of these videos and Richards is creating a schizophrenic mess of a story. His entire case revolves around a clearcut viewing of the video and explaination of what is occurring at any point, instead of extensive cuts and excerpts of the long videos WE HAVE HIM ASKING RITTENHOUSE WHEN THE EVENT OCCURRED IN THE VIDEO.

Court isn't some mathematical equation, its storylines, emotions and trying to apply laws to it in an imperfect manner, Richards is boring, scattered in presentation and and inept with the technology he uses day-to-day. Its one thing to have a bumbling professor who can't into pdf, its another to be involuntarily pressed into jury duty and watching boomers fumble with videos. The Prosecution has been stellar in their presentation, everything is smoothly done and transitions from one point to another effortlessly, Richards has a jarring staccato of a tempo and right as he starts making a point he fucks up and has to dick with the technology. The Jury is going to be bored and have contempt for the defense attorney.

This is the complete opposite of how Nelson did the Chauvin case, he had great flow and presentation.

 

[Probably An Autist]

What is a jury? A jury is a multi-headed creature, with over a century of combined life experience, and 12 independently-operating bullshit detectors.

you forget that most of joe public are fucking morons who watch the news and regurgitate shit they read on the facebooks. I wouldn't trust some cunt on the street to save my life.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

You should remember the Jury isn't listening to Barnes shitting on the defense because he got cucked

 

[Leslie Nielsen]

I liked Kyle's lawyer more when he was calling everyone niggers.

 

[waffle]

Am lawyer.

Richards should be objecting to way more shit with the cop. There wasn't foundation for any of those videos, and most of them weren't legally relevant. Moreover he just lets the other lawyer testify and lead his witnesses all over the place.

Hopefully the Italian guy gets promoted.

 

[Shaolin]

I’m looking forward to seeing who the defense calls to testify. Praying it’s not his mum though as that lady is sub-retarded and can barely string a sentence together.

 

[Xx_Retard Faggot 1488_xX]

And all that same footage showed Kyle saying he "wanted go help people", calling out offering first aid, and extinguishing a dumpster fire. It hardly looks like the actions of bloodthirsty vigilante looking to pick a fight.

What is a jury? A jury is a multi-headed creature, with over a century of combined life experience, and 12 independently-operating bullshit detectors.

You are assuming a theoretical understanding of human beings. This is a real jury of real people with who knows what intelligence, and who knows what intent.

Guess what: The avg nigger of 80 IQ knows how to get out of jury selection, alot of the people selected for jury duty in this case already did exactly that. Who would want to be on this case anyways, and take that risk and burden? I'll tell you who:

1) Those dumb enough to not get out of it, demonstrating their mental capacity to judge this case.
2) Those who have motives to be on it, who already have their plan.

While I lean on the assumption that we have more of #1 (if not all being in group 1), we are in a "pick your poison" situation.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

Barnes is an exceptional sperg. After watching him flail around like an idiot this year I have trouble taking him seriously.


If that's what Barnes is advocating for he's an even bigger imbecile than I'd imagined.


View attachment 2686336
i miss him bros

Barnes is legitimately one of the weirdest spergs I've seen people latch onto, all he was doing in the past year was putting out just awful, awful case theories on le election stole and all that. Just embarassing.

Stick to tax law dude

 

[murdered meat bag]

I think Nick said that Richards's problem was that he was great with remembering facts on the fly but bad at creating a narrative. I think that's what he said Barnes's issue with Richards was. Richards did seem to meander and look lost quite a bit, to me at least. I'll try to do better and let Richards fight his war these coming days. I worry because every single juror in there is most likely either as dumb as I or a little smarter or a little dumber. If I was annoyed and initially confused with his defense what's the chance that they would be as well?

were you watching the raw or the ricketa stream? theres a noticeable difference in my reactions when it was raw footage vs watching comentary. having quarterbacks, right or wrong, providing feedback is going to taint your understanding of whats happening in that courtroom.

watch tomorrow's case raw. you're going to accept things as they're presented and not go "what the fuck object you retard".

 

[Meat Target]

I want Rittenhouse to succeed, his case has a wider impact on ALL self defense cases because his is about as close as a textbook example you can get. He is trying to flee, he gets cornered and only responds when he is being attacked or someone has attempted to seize his rifle. Richards has been handed a slam dunk case and he is botching it by letting the prosecution go wild. Remember, the jury is NOT as informed as this crowd here, they haven't seen most or any of these videos and Richards is creating a schizophrenic mess of a story. His entire case revolves around a clearcut viewing of the video and explaination of what is occurring at any point, instead of extensive cuts and excerpts of the long videos WE HAVE HIM ASKING RITTENHOUSE WHEN THE EVENT OCCURRED IN THE VIDEO.
View attachment 2686322

Court isn't some mathematical equation, its storylines, emotions and trying to apply laws to it in an imperfect manner, Richards is boring, scattered in presentation and and inept with the technology he uses day-to-day. Its one thing to have a bumbling professor who can't into pdf, its another to be involuntarily pressed into jury duty and watching boomers fumble with videos. The Prosecution has been stellar in their presentation, everything is smoothly done and transitions from one point to another effortlessly, Richards has a jarring staccato of a tempo and right as he starts making a point he fucks up and has to dick with the technology.

Are you saying that because that is your opinion, or are you just ballwashing Daddy Rackets?

you forget that most of joe public are fucking morons who watch the news and regurgitate shit they read on the facebooks. I wouldn't trust some cunt on the street to save my life.

You are assuming a theoretical understanding of human beings. This is a real jury of real people with who knows what intelligence, and who knows what intent.

Guess what: The avg nigger of 80 IQ knows how to get out of jury selection, alot of the people selected for jury duty in this case already did exactly that. Who would want to be on this case anyways, and take that risk and burden? I'll tell you who:

1) Those dumb enough to not get out of it, demonstrating their mental capacity to judge this case.
2) Those who have motives to be on it, who already have their plan.

While I lean on the assumption that we have more of #1 (if not all being in group 1), we are in a "pick your poison" situation.

Duly noted but consider:

1. This isn't Minnemogadishu. The jurors are from Kenosha and were personally affected by the chimpening. This is Trump Country.
2. Some of the most outspoken, dyed-in-the-wool ideologues have been excused from the jury.
3. Normies rejected woke retardation in Virginia last night. Including white women who voted for Biden. There are still millions of non-exceptional individuals in this country.

I get it. I would rather be a pessimist and be wrong than be an optimist and be wrong. But one sloppy day doesn't mean Kyle's done. The ballgame has only begun.

 

[Xx_Retard Faggot 1488_xX]

Are you saying that because that is your opinion, or are you just ballwashing Daddy Rackets?


Duly noted but consider:

1. This isn't Minnemogadishu. The jurors are from Kenosha and were personally affected by the chimpening. This is Trump Country.
2. Some of the most outspoken, dyed-in-the-wool ideologues have been excused from the jury.
3. Normies rejected woke retardation in Virginia last night. Including white women who voted for Biden. There are still millions of non-exceptional individuals in this country.

I get it. I would rather be a pessimist and be wrong than be an optimist and be wrong. But one sloppy day doesn't mean Kyle's done. The ballgame has only begun.

No it doesn't mean he is done, but the defense DOES need to shift priority on emotions and storytelling for this jury, not ramble. When was the last time your wife listened to you ramble about your hobbies for more then 10 minutes?

 

[Puff]

No it doesn't mean he is done, but the defense DOES need to shift priority on emotions and storytelling for this jury, not ramble. When was the last time your wife listened to you ramble about your hobbies for more then 10 minutes?

I've got the same complaint as you, but it IS the defense's witness time. Might just not be a priority. The cop that everyone is complaining about has very little relevance besides getting video in.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

I've got the same complaint as you, but it IS the defense's witness time. Might just not be a priority. The cop that everyone is complaining about has very little relevance besides getting video in.

Video that both sides wanted in anyways

 

[Xx_Retard Faggot 1488_xX]

I've got the same complaint as you, but it IS the defense's witness time. Might just not be a priority. The cop that everyone is complaining about has very little relevance besides getting video in.

His little relevance is what my concern with him is. Why does he get to stand in for everyone else who filmed that shit? And why does he get to expand his role and just "knowing" that in the FBI footage, that the one white blob is Kyle and the other white blob is Jewman. How come the defense wasted like 40 minutes asking about rubber bullets and what an IOS is?

It just feels like the defense doesn't even know what it's goal with this witness is, and not asking the pig what he would do in the situation. If my retarded ass was a lolyer, I would ask what he would do in Kyle's situation, and then finish questioning when he says "feed lead into jew stomachs directly"

 

[Puff]

His little relevance is what my concern with him is. Why does he get to stand in for everyone else who filmed that shit? And why does he get to expand his role and just "knowing" that in the FBI footage, that the one white blob is Kyle and the other white blob is Jewman. How come the defense wasted like 40 minutes asking about rubber bullets and what an IOS is?

It just feels like the defense doesn't even know what it's goal with this witness is, and not asking the pig what he would do in the situation. If my exceptional ass was a lolyer, I would ask what he would do in Kyle's situation, and then finish questioning when he says "feed lead into jew stomachs directly"

The rubber bullets were decent to address, but they weren't tied in at all.

 

[DamnWolves!]

watch tomorrow's case raw. you're going to accept things as they're presented and not go "what the fuck object you exceptional individual".

I just want to remind everyone that the Fox6 News Milwaukee stream on YT has raw footage, totally unmoderated live chat, lost boomers, sneed, and is fucking hilarious.

 

[Ancient Pioneer]

Are you saying that because that is your opinion, or are you just ballwashing Daddy Rackets?

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/kyle-rittenhouse-legal-proceedings.103034/post-10351978

I don't know? Am I?

I'm not pleased with the performance the defense has done in the court room. Dropping the hard R in his fucking opening statement is probably where I started suspecting this guy is a fucking moron considering the fact he just played the video of Rosenbaum saying "Shoot me Nigga" less than 10 seconds earlier and he still fucked the quotation up. If you're a criminal defense lawyer your primary fucking clientele is hood trash use the word nigga as a replacement for every noun and pronoun relating to describing an individual so there is no fucking excuse for Richards not to know the difference between what is acceptable and what is not. The only time you bring the hard R into court is when you're trying to poison the jury -- one that must contain a few black people to begin with -- over some racial bullshit like Francis Lee Bailey Jr did during the OJ trial. Why that was used in this courtroom is beyond me, the only person in this case that is black would be jump-kick man and he isn't present nor was there a racial motive in his interaction since Rittenhouse likely didn't even SEE what jump-kick man looked like.

I don't need Barnes or any other asshole to tell me what is going on, I can tell when I'm getting bored or cannot follow what the hell the lawyer is saying on my own and I've actually seen the evidence beforehand so I know the general gist of where the lawyer should be taking this case. This is two days of absolute scatter shot lawyering, nothing has flow or incentive for the jury to piece together with other evidence, its just random tidbits of information here and there that the jury will forget the moment they leave.

 

[polyester]

How come the defense wasted like 40 minutes asking about rubber bullets

Because earlier, the video had shown a conversation along the lines of (paraphrased):

Reggs: "Are those real guns?"​

​

Kyle: "Yeah, we don't have nonlethal."​

And the sneaky prosecutor fuck Binger guided the police officer witness to define "nonlethal methods" as things like talking, pepper spray, etc., to put the idea in the jury's heads that Kyle's words could have meant something like "Our scary eeeevil militia doesn't believe in using words or other nonviolent means of conflict resolution, we immediately shoot!", when in reality Kyle was clearly just referring to not having access to rubber bullets.

So when it was Richards' turn to question the witness, he circled back to that and forced the witness to mention rubber bullets, to correct the record on that matter.

As to why that took him so much time that he risked boring the jury to death?
Yeah, I don't know either.

 

[Black Light Red Panic]

 

[6MillionCoofs]

Are you saying that because that is your opinion, or are you just ballwashing Daddy Rackets?

The defence could be way better than it is. You Don't need lawyers to see that.