🐱 Men with ‘golden penis syndrome’ are ruining sex and dating for women

CatParty


Beware of the college grad cad!

Men with college degrees have become so cocky that they’re ruining romance for their female counterparts, one “leading expert” alleges.

Just 40.5% of college students in the United States are male, according to the National Student Clearinghouse, meaning they’re in short supply and high demand when dating on campus.

A lack of competition has led these men to develop “golden penis syndrome” — an arrogance that stems from the assumption that a steady supply of females will be sexually interested in them.

“Golden penis syndrome” has led these smug males to engage in dastardly dating practices, such as cheating and ghosting, because they’re confident that another woman will always be waiting around the corner.

The term was purportedly coined by frustrated female students at Sarah Lawrence College in upstate New York — where three-quarters of all enrollees are the fairer sex.

Journalist Jon Birger believes many college-educated men in their 20s, 30s and 40s have also developed GPS because they’re similarly in high demand when it comes to dating.


“The sex ratios among college-educated, hetero singles in Manhattan is approximately three women for every two men. I’ve interviewed a lot of men who were continuing to take advantage of that imbalance,” Birger told Mel Magazine.

“[And] 1981 was the last time that four-year colleges in the US graduated more men than women. Ever since, women have been leaving men in the educational dust.”

Birger — who penned the best-selling book “Date-onomics: How Dating Became a Lopsided Numbers Game” — further explained to the Daily Mail: “We’re seeing a generation of young men who think they’re Adam Driver or Michael B. Jordan. Of course, it’s not about them. It’s the ratio.”

He continued: “When men are in undersupply, the dating culture becomes less monogamous — men are more likely to treat women as sex objects and treat relationships as disposable.”

Not only are men with “golden penis syndrome” more likely to treat their dates badly, they may also be less inclined to put effort into their physical appearance and their sexual performances.

Birger previously spoke with The Post, declaring that dating was particularly dire for heterosexual women in New York.

College-educated women are more likely to date among their own milieu of college-educated men, but as their numbers are so skewed, they’re in for a rougher time.

Birger told The Post that the imbalance is also exacerbated by New York’s large population of gay males. Some 9 to 12 percent of men in Manhattan are gay, according to Gary Gates, a demographics expert at UCLA’s Williams Institute.

But Birger had some trusty advice for female singletons seeking to settle down: Be cautious of the college-grad cads.

“I would be wary of guys who have remained never-married into their late 30s and 40s,” he explained to Daily Mail. “Especially the better-looking ones with good jobs. These men are having too much fun playing the field.”

He also advises women to be assertive when pursing romance, stating: “Fact is, men like women who like them. Also, a man is much less likely to take advantage of a woman who puts herself out there.”
 
one would think these negative outcomes would lead at least some of them to start questioning the social engineering they have blindly supported for the last half century?

but no, at this point they're all way too invested in it. they have made progressivism a core part of their personal identity. because of this, no such insight will occur, no corrective measures will be taken, and the situation will continue to get worse, with disastrous long term consequences for all of society.

Grooming women requires interacting with women.
more importantly grooming requires a position of at least moderately high social status to begin with, to attract the girls in the first place, and if you have that then you don't need to engage in child grooming to get women anyway so it's all redundant in a way (unless you are specifically trying to get with teens)
 
Women at any point time regardless of stimuli: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, FUCK MEN
Simultaneously: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, HELP US, MEN
The problem is that all women are chasing the Top 3% of men (seriously, it's a scary low number), so those three percent don't have to stay in a committed relationship because literally every woman wants them. Then the other 97% of men get yelled out for not wanting to wife up these women after they've "had their fun" or even are single mothers.

Now, we are seeing more and more women on social media, Reddit, and whatever openly stating that they married some guy after they "had their fun", and now that they've been married for a few years they are going to divorce their husbands even though by their own admission the husbands did literally nothing wrong and the women are just bored. So that's what the 97% are getting: a woman that resented "settling" for him since the 3% had no reason to settle down, and after a few years will divorce him, take the kids, and probably trash him to his friends and family on the way out.

I don't mean to sound blackpilled or incel or anything; that's openly happening now. Especially with black women where they will literally yell at the 97% man for not stepping up and being a stepfather because their baby daddies either left them or "weren't good enough."
In short: the female subculture at large needs prescription glasses-- they look one way and speak to the group in the opposite direction
It's more like the the 1% of the 1%. Delusional doesn't even begin to describe a lot of modern women.
The men they're looking for are chimeras constructed from bits and pieces of all the men to whom they gave access to their bodies, with some utilitarian desires (e.g. lots of money) sprinkled in.
 
The problem is not that women are dating assholes. It is that feminism is creating assholes by creating an artificial shortage of men (or a glut of women to compete with one another) at college (and, not mentioned in this article, in higher level offices where an education is required)
Feminism isn't creating assholes. These women are just shit and a guy doesn't have to go through the whole "you go through it, before you do it" to find that out. With this over availability, a good man with a large income doesn't have to settle.
 
If you let some guy fuck you without dating him for at least a few months beforehand, you have zero ground to stand on when you get pumped and dumped. Almost no coomer is going to put that much time and effort into dating you when there are infinity college slags out there that he can use as a cumsock for the price of two drinks and some flattery. You know this. We all know this. The fact that you choose to ignore it is entirely on you. He may be a piece of shit, but you're an exceptional individual, and I wouldn't want to live with either.
Modern women don't want a good relationship. They will happily stay with a terrible guy if he provides status and money. That's all they care about, being able to brag on social media. They will happily bang a high status dude on the off chance he decides to stay with them. Fuck these women, I'm sick to death of them complaining about a mess they made.
 
Fuck these women
No way, that's how we got into this mess.

I'm sick to death of them complaining about a mess they made.
To be fair, they wouldn't have been able to accomplish as much as they did, much less what they accomplished on an institutional level, without the cooperation of sufficiently browbeaten men.

It's less "YOU GET WHAT YOU FUCKING DESERVE!" and more "but this is exactly what you wanted!".
 
Feminism isn't creating assholes. These women are just shit and a guy doesn't have to go through the whole "you go through it, before you do it" to find that out. With this over availability, a good man with a large income doesn't have to settle.
Feminism is indeed creating assholes to an extent. Many men being treated poorly by their partners who think of them lesser than dirt or that they don't need to hold any moral values and thus turning a lot of men jaded or hostile towards women has done just that in the dating pool.

To be fair, it's not just feminism. It's how society (with feminism and without) has treated general men whether with a large income or not for years that's helped attribute to men becoming like this.
 
When people ask why I left SF for NYC I usually give them a bullshit reason but this is the real reason. Unfortunately all I found were soy boys which are way more intolerable than actual fags. At least I don't need a poo map.
I hope you don't have a friendzone because men and women make horrible, confusing friends if they're in breeding age range
chances are any man in it probably is a good match though
 
10371439 said:
With this over availability, a good man with a large income doesn't have to settle.
he still does if he wants a proper family.
the catch is, a high status man can delay family as long as he wants. party until he's 50 years old, then put his money and status to use and marry a 25 year old to have children with. you see this pattern in the rich and famous all over the place.

it's basically this illusionary dream of "having it all" that feminism sells to women, except for men it can actually work because male attractiveness is driven by money and status while womens attractiveness is driven by youth and beauty, and men don't age out of fertility.

the downside for men is of course that it can only ever work for a small fraction of men, due to how top-heavy the money/status distribution is.
 
Last edited:
In the 1800's my great great grandfather sent a picture of himself to a 'Find a Wife' service in New York City. He wasn't a looker, kind of short, and he was standing there with a rifle, two dogs, a log shack, and a goose. Behind him was tilled fields, two deer up on skinning racks, some cows. On the back of the picture he wrote: "I own everything you see and do not excessively drink. I know numbers and letters." He was married within a year by a woman who rode across the country on a train.

Why do I mention this?

It was an interesting thing to bring up on a date with a woman to see how she reacted. A lot of them acted like the woman was stupid for jumping on a train.

Modern women like the ones in this article would turn their noses up at the equivalent man in the current times.

I have a friend who's widowered. He's in his late 40's/early 50's. He owns multiple properties, has almost zero debt, and lives off of his rentals and his Marine Corps pension. His kids are all grown.

He's told me he gets constant hits for women with 2-5 kids, often from different men, who are "ready to settle down" and are 3/10 at the most and usually in their early 30's, who act like he should be grateful they even swiped or showed interest in him.

I told him he should get with the 22 year old that messaged him the simple question: "Your dick still work?"
 
You’d probably get a kick out of igotstandardsbro.com, the world’s finest female delusion calculator.
Is there a version to calculate how deluded I am? I would like a woman 21-35, no kids, no drugs, not obese, no tattoos or facial piercings, politically conservative or moderate. I'm guessing 4/5 (video game enthusiast).

I'm sure at least one person wants to object, but if I told you where I live, you'd say, "Yeah, bro, that's a 5/5 for you."
 
a good man with a large income doesn't have to settle.
A good man with a large income probably can't afford to settle, due to the risk of 50% of everything he's worked for walking out the door after a few months of marriage.

I would like a woman 21-35, no kids, no drugs, not obese, no tattoos or facial piercings, politically conservative or moderate.
That's lottery ticket territory there mang.
 
Back