I thought I had seen a post back in the riot threads about a Wisconsin law that allowed teenagers under 18 to carry long guns. The way it was written sounded like it was tailored for deer hunting season, but it seemed to apply to Kyle as written.
At this point if I get on a jury here is my vote no matter what I hear/see:
I foresee her being put up last with just enough time as one last prosecution witness for the day, many tears shed, possibly a "YOU KILLED MY BOYFRIEND!" outburst toward Kyle, then the State asks the judge to adjourn for the day. Jury has that in their mind all weekend.
For real, I wanna salt my popcorn but I don't also wanna catch aids from going on reddit
The funny thing too about that is if you waited until after the not guilty verdict, you could then go and literally post videos of yourself rubbing your balls on pedo midget Jew's tombstone and there'd be nothing they could do about it to Rittenhouse because of double jeopardy.
If you look at what happened, it's clear that Kyle shot all three in order to defend himself. You would need to be deranged to think that he was some kind of active shooter that went out there to kill as many people as possible. The worry is that the jury will be bored by the defense, and that they'll be dumb enough to fall for the obvious bullshit the prosecution is saying. I think that if the prosecutor is able to get the jury to think just one of the shootings is unjustified, they'll decide Kyle is a murderer and assume he's guilty for killing both people and not justified for shooting the one-armed bandit.
Doxing your balls would be supremely exceptional but I'd watch that video a couple dozen times.
The prosecution is doing a great job of getting the jury to pay attention, by putting out witnesses that are hostile to their narrative. If richards just did basic lawyering he wouldn’t have any trouble winning this case, but he seems to take NyQuil before the court hearing or something because he never objects.
That would definitely be the obvious outcome if this were in Seattle or Portland, but how likely is it in Kenosha? Are Wisconsinites' politics so dyed-in-the-wool that they'd send an innocent kid to prison just to send a message?
I think it's the other way around. Jury nullification can only declare "Not Guilty". So maybe they'd use it to let him off the hook of the weapon charge even if it technically applies.
They were playing the same cards with Zimmerman. How many years did he get?
Did you forget the part the jury will be made of people local to the area?
You can say Nigger on this
I just don't like saying it. I know I can but I prefer not to.
The jury isn't getting the "benefit" of the court TV narrator, only the actual testimony. All they're getting are the witnesses saying how innocent Kyle is and seeing how slimey the prosecutor is.
legalinsurrection.com
In the long view, you may be right. In the short view, it's because Rittenhouse embarrassed City Hall. The government was helpless to stop the city from burning for two nights straight, and in the space of 5 minutes, he stopped that shit dead in its tracks. So he couldn't just be some boy scout from the burbs who was trying to help and found himself in over his head. He had to be a white nationalist militia member just itching for a chance to shoot peaceful protestors with his evil AR-15.
