Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Actually, no. When the FBI agent called me and spoke to me discussing my complaint about you all, he said that the FBI prioritizes Cyberstalkers who have (1) violated protective orders and (2) have made direct death threats. Since Kiwi Farms has made death threats to my family they have an open case on Kiwi Farms. They ARE watching. They just aren't going to arrest Joshua Moon until Kiwi Farms crosses the line by actually sending someone within close promixity of my house or car.

When you cross a certain line, they prosecute. Because they are, after all, very busy. And sadly, the FBI agent said that stalking of women was very common and there are literally hundreds of women being stalked every day. That's why they have to selectively prosecute the most dangerous of stalkers. Otherwise - as the FBI agent said - jails would be full of Stalkers.

Well if they flood jails with marijuana offenders, why not just let all the people with marijuana charges go and replace them with the Stalkers? GEE, LIKE DUH!
Melinda, the vast majority of cybercrimes that get reported to the FBI get ignored. Cyberbullying doesn't matter to them. A site would need to be selling illegal drugs, selling humans, posting images of dead bodies, or posting CP. The moment it's "harassment" they give zero shits about it. They're not the UK or New Zealand where they would give a shit. All this post you wrote is a futile attempt to scare people. The site is eight years old now, if the FBI gave a shit about it it would have been closed years ago. Silk Road by the way lasted four years and they knew how to stay hidden on the dark web. Kiwifarms is public. If cyberbullying mattered it would have been shut down within the first year. There are no laws about talking about people there certainly aren't any laws against insulting people. Hell, here it's considered freedom of expression.

Should I also mention your six failed lawsuits against the site? Where were the FBI to help you during those? Face it, no one gives a shit that your fee fees are hurt other than you. Even Marshall doesn't give a shit, he just wants to make money off your self imposed suffering.

But you're abusing me as a woman and my children by posting on this site smear campaigns, social abuse and libel against me? You are abusing my children by attacking their primary caregiver and effectuating negative consequences for their primary caregiver. (Whether or not you think it's justified is irrelevant) So what's make you different? Or is the reality that you hate in others what you project on them - that which actually exists within yourself?
You continue to fail to understand that we laugh at you because of the constant oversharing you do on this site, we pity your children for having a mother like you. You don't understand what social abuse is or what libel is in the United States. The only reality you hate is your own. The only hate is your own as you projected it upon us. You're a sick pathetic woman. I would feel sorry for you if you didn't choose this for yourself.
That boy is going to hit 50 like a semi truck hitting a minivan.
More like a train hitting a smart car.
 
Last edited:
Oof. Am I hung over this morning. I played the “Melinda the Moron” drinking game last night - I drank a shot every time Melinda misused the word “Narcissist” in a reply. I passed out.

Tonight’s game will be to drink every time I see her use “Exhibit” in reply to something that isn’t actionable. YHWH help my liver.
At this rate, you're going to need to change your name to "Sir Drank-a-Lot." Or intersperse your "exhibit" drinks with water for every sensible reply that she gets, or something.

Her nonsensical bullshit walls of text are why I couldn't play a drinking game in this thread. One post could kill someone, if they didn't have the tolerance.
 
New docs.
image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png

image-000001.png
image-000002.png
image-000003.png
image-000004.png
image-000005.png
image-000006.png
image-000007.png
image-000008.png
image-000009.png
image-000010.png
image-000011.png
image-000012.png
 

Attachments

Last edited:
"Mentally there's not room in your brain that can contain us
We don't give a shit about your feelings call it shameless"

Bukshot
New docs. Images to come.
When will Melinda learn to cite relevant crime? Talking about some sped in Virginia is different from a sex offender on social media. With this same argument Marshall shouldn't be on Youtube and Facebook given his actual criminal history.
 
New docs. Images to come.
Ah yes, I see we're back to "we live in a society."

Ordinary members of society do not go out of their way to use public court records to "doxx", harass, and stalk other people.

No, but they DO lawfully use such materials to defend themselves against frivolous and baseless court proceedings.
 
That's already been addressed in the pleadings. Your theory that a victim must be silent in the face of an abuser fails as a matter of law.

Yeah, but normally half of what the “victim” says doesn’t wind up getting used as evidence that they’re acting in bad faith - I don’t really care either way, you do you, but the constant legal failings are amusing.

Seriously, if you want the Farms to stop paying attention to you, stop screaming into the Internet Void for us to find. You don’t exactly make it difficult, especially since unless the lawsuit is explicitly about the kids it’s all a matter of public record…
 
Cyberbullying doesn't matter to them.
Probably because it isn't an actual crime in most states, and in states where it is, it only applies to schools (see, for example, Florida's cyberbullying laws)
Do we know if that authorization was ever renewed?
We don't.

Actually, no. When the FBI agent called me and spoke to me discussing my complaint about you all, he said that the FBI prioritizes Cyberstalkers who have (1) violated protective orders and (2) have made direct death threats. Since Kiwi Farms has made death threats to my family they have an open case on Kiwi Farms. They ARE watching. They just aren't going to arrest Joshua Moon until Kiwi Farms crosses the line by actually sending someone within close promixity of my house or car.

"FBI won't arrest Null until he commits a crime". Yes, Mel, that's how laws work. We haven't commited a crime, therefore no arrest.

Just because something is public record doesn't mean it exists for the purpose of being misused for Cyberstalking.
The misuse of public records falls under Cyberstalking.
False. Looking at, reposting, and using public documents (including court documents) has been long recognised as a legal thing to do, a right, and in the public's best interest. See, for example, Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, or B.R. v. F.C.S.B., 21-1005 (4th Cir. 2021).

You don't like it? Tough luck. It's our right to publish your docs here. Petition Congress if you don't like that.

No, the real question is, is why are you so anxious to defend CPS?
You're moving goal posts again~

I'm just stating facts, Mel. And the best part? Your court cases show that you know I'm right.

Intimate details? I don't know what kind of lame sex life you have, but merely mentioning frequency and desire is no "intimate details". Trust me, you have been spared a lot. I have hit the back button a few times!
Mel, you told us all your fetishes, you told us your favorite positions, you told us about how much you worship your boy toy's dick, Mel, you've shared eveything about your sex life with us, including when and how you lost your virginity.
I will order my own set of documents from Buchanan County and post them myself if I have to.
About what specifically? Mind you, that might cost you a lot of cash. They don't send docs over mail cheap, IIRC
 
About what specifically? Mind you, that might cost you a lot of cash. They don't send docs over mail cheap, IIRC
The crap she wants sealed in the W.D.Va. case. I don't have to pay the big money to get certified copies (and even that isn't very much).

Calling up the clerk's office and saying, "Hello, this is (((talk talk talk))), an attorney in _____. I need to get a copy of the court records from an old case. It's number ------. Yes, I can pay in advance, just tell me who to write the check to," has not failed me yet. A little chit-chat about the weather and the deed is done.
 
Wow what a load of horse shit. Can't wait for the judge to finally just end this nonsense and finally take away her ability to file frivolous lawsuits. And for Null to auction off her pew pews so I can post pictures of them here whenever she seethe posts
 
Probably because it isn't an actual crime in most states, and in states where it is, it only applies to schools (see, for example, Florida's cyberbullying laws)
It's more to do with limited resources both in man power and cash. Like they only pay around $150k max for computer forensics, A casino in Nevada will pay you around $400 an hour to do the same job.
 
Tldr: Hardin responded therefore he did it with Malice and to hurt me, Hardin unnecessarily included my IFP petition, everything KiwiFarms does must be super evil and criminal, don't listen to Hardin , he is irrelevant and so are his arguments, Null bad because Andrew bad, since Kiwi must be do crime, therefore document look be crime, therefore bad, and even more Kiwi Bad

That's all that's in her motions. Needless to say it's a mess, and she is wrong about everything. 90% of that document is essentially just "kiwi bad" and accusing us of crimes she didn't manage to prove.
 
Tldr: Hardin responded therefore he did it with Malice and to hurt me, Hardin unnecessarily included my IFP petition, everything KiwiFarms does must be super evil and criminal, don't listen to Hardin , he is irrelevant and so are his arguments, Null bad because Andrew bad, since Kiwi must be do crime, therefore document look be crime, therefore bad, and even more Kiwi Bad

That's all that's in her motions. Needless to say it's a mess, and she is wrong about everything. 90% of that document is essentially just "kiwi bad" and accusing us of crimes she didn't manage to prove.
I just glanced at it but did she site any case law other than her own? Like even if it was incorrectly cited or she came to a conclusion that the court didn't, was there anything other than her failed lawsuits before her cited?
 
Tldr: Hardin responded therefore he did it with Malice and to hurt me, Hardin unnecessarily included my IFP petition, everything KiwiFarms does must be super evil and criminal, don't listen to Hardin , he is irrelevant and so are his arguments, Null bad because Andrew bad, since Kiwi must be do crime, therefore document look be crime, therefore bad, and even more Kiwi Bad

That's all that's in her motions. Needless to say it's a mess, and she is wrong about everything. 90% of that document is essentially just "kiwi bad" and accusing us of crimes she didn't manage to prove.
"I exist, therefore crime" was what I got from it.
 
The Court system is not a complaint blog Melinda. And if anything you are Stalking US. For someone complaining vociferously about how in fear you are of us Stalkers you sure do spend alot of your time with us.
 
Back