Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[Spicey McHaggis]

He was arrested and charged for these things but if I remember correctly then he was never convicted for it.
So he was allowed to carry a gun.

He was on probation at the time iirc, which 99% of the time keeps you from owning guns during that time.

 

[Meat Target]

I'll bet cash money that no less than half the jury talks to someone in their household about this case.

I hope they also look up the three stooges' criminal records, keep quiet about it, but let it influence their decisions.

After all, they've had to be removed from the courtroom several times, so that Pros could beg to not have their criminal records admitted. Surely, they see that as suspicious.

I don't care if that taints the jury in Kyle's favor. This trial is a travesty.

 

[LaxerBRO]

I wonder if Merrick Garland is enough of a vindictive little goblin to charge Kyle with civil rights offenses, guilty or not guilty.

That would be a reach.

Remember a curfew had been declared and the police were telling everyone to go back to their homes.

You cannot argue the people had a right to be there in light of a curfew. As their presence was illegal the state loses their civil rights violation argument.

Aka:
Their is no civil right to be in public when a curfew is in effect.

 

[TheClappening]

I hope they also look up the three stooges' criminal records, keep quiet about it, but let it influence their decisions.

After all, they've had to be removed from the courtroom several times, so that Pros could beg to not have their criminal records admitted. Surely, they see that as suspicious.

On the one hand, I kind of just want everything to be nice and proper, because nice and proper is all Kyle needs to win, with how ludicrously strong Kyle's self defense case is.

On the other hand, it would be funny for the entire jury to be redpilled because they read the "victims" were a child rapist, a violent domestic abuser, and granny abusing burglar packing heat.

 

[Pizza Munch]

For anyone interested RE Black:

Man faces 12 years for buying gun Kyle Rittenhouse used in Kenosha shootings

Dominick Black, 19, of Racine, was charged with two counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a person under the age of 18, causing death.

www.wisn.com

archive

 

[Meat Target]

On the one hand, I kind of just want everything to be nice and proper, because nice and proper is all Kyle needs to win, with how ludicrously strong Kyle's self defense case is.

On the other hand, it would be funny for the entire jury to be redpilled because they read the "victims" were a child rapist, a violent domestic abuser, and granny abusing burglar packing heat.

I would agree with your first point if we didn't live in Clown World. Like I said, it is unjust that the pasts of Kyle's attackers are being concealed from the jury. What they did to him was consistent with their long histories of violence. The jury deserves to know that.

I'm also disappointed that Lex didn't pursue that line when questioning Rosy's crackho gf. There's no place for honor in a dirty fight.

Yes, Kyle's self-defense claim is airtight. But I want anything that increases his chance of acquittal in evidence.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

This isn't a trial. It's a battle between the forces of good and evil.

This has been going on for years, particularly in blue states. Someone brought up the bar owner that committed suicide because he was hounded for ventilating a rioter that attacked him and his father when they kept them from destroying their tavern. It would be great if this case turns the tide but I'm not optimistic.

 

[CapraDeus]

So the drug she mentioned is prescribed off-label for bipolar disease, and it's controversial because it increases suicidal tendencies.

View attachment 2691590

Neurontin Lawsuit Results in $142M in Damages Against Pfizer - AboutLawsuits.com

A federal jury in Boston has found that Pfizer violated U.S. racketeering laws by illegally promoting off-label uses of its epilepsy drug Neurontin, and

www.aboutlawsuits.com

That's really fucky, because that medication is also used for nerve pain and in combination with opioids to increase the effect of them and therefore reduce the necessary dose (off-label.) As in, that's at least 5 conditions that it's been said it can be used for. Interesting.

 

[Sprocket]

On the other hand, it would be funny for the entire jury to be redpilled because they read the "victims" were a child rapist, a violent domestic abuser, and granny abusing burglar packing heat.

This is the main reason why I don't believe jury trials are fair. It's near impossible to separate people from their biases, prejudices and politics. So it's very hard for the average person to just assess the facts and reach a conclusion without the above mentioned influencing their reasoning. There's also no telling if there's a retard or two in jury in any given case either.

 

[But I Digress]

That's really fucky, because that medication is also used for nerve pain and in combination with opioids to increase the effect of them and therefore reduce the necessary dose (off-label.) As in, that's at least 5 conditions that it's been said it can be used for. Interesting.

I use it for severe nerve damage. It has never made me feel like killing myself.

Rosenbaum is just a fuckhead bipolar manic. Well, was, now he's now raping boys in heaven.

 

[JohnDoe]

Rosenbaum is just a fuckhead bipolar manic. Well, was, now he's now raping boys in heaven.

Just FYI, but rapists, child abusers, and (((subversives))) go elsewhere.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

Rosenbaum is just a fuckhead bipolar child molester. Well, was, now he's now raping boys in hell.

fify

 

[Meat Target]

This is the main reason why I don't believe jury trials are fair. It's near impossible to separate people from their biases, prejudices and politics. So it's very hard for the average person to just assess the facts and reach a conclusion without the above mentioned influencing their reasoning. There's also no telling if there's an exceptional individual or two in jury in any given case either.

The jurors have more in common with Kyle than they do with Binger. They're most likely laypeople who can detect Binger's bullshit. If they can't detect that, then they can at least see how the witnesses have utterly buttfucked the prosecution.

You could also see how agitated the Pros was today. What do you think people in the same room see?

On top of all that: they also probably see how the judge is reacting to Binger.

 

[TheClappening]

This is the main reason why I don't believe jury trials are fair. It's near impossible to separate people from their biases, prejudices and politics. So it's very hard for the average person to just assess the facts and reach a conclusion without the above mentioned influencing their reasoning. There's also no telling if there's an exceptional individual or two in jury in any given case either.

It's why the law frames it as "jury of your peers". As in a jury of nominally normal people who have their own biases and experiences.

Maybe not perfect, but I think more than good enough for the vast majority of cases.

fify

Child-rapist.

It might be just me, but I associate "molesting" as something like sticking your hands down their pants or something. What Pedobaum did was anally penetrate those little boys, and we can't downplay that.

 

[Sprocket]

The jurors have more in common with Kyle than they do with Binger. They're most likely laypeople who can detect Binger's bullshit. If they can't detect that, then they can at least see how the witnesses have utterly buttfucked the prosecution.

You could also see how agitated the Pros was today. What do you think people in the same room see?

I don't mean in just this trial, I mean overall. Hypothetically, some rando could find himself in the wrong place and wrong time stumbling onto the scene of a homicide, find himself on trial for murder charges and get sent to prison purely because most of the jury were leftists and he was wearing a MAGA hat when the cops questioned him.

EDIT: Just pointing out that I'm not a yank and this is just based on my limited understanding of how the legal system works there.

 

[Mukhrani]

I use it for severe nerve damage. It has never made me feel like killing myself.

Rosenbaum is just a fuckhead bipolar manic. Well, was, now he's now raping boys in heaven.

The suicidal/violent aspects come in when it's given to bipolar people and a few other classes, not prescribed for actual nerve damage. Pfizer got sued because they were trying to increase such off-label prescriptions in order to rake in more $$$.

 

[TheClappening]

I don't mean in just this trial, I mean overall. Hypothetically, some rando could find himself in the wrong place and wrong time stumbling onto the scene of a homicide, find himself on trial for murder charges and get sent to prison purely because most of the jury were leftists and he was wearing a MAGA hat when the cops questioned him.

EDIT: Just pointing out that I'm not a yank and this is just based on my limited understanding of how the legal system works there.

In burgerland, a conviction requires a unanimous decision of 12 jurors using the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt. In your scenario, if the poor MAGA schmuck was found at the scene but none of his prints or DNA were found on the murder weapon or whatever, that's reasonable doubt. That should be an acquittal.

There's also the second part of your scenario, of a hypothetical panel of Orange Man haters who would love to throw some MAGA geek into prison. In jury selection, there's a bunch of jury candidates, and the defense and prosecuting lawyers attempt to find reasonable, neutral jurors. I mean, sure, the defense wants to find jurors that lean sympathetic to the defendant, and the prosecution wants jurors who lean towards a guilty verdict, but they don't want something overt. Like if some dangerhair has FUCK DRUMPF tattooed on her forehead she would be bounced.

It's still not perfect. As we saw in Chauvin's conviction, one of the jurors lied during the questioning process and would go on to reach a guilty verdict.

 

[Art Kassul]

For anyone interested RE Black:

Man faces 12 years for buying gun Kyle Rittenhouse used in Kenosha shootings

Dominick Black, 19, of Racine, was charged with two counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a person under the age of 18, causing death.

www.wisn.com

archive

Those articles where every paragraph is a single sentence?

Those really annoy me.

Can no one write coherently anymore?

What has the world come to?

\n\n

Kyle Rittenhouse on trial: Everything you need to know

What could be the most closely watched trial in Kenosha County's history begins Monday.

www.wisn.com

Sheskey is white and Blake is Black.

That always reads so petty.

 

[waffle]

The jurors have more in common with Kyle than they do with Binger. They're most likely laypeople who can detect Binger's bullshit. If they can't detect that, then they can at least see how the witnesses have utterly buttfucked the prosecution.

You could also see how agitated the Pros was today. What do you think people in the same room see?

On top of all that: they also probably see how the judge is reacting to Binger.

They've seen the judge get very irritated with Binger several times, while being downrigjt friendly to the defense. Im sure they have the impression that the judge is not happy about bingers conduct in the case.

 

[Übertroon]

Trial by jury might seem like luck of the draw, but I see way weirder decesions by judge panels.

Hoping for one sane individual among 12 commoners usually happens more often than hoping for 2 out of 3 judges to not be morons