Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Nothing is stopping Smelly from posting any wins she has in other jurisdictions or in State court.

There have to be wins for her to post them

 

[Space Cooter]

Nothing is stopping Smelly from posting any wins she has in other jurisdictions or in State court.

One time she beat one of the tardkids at checkers. Does that count?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Nothing is stopping Smelly from posting any wins she has in other jurisdictions or in State court.

She has none

 

[talk talk talk]

Case Docs

Scott v. Va. Dept. of Med. Asst. Svcs., 18-cv-00012 (W.D.Va. 2018 )

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Case Docs

Scott v. Va. Dept. of Med. Asst. Svcs., 18-cv-00012 (W.D.Va. 201

I bet these are whats setting her off. She wants these sealed and now they are out on the internet and archived. Granted, they won't be sealed but still

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

@TamarYaelBatYah says You strike your parent, that's it. You're eternally condemned. Elohim will not forgive you

It's noted that your religious beliefs seem to give you pass after pass, but not even your kids get an inch of leniency?
You wanted evidence that you're a psychopath, well.. voila.

 

[talk talk talk]

Case Docs

Scott v. Wise Cty. Hsg. Auth., 18-cv-00045 (W.D.Va. 2018 )

We only have the dismissal order for this one. The complaint is sealed because Plaintiff put the full name of her minor child in it like an absolute mongoloid.

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

(Gee, I didn't know I looked so poor?! LOL)

I'm rather tolerant of people's dressing styles but that pink jacket you had in one of your book promotion vids? I hope it has some sentimental value to you because damn, it doesn't look good.

Proof of claim?

In simplest terms, psychopaths are people with lowered emotional response, who need extreme stimuli so they engage in extreme activities (extreme sports, conflict situation, generally taking risk) and have reduced empathy. Doesn't fit? At all?
In everyday language the term is used synonymous with "sociopath" but that's incorrect. Many high-ranking managers have the same traits. Psychopathy can but doesn't have to lead to anti-social behaviors.

Since many of you Trolls here have openly admitted that they are angry and distressed a giant legal hammer might come down on this site, that's a full on projection.

When Trump was mad about 230 and threatened to get rid of it, yes, some people were worried. In regards to your lawsuit the general sentiment is that it's bad because simply costs a lot of money that could be otherwise used to maintain and improve the site.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Case Docs

Scott v. Wise Cty. Hsg. Auth., 18-cv-00045 (W.D.Va. 201

We only have the dismissal order for this one. The complaint is sealed because Plaintiff put the full name of her minor child in it like an absolute mongoloid.

So all she has to do is post her minor children here, include them in her next frivolous lawsuit (if she is allowed to have one), then after it gets dismissed for being frivolous and once again failing to state a cause of action, she can have it sealed. There you go Melinda, why not throw your kids under the bus to try and get something you want? You do that with everyone else

 

[talk talk talk]

Case Docs

Scott v. Carlson, 18-cv-00047 (W.D.Va. 2018 )

 

[RodgerDodger]

So all she has to do is post her minor children here, include them in her next frivolous lawsuit (if she is allowed to have one), then after it gets dismissed for being frivolous and once again failing to state a cause of action, she can have it sealed. There you go Melinda, why not throw your kids under the bus to try and get something you want? You do that with everyone else

She tried that trick and got tossed and admonished for trying to legally represent the child when she is not an attorney. Same would apply with what you describe. Which won’t stop her. She already threatened Dear Feeder with continuing the lawsuits in her children’s names.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

She tried that trick and got tossed and admonished for trying to legally represent the child when she is not an attorney. Same would apply with what you describe. Which won’t stop her. She already threatened Dear Feeder with continuing the lawsuits in her children’s names.

(804) 531-6228

 

[pearlslam]

Finally, something that is right up my alley:

My children know better than to strike me. Striking your parent is an unforgivable sin in The Torah. There is no blood atonement allowed for sins that lead to death in The Torah. You strike your parent, that's it. You're eternally condemned. Elohim will not forgive you.

I don't teach my children the Christian lie that all sin is forgivable, because it's not. There are more than 70 sins in The Torah for which there is no blood atonement. Striking you parent is one of them, and I have cautioned them to NEVER commit an unforgivable sin. Torah lessons are part of our routine homeschooling. Many messianic families likewise. They put instruction of The Torah at the core of their homeschooling. Old fashioned, but it's good.

That is all fine and dandy and all that, but do you know what is better? You worshiping a god that throws the remainder of OT out of sheer convenience and holding your kids to a standard that was rejected nearly 2000 years ago.

 

[talk talk talk]

Case Docs (last one)

Scott v. Moon, 19-cv-00005 (W.D.Va. 2019)

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

Finally, something that is right up my alley:


That is all fine and dandy and all that, but do you know what is better? You worshiping a god that throws the remainder of OT out of sheer convenience and holding your kids to a standard that was rejected nearly 2000 years ago.

Her children are literal and figurative tools and she will happily treat them as such.

 

[Forgotten Snack Cake]

Holy fucking delusions. Child porn accusations, theft accusations, abortion accusations, drug accusations… Someone’s pissed off the harpy enough she’s listening to Ashley wholeheartedly without an ounce of skepticism. I don’t know why I’m so shocked as this is coming from a woman who quotes herself as a source in arguments when she can’t find any other source. Poor Meli. She knows who each of us are, our deepest darkest secrets that we all poured out to Ashley the Hut and still can’t find the time to name the Does in her suit.

 

[talk talk talk]

I have updated the big case summary list with links to each individual post with case docs.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Futile. for the record.

Thanks for catching that, spellcheckers can be a bitch. Been corrected.
Off to get some sleep. Everyone's been fed and I need to sleep off this pain in my leg.

narcissistic gas lighting and victim blaming

I don't really pay attention to these infantile posts from you @TamarYaelBatYah. You don't know what narcissism means, or gaslighting for that matter nor are you a victim. All these posts do is give us a tell for what upsets your delicate feelings the most so others can hammer it home. It's no different than any other cow that frequents the farms. Ashley for instance will repost the same images and use her same talking points as a sort of "gotcha" over and over again.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

We are either watching @TamarYaelBatYah have a mental breakdown, with each new post representing another fragment of her fractured mind, or she's gunning for the Schizocow tag.

So, which is it, Mel? Are you having a mental breakdown, or are you trying to get the Schizocow tag?

 

[RodgerDodger]

Case Docs

Scott v. Lyall, 17-cv-00050 (W.D.Va. 2017)

N.b. This is part of the Great Buchanan County Lease Catastrophe. The state court records of this are currently at issue in her suit against Dear Leader. This is her trying to get the Federal District Court to order the Virginia courts to do things. She really flexes her story-telling chops in this file!

Fascinating Captain. If a second undocumented hearing occurred in November in which the Appeals Bond and Attorneys Fees were removed, why was she pursuing it further at the Federal Level and into the Federal Appeals Court in December, January and February? With clear written decisions telling her no? And with Melinda showing a distinct understanding that $750 in Attorney’s fees were ordered against her and an Appeal Bond in that amount was required. And now given this official document trail, which Ms. Scott clearly is well aware of, Why is she attempting to pass off a vague web page as proof that the current Defendants Attorney is not simply incorrect, but that he has committed a Sanctionable Act of fraud against the court. Oh Melinda you devious witch. You do so project your own sins upon others.