Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Being a cuck to thugs instead of protecting your community is a worse idea, but that is the mentality you are encouraging when you say this kind of thing regarding the rittenhouse case.

'I know they'll burn down our stores and destroy everything we hold dear just for the sake of their protest, but at least you won't have to go to court!'
Although you are morally correct, going to court can be even more dangerous than facing down an angry mob and having your life's work destroyed.
 
The funny part is though, as for as the law goes, he would have been better off just mag dumping on Grosskreutz. Grosskreutz is the one witness that is unlikely to fuck over the prosecution.
Unless he shows up drunk out of his mind, which is apparently how he spends most of his time.
Being a cuck to thugs instead of protecting your community is a worse idea, but that is the mentality you are encouraging when you say this kind of thing regarding the rittenhouse case.

'I know they'll burn down our stores and destroy everything we hold dear just for the sake of their protest, but at least you won't have to go to court!'
He was just a kid with no experience doing security or anything, and he might as well have just been reporting to Mogadishu with no training whatsoever for it. It was extremely naive for him to do this. Perhaps it shouldn't have been, but we don't live in the kind of world where good deeds are forgiven.
 
So the pajeets were nervous because they got themselves a little insurance fraud going on. They claimed they had no insurance when they put up this Gofundme but it sounds like they did infact get paid by insurance. Perhaps the Kenosha PD could spend their efforts on investigating this instead of 17 year olds who defend themselves.
Reread that gofund me, they have insurance but the insurance company was attempting to skirt out of payment. Absolutely nothing wrong with how that was presented at the time.
 
Reread that gofund me, they have insurance but the insurance company was attempting to skirt out of payment. Absolutely nothing wrong with how that was presented at the time.
"Our insurance company is finding their way out so they don't have to pay for all this arson that took place Monday early morning and 2nd time early Tuesday morning."

It's kind of a weird way to put that though. I mean, shouldn't you wait for the final verdict on what the insurance company is doing before you ask for donations? "Is finding their way out" implies that the insurance company is still reviewing the case.

Like, what are they going to do if the donations start flying in and then suddenly the insurance company decides it has to pay?

That does strike me as somewhat fraudulent.
 
"Our insurance company is finding their way out so they don't have to pay for all this arson that took place Monday early morning and 2nd time early Tuesday morning."

It's kind of a weird way to put that though. I mean, shouldn't you wait for the final verdict on what the insurance company is doing before you ask for donations? "Is finding their way out" implies that the insurance company is still reviewing the case.

Like, what are they going to do if the donations start flying in and then suddenly the insurance company decides it has to pay?

That does strike me as somewhat fraudulent.
Did you notice where he 1st agreed that the damaged property was in the ballpark of $200,000 and then the defense pointed out that they claimed over 1.5 million dollars in damages with their insurance company? They pretty clearly committed insurance fraud, that's why he was evasive.
 
Whatever happened with him? Last I heard he was suing the authorities despite the fact that he was breaking the law himself. Did he ever get charged with anything?
He wasn't even charged with carrying a pistol as a felon, and his felony conviction got expunged since the shooting.
 
That exact video was discussed in the pretrial motions where the prosecution was trying to have it barred saying it wasn't relevant to the shootings later. They clearly think it'll hurt their case so it's probably going to be played during the defense witnesses' turn.
If courts were truly moral and just (lmao)
objecting to evidence favoring the opposition should be grounds as contempt of court and/or due process.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Meat Target
"Our insurance company is finding their way out so they don't have to pay for all this arson that took place Monday early morning and 2nd time early Tuesday morning."

It's kind of a weird way to put that though. I mean, shouldn't you wait for the final verdict on what the insurance company is doing before you ask for donations? "Is finding their way out" implies that the insurance company is still reviewing the case.

Like, what are they going to do if the donations start flying in and then suddenly the insurance company decides it has to pay?

That does strike me as somewhat fraudulent.
Even if you hire a lawyer it can take years to get money on a major insurance case. That was before COVID turned all the court dockets into an even bigger fucked to death pile of shit than they already were.

Even if their policy covers fire and civil unrest they'll do shit like accusing you of setting the fire to get the insurance proceeds.
 
I have a hard time believing that the police would ever advise civilians to take such action against a criminal suspect. Think back to one of the major contentions in the Zimmerman trial being whether he was allowed to pursue Martin when the 911 operator told him that his help wasn't needed.
Prior to the Summer of Love, yes. But during and after, things changed. Departments were full on quitting in droves and saying "This what you want? Fine."
The media-endorsed full-on vilification of law enforcement changed things fundamentally.
 
He was just a kid with no experience doing security or anything, and he might as well have just been reporting to Mogadishu with no training whatsoever for it. It was extremely naive for him to do this. Perhaps it shouldn't have been, but we don't live in the kind of world where good deeds are forgiven.

The issue is that kids like Rittenhouse will end up on the front lines, because when you don't have the police you end up with whoever is willing and able to show up. Case in point SA, where kids are forced to fight alongside their parents.

Rittenhouse should never have been needed in the first place. Once we pass that point there is no more ideal situation, and this is what we're going to get.
 
He wasn't even charged with carrying a pistol as a felon, and his felony conviction got expunged since the shooting.
From what I could tell he had been charged with felony burglary, but it was dismissed years before all of this. I think he was on probation at the time, but he's got the least solid info on him of all 3 the idiots.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back