Goonclown Steven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner

ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
  • Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
  • Practice harm reduction. Read our prudent poster's guide.
  • Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
Scarmaiden said:
I see leftoids in particular taking it as the personal crusadegrift because "muh ecology and energy consumption"
Case in point: Demon Troon, suddenly caring about NFTs just as Tiny begins shilling for those:
View attachment 2690726
...
Click to expand...
My favorite part about this NFT environmentalist sperging is the people sperging about it have no idea what proof of stake means, and that ETH is going to be switching to that very soon. Basically booting out all the miners from the ETH blockchain when that happens and completely negating environmental concerns since the servers required for staking pools are orders of magnitude less power intensive.

So putting aside the the potential issues with making a blockchain proof of stake and the fact that cucking out an entire mining ecosystem to environmentalist interests is fucking gay for a second, the people complaining aren't even complaining about a real issue at this point.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: 6thRanger, Guntkvd, RurkerHivemind and 4 others
Found a Destiny fan today.

A coworker was "debating" at work. He was insisting that Alec Baldwin had zero responsibility in killing another person. My guy's primary source and inspiration for his argument was Destiny. And he had no time to consider the perspective that Baldwin does vear responsibility; then thought he proved his point and won when I became incredulous when he used a apples and oranges comparison to the Nazis to prove his point.

Afterwards he went on about how he doesn't like to "debate" ethics because that is too deep a rabbit hole and suggested that I should just debate on his terms and not on ethics. I have no fucking idea what this dude was going on about; but he was tying himself into knots to defend a guy that didn't check his gun before shooting someone.

All I know is that internet "debaters" have ruined debate for entire generations of people. They want to go in and win and spike the football and have no interest in learning about the arguments and positions being discussed. I feel dumber for spending ten minutes listening to this guy stroke his ego.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: beets4borshenko, Donny Cheese, 6thRanger and 13 others
australiaaccuser.png

Tiny is now getting harassed by a former Australian girl who spoke on his stream. She claims she got raped because of him and now she's being silenced lmao. She should hire Ana as her therapist.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: 6thRanger, Gaylord Brachiosaurus, Lobster Cult High Priest and 2 others
Mike Stoklasa said:
Found a Destiny fan today.

A coworker was "debating" at work. He was insisting that Alec Baldwin had zero responsibility in killing another person. My guy's primary source and inspiration for his argument was Destiny. And he had no time to consider the perspective that Baldwin does vear responsibility; then thought he proved his point and won when I became incredulous when he used a apples and oranges comparison to the Nazis to prove his point.

Afterwards he went on about how he doesn't like to "debate" ethics because that is too deep a rabbit hole and suggested that I should just debate on his terms and not on ethics. I have no fucking idea what this dude was going on about; but he was tying himself into knots to defend a guy that didn't check his gun before shooting someone.

All I know is that internet "debaters" have ruined debate for entire generations of people. They want to go in and win and spike the football and have no interest in learning about the arguments and positions being discussed. I feel dumber for spending ten minutes listening to this guy stroke his ego.
Click to expand...


Steven hasn't even argued that Baldwin had zero responsiblity. He just said that where the responsibility lies is currently unclear, and due to the circumstances of the case they will be thoroughly publicized, so no one should make any definitive statements before then.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: 6thRanger, Guntkvd, Lobster Cult High Priest and 4 others
Hirbowedge said:
Steven hasn't even argued that Baldwin had zero responsiblity. He just said that where the responsibility lies is currently unclear, and due to the circumstances of the case they will be thoroughly publicized, so no one should make any definitive statements before then.
Click to expand...
So the guy was just saying random, crazy shit? WTF I love him now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger, RurkerHivemind and Scarmaiden
Mike Stoklasa said:
He was insisting that Alec Baldwin had zero responsibility in killing another person.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry to be the one to tell you, your employer is hiring the mentally disabled for the tax credits. But you probably knew that when he referenced Destiny as a source.

1) The gun is always loaded.
2) Never point a gun at anything you don't intend to destroy.
3) Three safety checks is four too few.
The very basic rules universally agreed upon.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Guntkvd, RurkerHivemind, Sammich and 3 others
Not Really Here said:
I'm sorry to be the one to tell you, your employer is hiring the mentally disabled for the tax credits. But you probably knew that when he referenced Destiny as a source.

1) The gun is always loaded.
2) Never point a gun at anything you don't intend to destroy.
3) Three safety checks is four too few.
The very basic rules universally agreed upon.
Click to expand...
He said that gun rules didn't apply because ????? and also "there are people to check that for him."
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger, RurkerHivemind, Scarmaiden and 1 other person
On CRT

I watched a stream a couple of months ago where he was reading through the material and he thought it had 10% merit (some kids learn in different ways, so offer alternative teaching methods) and 90% racist garbage (blacks are dumb at maths so make the quiz about the maths of gangbanging)

The meme answer is 'isnt that some legal way of seeing things' because thats what the leftists pushing it have been saying to defend it (ie "you dont have a law degree? Then stfu you know nothing abour CRT. Leave this discussion to me, internet leftist").

Sometimes desTiny operates on so many levels of irony, satire and lampooning that its hard to follow. He definitely is looking to secure the bag (and has said as such) so that gives him good motive to not talk about it.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: 6thRanger, Guntkvd, Gaylord Brachiosaurus and 2 others
Yuri_ said:
Isn't Merriam Webster the one that changed a definition simply to take a stab at Amy Conney Barrett?
Click to expand...
Yes, this was when Amy Coney Barrett innocuously used the term "sexual preference" during her Supreme Court nominee hearing, which prompted Senator Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) to throw a fit with the false claim that the term is offensive. Merriam-Webster changed its definition of "sexual preference" that very same day to back up Hirono, and it has remained as such ever since.
1636640591145.png

This is why I believe this latest "crocodile tears" subtweet is the purposeful action of the company rather than a rogue intern.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: 6thRanger, Strange Looking Dog, Guntkvd and 8 others
Alter Ego said:
Yes, this was when Amy Coney Barrett innocuously used the term "sexual preference" during her Supreme Court nominee hearing, which prompted Senator Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) to throw a fit with the false claim that the term is offensive. Merriam-Webster changed its definition of "sexual preference" that very same day to back up Hirono, and it has remained as such ever since.
View attachment 2707330
This is why I believe this latest "crocodile tears" subtweet is the purposeful action of the company rather than a rogue intern.
Click to expand...
Dictionaries turning into woke activists..... It's all so tiresome
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: beets4borshenko, 6thRanger, Guntkvd and 4 others
Mike Stoklasa said:
He said that gun rules didn't apply because ????? and also "there are people to check that for him."
Click to expand...
gun rules don't apply because it's a movie set. e.g. "Never point a gun at anything you don't intend to destroy" doesn't apply because actors point guns at other actors without trying to kill them. idk how this is hard to understand.
 
  • Agree
  • Disagree
  • Dumb
Reactions: Aborto, Kermit Jizz, 6thRanger and 9 others
RidiculeReverse said:
gun rules don't apply because it's a movie set. e.g. "Never point a gun at anything you don't intend to destroy" doesn't apply because actors point guns at other actors without trying to kill them. idk how this is hard to understand.
Click to expand...
Ok that one rule may not apply for obvious reasons - the rest still should (like assuming it's loaded unless you see with your own fucking eyes it isn't). Don't you think he still should've checked if it was loaded, regardless of if someone told him it wasn't loaded? That seems like a no brainer. If someone handed you a gun told you it's not loaded, would you put it to your temple and pull the trigger? Ofc not, you'd triple check it
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Kermit Jizz, Local Fed and Lobster Cult High Priest
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back