Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh yes, we didn't object, It was all part of the plan. -my plan-

lex-luthor-380.jpg
 
I suspect the prosecutor was afraid to press him too far out of the fear he would go full exceptional individual. Based on the cross, an entirely reasonable concern.
He seems like a perfect witness for the line of questioning to get there, though.

He racked his rifle?
You put your hands up?
Can you say with any certainty which of those happened first?

At worst you get a "no" since this witness has been pretty good at responding to "yes"/"no" questions he hasn't already been prepared for (like the initial several where he expanded a ton on his experiences as an EMT).

The tough part would be communicating how "racking" is indicative of a misfire when this witness is already kinda iffy on simple concepts like chambering a round in his own weapon which is not a rifle (something I'd expect the Defense to point out).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Make Anime Illegal
Dear god, he's actually exceptional. Public comments like that are full blown insanity when you have both and upcoming civil suit, and are a witness. He really doesn't know when he should shut the fuck up.
Why would he ever shut up? His tribe was literally allowed to try burning down a federal courthouse with people in it every day for most of a year with no consequences -- and everyone called them good boys for it. Consequences are for the goyim.
 
Love this, absolutely love it, but why are they crowing "directed verdict" instead of "motion to dismiss" on the murder charges?
The defense will file a motion to dismiss, and if the Judge grants the motion he is handing down a directed verdict.

Any defense attorney worth his salt will file a motion to dismiss if only to set it up as a last ditch appeal to use in a hight court. (If he doesn't file the motion and gets to appeals court, they'll say "you can't argue that the prosecution failed to meet their burden of proof in this court because you didn't file a motion to dismiss", raising the issue at that trial)

Most of the Time it is not granted, unless you have an exceptional case like this one where the prosecution seems to be committing suicide by a 1000 cuts with their own witnesses, and undermining nearly every foundational element of their case word by word.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back