@TamarYaelBatYah
I'll assume you're asking in good faith.
We call them lolcows because we find their behavior funny, absurd, hypocritical, and/or unbelievable in some way. We go digging into their pasts because we want to know if their observable pattern of behavior is a recent phenomenon or if they've always been like this. Since the information we gather is a matter of public record, it is, in fact, perfectly legal to host it. However, as a rule, we do not engage with the cow, and we do not contact law enforcement unless a law is being broken. Doing either will result in mockery of the person doing so, and the Kiwi Farmers turning them into a new lolcow.
But that's not what you're asking, is it? You want to know the moral justification that we sit and laugh at them. Well, I'll give it to you, with verses from the Torah to back me up.
These are people who, more often than not, are beyond help. Any good advice we could give them would be ignored and spat upon, and they'd just go back to whatever it is they were doing (Proverbs 26:11).
Further, our mockery is not scattershot or targeted at things beyond a lolcow's control (such as an injury they sustained at birth), but based around whatever their pattern of behavior is (such as Elijah mocking the priests of Baal; 1 Kings 18:27-29).
Lolcows reject all advice and are beyond any sort of usual help, so our only recourse is to mock them, in the hope that the mockery awakens a latent sense of shame. If not, then they're held as examples to the world or how not to live the one life you have.
And now you know why you have a thread and why you are mocked.
And yet you have failed to give a justification from The Torah that such behavior is moral. There is no justification in The Torah for mocking individual people publicly. (Proverbs is not The Torah, and neither is 1 Kings. And even still, neither of those condone scapegoating of individuals).
In fact, I would go so far to say that mocking people is considered evil. When Miriam mocked Moses she broke out in leprosy (Numbers 12:8-10).
nothing about Judaism requires that non-Jews be Jewish
Other than the 7 Noachide laws doctrine, you Orthodox believe that the Wicked will just disappear into thin air at the "end of days", or be reincarnated through the fires of Gei-Hinnom/given a second chance? I've heard different things from Orthodox.
Which is it?
how a fucking nobody who registered today
That's very telling of you. Anyone who is a newcomer to Kiwi Farms is a "nobody" ....because you're trying to recreate the world here. Comical.
@TamarYaelBatYah
Oh OK. I'm sure the words of an exceptional lap dog who tries to act tough and front at your beck and call totally overshadow your own on this forum that totally show you get riled as fuck any time someone hits too close to home. We can read you like an open book. All we have to do is talk about how you did this to yourself, how ALL your lawsuits have been dismissed because of your own stupidity, and your fake Jewness.
Hahahahaha! Is that what we're calling it now? Sure Melinda it's """"word art"""" and not you totally getting bitch mad at people seeing right through you and your massive ego and narcissism.
Those are more of your narcissistic narratives at play in your head
and because all of the children in the house are biologically his, and they have a shared vision of those children being home schooled by their mother.
misogyny
There are plenty of homeschooling BLENDED families that function well. Success of homeschooling and finances has nothing to do with patriarchal makeup of the household.
In fact, I've seen a few homeschooling families where the wife had children before marrying a second time. In one of them, the female was the breadwinner and the husband stayed home to school the children.
"I raise my own kids so we need to live in poverty" is a weird take. Most home schooling families manage to live in stable housing with basic necessities provided via the other partner working. You know, the father, who is happy to work to support his family because the mother chose a reasonable person and because all of the children in the house are biologically his, and they have a shared vision of those children being home schooled by their mother.
Does Marshall not hold a real job?
That is not a good synthesis of what I said ....and my family doesn't live in poverty. We are low income (our ratio of people to income qualifies as "low income"). What I said was, is that I sacrifice income in order to raise my own children instead of shuffling them off to daycare and public school so I can to earn more. This is not a phenomena of my family only. Many homeschooling families in rural areas are on the low income/on the poorer side. Even the ones where the husband is the sole breadwinner and working full time.
I met a messianic lady whose family was so poor they could barely afford gas in the car and paper to write on (not making fun of them, just describing the reality). I've also met messianic families struggling with paying for things from time to time. Because they refuse to take jobs which require them to break the Shabbats. Also, most jobs in SW VA don't pay very much. Usually the only homeschooling families that are wealthier are those were the husband's job is in the real estate market, insurance, medical fields, or tech companies. That doesn't mean other men's jobs are not important. That's just the way Capitalism works: money is distributed according to pay scales/type of work.
Marshall works a full time, 40+ hours a week.
Maybe you should educate yourself more on the economic dynamics of rural America. Also the income gap between Hispanic men and White men - under the term "institutionalized racism".
This is not a religious, Torah based discussion board. Where exactly do you think you are? Your rules do not apply. Why should my opinions be based on a Middle Eastern religion that my ancestal western European tradition predates and works much better for me? I don't demand that other people live by my religious values. In fact doing so is against said religious values. Who the fuck do you think you are voluntarily coming here and demanding that this website be run according to the Torah? That's beyond stupid.
And yet that's what I have been asking you (all) this whole time!
WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU TO THINK YOU CAN DEMAND I LIVE MY LIFE ACCORDING TO YOUR GOY STANDARDS?
That's a two way street!
So when will you start educating yourself by reading and researching as well as exposing yourself to an academic setting of law that shows you are frivolously filing lawsuits?
You're trying to school me on what a "frivolous" lawsuit is but you can't even use the definition correctly.
Why don't you first learn the legal definition of "frivolous" then someone like me with an educated brain might entertain what you say.
As it stands, you have yet to properly use the word "frivolous" according to its legal definition.
No but I bet he will be pissed when he has to fine 11k to pay for your frivolous appeal.
Marshall is not a Plaintiff in the case, he doesn't have to pay for anything.
And he won't be pissed at me either. He's on my side when it comes to Kiwi Farms. Your fantasy of taking my property and money is just that....a delusional fantasy. Joshua Moon is not going to be able to overcome Virginia's Homestead Exemption Act to take anything from me. The law is the law.
If Mr Looney Mooney was smart, he would have responded
pro-se to save money ....or offered me a settlement for a lot less than his attorney fees. Joshua Moon thinks he's so much smarter than me, then he shouldn't have doubted he could win
pro-se against me
.
Lets break this down. 1. If living a materialistic world is so bad, why are you taking welfare? Its materialistic and preventing you from living the life you supposedly think is righteous.
You're confusing material objects for survival and
materialism, the focus on material things for well being.
2. The way you are living your life is worse than literally everyone's life on here.
aaaaHahaha, you think as a Goy you have a better life than me? The sheer fact that you come on here as an anonymous Troll to attack others is proof enough that your life is horrible and you need relief from it. Nobody who was happy with their life would take their free time to seek out complete strangers and then go on the attack against them (in this case as "lolcows").
But by all means, wear those invisible clothes Mr. Emperor. Good that you think as a Goy your life is good. I wouldn't want you to discover what us Israelites have.
@TamarYaelBatYah
a bunch of narcissistic narratives
PASS! Ain't no one got time for that shit
Pull the other one, it squeaks! Where's that earning potential at then? Why is it that I'm bringing in more as an "illiterate retail clerk" in a high COL city than you are with your bachelor's?
You're really going to make it that easy for me to show how dense you are?
Ok, I'll bite.
The reason you have more net profit as an uneducated retail clerk is because you don't have small children and you aren't homeschooling, so you can dedicate all your time to working 40 to 60 hours a week. It's simple math: example: homeschooling mom who teaches classes for money (10*$25/hr= $250/week) vs. W2 out of the house employee (40*$15/hr=$600/week).
Why did you make that so easy for me to show how much of a re-tart you are? lol
When you warp the facts to suit your viewpoint no matter what anyone else says, even against the writings of scholars who've studied Torah for longer than you've been alive, of course the arguments of some yokels on a forum will seem silly. You've declared yourself high judge of the game that is religion and therefore anything anyone says criticizing the way you do things is wrong. At this point, debating you on Torah is like trying to talk swine out of rolling in filth.
Again, those aren't facts. That's more OPINION.
And on the other side we have you, a "feminist" who believes that women who control their sexuality and abstain are "broken". Hypocrite.
That's not hypocrisy. Sexual repression initiated by a woman onto herself is a form of
internalized misogyny. She's internalizing messages by men on what a "good girl" should behave like. Or it's a symptom of being abused by a man. It's not natural, nor healthy for a woman (a female age 20+)
not to enjoy having sex on a regular basis.
A woman is empowered by
owning her sexuality, which includes
enjoying sex, on a regular basis.
Sexual repression is disassociating from one's self. It's self abandonment. When a person loves themself (not a word technically, but I like it), they get in touch with their needs. Anything else is self abandonment. A woman not desiring sex on a regular basis is part of disassociation with one's body. Not healthy.
Granted, of course, women over 30 and 40, and dang, 50s too, they are going to want sex more frequently than women in their 20s, but the principle still holds true. Infrequent desire for sex is NOT natural for a woman. There's something in the brain not functioning right (not always the woman's fault).
It's why she couches things in terms of sin to begin with, rather than about her being factually wrong or causing harm or anything like that because those are not things she can spin in new ways from moment to moment.
Also wow, she's very manic today. That's two big angry meandering responses already.
You're sore losers. Every time I put your ass in check, you flail about to and fro guarding your melons
KIWI FARMS TROLLS:
"Doom on you, doom on you..."
lol
Have you met a woman, other than yourself, ever in your life? They love drama and gossip. Nobody calls them not healthy. Gossip, and websites to gossip in, are normal.
That's a stereotype of the female gender. MALE creatures like gossip too.
Men are also highly emotional about things.
Either way, male, female....gossip may be normal to either gender, but it's certainly not healthy. I've never seen a religion condone gossip. It psychology it's negatively termed the "Smear Campaign"
