Crime Palestinians say dozens of cars wrecked in settler vandalism

Article Archive

Palestinians say dozens of cars wrecked in settler vandalism​

RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) — Palestinian eyewitnesses said a group of Israeli settlers vandalized dozens of cars in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday.

A number of witnesses told an Associated Press photographer that Israeli settlers entered the town of al-Bireh near the West Bank city of Ramallah and damaged dozens of parked vehicles.

Cars and walls were spray-painted with Stars of David and Hebrew slogans including the phrase “price tag,” a term used by hard-line settlers in retaliation to perceived efforts by Israel and Palestinians to stop settlement expansion. There were no reports of injuries.

The Israeli army confirmed its forces entered al-Bireh to investigate the incident. Video footage from Palestinian broadcaster Al-Quds TV showed scuffles breaking out between Palestinians and troops, who used tear gas to disperse residents and journalists.

The vandalism comes amid an uptick in settler violence. In October, four Palestinian olive harvesters were lightly injured after being attacked by some 30 settlers who hurled stones and sprayed pepper spray at the workers.

In September, dozens of Israeli settlers ambushed a Bedouin village in the southern West Bank, smashing cars and houses. The attack left several injured, including a Palestinian toddler who was hospitalized with head injuries.

Last month, Israeli authorities approved 3,000 new settler homes in the West Bank. Israel also agreed to build 1,300 housing units for Palestinians residing in areas of the West Bank fully governed by Israel.

Israel captured the West Bank in the 1967 war, with the territory now home to more than 2.5 million Palestinians and nearly 500,000 Jewish settlers. The majority of the international community views settlements as an obstacle to peace. Palestinians seek the West Bank, along with east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, as part of their future state.

 

[Lone MacReady]

Imagine your homeland is invaded by "White people" and fully equipped Jews following the largest war in history, and the "White people" steal your lands, give them to the Jews for free, and those same Jews butcher your people and expand their conquests for decades. The Palestinians need to prepare for when Israel's dog finally dies.

 

[Crazedking]

Imagine your homeland is invaded by "White people" and fully equipped Jews following the largest war in history, and the "White people" steal your lands, give them to the Jews for free, and those same Jews butcher your people and expand their conquests for decades. The Palestinians need to prepare for when Israel's dog finally dies.

man can we just like stop fucking around in the middle east and let that powder keg explode already. Fuck em all. Let them kill each other and to the victor goes the spoils and the loser the victim bragging rights.

 

[Dagobert]

Imagine your homeland is invaded by "White people" and fully equipped Jews following the largest war in history, and the "White people" steal your lands, give them to the Jews for free, and those same Jews butcher your people and expand their conquests for decades. The Palestinians need to prepare for when Israel's dog finally dies.

Israel curbstomped the Arabs repeatedly because the Arabs are a bunch of raging theocratic mongoloids. Even without American support, the Arabs would still have Israel hand their asses to them.

Say what you will, but the Israelis won their country via the right of conquest and the Palestinians haven't. If they Palestinians can pull it off, more power to them, but I would sooner put my money on the Pope reclaiming the Papal States before I'd bet on the Palestinians winning against Israel.

 

[Snekposter]

The Palestinians need to prepare for when Israel's dog finally dies

The only thing keeping the Palestinians safe from being shoah'd is the chain that binds Israel and the USA. The minute nobody has their back is when they start up the dozers and shove the Palestinians into the seas. Oh, and all their Arab neighbors will gladly chip in for the fuel costs since they're no fonder of the Palestinians.

 

[Chicken Neck Nelly]

Imagine your homeland is invaded by "White people" and fully equipped Jews following the largest war in history, and the "White people" steal your lands, give them to the Jews for free, and those same Jews butcher your people and expand their conquests for decades. The Palestinians need to prepare for when Israel's dog finally dies.

You sound like a far-left eurofag whining about the poor brown muzzies who thinks history began in 1945. Jews lived there the entire time and the Muslims treated them like shit for over 1000 years, the Grand Mufti of Palestine expressed admiration for Hitler, was overtly his ally and wanted to help with the Holocaust, but yeah, the Jews don't need a nation state to prevent their extermination and those pooooooor innocent Palestinians dindu nuffin.

 

[Eternal Gopnik]

Israel curbstomped the Arabs repeatedly because the Arabs are a bunch of raging theocratic mongoloids. Even without American support, the Arabs would still have Israel hand their asses to them.

Interesting read on the topic - note that it's from 1999, so before Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, or the fellow whites' adventure in Lebanon: https://www.meforum.org/441/why-arabs-lose-wars

 

[Beautiful Border]

Imagine your homeland is invaded by "White people" and fully equipped Jews following the largest war in history, and the "White people" steal your lands, give them to the Jews for free, and those same Jews butcher your people and expand their conquests for decades. The Palestinians need to prepare for when Israel's dog finally dies.

Why are you putting "white people" in quotes? What are you getting at here?

 

[Poppavalyim Andropoff]

Concreting the entire fucking Middle East shithole would make one hell of a racetrack & with all that fuel nearby ….

 

[WeWuzFinns]

You sound like a far-left eurofag whining about the poor brown muzzies who thinks history began in 1945. Jews lived there the entire time and the Muslims treated them like shit for over 1000 years, the Grand Mufti of Palestine expressed admiration for Hitler, was overtly his ally and wanted to help with the Holocaust, but yeah, the Jews don't need a nation state to prevent their extermination and those pooooooor innocent Palestinians dindu nuffin.

Jews are just European and there isn't any genetic evidence of them having anything to do with Palestine. Israel is just some fabrication some cringe sky daddy worshippers invented after ingesting too many psychoactive mushrooms. Europeans should have no business in the middle-east and I'm perfectly fine if every last one of them is killed if they refuse to leave peacefully.

 

[Chicken Neck Nelly]

Jews are just European and there isn't any genetic evidence of them having anything to do with Palestine.

So you're just another person who clearly has no knowledge of the fact that significant numbers of Jews have lived in Palestine and other parts of the Middle East since the Romans conquered Judea (and obviously beforehand)? Are you aware that Arabic and Hebrew are both Semitic languages and are highly related? There are many genetic studies that show that Jews all around the world, even ones who have mixed heritage over centuries have Middle Eastern DNA and the ones who have always lived in the Middle East have basically the same DNA as the Muslims there. What you said is completely fucking baseless and the reality is the exact opposite.

Jews worldwide share genetic ties - Nature

But analysis also reveals close links to Palestinians and Italians.

www.nature.com

Israel is just some fabrication some cringe sky daddy worshippers invented.

And all Muslim countries aren't? What kind of dumb argument is this? At least you are consistent with making dumb arguments.

 

[WeWuzFinns]

So you're just another person who clearly has no knowledge of the fact that significant numbers of Jews have lived in Palestine and other parts of the Middle East since the Romans conquered Judea (and obviously beforehand)? Are you aware that Arabic and Hebrew are both Semitic languages and are highly related? There are many genetic studies that show that Jews all around the world, have Middle Eastern DNA and the ones who have always lived in the Middle East have basically the same DNA as the Muslims there.

Jews worldwide share genetic ties - Nature

But analysis also reveals close links to Palestinians and Italians.

www.nature.com

And all Muslim countries aren't? What kind of dumb argument is this? At least you are consistent with your dumb baseless arguments.

Jews are just Germans who invented their own dialect of German and called it Yiddish. They just invented their own history to distance themselves from the genetic reality that their ancestors lived in mud huts and chased boars butt naked. They are just larpers trying to be unique snowflakes but Germany is fur of larpers it is in their genes. The history you describe is from the bible and that shit is thoroughly debunked by all the experts.

 

[Chicken Neck Nelly]

Jews are just Germans who invented their own dialect of German and called it Yiddish. They just invented their own history to distance themselves from the genetic reality that their ancestors lived in mud huts and chased boars butt naked. They are just larpers trying to be unique snowflakes but Germany is fur of larpers it is in their genes. The history you describe is from the bible and that shit is thoroughly debunked by all the experts.

Lmfao what the fuck man, this has to be just trolling. The Furrymap really proved your point and convinced me, fuck da j00s. The real question has become, why are there so many furries in Germany and the UK, and so few in France, Italy and Spain?

 

[Dagobert]

Jews are just Germans who invented their own dialect of German and called it Yiddish. They just invented their own history to distance themselves from the genetic reality that their ancestors lived in mud huts and chased boars butt naked. They are just larpers trying to be unique snowflakes but Germany is fur of larpers it is in their genes. The history you describe is from the bible and that shit is thoroughly debunked by all the experts.

This must be bait. I refuse to believe somebody is such an exceptional Nigger that they think Jews only came from Germany.

 

[Chicken Neck Nelly]

This must be bait. I refuse to believe somebody is such an exceptional Nigger that they think Jews only came from Germany.

Yeah it's gotta be, he sounds like every Bulgarian I ever talked to

 

[SITHRAK!]

the Israelis won their country via the right of conquest

The Jews took Israel through political machinations, including the subterfuge within the British Commonwealth to spur the Balfour Declaration.
They literally manipulated a colonial power into allowing them to settle land that wasn't theirs, then unilaterally declared it was now their land.
Not that this stops Jews in Western nations from constantly squawking about how evil colonialism is when white people do it, but I digress.
They ensured that they also infiltrated and controlled the power structures of several of the Veto-holding members of the UN in order to render themselves unaccountable to 95% of humanity.

'Right of conquest' only occurs in two situations: military defeat of the existing populace, and 'terra nullius', neither of which apply in the case of Israel.
They can't even claim an ancestral right to the land as the pilistini (Palestinians) lived there before the Jews fled Egypt, and today's Israeli Jews are overwhelmingly Ashkenazim (~80%), who were converts, and did not originate in the Levant.

If the Israelis had fought for the formation of Israel and won it without massive assistance and interference-running from one of the world's superpowers, I'd say fair enough. But there was no conquest, no war. The Jews never formally declared war during the establishment of the modern state of Israel, so the Palestinians never had the opportunity to repel them militarily. Israel wasn't conquered, it was stolen.

'Right of conquest'? Don't make me laugh.

 

[Foltest]

T

The Jews took Israel through political machinations, including the subterfuge within the British Commonwealth to spur the Balfour Declaration.
They literally manipulated a colonial power into allowing them to settle land that wasn't theirs, then unilaterally declared it was now their land.
Not that this stops Jews in Western nations from constantly squawking about how evil colonialism is when white people do it, but I digress.
They ensured that they also infiltrated and controlled the power structures of several of the Veto-holding members of the UN in order to render themselves unaccountable to 95% of humanity.

'Right of conquest' only occurs in two situations: military defeat of the existing populace, and 'terra nullius', neither of which apply in the case of Israel.
They can't even claim an ancestral right to the land as the pilistini (Palestinians) lived there before the Jews fled Egypt, and today's Israeli Jews are overwhelmingly Ashkenazim (~80%), who were converts, and did not originate in the Levant.

If the Israelis had fought for the formation of Israel and won it without massive assistance and interference-running from one of the world's superpowers, I'd say fair enough. But there was no conquest, no war. The Jews never formally declared war during the establishment of the modern state of Israel, so the Palestinians never had the opportunity to repel them militarily. Israel wasn't conquered, it was stolen.

'Right of conquest'? Don't make me laugh.

The Arab state declared war the day after Israel was founded.

 

[Dagobert]

The Jews took Israel through political machinations, including the subterfuge within the British Commonwealth to spur the Balfour Declaration.
They literally manipulated a colonial power into allowing them to settle land that wasn't theirs, then unilaterally declared it was now their land.
Not that this stops Jews in Western nations from constantly squawking about how evil colonialism is when white people do it, but I digress.
They ensured that they also infiltrated and controlled the power structures of several of the Veto-holding members of the UN in order to render themselves unaccountable to 95% of humanity.

'Right of conquest' only occurs in two situations: military defeat of the existing populace, and 'terra nullius', neither of which apply in the case of Israel.
They can't even claim an ancestral right to the land as the pilistini (Palestinians) lived there before the Jews fled Egypt, and today's Israeli Jews are overwhelmingly Ashkenazim (~80%), who were converts, and did not originate in the Levant.

If the Israelis had fought for the formation of Israel and won it without massive assistance and interference-running from one of the world's superpowers, I'd say fair enough. But there was no conquest, no war. The Jews never formally declared war during the establishment of the modern state of Israel, so the Palestinians never had the opportunity to repel them militarily. Israel wasn't conquered, it was stolen.

'Right of conquest'? Don't make me laugh.

Israel literally fought off all their neighbors in 1948 as well as the native militias and armies, and functionally every piece of land they occupy currently was fought for. Who cares if there were degrees of manipulation or support of outside powers involved, I don't give a shit that the Israelis had help from America the same as I don't give a shit Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, the Sauds, or even the British helped the Arabs. There have been almost no wars in history where some sort of outside context wasn't present. The only thing that indicates is that the Arabs failed yet again but on the diplomatic battlefield than the literal one.

Civilizations live or die on the capacity to defeat their neighbors and defend themselves. "International Law" might try to civilize it, but ultimately there's nothing fair in war. It isn't the same as the courtroom or civil life, it is a matter of murder and destruction. Israel's tactics are underhanded and sneaky, but they work. And if they work, quite frankly, I don't see any problems in it.

 

[SITHRAK!]

The Arab state declared war the day after Israel was founded.

The UN partition vote of 1947 (which was swung in favor of 'Israel' via Jewish infiltration of Western powers in charge of the vote) resulted in a series of escalating clashes and violence between 1947 and 1948, as Palestinians were driven from their ancestral lands.
The Israeli declaration of Independence (hah!) was signed in secret and when word got out, Arab powers wanted to intervene. Hence the Arab-Israeli war of 1948.
Please remember my point, which was that Israel was not 'conquered', meaning that the native population had no opportunity to oppose the annexation and theft of their land through force of arms, as permitted under international law. However, once the state of Israel was declared, the Arab states were entirely within their rights to declare war.

Israel literally fought off all their neighbors in 1948 as well as the native militias and armies, and functionally every piece of land they occupy currently was fought for.

There's a significant difference between stopping a thief getting into your home, and fighting off a thief who's already inside and has a couple of friends with them. You're conflating the unilateral declaration of a sovereign state without the conquering of its populace, with the defending of said illegitimate state after it's declared.

"International Law" might try to civilize it, but ultimately there's nothing fair in war.

Brainlet take. It's why we don't allow biological or chemical warfare, nor 'inhumane' weapons like shotguns, or unjacketed ammunition, or white phosphorus (unless it's Israelis 'marking targets' or 'dropping smokescreens' when ethnically cleansing civilian areas, as we saw in Lebanon). Fair prosecution of war is an international right recognized by the UN as long as agreed humane considerations are not violated.

There are many forms of consensual international law covering what states may and may not do in relation to each other, and shipping in a bunch of foreigners then letting them declare themselves a new state is not a recognized process.

The best analogy might be if the Latino population of LA unilaterally declared themselves to be the New State of Aztlan and started brutally expelling, murdering and imprisoning non-Latinos. That shit would be crushed in a week. But it's okay when 'the most victimized people on earth' do it...

 

[Dagobert]

The UN partition vote of 1947 (which was swung in favor of 'Israel' via Jewish infiltration of Western powers in charge of the vote) resulted in a series of escalating clashes and violence between 1947 and 1948, as Palestinians were driven from their ancestral lands.
The Israeli declaration of Independence (hah!) was signed in secret and when word got out, Arab powers wanted to intervene. Hence the Arab-Israeli war of 1948.
Please remember my point, which was that Israel was not 'conquered', meaning that the native population had no opportunity to oppose the annexation and theft of their land through force of arms, as permitted under international law. However, once the state of Israel was declared, the Arab states were entirely within their rights to declare war.

Wait, you literally acknowledge the 1947-1948 civil war in the Mandate, then argue the Arabs didn't oppose the seizure of their land via arms? Like, do the Army of the Holy War or the ALA not count? Yeah, the Jews were better organized (what do you expect), but the Arabs were fighting for it. And then when the Partition was actually proposed and failed, they still had to fight even for a lot "assigned" to Israel by the UN.

The Jews who moved to Israel were overwhelmingly moving to urban cities and already Jewish regions. Of the population in 1922, 11% were Jews yet Jewish ownership of land in all of Palestine was <6% of the land. Even by 1946, that figure had hit 6.2% according to land surveys in the mandate. Quite literally despite their aggressive attempts at gaining land at aims of achieving Zion, the Jews in Palestine held a disproportionately small chunk of Palestine at the time of Israeli independence. So yes, for a small proportion of the land perhaps, the Jews didn't earn it via the right of conquest. But that's a tiny minority of the land that Israel eventually took, so overall, yes, Israel was won via the right of conquest.