Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 66 13.9%

  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.3%

  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 116 24.4%

  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 86 18.1%

  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 201 42.3%
  • Total voters
    475
Kosher Salt said:
He's cleaning up. #3 highest superchatted channel for the USA last week, and it's only been getting higher with each stream. He's been the #2 or #3 highest superchatted channel worldwide for the past couple of days that he's been covering the trial.

View attachment 2704921
View attachment 2704927
View attachment 2704930
View attachment 2704947
Click to expand...
It boggles the mind that V-Tubers make this much fucking money when there ISN'T some big event like this. Holy shit.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Iron Hamster and Kosher Salt
Ten grifters grifting!
1636571478595.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: ditto, Disgruntled Pupper, FlappyBat and 4 others
CatgirlTyranid said:
Everyone is holding their breath. I assume Kyle insisted on taking the stand. Smh...
Click to expand...
I don't think that's necessarily the case; with an affirmative self-defense claim it's not unusual to have the defendant testify as to why they fired and describe their fear of imminent harm for each encounter- especially the first one which wasn't as well documented on video.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: DelusionTree and talk talk talk
PyrrhicRustle said:
Man that whole “we’ve made a community here” thing was pretty gay
Click to expand...
Well, it's true, even if much of that community is so autistic they make Kiwi Farms look like normies.
Apteryx Owenii said:
I don't think that's necessarily the case; with an affirmative self-defense claim it's not unusual to have the defendant testify as to why they fired and describe their fear of imminent harm for each encounter- especially the first one which wasn't as well documented on video.
Click to expand...
You have to think what a jury that hasn't been immersed in this case from the beginning thinks. They're wondering who is this guy exactly, and the prosecution has a ready-made narrative for them that he's a murderous monster of some sort. If he comes across well, and he did, they have an idea who this guy is and that he isn't what the prosecution says.

He comes across as sincere and remorseful. Even though he had every right to defend himself, he wasn't happy or gleeful about doing it. I don't see how they look at him on the stand and think this is the guy the prosecution told them he was in their lying-ass opening statement.

If the defense is good, they're going to go over what the prosecution promised them in the beginning, and refresh the jury's recollection as to all the empty promises of upcoming proof the prosecution gave them, only for their own witnesses to testify to the opposite.

But since it often comes down to feels > reals, it's actually important for the jury to have some idea who this guy really is, especially when he seems like a decent kid whose worst offense was that he was unwise even to be there. Even having made that unwise choice, though, he had the right to defend himself, and if he hadn't, he'd quite literally be dead now at the hands of the scum of the earth.

I don't think the jury will get to know the full extent to which every one of these "victims" was absolutely worthless trash, but I hope they at least get an inkling of it.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: ditto, not william stenchever, Rainbow Idiot and 2 others
Based judge haha:

Schroeder, 75, who is overseeing the highly-publicized proceeding, has a reputation for being stern and handing down tough sentences. In 2018, he sentenced a woman convicted of shoplifting to inform managers of every store she entered that she was on supervision for theft. He told the woman that "embarrassment does have a valuable place in deterring criminality." An appeals court eventually threw out the sentence.
Click to expand...

https://archive.li/JNc0D


 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: anionfarflung, Himedall All-seeing Waifu, Kosher Salt and 3 others
PorkeyDuck said:
View attachment 2705325
archive.md

Xazzy on Twitter: "Reminder to rekieta's analysis with a grain of sal…

archived 10 Nov 2021 20:37:52 UTC
archive.md archive.md

View attachment 2705335
archive.md

In My GF Arc 👩🏾‍🤝‍👩🏽 on Twitter: "Rekieta is the same guy that s…

archived 10 Nov 2021 20:37:42 UTC
archive.md archive.md
Click to expand...
Oh great, people who thought Vic had no chance at all, but Nick touching it sank it to new extremes.

Between "I think he has a chance" turning into "he would win" and that, I believe an Advil is necessary.
 
CrippleThreat said:
Oh great, people who thought Vic had no chance at all, but Nick touching it sank it to new extremes.

Between "I think he has a chance" turning into "he would win" and that, I believe an Advil is necessary.
Click to expand...
Rittenhouse's self defense claim is far, far stronger than Vic's defamation claims could ever hope to be, and I think Lasagna man had viable claims.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Apteryx Owenii, not william stenchever, Iron Hamster and 3 others
TheClappening said:
Rittenhouse's self defense claim is far, far stronger than Vic's defamation claims could ever hope to be, and I think Lasagna man had viable claims.
Click to expand...

Seriously, there's a damn video. I'd kill for video of vic doing anything remotely unwholesome.

Also i wish kyle didn't take the stand but that was seriously the most entertaining stream since shoe eater.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ECLIPSE 6969XXX, Iron Hamster and Rainbow Idiot
TexOffender said:
Seriously, there's a damn video. I'd kill for video of vic doing anything remotely unwholesome.

Also i wish kyle didn't take the stand but that was seriously the most entertaining stream since shoe eater.
Click to expand...
I dunno, it's tough to top the double feature of Grambo and Foto Gump.

It made me feel moderately sorry to see Kyle ugly crying, and after the first hour I wanted to reach into the screen and punch Binger. The two that I mentioned were hilarious from start to stop.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: ECLIPSE 6969XXX, Kosher Salt and TexOffender
TexOffender said:
Seriously, there's a damn video. I'd kill for video of vic doing anything remotely unwholesome.

Also i wish kyle didn't take the stand but that was seriously the most entertaining stream since shoe eater.
Click to expand...
The man's entire life has been on video. Vic is literally an example of where the absence of evidence literally IS evidence of absence.

If he's done all this shit, where is the evidence? And I don't mean mentally ill fujoshits angry he didn't sign their gay child pornography.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Irrational Exuberance, Farmer Y and 8 others
Assuming about 10 hours of streaming (he starts and ends a little after the 8-hour trial day) per day, he's pulling like $600 per day. Those are lawyer rates, by lawyering with other lawyers on youtube.

The grift is real.

Where do you find those demographics by the way?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back