Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Screenshot_1.png
Since people are starting to necro some of Gaige's comments on Reddit, I decided to poke around to see if there's anything worth archiving before he goes into DFE mode there. There certainly was, but I noticed some of them were only on his profile and not visible in the threads themselves.

Luckily, most if not all of them can be restored using reveddit.com. 46 in total, sorted from newest to oldest. Most recent comment is from almost 2 months ago.
Screenshot_2.pngScreenshot_3.pngScreenshot_4.pngScreenshot_5.pngScreenshot_6.pngScreenshot_7.pngScreenshot_8.pngScreenshot_9.png
Reveddit
Archive
 
Last edited:
what is the judge gonna do if the expert witness confirms Binger was lying out his ass on the picture zoom ins?
The expert witness the defense wants to call tomorrow isn't related to that (unless I'm stupid and he can some how speak to that). The prosecution is unlikely to be able call Kyle up again and that is what they wanted the pinch and zoom for, so it's mute.

Unless the defense wants to call up an expert to say the prosecution was lying, which I doubt they'd be able to really do, no one is going to be called up to testify on how they were lying to the judge. It doesn't even prejudice the case since I don't believe the jury was there for that conversation.

You're not going to nail them on any actual misconduct for that since 'lol turns out we were wrong, we're not experts' works as a good enough defense for them.
 
Last edited:
Most of the pain came in PT? Dude can't move that arm without rolling his shoulder first. He needs a helluva lot more PT before Rosey is back up to doing her full duty.
 
Defense has been studiously avoiding every single thing pross has said unless it fucks with their case. They already introduced doubt via technology there, and Binger is on his last strike. Binger is currently in some Pleasant Prairie bar using alcohol to kill the brain cells that ever thought that "I was on the shitter and zoomed in on my phone" was good for his case.
its not just the fact that he made that wrong statement as if it were fact
its also the way he slimily tried to bring it up at the last minute and talked down to everyone as if they were idiots for not knowing it.
edit: i have my own theory as i said earlier. he knows he's lost his case and his career is on the line.
so he's going to torture everyone in the court house out of pure spite. one last fuck you to everyone for dare questioning his judgement.

Edit: "Iirc Dr. Black was only admitted to testify about video forensics."
does a video forensics expert not know about algorithim based rendering.
maybe we should call an expert photgrapher to the stand
 
Last edited:
That clip was from a video so if we want to be autistic... Either way, I don't think the defense gains anything from trying to push that angle.
The resizing algorithm wouldn't noticeably change the image unless you were doing something retarded, like zooming in to a few pixels in some low quality drone footage at night to try to prove someone is pointing a rifle at another person...
 
One point I hope the defense makes is how the amount of ambient light would affect the exposure time of a camera. Footage taken at night, when there is much less ambient light, requires longer exposure times. When you have an object in frame that's moving, that will result in the image being much blurrier than normal.
 
so he's going to torture everyone in the court house out of pure spite. one last fuck you to everyone for dare questioning his judgement.
I think the "mean ol' Trumpist judge was completely unfair when he rendered that mistrial for prosecutorial misconduct!" line is more in play. It was fun to see Richards specifically call it out, too. "Oh, did you have a nice lunch, Mr. Binger? Because 3 paralegals and I did *not*."
 
Could Kyle not have plead the 5th there?
Hindsight's 20/20 but that seemed like the obvious right move there
By testifying Kyle has waved his 5th Ammendment right for the duration of his testimony.
That's why the Judge asked Kyle if he was extra super sure he wanted to testify at the beginning.
It's also why the Judge went ape shit on Binger for his "this is your first time speaking publicly about this isn't that right?" horseshit. Kyle has the right to remain silent. Binger's line of questioning there was a constitutional violation.
 
I think the "mean ol' Trumpist judge was completely unfair when he rendered that mistrial for prosecutorial misconduct!" line is more in play. It was fun to see Richards specifically call it out, too. "Oh, did you have a nice lunch, Mr. Binger? Because 3 paralegals and I did *not*."
is his plan to get disbarred and hired by CNN as a legal consultant?
i guess it could work, but its a gamble.
he's no doubt going to get fired from being an Assistant DA
and what other court will hire him?
we saw an entire group of lawyers getting iritated at him for being such an arrogant ass.
i doubt any judge, lawyer or DA's, want such a trouble maker around
edit: one of those irritated lawyers was a prosecutor himself.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DicksOutForChauvin
diD YoU evEN CarE WhEtHer AnthONY HUber DiEd oR NOT? Fuck no that's not a concern in a self defense shooting
He's acting like Kyle had plenty of time to mull over whether or not he was going to shoot. He literally shot Huber and Byecep within seconds.
The frame by frame without playing the full video to show how fucking fast that happened was particularly sleazy.
 
Man, these social media interns. On second thought, Merriam-Webster is the same dictionary that instantly changed the definition of "sexual preference" to say that it's offensive the moment a Democratic politician said so in a ludicrous attack against a Supreme Court nominee, so this is probably also a purposeful action of the company rather than a rogue intern.
View attachment 2706699
Merriam-Webster does that kind of shit all the time with 'trending' lib-Twitter crap, they probably belong as an entry in the gimmick twitter account thread on KF.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back