Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[mr.moon1488]

Meanwhile in artificial trending seethe

View attachment 2708496

I hate jews.

 

[IamnottheNSA]

This is their evidence. This is the blur in question.

Spoiler

AMOGUS

 

[You're a Big Guy]

IT WAS ACTUALLY THE REAPER COMING FOR ROSENBAUM!

 

[GeorgeHWBush]

View attachment 2708498View attachment 2708499View attachment 2708500

Is this loss?

 

[Matt Damon]

>yfw when you make more a year.

Damn man. Damn.

And I didn't even go to law school.

 

[kūhaku]

As you can see your honor, Kyle is clearly the impostor

 

[4AMPudding]

>its not going add detail
>but its going to add pixels of unknown color

 

[Kermit Jizz]

This 'expert' doesn't know shit hahahaha

I didn't watch him testify earlier, so I'm not sure of his competency. But in his defense these questions are fucking asinine. You can't know what your complex algorithm is necessarily going to do with arbitrary data. Having him here is pointless in the first place.

 

[Extreme Crusader]

I hate jews.
View attachment 2708503
View attachment 2708504

OY VEY

 

[Nobunaga]

What is this bigfoot is in gta san andreas bro, just look at this blurry 160p photo shit
Holy fuck

 

[Eryngium]

View attachment 2708498View attachment 2708499View attachment 2708500

It’s over for rittenhousebros
LOCK HIM UP

 

[Only A Retard Sometimes]

yes but really no

 

[Lunatic Fringe]

I feel like a fucking boomer here. Could something dark on the road behind the weird figure, like a dark rock, cause the software to "join" them together? Create a weird shape that looks like something pointy? This seems like a fucking utter reach.

 

[Michael Janke]

It’s over for rittenhousebros
LOCK HIM UP
View attachment 2708508

mutts law

 

[St.Davis]

The problem here is that neither the defence, prosecution, nor judge actually know anything about "pixels" or "Interpolation" or anything of the sort. 47 is doing his absolute best trying to argue his (correct) point with an exceptionally limited understanding of the concepts being discussed.

If anyone involved knew anything at all about this subject it would not be taking this long, but unfortunately they are all normalfags who can barely send an email.

 

[KiwiFarmerSimulator2021]

I think its very telling that the judge and defense havent shared their pronouns. Grounds for a Miss/MrTrial.

 

[Some JERK]

"If you have a picture of a person from 1 mile away and the person is depicted by a single pixel, when you enlarge that image by 100x times, does that mean that the person is, in fact, a large grey square?"

 

[FlappyBat]

Allowing evidence to be introduced which has been altered by some program which the defense cannot audit should be a violation of due process and your constitutional rights

 

[Chief Ungo Bungo]

I didn't watch him testify earlier, so I'm not sure of his competency. But in his defense these questions are fucking asinine. You can't know what your complex algorithm is necessarily going to do with arbitrary data. Having him here is pointless in the first place.

All he has said is "I don't know" or "I'm not sure" compared to John Black who clearly knew his shit

 

[gaystoner]

I feel like a fucking boomer here. Could something dark on the road behind the weird figure, like a dark rock, cause the software to "join" them together? Create a weird shape that looks like something pointy? This seems like a fucking utter reach.

ABSOLUTELY. This is so fucking sketchy if it become precedent that

this image could potentially result in going to prison