- Joined
- May 6, 2019
So now the jury will only decide on first-degree murder, no lesser offense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is that a Spodermen reference? God I miss that meme.What is the pin Binger is wearing today? I can't make it out. Harry Potter? MLP? Spodermon? Give me more reasons to hate consoomers as if I didn't already have enough.
If my understanding is correct, the prosecution is trying to throw in an additional lesser charge because they don't think their murder charges are going to stick right?They are arguing legal semantics, very fine legal semantics.
I can't tell as I'm distracted by the hideous 70s porn jacket.What is the pin Binger is wearing today? I can't make it out. Harry Potter? MLP? Spodermon? Give me more reasons to hate consoomers as if I didn't already have enough.
If you are indifferent to anyone else getting hurt around the person you are shooting at.Are they really arguing that if you're indifferent to shooting someone that is threatening your life that it's a crime?
They are arguing legal semantics, very fine legal semantics.
I've gotten that part, I just wasn't aware that this wishy washy way of speaking was normal for deciding these charges.They're deciding what charges will go to the jury, and what charges they can vote on. Later on they'll go into detail on the letter of the law to the jury.
No, it has to do with the circumstances and state of mind surrounding the shooting.Are they really arguing that if you're indifferent to shooting someone that is threatening your life that it's a crime?
Yes, so the judge gives the jury clear instruction on what they are meant to consider, what the standard of proof is, if there is stuff they heard that they should disregard (like Binger's 5th amendment slimefuckery) and so on. It is an attempt to set a clear standard for juries to look over the evidence and compare it to whether it meets that standard, as opposed to them going "well I feel".So is today going to be shorter than usual? IDK what motion and jury instruction is.
"Guilty on all charges" voters already btfo, then.So now the jury will only decide on first-degree murder, no lesser offense.
especially after the judge said "i do not believe you were acting in good faith" then Binger proceeded to fuck around the next day.I do not understand why the prosecution seem to still be under the impression that the judge will just immediately agree with them.
NAMBLA membership pin.What is the pin Binger is wearing today? I can't make it out. Harry Potter? MLP? Spodermon? Give me more reasons to hate consoomers as if I didn't already have enough.
Beyond all the legal jargon and bullshit, yes. In a sane world the 1st degree is toast, but they might get him on some lesser charge, so that's what they want in.If my understanding is correct, the prosecution is trying to throw in an additional lesser charge because they don't think their murder charges are going to stick right?
It's also a dumb argument because literally any bullet can overpenetrate. Even handguns, even with hollow points.Fatty is now trying to claim that bullets can go through houses because he listed them as things kyle did not care about when he shot pedobaum 4 times in less than 3/4's of a seconds
Fucking Lunacy
Binger on his phone was him creating his OnlyFans page so he can start to e-beg.Binger's already arranging his media appearances.
The real interesting thing will be if he's found innocent and nogs burn down the city.For me personally I think he will be found guilty. Dude is clearly innocent but I have no faith in the system. The jury will find him guilty just to appease the mob and he will be held up as an example of what happens when you try to defend yourself from commie pedophiles who come to burn your city and rape your kids. The system is beyond fucked, the world is fucked, we're all fucked.
He basically invented minority grievance hustling. He'd do this trick where he would protest you for being racist, but you could solve it by paying his anti-racist consultants thousands of dollars to fix your racism. This is pretty much the genesis of what "diversity consultants" are today.Isnt this the Don Imus controversy nigga?
Dude has been saying nothing but exceptional shit for the last 20 years apparently
I wish there was a stream with people familiar with this stuff providing smart commentary. Rekita has a stream but it's like 10 people at once all trying to make epic dunks and talking over the actual courtroom stream instead of being helpful.This conversation's so muddled with legal jargon, but it's a bunch of back and forth of "I think..." and "Well I feel it should be..."
Like, was this discussed prior? This is my first time watching a trial, I really don't get what's going on with this "discussion."
And the Judge just said it himself, "Conversations with lawyers are always so interesting." Interesting indeed, but what does it mean!