Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[kūhaku]

I don't think the defense fought that hard on the provocation instruction because the prosecution is going to look like idiots for arguing it.

If that video is their "best" evidence, they have virtually nothing. Who in their right mind looks at that video - enhanced, slowed down or not - and thinks that it contradicts the testimony from multiple witnesses (including those the prosecution put on the stand)? It's ridiculous, just like everything else about this case.

But why even let them do that? Why not just shoot the evidence down so they literally have nothing? I would only see allowing them to do this as a tactic if it prevents them from doing something else, but if this is their last leg then why give it to them?

 

[Gluten Crusader]

Literally created an account to start commenting on this bullshit. The doomers need to chill the fuck out and look at the facts. Binger's case realizes solely on his ability to lie about a shity image and video to the jury who need to believe that bullshit beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Eurofags should face the wall for being pussies.

Anyways, hopefully Binger does closing statements, the jury dislikes him and it gives him some time to defend Kyle's case one more time he hasn't failed us there. The jury also might find Kyle guilty on lesser charges as a compromise.

I personally believe go balls out and acquit Kyle of everything.

Them compromising gives the leftists and chimps the ammo they need that their actions have no more consequences since cities are willing to accommodate them.

Also for the next riot in Kenosha, nobody goes to defend them, let them all burn.

I am tired of all of these atomized hell holes that keep voting blue and blame other folks for just not cucking.

 

[Czechem Republic]

Speaking of a hung jury, how easy is for the state to just fill the jury with people they know will just vote guilty no matter what?

Very. The jury pool is more or less random, any bias called out in questioning is an easy strike for cause (i.e. that juror is out), and both sides get a number of strikes without cause.

 

[Spirelord]

Speaking of a hung jury, how easy is for the state to just fill the jury with people they know will just vote guilty no matter what?

Probably just as easy as it is being a lawyer without remembering the laws of your state, multiple parts of the bill of rights, the inability to use the right to silence as evidence of guilt, BAR requirements which you should know before becoming a lawyer...

Pretty hard, not impossible. And I'm sick of hopium so let's say 70/30.

 

[Jarolleon]

I agree that such people exist, but come to think of it, isn't there a good deal of overlap there with the sorts of people who consider incorrect language to be violence as well? So obviously Kyle was literally being assaulted well before he had to pull the trigger.

Then again, these are retards we're talking about, so logical consistency doesn't matter anyways.



If Kyle gets convicted, the takeaway some people may get is this:

Should you decide to defend your community from joggers, open confrontation will not go your way, even if you are in the right and did everything in your power to avoid needing to take a life. Your best legal recourse is to do everything in your power to not get caught by the authorities in the first place.

I've read some glowposting regarding shooting into large crowds from a distance and whatnot, and how hard someone who did so would be to catch. I would begin to expect at least one incident of that nature should Kyle be convicted, given sufficient rioting. In other words, I'd expect any sort of right-wing response to rioting to become more clandestine rather than attempt to rely on any institution, since it's been proven that they can't.

Some may consider that to be a silver lining.

If someone fired into a crowd and got away with it, would it even be reported? Or would they cover it up like the Christchurch video?

 

[Some JERK]

If Kyle gets convicted, the takeaway some people may get is this:

Should you decide to defend your community from joggers, open confrontation will not go your way, even if you are in the right and did everything in your power to avoid needing to take a life. Your best legal recourse is to do everything in your power to not get caught by the authorities in the first place.

Yep. If Kyle is convicted it won't keep people from showing up armed, it'll just force them into showing up armed and masked.

 

[Liber Pater]

being mostly about him manipulating people outside the legal system to get his desired results.

So what you're saying is that it's extremely relevant to this case

 

[Spicey McHaggis]

Here, have a distraction from the doomposting.

 

[TheClappening]

The rackets panel is going over the left-hand/right-hand thing with a sling.

It's established that Kyle had a single-point sling, and single-point slings can easily go from left to right and back. Does the jury know that? Who knows.

 

[BradCarter]

Devil's advocate here. Maybe this was an attempt by the defence to win both the case and popular opinion. If the media could get clips of "Kyle's shady lawyers censoring evidence and jury instructions" they would obviously play it on a loop if Kyle got off.

 

[Hyro]

Shame it wasn't a bench trial, it'd be a guaranteed win lol

 

[Dumb Bitch Smoothie]

You know in the event that Kyle is innocent or acquitted, and people do riot, use of deadly force as self defense/protecting property from BLM faggots is...justified. Especially in similar conditions.

 

[Czechem Republic]

Devil's advocate here. Maybe this was an attempt by the defence to win both the case and popular opinion. If the media could get clips of "Kyle's shady lawyers censoring evidence and jury instructions" they would obviously play it on a loop if Kyle got off.

We both know they're going to slander him to hell and back if he walks, even if the reasons are made up whole cloth.

 

[Meat Target]

Shame it wasn't a bench trial, it'd be a guaranteed win lol

Heard by Schroeder? Probably. Heard by any other judge? Ehhh....

 

[Some JERK]

Shame it wasn't a bench trial, it'd be a guaranteed win lol

I don't know about that. Certainly with this judge, but do you know which judge you have before you request a bench trial? If not then that seems like one huge fucking gamble.

 

[BradCarter]

We both know they're going to slander him to hell and back if he walks, even if the reasons are made up whole cloth.

Obviously, I'm not saying it'll work. I'm just saying it's a potential reason for the defence to... Well not defend.

 

[Forest Portal Triumph 747]

In theory perhaps but in practice, he'd have to be insane to even consider it. Think of how that would look. The optics alone would sink him. The left would go full rabid and start screaming for his head as some kind of trump supporting nazi letting off a trump supporting murderer despite the fact the jury said he was guilty. At best he'd be hounded to no end, might even get shit started with the state bar and all kinds of inquiries and investigations because of it. To say nothing of the very real chance of triggering a riot. The left could point to the outcome and say kyle is a murderer according to the jury and only got off due to a corrupt trump supporter judge that is racist against asians and harassed the prosecutor during the trial

Nothing good would come out of the judge doing that for anyone involved

What the fuck do you mean 'nothing good' would come out of it? Real justice would be done, and if it makes leftists go violent then it means more of them can receive righteous 2nd Amendment treatment.

 

[Corn Flakes]

Devil's advocate here. Maybe this was an attempt by the defence to win both the case and popular opinion. If the media could get clips of "Kyle's shady lawyers censoring evidence and jury instructions" they would obviously play it on a loop if Kyle got off.

The defense lawyers made that pretty much explicit when the judge asked them if they had any comment on the "evidence" and they basically just looked at him and said "this shit speaks for itself, your honor" and the judge just laughed.

 

[FunPosting101]

Shame it wasn't a bench trial, it'd be a guaranteed win lol

Yeah, the Judge isn't having any of the prosecution's shit. Pity the defense is either fucking retarded or knows something the rest of us don't.