There is no doubt that a jury comprised of individuals who aren't totally exceptional *and* are willing to evaluate fairly in spite of possible mob intimidation, would not be moved by the idea that Kyle should be considered guilty because he 'provoked.'
I haven't bothered following this case other than watching a couple live streams to see the prosecution hilariously fuck up. All I know about the jury is that some wigger type got kicked off for making an anti-cop joke "Why did the cops shoot Jacob Blake seven times? Because they ran out of bullets", and that it's 40% men and 60% women and mostly (or all?) white. We don't know who is a libtard on the jury and who isn't.
If there is at least one person on the jury who isn't a libtard and therefore plainly sees Kyle deserves a 'Not Guilty' verdict, then I guess it comes down to "will they cuck out to doxxing and other potential threats?"
The Chauvin Trial and this one have made it a DREAM for me to get on a jury for a case like this so I can show the world how it's done: Proudly vote Not Guilty, while feeling no intimidation from the libtard menace because I will have millions of patriots, the second amendment, and God on my side.