Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wouldn't try that. Ask yourself, what was the FBI drone footage actually used for? It certainly wasn't used to prosecute rioters for serious felonies. So why was it there?

Open confrontation will not work. It will continue to be done quietly in the shadows. Very little of what is going on sees the light of day or is openly talked about. The actions and inactions are coordinated behind closed doors and there are many people involved who go to great lengths to assure that things play out the way they want.

Gifting them some vigilante gunman for every resource to be mobilized to find would be the biggest propaganda victory since Jan 6.
It's not about what you, me, the guy your responding to, or some rando should do. It's about what Rittenhouse getting sent up the river for a crime he didn't commit will lead to. It's also not a question of what will work or not, if Rittenhouse goes to prison, and rioters get free reign, nothing will actually "work". Some rather ugly things will, however, fail less terribly then other things though, even if they eventually lead to the country either breaking apart or getting a new flag some decades down the road.
 
So... uh... is today's stream over?


lolno. They are professionals and they have done well.
Just cause they don't go down the TV meme route of OBJECTION YOUR HONOR THE PROSECUTION'S ARGUMENT SUCKS! all the goddamned time, people think they are timid.

They just pick their battles smartly. And if the prosecution now gets a grainy fucking video where the judge had to look at from half a foot away with fatty holding a stick up to the image to make the judge see what he's babbling on about... Oh. The. Fucking. Horror. Kyle's gonna go to the chair, I guess. :story:
Well, the prosecution got that photo in thanks to it being rebuttal to Kyle's cross, so it was a direct result of doing exactly what 99.9% of experienced trial attorneys would absolutely not do during a murder trial. Did you see Chauvin or Zimmerman on the stand when they were on trial?

Meanwhile, in the Arbery trial, the prosecution isn't even allowed to call the guy a "jogger" because the defense is actually objecting to things...
 
I didn't really understand what Rekieta meant when he said that lawyers are subhuman. Because he seems so nice and jolly, and all of his guests seem like cool people.
I guess that's because I've never got to see prosecutors at work. I never hated someone so much in my life as these two. I can't even put into words how much I seethe when they're on the screen. It doesn't affect me, right? But somehow their behavior and all the openly dishonest shit they're pulling trying to convict an innocent person right in front of me...
There's some part of me that's so profoundly offended by what's going on, it's just burning with white-hot loathing. I can feel it flaring in my chest.
This prosecution is a mockery of justice, despicable perversion of truth. These two deserve to burn in hell for what they're knowingly doing.

I know it's cringy, but I had to let it out guys, it won't happen again.
It's because we've all been lied to our entire lives that the government is the entity that dispenses justice. Sure there were some mistakes, but the institution exists to punish lawbreakers. Now we are seeing very clearly that the state and it's actors really have no value on justice. They simply don't care. The prosecutors are well aware Kyle is innocent but simply need to trick the jury to improve their own careers. It's perfectly natural to feel that burning anger.
 
Chauvin trial had an at best apathetic judge at worst actively pro Floyd. Rittenhouse trial has a fair judge, who leans Rittenhouse.
The Chauvin judge wasn't pro Floyd, he was PRO BREAK. Get it right.
this guy was a writer for The Office + plus is the creator of Brooklyn 99 and The Good Place btw

View attachment 2709761
ANd Nine Nine was one of the biggest TV shows of the last few years. A workplace comedy. About cops.
Kylebros are getting too cocky, calling it now: guilty on all counts, Wisconsin repeals its historic death penalty abolition act and retroactively apply it to Kyle. Beheaded by guillotine.

Completely agree. Everyone in the thread is acting like they know the jury, but they don't.
Pride comes before the fall, you know?
LOL remember when Trump tricked thousands of his most devoted supporters into a rally that resulted in them all being arrested for felonies and being added to watchlists for the rest of their lives? How the most iconic people in that rally are now literally bankrupted and divorced, penniless and facing a decade in jail?
And now the right is calling them "political prisoners" in a "gulag". All that's missing is the protests from prison the IRA did.
Remember how he had one week left in office and the only political power he actually wielded at that point was with the pardon and instead of taking the bullet for his most diehard patriotic followers by pardoning them and accepting the consequences of starting a riot he just let them all hang for him?

hahahahaha lmao and this nigger wants to run again, these people will still vote for him, and they still have faith in their BASED REPUBLICAN ™️ politicians still.
Wow, /pol/ must have been really disappointed. As were you.
If the jury doesn't acquit Kyle, it's going to be a pretty massive blackpill for me. Proof that we're actually living in full anarcho-tyranny.
The world as you knew it died in 2019. How far are you willing to go to bring it back?
To explain that further, the left until now has had a near-total monopoly on the ability to move personnel and actors across state lines to support their projects. While disorganized, there are a lot more right-wing groups cropping up to do this now. If Kyle gets a not guilty verdict it does rather incentivize doing that more. And just like that a major logistical advantage the left has goes up in smoke.
Or some /pol/ types moveout because they feel they have nothing to lose and they give zero fucks.
Fuck these slimy pieces of shit. They're obviously trying to make anything stick in any way possible regardless of letter or spirit of the law. This is not pursuing justice, it's pursuing a conviction.
Isn't that what being a prosecutor is?
If Kyle walks, the best ending is that he gets his bail back and fades into obscurity
Assuming Antifa and company let him. Dude's 17/18 and has his entire life ahead of him.
20211112_171922.jpg
Fitting.
Everyone doomposting in this thread without even seeing the closings yet is a massive pussy faggot. Touch some grass, all of you.
That or they were burned from Chauvin.
Is it safe to say that this thread will be doomposting for the entire weekend?
Yes it is. Some could argue it's already started.
I think a lot of doomers need to realize that conviction requires unanimous approval of the jury.

If just one person isn't a window-licking tard who guzzled the prosecution's shit arguments uncritically, no conviction.

There is no way this doesn't end in acquittal or mistrial via hung jury. I'd wager money on it.
That's assuming we don't get to the point where someone on the jury decides to create 12 Angry Men...but for a conviction.
 
There is no doubt that a jury comprised of individuals who aren't totally retarded *and* are willing to evaluate fairly in spite of possible mob intimidation, would not be moved by the idea that Kyle should be considered guilty because he 'provoked.'

I haven't bothered following this case other than watching a couple live streams to see the prosecution hilariously fuck up. All I know about the jury is that some wigger type got kicked off for making an anti-cop joke "Why did the cops shoot Jacob Blake seven times? Because they ran out of bullets", and that it's 40% men and 60% women and mostly (or all?) white. We don't know who is a libtard on the jury and who isn't.

If there is at least one person on the jury who isn't a libtard and therefore plainly sees Kyle deserves a 'Not Guilty' verdict, then I guess it comes down to "will they cuck out to doxxing and other potential threats?"

The Chauvin Trial and this one have made it a DREAM for me to get on a jury for a case like this so I can show the world how it's done: Proudly vote Not Guilty, while feeling no intimidation from the libtard menace because I will have millions of patriots, the second amendment, and God on my side.
 
The difference between "domestic terrorism" and "holding you accountable" depends entirely on the political views of who is doing it, not what is done or how.

View attachment 2711117
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/group-posts-address-prosecutor-kyle-182241891.html (Archive).
The group, Kenosha Strong Patriots, shows 159 members and shared a post from a user that features a photo of Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger, and lists his home address.

Watch out, 159 boomers searched the guys name on whitepages and posted it on Telegram (now an 'extremist platform').
 
Has anyone explained to the chucklefuck(s) who are working on doxing the jury "for great justice" exactly how many laws they're breaking?
 
Well, the prosecution got that photo in thanks to it being rebuttal to Kyle's cross, so it was a direct result of doing exactly what 99.9% of experienced trial attorneys would absolutely not do during a murder trial. Did you see Chauvin or Zimmerman on the stand when they were on trial?

Meanwhile, in the Arbery trial, the prosecution isn't even allowed to call the guy a "jogger" because the defense is actually objecting to things...
I think it was important to humanize Kyle to the jury. The majorly female jury btw.

And what image do you talk about? The shitty one or the absolutely shitty one? Or the shitty one with poorly established relevancy? For fuck's sake, the prosecution is playing poker with only two cards in their hands and one is from Uno.

The quality of a defense is not measured in the OBJECKSHUN YURR HONORs by the minute. For instance, objecting too much during Kyle's cross (while he took every hit on the chin like a trooper without flinching and marching on) would only made it look like they use it to help Kyle like he was a puppet on strings. They used it here and there, gave Kyle a little breather to compose himself, but Kyle still managed to win that battle on his own. He's very young, he did very well and the prosecution got nothing out of him that was more significant than "Hurr, he told some rando on the street he's an EMT when he's not durr".
 
It's not the blurry picture that people are worried about. It's provocation being included in the Jury instruction. There are people who unironically think having an AR is provocation. So letting it into the jury instruction at all was fucking exceptional.
The blurry picture is only an issue because it was used as a pretext to get the provocation instruction added. End of the day, it's obvious the picture shows nothing but a few blurry pixels that could just as easily be my ass.

The problem is that the defense dropped the ball- the "testimony" that the prosecution says also supports this is either ridiculous inferences on the actual testimony, or something said by that moronic video "expert" who spent 20 hours looking for a frame that MIGHT support that argument, or worse yet, on things the PROSECUTOR said (which is not testimony, but the jury still heard him say the words), I actually don't fault the prosecution for being scummy and grasping for straws. They are trying to prove their flimsy case and have very few options. I blame the defense for laying down and dying when all they had to do is actually object to things during the trial, and NOT lay down and die during the jury instruction session.

Most of this is stuff that a reasonable jury with no biases would likely see through and/or just point and laugh at, but we do not live in reasonable times, so asking the jury to go look for evidence of provocation that is only there if you really stretch things, is VERY dangerous to Kyle's case. The prosecution has been winning, or at least breaking even on decisions where they don't give in, and keep fighting, even when they piss off the judge. The defense was just too passive- even the guy who looks like agent 47 who was actually doing pretty good most of the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back