Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think he walks on the killin' 'tards charges. Prosecution went out of their way to prove that.

The only unknown in my mind is if he walks on the misdemeanor weapons charge. They've got him on that one 100%, but I could see the jury letting that one slide on principle. Doesn't matter much, he'll probably get time served and that'll be the end of it.
It's not even jail time, it's a fine.
 
If there is even a single parent on that jury, it's a hung jury at worst. That mother will hold out to the end of time because she'll see her own kids in Rittenhouse every time she closes her eyes.
Too bad Pedobaum's record was never officially shown to the jury, because any parent will be thanking Kyle for stopping the pedo from possibly raping their kids.
 
Soon
FD8UPibWUAAElba.png
 
Probably because of how Derek Chavin's trial went. That case ALSO got really bad for the prosecution; and yet the fucking jury decided to convict him based on threats on their lives, should they either

a. acquit him
b. have a hung jury

Do you get it now?
You are aware that you're only the hundreth person to make this comparison righrt? I dont know why you people keep making it. Regardless of your feelings on Chauvin, the cases aren't remotely similar.
 
I am curious though. Why do you think the judge allowed this dumb picture in as evidence to begin with? It's obviously nonsense and I don't think it's going to change much at all.
More or less just fed up with it, and assuming the jury won't give a fuck any more than he does to figure out what a totally indistinct smudge is doing. While also giving him a way to limit the time that they get for closing statements.

Look, everyone knows that Binger was lying out his ass when he said he needed -only- three hours for it. The judge lowballed them with an hour and a half, intending to give them some leeway room. Binger protested, so he just added the leeway on to the official count and made it a hard limit.
 
Jury wasn't sequestered. They're not supposed to take that into consideration, but I'd take odds at least half of them know and will vote accordingly.
This is a good point as well. Regardless of whether the jury should or shouldn't read what the media is saying, if you believe they're tainted by outside sources like the media, it stands to reason they can also be tainted by other outside sources like criminal records that show Rosenbaum is a fucking pedo who raped 5 kids.
 
Probably because of how Derek Chavin's trial went. That case ALSO got really bad for the prosecution; and yet the fucking jury decided to convict him based on threats on their lives, should they either

a. acquit him
b. have a hung jury

Do you get it now?
Here is every way they are dissimilar off the top of my head.

1: Demographics: Chauvin was a trial in a deep blue city in a deep blue state. Rittenhen is in a trial in a lean blue city in a solid purple state.
2: Defendants: Chauvin was a thoroughly unlikable piece of shit, at best apathetic to what he had done. Rittenhouse is a thoroughly likeable, if terribly naive, kid who actively regrets what he had to do.
3: Judges: Chauvin trial had an at best apathetic judge at worst actively pro Floyd. Rittenhouse trial has a fair judge, who leans Rittenhouse.
4: Juries: Chauvin trial had out and out activists, deeply ingrained, with enough black people on it in the summer of BLM, for a black victim, and who had a strong anti-cop stance. Rittenhouse has 11 women, some mothers, no systemic bias throughout at all.
5: Threats of riots: Prior to the chauvin verdict or even -the trial- there were massive threats of violence and unrests which permutated the culture before the jury was even selected. For this one, there hasn't been a peep about it until midway through the trial, and even that has been barely even tepid at best.
 
Here is every way they are dissimilar off the top of my head.

1: Demographics: Chauvin was a trial in a deep blue city in a deep blue state. Rittenhen is in a trial in a lean blue city in a solid purple state.
2: Defendants: Chauvin was a thoroughly unlikable piece of shit, at best apathetic to what he had done. Rittenhouse is a thoroughly likeable, if terribly naive, kid who actively regrets what he had to do.
3: Judges: Chauvin trial had an at best apathetic judge at worst actively pro Floyd. Rittenhouse trial has a fair judge, who leans Rittenhouse.
4: Juries: Chauvin trial had out and out activists, deeply ingrained, with enough black people on it in the summer of BLM, for a black victim, and who had a strong anti-cop stance. Rittenhouse has 11 women, some mothers, no systemic bias throughout at all.
5: Threats of riots: prior to the chauvin verdict or even -the trial- there were massive threats of violence and unrests which permutated the culture before the jury was even selected. For this one, there hasn't been a peep about it until midway through the trial, and even that has been barely even tepid at best.
On point 5, through my cultural right grapevine it looks like it's been hard to keep people on leashes to not drive down to Kenosha before anything has been determined.
 
Plus with this trial, when they inevitably go "yeah you can defend yourself against unemployed felons trying to kill you" I don't think you're gonna get the riots you think
Hey, if they're already convincing themselves that it's going to be open season on their asses if they riot again, why bother correcting them?
 
More importantly Murphy killed Germans, Rittenhouse shot the commie pedophiles you're so fond of.
Look who's talking about pedophiles. You all need to have your computers seized. This hullabaloo and white knighting over a fucking teenager is creepy.
Provably untrue, you merely need to read the thread.
I am reading it. You all are so buttmad that I have the audacity to disagree with you and criticize the kid that you people are thirsting over.

Conservatives are turning this kid into a saint and it's fucking creepy.

Dilate harder. You'll never be a real woman.
Don't take your insecurities out on me, incel. Not my fault you've never touched a boob.
Because those leftists killed were pieces of shit while Kyle rittenhouse is the epitome of the boyscout your parents want you to be like.
My parents never wanted their daughter to be a boy scout. And they would have kicked my ass if I had crossed state lines with an AR 15 to play vigilante.
 
Probably because of how Derek Chavin's trial went. That case ALSO got really bad for the prosecution; and yet the fucking jury decided to convict him based on threats on their lives, should they either

a. acquit him
b. have a hung jury

Do you get it now?
It's different in a way.

Minneapolis, instead of reprimanding the Democrats at the ballot box, gave them the state of Minnesota by 7 points. They put on the amendment to ban the police department this year. Although it failed by over 10 points, it shows how left wing crazy Minneapolis is. You would get a fair trial for Chauvin in Minneapolis like you'd get a fair trial for Jan 6th boomers in DC. Ergo, you wouldn't, since almost 90% of each area (yes this was polled) thought that each of their respective defendants were 100% guilty before the bodies were cold.

Kenosha had a similar experience last year. Its not a particularly large county or city, but it is a traditional bellweather for Wisconsin. Kenosha county voted for Trump by 3.1 points.

What it means is two radically different mentalities in each city and therefore different jury makeup.
 
I think he walks on the killin' 'tards charges. Prosecution went out of their way to prove that.

The only unknown in my mind is if he walks on the misdemeanor weapons charge. They've got him on that one 100%, but I could see the jury letting it slide on principle (both because kyle is sympathetic and the state prosecutors are trash).

Doesn't matter much, he'll probably get time served and that'll be the end of it.
I've seen good arguments that the possession charge shouldn't apply to him. It'll come down to the jury instructions.

If it's the bald "was he under 18 and carrying a deadly weapon," then he's guilty since there's no fact to dispute, and Kyle was clearing carrying a deadly weapon and was 17 at the time.

If the defense can work in the exceptions, then it's possible he walks on that too. If I remember right the exceptions are

Is Kyle carrying a pistol, short barreled rifle, or short barreled shotgun?
and
Was Kyle hunting without a license.

Kyle was carrying a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 Sport 2, which has a 16'' barrel. So the first exception is met. Rioter-hunting memes aside, Kyle clearly wasn't hunting. If those are taken in consideration, he walks.

4: Juries: Chauvin trial had out and out activists, deeply ingrained, with enough black people on it in the summer of BLM, for a black victim, and who had a strong anti-cop stance. Rittenhouse has 11 women, some mothers, no systemic bias throughout at all.
There was also Brandon Mitchell, who literally perjured himself to get on the jury. It's hard to tell at this moment, but I don't see that likely for Kyle's jury.
 
Look who's talking about pedophiles. You all need to have your computers seized. This hullabaloo and white knighting over a fucking teenager is creepy.

I am reading it. You all are so buttmad that I have the audacity to disagree with you and criticize the kid that you people are thirsting over.

Conservatives are turning this kid into a saint and it's fucking creepy.


Don't take your insecurities out on me, incel. Not my fault you've never touched a boob.

My parents never wanted their daughter to be a boy scout. And they would have kicked my ass if I had crossed state lines with an AR 15 to play vigilante.

There's low-effort bait, and then there's whatever the fuck this mess is.
 
There was also Brandon Mitchell, who literally perjured himself to get on the jury. It's hard to tell at this moment, but I don't see that likely for Kyle's jury.
No. Something a lot of the doomers are just... ignoring, is the difference in how much this matters to the on-the-grounds leftists.

Let's be clear, the people who -really- want Kyle to fry is not the rank-and-file. Yes, they hate him and want him to be sentenced guilty. But they don't vehemently hate his very being to the point they'd want to risk going to prison just to get him in there too. What Kyle did wasn't what Chauvin did, it's more abstract to them and harder to pin on a martyr to generate the same feeling.

The people who -really- want Kyle to fry is the Establishment and general Democrat apparatus which realized that if he gets off, then their golem is in danger and their golem will know it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back