Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

[Astro Galactic Megalul]

I did my best trying to interpret Wisconsin gun laws as it pertains to Kyle Rittenhouse in this case, with the help of Rekieta Law.
You will need it to show people that it was legal for Kyle to possess and carry that rifle.
He's charged for the violation of statute 948.60 "Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18", to which there's an exception under subsection 948.60(3)(c).

Under that exception statute 948.60 only applies to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person in violation of section 941.28 OR is not in compliance with 29.304 AND 29.593 (everything after that relates to this exception). It's two separate exceptions before and after OR in the same subsection of that statute.
Only what's marked with green here applies to Kyle.

For section 948.60 "Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18" to apply, Kyle has to either violate section 941.28 "Possession of short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle" OR section 29.304 "Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age" AND 29.593.
Kyle was 17, so the hunting part of that subsection doesn't apply to him. So only the first exception remains. He would be in violation of 948.60 only if his rifle was shorter than 941.28 allows , which it's not. No one would've sold them one, it's a standard run of the mill rifle. Detective testified in court that it's compliant with the law.

This shit is confusing, but essentially it says that a 17 y/o can have a rifle or a shotgun as long as it's of the length compliant with the statute 941.28.
I'm an absolute rеtard when it comes to such things, so if my language is inaccurate and someone can correct me to make it better, feel free to do so.

 

[TJBirish]

I know. It was in response to someone saying that even him winning would not help in a run for DA. His opponents won’t get to use all the underhanded shit he did against him in court if he wins. Because it will have worked. He also gets to call himself the dude that got rid of the right to defend yourself which the Left has wanted for years.

That sounds kind of counterproductive in a county that voted for Trump 50.7% to Biben 47.5%

 

[Random Internet Person]

When people tell you who they are, believe them.

Especially when they say they hate you and want you dead.

So let's say you have the cops that aren't willing to kiss DeBlasio's ass, and are willing to arrest the rioters for being complete pieces of shit. Well, congratulations, because the local-level District Attorneys won't fucking prosecute, short of a murder or manslaughter charge. Here in NY, Arson that causes a death carries the death penalty, one of the rare offenses that does. The DA basically rubber stamped every Arson that hit their desk as not worth prosecuting.

I bring this shit up because this is exactly what happened in Kenosha. The entire Rittenhouse case would not have fucking happened if city officials had bothered to do their fucking jobs. They didn't because they cynically intended to use the riots as a weapon against the opposition and give themselves more authoritarian control that none of their constituents would ever have approved of.

Now all we can hope that people don't see this shit as a sign that "Shoot to kill....and maybe save some bullets for yourself for when the brass and the book comes". And that's not getting into the regular folks not held down by a badge.

No. I refuse to abandon someone who has been such a good and close friend to me over the years. You don’t disown your brother just because he got cancer. You help him fight it. You help him get better and heal. We have to show the compassion that they can’t. It’s our responsibility to mend this rift and reunite our country. If we can’t do that then we don’t have an America to save.

You do you, man. Hope the cancer gets its ass handed to it. As for the rest of the message, this whole thing about compassion for your ideological is seen by /pol/ and other places as a weakness the right needs to get rid of in order to fight things like Antifa and win.

 

[The Great Autismo]

I did my best trying to interpret Wisconsin gun laws as it pertains to Kyle Rittenhouse in this case, with the help of Rekieta Law.
You will need it to show people that it was legal for Kyle to possess and carry that rifle.
He's charged for the violation of statute 948.60 "Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18", to which there's an exception under subsection 948.60(3)(c).

Under that exception statute 948.60 only applies to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person in violation of section 941.28 OR is not in compliance with 29.304 AND 29.593 (everything after that relates to this exception). It's two separate exceptions before and after OR in the same subsection of that statute.
Only what's marked with green here applies to Kyle.
View attachment 2713343
For section 948.60 "Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18" to apply, Kyle has to either violate section 941.28 "Possession of short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle" OR section 29.304 "Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age" AND 29.593.
Kyle was 17, so the hunting part of that subsection doesn't apply to him. So only the first exception remains. He would be in violation of 948.60 only if his rifle was shorter than 941.28 allows , which it's not. No one would've sold them one, it's a standard run of the mill rifle. Detective testified in court that it's compliant with the law.

This shit is confusing, but essentially it says that a 17 y/o can have a rifle or a shotgun as long as it's of the length compliant with the statute 941.28.
I'm an absolute rеtard when it comes to such things, so if my language is inaccurate and someone can correct me to make it better, feel free to do so.

Confronting someone who thinks Rittenhouse is a wannabe mass murderer with the actual law showing he's innocent is just going to get them to stutter for a second and either end the argument or start crowing about state lines or white supremacy. They don't care about the actual law, they're using the law as a way to punish a heretic.

 

[Dumb Bitch Smoothie]

Fun Fact: The rooftop koreans were demonized by the media at the time and the LAPD even shot one rooftop korean while have no issues with niggers and wetbacks burning and looting everything in sight.

It's because niggers hate Asian people.
Until they have a use for them (usually to own the whiteys) that is.

 

[MrJokerRager]

I love how twitter neolibs/leftists bring up race as some sort of gotcha. The answer is obviously yes but they are so limited in thinking that everything is about race that when you answer truthfully, they will still accuse you of lying about your answer. You can't win.

The response to that is because of gun control and its racist origins.

Gun Control was originally used against blacks to the point there was an event in the South were a gun store refused to sell guns to black folks while some white militia was coming into town to rig an election by force.

Black folks if being attacked with no just cause by evil doers, deserve to use guns to repel the threat. The state government of the time and law enforcement turned a blind eye or too weak to stop the Tulsa massacre and with gun control laws at the time, it destroyed or damped the will of blacks to buy guns.

Also bring up that California should as a result, repeal all gun control laws for the blacks in California to defend themselves as the great white devil, in their view, Ronnie Raygun passed the Mulford Act sponsored by a Californian Republican at the time.

As a result to own the racist GOP, repeal all gun control laws.

This would be my ideal response to all this bullshit. Also it should be brought up that Kyle is a Hispanic as well.

 

[Matt Damon]

I love how twitter neolibs/leftists bring up race as some sort of gotcha. The answer is obviously yes but they are so limited in thinking that everything is about race that when you answer truthfully, they will still accuse you of lying about your answer. You can't win.

Because to these people, pervasive racism is a bedrock axiom that requires no substantiation. It's not something that can even be challenged because it's as universally, fundamentally true as the laws of thermodynamics.

So if you say something that contradicts that axiom, it's automatically a lie or a cheat or a bad faith argument.

 

[DelusionTree]

The response to that is because of gun control and its racist origins.

Gun Control was originally used against blacks to the point there was an event in the South were a gun store refused to sell guns to black folks while some white militia was coming into town to rig an election by force.

Black folks if being attacked with no just cause by evil doers, deserve to use guns to repel the threat. The state government of the time and law enforcement turned a blind eye or too weak to stop the Tulsa massacre and with gun control laws at the time, it destroyed or damped the will of blacks to buy guns.

Also bring up that California should as a result, repeal all gun control laws for the blacks in California to defend themselves as the great white devil, in their view, Ronnie Raygun passed the Mulford Act sponsored by a Californian Republican at the time.

As a result to own the racist GOP, repeal all gun control laws.

This would be my ideal response to all this bullshit. Also it should be brought up that Kyle is a Hispanic as well.

That's the origin of gun control in the south, but in the north the earliest forms was actually used to disarm socialists and unions attempting to organize.

 

[X Prime]

Fun Fact: The rooftop koreans were demonized by the media at the time and the LAPD even shot one rooftop korean while have no issues with niggers and wetbacks burning and looting everything in sight.

A lot of those Americans see Western Europe (A welfare moral blackhole pet project of NATO) as the ideal utopia.

The quicker everyone realizes that the elites see blacks and non-white Hispanics as ungovernable feral animals to be appeased out of fear for their lives, the quicker a lot of things about how the police react to race riots make sense.

 

[Iron Hamster]

View attachment 2713202
credits: @slonker_

Needs to edited into the scene from Fifth Element and Leeloo watching the war clips.

 

[MrJokerRager]

The biggest push for gun control was when Reagan and other Californians tried to disarm Black Panthers due to their exercising their rights and policing their own neighborhoods then protesting in the state capitol with guns. The idea that whiteness = pro gun is insane and I have no idea where people get it from.

I am amazed at how Bill Clinton saved the second amendment by passing the AWB and gifting the entire South, heavily pro gun, to the Republican Party.

Which gives us the current Republican Party of today that blocked Obama hard over gun control, Bush letting the AWB expire and Trump for the most part being gun friendly expect for the bump stock ban, later overturned in the Biden era.

A lot of Republicans and Democrats at the time had similar views on guns but their view on guns generally isn't the same views of today's Republican Party.

Both would see the current 2A crowd as lunatics or domestic scum.

Two major gun laws happened in the 1980s under Reagan and HW Bush.

 

[Plaintiff is fat]

You know what really boggles my mind in all of this?
The whole "he shouldn't have been there" argument. People are so fucking docile, so passive, so cucked, that they just conceded their cities to violent extremists, they default to the idea that it's okay for antifa/BLM whoever the fuck to destroy peoples' livelihoods, as if they have a fucking right to it. "Yeah, sure, go ahead and destroy property, what can ya do, right? Have fun!"

He was in a crowd, unmasked and unvaccinated in the middle of a freaking global pandemic!!!!!!! not only did he murder two innocent sweet black men but also millions of grandmas.

 

[H. Bergeron]

Is this person a lolcow? Because they look like a lolcow:

https://twitter.com/BadBunnyTwitch/status/1459291293536776194?s=20

 

[Matt Damon]

Is this person a lolcow? Because they look like a lolcow:

https://twitter.com/BadBunnyTwitch/status/1459291293536776194?s=20

-Self-defense
-Emotional distress at taking human life
-Due process
-Asking questions
-Facts
-Empathy

These are now all fascism. Good Christ.

 

[MrJokerRager]

So self-defense, emotional distress at taking human life, due process, asking questions, facts, and empathy are now facism.

Good Christ.

Is this person a lolcow? Because they look like a lolcow:

https://twitter.com/BadBunnyTwitch/status/1459291293536776194?s=20

Has personal pronouns listed, advertises her value through her body, is a white young women and admits to being a communist thanks to the internet.

Of course, Islam is right about women.

 

[Billy Beer]

I hope there is a riot after this trial, and I hope people from all over America descend, armed, to make sure this is the last riot that ever happens.

With zero deaths, of course.

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

Is this person a lolcow? Because they look like a lolcow:

https://twitter.com/BadBunnyTwitch/status/1459291293536776194?s=20

Generic twitch socialist #254, nothing she says or thinks actually matters thankfully.

 

[H. Bergeron]

Image of the tweet as I think it will get deleted. She already blocked replies to only people she follows.

 

[Prosopagnosia]

View attachment 2713399

Image of the tweet as I think it will get deleted. She already blocked replies to only people she follows.

I wanna punch that bitch in the face so bad.

 

[Weppers]

No. I refuse to abandon someone who has been such a good and close friend to me over the years. You don’t disown your brother just because he got cancer. You help him fight it. You help him get better and heal. We have to show the compassion that they can’t. It’s our responsibility to mend this rift and reunite our country. If we can’t do that then we don’t have an America to save.

You might try the book How To Have Impossible Conversations by James Lindsay and Peter Boghossian. I don't know how well any of its advice works in person, but it was written for exactly this kind of problem.