Architect resigns over mostly windowless Munger Hall dormitory at University of California


Exterior of Munger Hall, UC Santa Barbara

Architect resigns over mostly windowless Munger Hall dormitory at University of California




Cajsa Carlson | 2 November 2021 | 131 comments

Architect Dennis McFadden has stepped down from a University of California committee in protest over designs for a university dormitory at its Santa Barbara campus where over 90 per cent of its 4,500 students would reportedly live in windowless rooms.



Named Munger Hall, the University of California Santa Barbara student housing would measure 1.68 million square feet (156,000 square metres) and house up to 4,500 students, according to local newspaper Santa Barbara Independent.

McFadden resigned from his role as a consulting architect of 15 years on the university's design review committee over the project, saying he was "disturbed" by the design of the building, The Washington Post reported.

Munger Hall was conceived by billionaire investor Charles Munger, who donated $200 million to the project, which has an overall budget of about $1.5 billion.

Majority of students to live in windowless rooms



While the gigantic Munger Hall would have fourteen entrances and exits, 94 per cent of students living in it would reportedly be in windowless rooms. The single-occupancy bedrooms would instead feature virtual windows that would simulate sunlight.

Each of the nine residential floors in the dormitory would have eight "houses", with eight separate "suites" organised around a communal kitchen and living area. The top floor would feature a one-acre courtyard with "social pods" and seating areas.
Munger Hall floor planA typical residential floor plan at Munger Hall
In his resignation letter, McFadden called the design "unsupportable from my perspective as an architect, a parent, and a human being".

"An ample body of documented evidence shows that interior environments with access to natural light, air, and views to nature improve both the physical and mental wellbeing of occupants," he wrote.

"The Munger Hall design ignores this evidence and seems to take the position that it doesn’t matter."

No other project "potentially more destructive to the campus"

McFadden said he left the committee as there was no possibility of making changes to the dormitory's design, according to the Santa Barbara Independent.

"The design was described as 100 per cent complete, approval was not requested, no vote was taken, and no further submittals are intended or required," he said.

"Yet in the nearly 15 years I served as a consulting architect to the DRC, no project was brought before the committee that is larger, more transformational, and potentially more destructive to the campus as a place than Munger Hall."

McFadden also pointed out that the current largest single dormitory in the world, Bancroft Hall at the US Naval Academy, houses only 4,000 students and is spread over multiple wings with more than 25 entrances.







Paul Goldberger

@paulgoldberger

If this report is true, this design is a grotesque, sick joke — a jail masquerading as a dormitory. No, design isn’t up to billionaire donors. How far UCSB has fallen since the days when it had architects like Charles Moore.



Architect Resigns in Protest over UCSB Mega-Dorm - The Santa Barbara Independent
He criticizes Munger Hall as "a social and psychological experiment" with unknown consequences.
independent.com

3:08 AM · Oct 29, 2021
1.9K
159

Copy link to Tweet
Tweet your reply



Pulitzer Prize-winning American architecture critic Paul Goldberger also slated the Munger Hall project online, tweeting: "If this report is true, this design is a grotesque, sick joke — a jail masquerading as a dormitory."

"No, design isn’t up to billionaire donors," he added. "How far UCSB has fallen since the days when it had architects like Charles Moore."

Virtual windows to have circadian-rhythm control system

Munger, who conceived the building, is the vice chairman of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway conglomerate and has no formal architecture training.

The detailed design of UC Santa Barbara building is being carried out by VTBS Architects, which is the architect of record on the project.

"This design emanates from Mr Munger's research and iterative processes to devise a transformational approach to student housing," VTBS Architects managing principal Navy F Banvard told Dezeen.

"While the single occupancy bedrooms afford each student his/her private space, every effort has been made to encourage student life co-living and collaboration."
Munger Hall dormitorySingle-occupancy bedrooms and common area in Munger Hall
The lack of natural light inside the majority of the students' rooms was one of McFadden's critiques of the project, but Banvard believes this is unfounded.

"All of the single-occupancy bedrooms have either a conventional window or a 'virtual' window," he said.

"All virtual windows will have a fully programmed circadian rhythm control system to substantially reflect the lighting levels and color temperature of natural daylight."
Leddy Maytum Stacy covers entire roof of Berkeley design centre with photovoltaics




"Circadian rhythm lighting is already found in many types of buildings," Banvard added. "All of the common areas and amenities, including the Great Rooms and Kitchens within each House, have significant access to natural light."

Munger has previously contributed buildings to other campuses, including Stanford and the University of Michigan.

The main image of Munger Hall is courtesy of University of California Santa Barbara.
 
. The top floor would feature a one-acre courtyard with "social pods" and seating areas.


Not even trying to hide it anymore.... your life will be based around that of an NPC video game character, and when your "stress" meter gets 'This" high, you will go to the social pod and will no longer feel stressed anymore! It works for The Sims, it'll work for you unless you're one of those regressive non-believers.

I wonder how long before those poor kids are also eating the bugs and sucking their dorm mate's girl dick with a forced grin.
 
You're too nice to the younger generation. If the little faggots want windows they can earn it like I did. No one fucking gave me shit, let alone windows.
 
Isaac Asimov once predicted that by now we’d be retreating from nature, living in underground commie blocks with walls and ceilings that glow and can change colors. Of course, he framed this as a good thing, being the early disciple of scientism that he was. Looks like he was just a little too hasty on the time frame.

If this were a small scale development, explicitly framed as an experiment, in a place way up north with dark and dreary conditions for most of the school year, this might be an interesting concept. Maybe give any participants some tuition breaks to sweeten the deal. But I think there are precisely zero students who want to go to college in coastal Southern California only to spend their time in a windowless room.
 
I feel like even if you didn't go crazy by the lack of natural lighting, not having windows is simply dangerous. What if there was a fire outside of your room?
Firetrap and suicide encourager. Imagine the boondoggle when this thing turns out to have HVAC issues or suicides double because of these rooms, and suddenly it's non-usable space that cost this much money and occupies this much space.
"Fire Death Trap" was the first thing that came to mind when I saw this shit. Too few exits. People will trample each other trying to get out, if they can even find the way in that windowless hell when the power cuts out.
 
I figured it's because communism is all about treating society as an engineering problem, they don't call it "scientific" socialism for nothing. Actually catering to people's preferences is a capitalist thing. Of course commies just design the cheapest way to get the job done.
No, treating society as an engineering problem would, at its core, seek pragmatic, efficient, and effective solutions for things.
Communism is trying to design a society based around arcane doctrines and theories made up by some pseudointellectual faggot, where the only thing that matters is ideological purity.
 
"Fire Death Trap" was the first thing that came to mind when I saw this shit. Too few exits. People will trample each other trying to get out, if they can even find the way in that windowless hell when the power cuts out.
With 10 exit stairwells and 4500 students (plus visitors and RAs) in the building, in the event of a nighttime fire, 400-500 people would need to exit via each staircase. It's not that that's impossible: on 9/11, NYFD evaced 7k people per WTC tower, 14k total, basically everyone below the impact of the planes. The towers only had 3 staircases each, which didn't meet any city building codes and constituted a huge flaw in their emergency preparedness. So it's possible to get thousands of people out of a staircase without a trample, but now imagine they're all dumbfuck college students and half of them are drunk.
 
No, treating society as an engineering problem would, at its core, seek pragmatic, efficient, and effective solutions for things.
Communism is trying to design a society based around arcane doctrines and theories made up by some pseudointellectual faggot, where the only thing that matters is ideological purity.
Case in point - It's DELIBERATELY uncomfortable and cramped in your 'room' ,forcing you to go to the "communal" kitchen/living room for anything other than sleep or solitary-critical tasks like short bits of reading/studying. Thus, you'll spend most of your time artificially "networking", "cooperating" and "making friends' with people due to inescapable proximity being forced as a better option than doing your own thing...... I can't be the only person noticing that, right?

That it's set up so any choice on the side of privacy deliberately punishes you? Oh, you wanna be selfish and not share? Into the closet with you where you can enjoy your artificial sunshine instead of the natural sunshine that spreads through the smiles of your comrades marching in lockstep!

This isn't just a pod, this is FORCED hive-behavior, the burnout rate of freshmen students is gonna increase five fold due to this feel-good nonsense.
 
Besides diminished utility, virtual windows employed in such numbers would obviously be a horrific liability, If they're sophisticated enough, they will be a bitch to replace, and will be prone to issues with more disturbing implications than actual windows.
If the latter gets broken, you'll have to put a tarp over it until the glass is replaced, but at least light can still come through. A fake window malfunction will extinguish the sun and a fix may not always be readily available or in supply.
 
Case in point - It's DELIBERATELY uncomfortable and cramped in your 'room' ,forcing you to go to the "communal" kitchen/living room for anything other than sleep or solitary-critical tasks like short bits of reading/studying. Thus, you'll spend most of your time artificially "networking", "cooperating" and "making friends' with people due to inescapable proximity being forced as a better option than doing your own thing...... I can't be the only person noticing that, right?

That it's set up so any choice on the side of privacy deliberately punishes you? Oh, you wanna be selfish and not share? Into the closet with you where you can enjoy your artificial sunshine instead of the natural sunshine that spreads through the smiles of your comrades marching in lockstep!

This isn't just a pod, this is FORCED hive-behavior, the burnout rate of freshmen students is gonna increase five fold due to this feel-good nonsense.

In terms of the trying to limit privacy part, why is the bathroom, in this example, a single person room? Surely, if they really wanted to minimize the privacy factor, that communal shower and toilet stalls would be a thing instead, or just have a row of toilets without the stalls, to go all-out. Heck, the individual cramped bedrooms would be considered too private, compared to just a giant room filled with beds.
 
This isn't just a pod, this is FORCED hive-behavior, the burnout rate of freshmen students is gonna increase five fold due to this feel-good nonsense.
That might turn out to be a good thing, more students escaping the Indoctrination Gulag.
 
That layout makes me think of this video:

Except that's at the South Pole, where inside, windowless rooms are slightly warmer. And the rest of the Amundsen-Scott base has lots of light.

So there it is, a research station in the coldest place on Earth has more access to natural sunlight and is less bug pod than an American college.
 
Besides diminished utility, virtual windows employed in such numbers would obviously be a horrific liability, If they're sophisticated enough, they will be a bitch to replace, and will be prone to issues with more disturbing implications than actual windows.
If the latter gets broken, you'll have to put a tarp over it until the glass is replaced, but at least light can still come through. A fake window malfunction will extinguish the sun and a fix may not always be readily available or in supply.
We have virtual classrooms, virtual meetings, virtual concerts, and virtual festivals, so what's so wrong about virtual windows? Get with the times, boomer.

Besides, as anyone who's ever lived in a college dorm can attest to, the repair crews are always timely about fixing things.
 
Case in point - It's DELIBERATELY uncomfortable and cramped in your 'room' ,forcing you to go to the "communal" kitchen/living room for anything other than sleep or solitary-critical tasks like short bits of reading/studying. Thus, you'll spend most of your time artificially "networking", "cooperating" and "making friends' with people due to inescapable proximity being forced as a better option than doing your own thing...... I can't be the only person noticing that, right?

That it's set up so any choice on the side of privacy deliberately punishes you? Oh, you wanna be selfish and not share? Into the closet with you where you can enjoy your artificial sunshine instead of the natural sunshine that spreads through the smiles of your comrades marching in lockstep!

This isn't just a pod, this is FORCED hive-behavior, the burnout rate of freshmen students is gonna increase five fold due to this feel-good nonsense.
Nice try, socialfags. I got a hotplate, bottled water, and ramen.
 
In terms of the trying to limit privacy part, why is the bathroom, in this example, a single person room? Surely, if they really wanted to minimize the privacy factor, that communal shower and toilet stalls would be a thing instead, or just have a row of toilets without the stalls, to go all-out. Heck, the individual cramped bedrooms would be considered too private, compared to just a giant room filled with beds.
Even the Navy made a better fucking barracks; and if the government is doing better than you, you're fucknig up. Building was U-shaped, and faced another U-shaped building, they were positioned so the U were facing each other. Every room had two sinks, and every two rooms were connected via a toilet/shower room that had one toilet and one shower. The Navy designed the whole getup to have 2 people per room, 4 people sharing a toilet/shower (doors locked room side). The Marine Corps said "Fuck that, watch this" and stuck us three to a room (six to a toilet/shower) and even as cramped as it was, it wasn't that bad; outside of the after morning PT and being told "30 minutes to shit shower and shave" and you have 6 fucking people lining up to wash up. We all had sunlight and enough room to have friends over to fuck around and do shit. I'd take Kowloon over this shit.
 
Back